Hyper Dimensional Design
- Thread starter Dutch
- Start date
- Status
On the contrary, that's the complete failure of HDD; you just say stuff and never check if it is nonsense before incorporating it.
That's quite a big mistake, considering your solution is to say that a massive National Park a small town once passed over the same general area as each other and are both hundreds of miles from mount St. Helens.
It's not a correction, it's an entirely new guess with even less validity than the original one.
Nope, anything incorporating the self admitted nonsense of mount St. Helens is wrong.
I don't know what that means due to the arrangement of words not making any sense, but you do realise how big Yellowstone National Park is, don't you?
So? Are you going to claim that large areas of Oregon, Nevada and Idaho are special too? Do your timelines go back 16 million years?
Did I say the Yellowstone hotspot wasn't stationary?
What do you mean by feeding?
Daylightstar
Philosopher
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8103709&postcount=5040
I have to do no such thing.
My relevant question:
As far as the first question from the list ( or list) is concerned
No calculations were ever provided by you.
Mind you:
So, both requests for calculations (on your insistence) have not been honored by you.
No calculations, no references or links to those calculations.
Evidently, the term liar describes you very well.
Go back to your 'cage' ..... and use your time there to do some 'research'.
I have to do no such thing.
My relevant question:
In your post quoted above, where you quoted yourself, nothing that even remotely resembles 'recalculating the HD Cube spot near mount St. Helens' through 'reversing the continental drift' can be found.
As far as the first question from the list ( or list) is concerned
No calculations were ever provided by you.
Mind you:
So, both requests for calculations (on your insistence) have not been honored by you.
No calculations, no references or links to those calculations.
Evidently, the term liar describes you very well.
Go back to your 'cage' ..... and use your time there to do some 'research'.
Last edited:
Daylightstar
Philosopher
'Feelings' and 'intuition', that's what it's all about:
Your judgement with respect to sharing your 'feelings' and 'intuition' or not, is not trustworthy, it's evidently worthless.
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Sounds pretty barbaric.
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
Exactly Dutch, once again demonstrating and expressly affirming that your Dimensional Design Hype is entirely one dimensional (just time) and singularly based just on your “perception of time”.
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please Dutch, I beseech of thee not to go there!!!! Do you understand the HDD ramifications of your ‘less politeness’?!?! In ain’t just a freak’n tetrahedron its a dodecahedron, from another dimension (those are the worst), of pain.!!! The suffering would be reprehensible, please think of the children!!!
Other than that, best of luck with your new and forth coming “less polite” approach. It could hardly do worse than your current and previous ‘less informed’ approach.
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
Yea, but he just wants it to be something more. Taking it to a different level of cohabitating relationship. Unbeknownst to us and, evidently, him.
Proove it.
I've seen dozens of posts where you've specifically referred to 9-11, 1111 (11-11), multiples of 11-11, etc. and based your calculations on the numerology of those specific date references. These are Gregorian calendar dates.
So, proove it. Pick another calendar, tell us which calendar it is, use the same relative reference on the Gregorian calendar (11-11, 9-11) and show us the numbers and how they stun you.
Last edited:
Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
1111 days 'awakeningstimeframe' around a monitored eventsday in the middle. Choose whatever calendar you like. As long as it is based on Earth's orbital period it doesn't matter at all. The fact that you don't seem to understand this indicates that you've probably have NEVER read or tried to understand the material.
Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
I don't want to be something more, I just notice something more.
I do recognize all these 'coincidences' and synchronicities while working with this stuff. That's what I share.
Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
Man, what I mean is that some posters here are treating me with very little respect and calling me whatever they want. Some aren't very polite and they accuse me of alot of things while they also aren't giving the impression that they are seriously dealing with my answers.
I have reason enough to be less polite in these cases but I guess it's not worth it so I can let it rest until now. So no need to be less polite yet
Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
We have a 3D reality ( + time ) that we find ourselves alive in.
If other dimensional realms, or if you prefer expressions of consciouness at other levels, indeed exist, than the 'link' between them would be our perception of time. All intelligent correlations are based on our perception of time, that's what HDDesign is about.
That's where the synchronicities and 'coincidences' occur.
Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
a perfect example of a useless remark, contributes nothing at all.
Why are you doing this and why does everybody accepts this?
If I would say it onces the heat would be on.
Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
Its worthless to those who decide to ignore all these 'coincidences' and synchronicities.
Sideroxylon
Featherless biped
That's everyone but you, Dutch. See a problem in that?
No, HDD is irrelevant to reality. You're making it up based on your own misconceptions. You even admit it, by saying HDD's based on "perceptions". Perceptions are fallible, faulty, vague. The truth sits in the middle and knows, to quote Robert Frost.
Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
Not at all, it should be clear that I was talking about the determination of the theoretical HD Cube spot near Yellowstone at aprox. 45 degrees North.
I took Mount st. Helens as a marker to reverse the continental drift, assuming the North American plae was moving to the North - North west.
While I was wrong to take Mount st helens as the marker, the theory is still valid. The North American plate moves west-south west:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowstone_Caldera
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowstone_hotspot
Dutch
Master Poster
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,466
Paul:
I was talking about the Yellowstone hotspot, which indeed appears to be stationairy around 45 degrees North.
Your remark doesn't make any sense at all, I hope you understand that.
If the North American plate was indeed moving to west-Northwest, than Mount st Helens would have been once at the same geometrical area as current Yellowstone location: above the stationairy plume.
We now know that the direction of the movement of the Nort American plate is west-south west. I just took the wrong marker to 'recalculate' the HD Cube spot around 45 degrees Nort near Yellowstone, but the therory is valid. I should have taken Island Park etc., which is indeed confirming the initial idea.
I was talking about the Yellowstone hotspot, which indeed appears to be stationairy around 45 degrees North.
Your remark doesn't make any sense at all, I hope you understand that.
If the North American plate was indeed moving to west-Northwest, than Mount st Helens would have been once at the same geometrical area as current Yellowstone location: above the stationairy plume.
We now know that the direction of the movement of the Nort American plate is west-south west. I just took the wrong marker to 'recalculate' the HD Cube spot around 45 degrees Nort near Yellowstone, but the therory is valid. I should have taken Island Park etc., which is indeed confirming the initial idea.
- Status