michaelsude: Neutron Stars?

Dancing David

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Mar 26, 2003
Messages
39,700
Location
central Illinois
Dancing David said:
I know you didn't just say that I'm the one who's falling into a trap with my understanding of theory.

This from a guy who thinks an object the size of an asteroid is spinning around at half the speed light, while being made entirely of neutrons, and it is ejecting a beam of light that is visible across galactic distances because the beam is being rotated directly at the earth like a lighthouse.

LOL

By the way, how are those double layers treating you guys in those MHD simulations you run?

Oh my...

um , so you reject the known physics because it doesn't match your internal reality. The fact that the forces that lead to the conclusion of neutron stars are measured and match the model is not a barrier for you... so which parts of the theory don't you accept?

Strong force, weak force, EM force and gravity.

Which is measured incorrectly and modeled incorrectly, what leads you to believe there are not neutron stars?

How does your theory explain the measured forces and model them correctly.

Here we go , rather than derail that thread.
 
michaelsude: You may as well start with the scientific evidence that makes pulars so "incredible" that they cannot exist.
  • Small size? (lots of things are small)
  • Rapid rotation? (lots of things spin)
  • Being made of neutrons?
  • Magnetic fields accelerating electrons?
  • Radiation from accelerating electrons?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom