Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
That is your claim, it just can not be verified. Which is why you have been asked in the past to demonstrate this "applying" of "elements of HDD" and to explain "elements of HDD".

You've been uuhhm ... less than helpful.
 
To that I might add that your above post clearly demonstrates that you indeed continue to imply to be able to demonstrate the "rationally applying" of "elements of HDD".

Imply, because no such thing is actually demonstrated...anywhere.
 
Daylightstar said:
That is your claim, it just can not be verified. Which is why you have been asked in the past to demonstrate this "applying" of "elements of HDD" and to explain "elements of HDD".

You've been uuhhm ... less than helpful.
Click to expand...

That's how these timelines work, you can verify by monitoring the timelines for an extended period of time
 
Dutch said:
That's how these timelines work, you can verify by monitoring the timelines for an extended period of time
Click to expand...

By "verify" you mean accommodate absolutely any event that occurs and seems significant from your little perspective on the world.
 
Last edited:
Sideroxylon said:
accommodate absolutely any event that occurs and seems significant from your little perspective on the world...
Click to expand...
...while doing absolutely nothing helpful for anyone, continually and absolutely failing to provide so much as a useful hint of major world events, and lying about your ability to demonstrate HDD's efficacy.
 
Sideroxylon said:
By "verify" you mean accommodate absolutely any event that occurs and seems significant from your little perspective on the world.
Click to expand...

I ave told you before, try for yourselves without HDDesign and come to the conclusion how little your perspective in fact is
 
Dutch said:
I ave told you before, try for yourselves without HDDesign and come to the conclusion how little your perspective in fact is
Click to expand...
Well, in the past you have shown to believe that you are a better predictor than others.

Not that this belief has been validated.
 
Daylightstar said:
Well, in the past you have shown to believe that you are a better predictor than others.

Not that this belief has been validated.
Click to expand...

and still you guys don't dare to try to do the same with random underlying themes for random future dates for an extended period of time ( not based on HDdesign).

So why don't you start with it? you can help eachother if you like
 
Dutch said:
and still you guys don't dare to try to do the same with random underlying themes for random future dates for an extended period of time ( not based on HDdesign).

So why don't you start with it? you can help each other if you like
Click to expand...
I'll do it.
On Thursday, July 21, 2011 the last Space Shuttle mission ended as the Shuttle Atlantis landed.
By using (hold while I decide what constant I need to use......"i" is too obvious, but probably the most applicable....ah-ha! "p", the plastic constant!) p, the plastic constant, I will demonstrate that something will happen, however vaguely related to the Space Shuttle Atlantis landing for the final time (from a space mission).

The first time line is simple. It is just Day 0 + p = significant event.
HERE IS MY MATH for everyone to follow along:
July 21 + [FONT=&quot][/FONT]1.3 = July 22.

My first prediction is that something related to Atlantis returning will happen tomorrow. (as this is the plastic constant, I alone can decide how large the window of opportunity is).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plastic_number

Now, going further out requires more advanced math. July 21 is the 202nd day of the year so if that is multiplied by p, we get the next significant dates by adding the result to the date and the result itself is another significant date.

HERE IS MY MATH!!1!11!
202 x 1.324=267.448
On both April 13, 2012 and September 24, 2011.

I will astound you all with my accuracy as soon as I shoehorn events am aware of the events.
 
I'm missing something in this .... a synchronicity .... didn't you overhear someone on the phone say that they should send "this guy" into deep space with a redundant spaceshuttle, because "this guy" has his mind floating in outer space beyond Pluto already?
And obviously, they were not talking about you.
 
Last edited:
Dutch said:
Well, HDDesign is about indications of Intelligent hidden correlations within our dimension, suggesting that there seems to be more than the dimension we 'exist' in.
Click to expand...


If there are any other dimensions other than the ones we exist in, then those dimensions must exist in another universe altogether, and in that universe those dimensions could be identical ( but separate ) from the ones in this universe.

j.r.
 
Dutch said:
You cannot test these synchronicities twice or more scientifically in the same way they've occured. You can have a sense of the hidden connectedness by continued monitoring of the findings, take good notice of the moment of postings ( as they are logged with date and time ).

Even I don't know what comes next, it can happen anytime. You have to take these synchronicities serious when they occur, that's the only way to open up your mind. You can spend a lifetime trying to 'prove' or disprove this, in the meanwhile you have missed the apparent 'communication' that is taking place.
Click to expand...

Once again, a non-response using word salad and vague terms you can use as camouflage to avoid committing towards anything you might have to prove later.
 
ufology said:
If there are any other dimensions other than the ones we exist in, then those dimensions must exist in another universe altogether, and in that universe those dimensions could be identical ( but separate ) from the ones in this universe.

j.r.
Click to expand...

you are talking about dimensions based on normal spatial/temporal principles.
Dutch is talking about dimensions based on dissociative principles.

Two completely different things.
 
Daylightstar said:
you are talking about dimensions based on normal spatial/temporal principles.
Dutch is talking about dimensions based on dissociative principles.

Two completely different things.
Click to expand...


You are very perceptive. What I'm wondering is whether or not he thinks we're talking about the same thing for practical purposes, in which case perhaps some advancement might be made by using language more precise to the context. In other words are we both talking about some plausible state of existence that could explain something analagous to a door that would allow passage between what appear to be two separate realities, or are we talking about purely mathematical abstract constructs?

j.r.
 
Plastic Dimensional Physics

Just perusing the news and, as I expectedpredicted, there was a slew of events related to the shuttle Atlantis' last mission. Seeing as how it only landed yesterday, I will magnanimously not consider most of those massive hits to my Atlantis Timeline. One thing did stand out, though:
Astronomers Find Largest, Oldest Mass of Water in Universe


http://www.space.com/12400-universe-biggest-oldest-cloud-water.html

If you can't see the connection, permit me....
Ancient= Plato's Atlantis
Massive amounts of water= c'mon, it was a freakin' SUNKEN continent.
Where? In space.
When= story released today. It took the light from this thing 14 billion years to reach Earth and the story is released today? What are the odds? (1:1).That is just the obvious hits. What say Dutch?
 
Wolrab said:
Just perusing the news and, as I expectedpredicted, there was a slew of events related to the shuttle Atlantis' last mission. Seeing as how it only landed yesterday, I will magnanimously not consider most of those massive hits to my Atlantis Timeline. One thing did stand out, though:
Astronomers Find Largest, Oldest Mass of Water in Universe


http://www.space.com/12400-universe-biggest-oldest-cloud-water.html

If you can't see the connection, permit me....
Ancient= Plato's Atlantis
Massive amounts of water= c'mon, it was a freakin' SUNKEN continent.
Where? In space.
When= story released today. It took the light from this thing 14 billion years to reach Earth and the story is released today? What are the odds? (1:1).That is just the obvious hits. What say Dutch?
Click to expand...


Cool article.
 
ufology said:
You are very perceptive. ...mathematical abstract constructs?
j.r.
Click to expand...

He does not concern himself with what we might think, only with what he believes.
Using language more precise to the context has shown not to work. Whenever it is tried something very odd happens: he suddenly turns into a chicken.
Eggs and feathers all over the place.

In the case of the topic starter's presentation on this forum, there really do not appear to be two seperate realities.
However, the topic starter unsuccesfully tries to establish a second reality.
There is no door, no passage. Just empty belief.

Also, the topic has no bearing on mathematics whatsoever.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom