Bjarne on: Dark Energy, only an illusion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Blue Mountain said:
Is there a prize of some sort when your list hits 25? :D
Click to expand...

Yes then RC will then win a tour on food from Wellington to Auckland, - but he must jump all the way in a bucket.

When he reaches 30 point at his list he also has won the same tour back.

Here is something more for your list RC

25.) I don't believe in the geodynamo crap
26.) I don't believe in the convection crap (inner heat flow) is the cause of subduction.
27.) I don't believe in dark galaxies.
28.) I don't believe gravity disappears into unknown dimension
29.) I don't believe in the gravitation or higgs crap.
30.) I don't believe that cosmological redshirt is caused by distance expansion, but due to that times tick slower now than previously, because everything expands proportional the same.
31.) I don't believe in parallel Universes.
32.) I don't in plenty dimension.
 
Bjarne said:
26.) I don't believe in the convection crap (inner heat flow) is the cause of subduction.

30.) I don't believe that cosmological redshirt is caused by distance expansion, but due to that times tick slower now than previously, because everything expands proportional the same.
Click to expand...

26. Good, no dying if a building falls on you in some earthquake.

30. Yet GPS still works without your belief.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Bjarne's ignorance of the scientific explanation of the correlation between black hole mass and the mass of the galaxy central bulge
First posted 16th March 2010!
Click to expand...

a black hole's mass is proportional to the mass of the stellar environment it inhabits. ...
http://www.stsci.edu/~marel/m15release.html

In 1993, Kormendy found that black hole mass is roughly proportional to the luminosity of the bulge component of the host galaxy
http://www.lsw.uni-heidelberg.de/users/mcamenzi/SMBlackHoles.html

Though several groups have previously found massive black holes in galaxies the size of our Milky Way or larger, these new results suggest that smaller galaxies have lower-mass black holes, below Hubble's detection limit, where the black hole's mass is proportional to the host galaxy's mass.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/newsletters/lpib/lpib81/holes.html
 
33.) Fast RC here is one more >> cosmological redshirt

PS...
Now when I help you with your list, I expect you send me some photos of the "tour" you will win, - right ?
 
Last edited:
Bjarne said:
30.) I don't believe that cosmological redshirt is caused by distance expansion, but due to that times tick slower now than previously, because everything expands proportional the same.
Click to expand...

So you don't believe in redshift at all. If everything including time expands the same then nothing - not even wavelengths - will change. Yet redshift is one of the most observed (and used) phenomenons in the universe. How do you explain that? And please - no *********** cows.
 
erlando said:
So you don't believe in redshift at all. If everything including time expands the same then nothing - not even wavelengths - will change. Yet redshift is one of the most observed (and used) phenomenons in the universe. How do you explain that? And please - no *********** cows.
Click to expand...

Yes this is right, - if you only focus on the space expansion, - the spectra will not appear to have expanded, - and this is in fact the point.
This is because when everything expands proportional, only the expansion of the Universe can't be responsible for cosmological red shift, because even tough the spectra have expanded propotional to everything else you'll still measure the same distances between each frequency because also the meter stick have expanded..

First at all notice: that according to the prevailing model, - photon energy disappear over time, which mean frequencies per time / second disappear.
Already here you have good reason to be carefully to accept the prevailing thesis. If doing so you accept that both photon energy and photon frequencies disappear, out it the big nowhere. - This is simply unacceptable.

Now, - If you unite the curvature of space, - with the expanding space, (since it is the same property), it automatically follows that you also must accept that after the universe have stretching to the double size then time must tick double so slow.

You cannot connect/unite expanding space to GR without also connecting it the existing GR-Math.
For example if you move toward the Sun (towards stretching space), - times ticks slower. (As you can see the time-stretch mathematic is already there) -
A unification of the mention space “properties” therefore also means you MUST unite the GR-mathematic, - to comprehend the expanding space.

This mean you have now (compared to when the Universe was half the size) double so much relative time compared to let say for 1 billion year ago..

This off course also must mean you today will receive double so many photon frequencies per second compared to 1 billion year ago.

So when you compare the light spectra created 1 billion years, you literally looks back in time, because what you really see in the spectra, - is how time was ticking (faster) in the younger Universe.

Now you see one more mystery is gone, - > the fact that nothing can lose energy, also not the photon.
There simply are no such lost of energy anymore, because the photon was born in a faster time, and that’s it.
So even though the universe really expands, (I believe it does make no mistake) this itself is not causing the spectra to change, but rather time to change, - and time is responsible for how many frequencies you’ll receive per second.

This off course lead even further, - because EM frequencies (EMF) doesn’t seems to be affected by the space expanding / time dilation. EMF seems to have its own time, or rather eternity.
But is that really so strange?
Remember nothing can move faster than light, - also not time.
Look at the Myon for example.
So the EMF seem to have its own time (or rather properly timeless dimension)..
Remember if you could move with the speed of light (so like the EMF does) distances and time would not exist.
Or simple spoken: There is no time for a photon.
 
Last edited:
Paulhoff said:
Since when did time MOVE.
:) :) :)
Click to expand...
When something travels with the speed “c”, time stops ticking. (because of the motion)...
If anything could move faster as "c" it would move backwards in time.
Paulhoff said:
And space can expand faster than the speed of light.:) :) :)
Click to expand...
This is not correct, because the expanding space is not a motion from A to B. - but something that happens everywhere.
So long you have no reference point you also doesn’t have any motion.
 
Last edited:
Bjarne said:
When something travels with the speed “c”, time stops ticking. (because of the motion)...
If anything could move faster as "c" it would move backwards in time.
Click to expand...
So, you don't know why time slows down when one travels at the speed of light. And that is BS about time going backwards if one could, and you can't, move faster than light.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Last edited:
Bjarne said:
Yes this is right, - if you only focus on the space expansion, - the spectra will not appear to have expanded, - and this is in fact the point.

..snip a lot of irrelevant nonsense..
Click to expand...

Please show how your "model" accounts for the observable phenomenon called redshift.
 
Bjarne said:
Yeeh yeh yeh
I have badly damage a world religion.
Shame on me.

But I can't guarantee I wouldn’t do it again.
Click to expand...

This is like the mouse and the elephant running over a bridge.
"What a rumbling we make!" Said the mouse.

Only, Bjarne is not a mouse. More like an ant.

Bjarne, your ideas make about as much a dent in existing science as a snowball makes on solid rock. And the reason is that you don't bother to lear about what you are talking about. Instead you just project your ignorance, and shoot off any silly idea that comes into your head.

Hans
 
Bjarne said:
Yeeh yeh yeh
I have badly damage a world religion.
Shame on me.

But I can't guarantee I wouldn’t do it again.
Click to expand...


You accomplished nothing except to further embarrass yourself.

And I can pretty much guarantee that you'll do it again, and again, and again...

Until the cows come home.
 
And I can pretty much guarantee that you'll do it again, and again, and again...
Click to expand...

It is of course easy just to sit an bla la bla blap , and deny any objective proves.

The next measurement experiment is under preparation.

Here is what I will do, and predict.

dlg.jpg

I think I am lucky that DTU have time to measure ADG inside and on the roof on 4 new feed stuff containers, - before harvest.

Now these containers are all completely empty.

They will all 4 be filled in about 4 weeks, then we can measure again (at the roof) .
Each can contain 4.000.000 Kg
Diameter and height is 20 meter
Based on the prevailing thesis we should be able to measure 267μGal at the roof so soon one container is full ( I believe)
If this is wrong please correct according to yours believe.

According to the new theory we will only measure 67 μGal
I hope we can do the second measurement exactly when the first container is full. – If so it’s a little lucky, to hit such timing.

Anyway we can also measure when all containers are full. > 16.000.000 Kg.
This is almost half the weight of DOMUS VISTA, but only 20% of the height.

So let’s have a competition now, - who will get closest to the final measurement result.

Even though we this time only can measure at the roof, we can easy determinate if the expected ADG measurement (according to the new theory) is 75 % off.

So now fellows and cissys try you now all to calculate the values you will expect according to yours dying religion, - central at the roof at each single container

More photos will folows soon.
 
Are you going to implement a proper protocol this time, or will your measurements be worthless again?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom