|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
![]() |
#1 |
Fortean
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,881
|
Museums that threw out meteorite collections in the late 1700s
Hello. I recently found an answer to a question that I'd been wondering about for some time, and I thought I'd put it up here in case anyone else had heard of the same thing and wanted to know more too.
Several times over the years, I've read the claim that in the late 18th century the scientific establishment so comprehensively rubbished the eye-witness reports of meteorites, that museums across Europe threw out their collections of meteorie specimins. Two examples of this are:
Quote:
Quote:
A reference, when one is given, points us to Paneth, “Science and Miracle”, Durham University Journal. Keen to find out more about this travesty of science, I paid for a copy of the paper, where I read:
Quote:
Still wanting to know more, I kept searching periodically until recently I found this quote from the book “Cosmic Debris: Meteorites in History”, by John G. Burke (available on Google Books) From Chapter 6:
Quote:
Quote:
|
__________________
"Once a man admits complete and unshakeable faith in his own integrity, he is in an excellent frame of mind to be approached by con men." David W. Maurer, "The Big Con" |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 24,509
|
|
__________________
Experience is an excellent teacher, but she sends large bills. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,056
|
Very interesting Ersby. I'm a museum curator myself, and would also point out that;
a) Very few museum objects that survive today have been in museum collections since the 1700s. I think you'll find that 'scarcely a single specimen' of virtually any category of object dates from pre-1790 (in terms of when it was collected obviously, not when it was made - in the case of meteorites this is more often going to be approximately the same date). b) With no best practice, documentation, or standards of any kind, any museum could throw away, destroy, sell or exchange any object in its collection - and many will have done. Knowing whether a given meteorite specimen was disposed of at all is going to be next to impossible - let alone the reasons for doing so. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Lackey
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 109,687
|
Fascinating post Ersby; interesting to see the process of Chinese whispers in action.
|
__________________
I wish I knew how to quit you |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,056
|
Take the British Museum, and the Natural History Museum that spun off from it later (same geological collection).
Originally Posted by NHM website
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Reality Checker
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,001
|
I was initially astounded that it wasn't until the early 19th century that there was "general acceptance that meteorites were natural phenomena". Copernicus published De revolutionibus orbium coelestium in 1453. Galileo published Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems in 1632. But then I found (thanks to Wikipedia) that the astronomer Johann Daniel Titius von Wittenburg first observed the asteroid belt in 1760, and it wasn't until 1802 that William Herschel first coined the term "asteroid".
So it makes sense that people weren't saving rocks until the early 1800's. When did anybody even first hypothesize there were space rocks falling to Earth? Again, according to Wikipedia, it was Ernst Florens Chladni in 1794. 1794! What did people think these rocks were before 1794? I presume, only weird looking rocks. The fact that it took only eight years for science to accept this new theory of meteorites indicates that science is actually handling things pretty darn well. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,454
|
To be frank, I have a different approach to the "Galileo GambitWP"
I would turn it around: how does this person know that it was wrong to throw out alleged meteorites? Is he saying that meteorites are not really from outerspace? The claim is self-contradictory: either he thinks science is capable of constructing reliable knowlege about the universe (in which case, it was a shame that meteorites were thrown out) or science isn't capable of constructing reliable knowlege about the universe (in which case, maybe those were just rocks after all, so it's a bad example). ie: fish or cut bait |
__________________
"Sometimes it's better to light a flamethrower than curse the darkness." - Terry Pratchett |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
New Blood
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 16
|
Way to deflate an extreme exaggeration. Now, I hate to break it to you, but this is not the end of the story of museums throwing away all of their meteorites.
It's just the beginning... |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Fortean
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,881
|
Well, don't stop there.
|
__________________
"Once a man admits complete and unshakeable faith in his own integrity, he is in an excellent frame of mind to be approached by con men." David W. Maurer, "The Big Con" |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,467
|
|
__________________
Visit rationalvetmed.net and rationalvetmed.org - because nothing is as good as homeopathy... ![]() 'No Way to Treat a Friend: Lifting the Lid on Complementary and Alternative Veterinary Medicine' book now available to order. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,827
|
Yes, I read an article on this in last month's Fortean Times. The author of this only found one museum that threw meteorites out - but sets the whole business in context. Worth reading it may actually still be the current issue, if not I might be able to get it to you Ersby
cj x |
__________________
I'm an Anglican Christian, so I declare my prejudice here. Please take it in to account when reading my posts. "Most people would rather die than think: many do." - Betrand Russell My dull life blogged http://jerome23.wordpress.com |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,393
|
Bookmark this site for use as an emergency emetic:
http://www.chabadsrilanka.com/page.asp?pageID={AF695233-2BD7-4F58-ABEE-C33FDA39EE70}&displayAll=1 |
__________________
A Novel and Efficient Synthesis of Cadaverine Organic chemistry, vengeful ghosts, and high explosives. What could possibly go wrong? Now free for download! http://www.scribd.com/doc/36568510/A...-of-Cadaverine |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Fortean
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,881
|
I had a quick look. It's on the site.
http://www.forteantimes.com/features...eteor_man.html While the point is done and dusted, I'd be interested in knowing what the 1968 reference for this myth was. |
__________________
"Once a man admits complete and unshakeable faith in his own integrity, he is in an excellent frame of mind to be approached by con men." David W. Maurer, "The Big Con" |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Fortean
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,881
|
|
__________________
"Once a man admits complete and unshakeable faith in his own integrity, he is in an excellent frame of mind to be approached by con men." David W. Maurer, "The Big Con" |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Fortean
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,881
|
Oh, and once last thing, while I'm bumping this thread to the top. When I read this post, I thought the Polite Skeptic had more examples of museums throwing out meteorites, but he hadn't. I asked him on his blog, and he explained. It seems that when he wrote "this is not the end of the story..." he meant "this is not the end for the story", meaning that this tale of bad science will continue to be told, despite evidence to the contrary.
|
__________________
"Once a man admits complete and unshakeable faith in his own integrity, he is in an excellent frame of mind to be approached by con men." David W. Maurer, "The Big Con" |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,942
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Gentleman of leisure
Tagger
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Flying around in the sky
Posts: 27,731
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Fortean
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,881
|
Perhaps. But compare that to the idea of museums everywhere throwing out all of their meteorites, which is what the original story said, and which is what you posted a couple of days ago.
What do you know think of the source that told you this story? Do you think it can be trusted? Aren't you annoyed that it passed incorrect information to you? Does it bother you at all? |
__________________
"Once a man admits complete and unshakeable faith in his own integrity, he is in an excellent frame of mind to be approached by con men." David W. Maurer, "The Big Con" |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Muse
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 606
|
Very nice research, Ersby, and blutoski makes a great point.
|
__________________
Woo, woo, woo, woo, woo, I'm pulling over the side of the road to let the ambulance drive by. - Senex "World domination is such an ugly phrase. I prefer to call it world optimization." - Less Wrong You can't make Frodo a Jedi without giving Sauron the Death Star. - Less Wrong |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,942
|
Apparently, this story originated with Richard Milton's book Alternative Science (Fourth Estate, 1991): "Milton told me he can no longer recall the source that he got it from – which is fair enough 18 years after he wrote it." See http://www.forteantimes.com/features...eteor_man.html Obviously, Milton should have documented his source, but it's quite clear from a number of sources that meteorites were long discounted by the scientific establishment:
"Isaac Newton and other savants in the 1600s were well aware of the myriad reports throughout history of stones falling from the sky, but summarily dismissed them as folk tales and so much 'vulgar superstition'. They would not gainsay 2000 years of the wisdom of their hero Aristotle who had decreed that no small bodies exist in space beyond the Earth and her Moon, and that the Earth is at the center of the solar system." See http://www.semp.us/publications/biot...php?BiotID=452 |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Fortean
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,881
|
You're mixing up two different things. Clearly new age writers have been peddling a shaggy dog story but I think, on the broader picture, MRC_Hans' earlier response is both short and to the point.
|
__________________
"Once a man admits complete and unshakeable faith in his own integrity, he is in an excellent frame of mind to be approached by con men." David W. Maurer, "The Big Con" |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Grammar Resistance Leader
TLA Dictator Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pattaya, Thailand
Posts: 41,468
|
Interesting. I'd always heard that Newtons first four laws resolved the question of orbits. That sort of connotes a "belief" in heliocentricity. I think I might automatically discount the intelligence of an author who cited Newton as a geocentrist. (I know it was a while ago, but you do realize where Newton was, date-wise, in relation to Copernicus and Galileo, don't you?)
|
__________________
Ha! Foolmewunz has just been added to the list of people who aren't complete idiots. Hokulele It's not that liberals have become less tolerant. It's that conservatives have become more intolerable. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,942
|
Yes, but Newton's belief in heliocentricity is irrelevant to the issue at hand. As Ursula Marvin noted in a 1996 article titled “Ernst Florenz Friedrich Chladni (1756-1827) and the Origins of Modern Meteorite Research" (Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 1996, Volume 31, p. 551), Newton stated that "to make way for the regular and lasting Motions of the Planets and Comets, it’s necessary to empty the Heavens of all Matter, except perhaps some very thin Vapours, Steams, or Effluvia arising from the Atmospheres of the Earth, Planets, and Comets." That same article details the close-mindedness of the late 18th Century scientific community toward meteorites and notes that some people who had witnessed them were afraid to come forward for fear of ridicule.
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Collector of Meteorites
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: On an inactive volcano
Posts: 3,718
|
I know of at least one relatively recent meteorite to which this happened. The Palolo Valley meteorite fell in December 1946, actually punching a hole in someone's house. The potato sized rock was recovered and added to the Bishop Museum's collection in Honolulu, but at some time over the years, the museum lost track of the meteorite. At this point, its exact whereabouts are unknown. I've been trying to find a picture of the meteorite for a friend, but all documentation except for the most cursory has disappeared. Bad curating? Light fingered janitors? Who knows? I do know it would not have been thrown out as long as someone knew what it was.
|
__________________
"Do not offend the Chair Leg of Truth. It is wise and terrible." Spider Jerusalem, Transmetropolitan |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Grammar Resistance Leader
TLA Dictator Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pattaya, Thailand
Posts: 41,468
|
If his belief is irrelevant then why did you quote that idiotic statement about his belief that Aristotle's world view was the holy of holies? I mean, you didn't quote the article at all, and the article itself offers nothing surprising.
You googled. You found what you thought was a winning and telling statement about Newton. You posted it. It was wrong, either deliberately so, or it was an error because the author of the piece knew nothing about Newton, either. Not that you had that much credibility to begin with, but this sort of thing doesn't lend you any more. And, as has been pointed out, some brilliant minds believed some weird stuff. I would not be at all surprised to find out the Newton was very interested in meteorites, as any un-natural(as in "not found in your backyard") minerals were believed to be of use in alchemy and he had a noted belief in alchemy. Does that make him an idiot? Or does it merely make him wrong - on that topic? |
__________________
Ha! Foolmewunz has just been added to the list of people who aren't complete idiots. Hokulele It's not that liberals have become less tolerant. It's that conservatives have become more intolerable. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,942
|
That's not the issue -- the issue is the attempt on the part of a number of scientists to try and silence debate on meteorites by ridiculing them as impossible. For example:
"After the fall of a meteorite was witnessed and described in a document notarized by the mayor and 300 citizens of Barbotan, France, in 1791, scientist Pierre Berthollet lamented: 'How sad it is that the entire municipality enters folk tales upon an official record, presenting them as something actually seen, while they cannot be explained by physics or anything reasonable.'" See http://www.amazon.com/Meteorites-the...der_0521587514 |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Fortean
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,881
|
But this happens in all walks of life. Looking at this part of history without the distractions of new-age propaganda, it's a example of how science can change and adapt. Bearing in mind the difficulties in comparing 21st and 18th century science, I'm quite sure that the debate over meteorites isn't as cut and dried as you'd like it to be.
|
__________________
"Once a man admits complete and unshakeable faith in his own integrity, he is in an excellent frame of mind to be approached by con men." David W. Maurer, "The Big Con" |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Grammar Resistance Leader
TLA Dictator Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pattaya, Thailand
Posts: 41,468
|
Meanwhile, back at the ranch....
Yet other scientists were formulating the actual theories of the true origins of meteorites. This kind of thing happens/happened all the time. Why, I've heard that there were scientists who said we'd never split the atom. Still other scientists were working on splitting that atom. There were quote end quote scientists who opposed Galileo. There were establishment shrinks who thought Reich was a little nuts. Oh, wait..... (As Sagan pointed out... "they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.) This ridiculing is just another way of questioning, ultimately. It's the crucible in which new ideas are tested and proved. So, the point is that the establishment always throws up roadblocks to new ideas? That's pretty obvious. That's the point of the OP, with an added sub-clause. The establishment always throws up roadblocks to new ideas, but it's no where near as draconian and deliberate as New Age mythologists are trying to make it sound. |
__________________
Ha! Foolmewunz has just been added to the list of people who aren't complete idiots. Hokulele It's not that liberals have become less tolerant. It's that conservatives have become more intolerable. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Grammar Resistance Leader
TLA Dictator Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pattaya, Thailand
Posts: 41,468
|
Ersby,
While I'm getting caught up in the crossfire, I just wanted to add my kudos. Nice little pocket of researching you've done here! |
__________________
Ha! Foolmewunz has just been added to the list of people who aren't complete idiots. Hokulele It's not that liberals have become less tolerant. It's that conservatives have become more intolerable. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10,696
|
Great bit of skepticism Ersby.
It took way more work and effort than our resident woo-google "researcher". |
__________________
"The method of science is tried and true. It is not perfect, it's just the best we have. And to abandon it with its skeptical protocols is the pathway to a dark age." -Carl Sagan "They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance."-Terry Pratchett |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,942
|
I also commend Ersby on his research, but I don't think it succeeded in uncovering all of the pertinent facts. For example, the paper I referenced by Ursula Marvin (of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics) noted that Ernst Chladni "wrote when he finished his book he hesitated to publish it because of the hostile reactions to be expected." (“Ernst Florenz Friedrich Chladni (1756-1827) and the Origins of Modern Meteorite Research" at p. 552.) And Domenico Tata, Professor of Physics and Mathematics at Naples, "was convinced of the authenticity of this (June 1794 Siena meteorite) fall, and said he had intended to publish a full description of it but was dissuaded by friends who warned him that he would be ridiculed by 'Savants' and, worse yet, by 'Half-Savants who are the more to be feared." (Same source at p. 560).
So, one researcher was reluctant to publish his findings, but ultimately summoned the courage to do so; the other did not publish his findings. Not exactly the best type of atmosphere for academic research. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Fortean
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,881
|
I'd imagine it's almost impossible to uncover all of the pertinent facts, since it all happened so long ago. For example, why were the French in particular so hostile towards the idea? Probably due to political pressures from the newly established French Republic, from what I've read, but I'll admit I'm not going to research that in too much depth.
As for the fall at Siena, the same article you reference gives details of three others who did publish reports suggesting the rocks fell from the sky, which you must've read because they're listed before the person who didn't, so why didn't you mention them? Aren't you interested in all the pertinent facts? And remember the Siena fall was before Chladni's work was published. The article is very good, and I should thank Rodney because if he hadn't mentioned it I wouldn't have found it. You can read it here: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1996M%26PS...31..545M |
__________________
"Once a man admits complete and unshakeable faith in his own integrity, he is in an excellent frame of mind to be approached by con men." David W. Maurer, "The Big Con" |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,942
|
I think it's fair to say that we each approached this subject with a different perspective. Mine was that the scientific establishment of the late 18th Century was not interested in a fair and balanced debate about the existence of meteorites, and so my posts have addressed that point.
Hmmm, we agree, and so readers beware. ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Fortean
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,881
|
|
__________________
"Once a man admits complete and unshakeable faith in his own integrity, he is in an excellent frame of mind to be approached by con men." David W. Maurer, "The Big Con" |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Grammar Resistance Leader
TLA Dictator Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pattaya, Thailand
Posts: 41,468
|
Rodney,
Please find me one (just one) major scientific breakthrough where the entire scientific commuity just threw all of their old texts in the fire. Every major advance has a more conservative group of scientists or scholars or researchers who decry it as nonsense. Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, Pasteur, Darwin, Einstein.... Ersby is not agreeing with you. You cite one who refused to publish and one who reluctantly published as part of your proof, but the article points out three others who did publish. So four published. Yeah, sounds like the scientific community was shutting down experimental and radical theories to me. Or - it sounds like you're cherry picking. |
__________________
Ha! Foolmewunz has just been added to the list of people who aren't complete idiots. Hokulele It's not that liberals have become less tolerant. It's that conservatives have become more intolerable. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,942
|
Fortunately, it did not have the power to do that, but who knows how long it would have been for meteorites to have been accepted if it were not for a fortuitous series of falls in the late 18th and early 19th Century? Do you think it was okay in that era that "witnesses to actual falls were withholding their evidence for fear of ridicule"? (Marvin at p. 585).
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
a carbon based life-form
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 39,049
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Fortean
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,881
|
|
__________________
"Once a man admits complete and unshakeable faith in his own integrity, he is in an excellent frame of mind to be approached by con men." David W. Maurer, "The Big Con" |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|