Simple question for Bigfoot enthusiasts: Why no unambiguous photos/videos? - Page 28

AttorneyTom · 26th July 2012, 06:49 PM

Originally Posted by parnassus

I was going through some photos and found this figure in the background, could this be a bigfoot?
http://www.internationalskeptics.com...pictureid=6369

A bigfoot ?? I see a family of them carefully camoe'd there. Mom, two twins (approx. ages 4), and Bobby (age 2 approx. ). I love watching their family unit hunt and work together like that ! No divorce and also they learn alot from each other. There is a zagnut wrapper but it is just off to the left of the camera frame.. that Bobby !

AlaskaBushPilot · 26th July 2012, 07:01 PM

while I respect Tom's opinion on what he saw, it is either what he said, or an owl in a tree.

Could someone now suggest that with two sides to every story, the truth is somewhere in between?

AttorneyTom · 26th July 2012, 07:09 PM

Originally Posted by AlaskaBushPilot

while I respect Tom's opinion on what he saw, it is either what he said, or an owl in a tree.

Could someone now suggest that with two sides to every story, the truth is somewhere in between?

You know.. looking closer now.. I see I forgot their eldest . Maxine ! She is getting to that BF age you know? Which would explain the wrapper thing and that empty six pack on the right. Teenagers.. ugh.

DennyT · 28th July 2012, 11:23 PM

hopefully the footers will monitor this cam; eventually bigfoot has to show up, right?

Deacondark · 29th July 2012, 09:36 AM

Originally Posted by parnassus

hopefully the footers will monitor this cam; eventually bigfoot has to show up, right?

I was just about to post this link! I've been watching it all morning. Strange that you can set up a camera in Alaska, and sit in the comfort of your living room watching bears catch salmon all day long, yet no-one has thought to pile up a bunch of Zagnut bars anywhere and put a live webcam on them...

AttorneyTom · 29th July 2012, 07:12 PM

Originally Posted by Deacondark

I was just about to post this link! I've been watching it all morning. Strange that you can set up a camera in Alaska, and sit in the comfort of your living room watching bears catch salmon all day long, yet no-one has thought to pile up a bunch of Zagnut bars anywhere and put a live webcam on them...

It is really interesting that event draws in the real animals. They avoid each other most of the time. I would hope that someone might get the BF's on video like that during the annual zagnut spill.. drift.. oops.. something ? It would be nice to finally see the Family Units in action !

DennyT · 15th September 2012, 10:20 AM

Great joke:
Two footers reach the pearly gates. God appears and one guy asks God, "does Bigfoot exist?"
"no." says God.
The Footer turns to his buddy and says, "wow, Bigfoot is even more elusive than we thought!"

Sonny2 · 15th September 2012, 02:10 PM

Originally Posted by parnassus

Great joke:
Two footers reach the pearly gates. God appears and one guy asks God, "does Bigfoot exist?"
"no." says God.
The Footer turns to his buddy and says, "wow, Bigfoot is even more elusive than we thought!"

Actually, they'd probably be more likely to say something like:

See, I told you God was a liar.

Drewbot · 15th October 2012, 12:54 PM

I finally see something in the Scott Herriott Klamath video.
A guy in a baseball hat

Go to :34 of this video to see what I saw.
http://www.facebook.com/video/video....25498637490948

LTC8K6 · 15th October 2012, 01:14 PM

I see the rare Tree Turtle.

RedRatSnake · 15th October 2012, 06:02 PM

I'll believe in the Tree Octopus, before i will in Sasquatch.

DennyT · 19th October 2012, 05:48 PM

http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/...sible.html?m=1

I am looking at this on my iphone. Appears to be a small bunch of leaves near the camera. Whatever it is it certainly isn't a Bigfoot. But it is unidentified, so, to the hysterical, it must be a Bigfoot. But wait, it can't be because, you know, they can't be photographed. And it couldn't be in camp, because, you know, they are so elusive.

Are we clear?

RedRatSnake · 19th October 2012, 06:16 PM

I see a picnic table with some bottles on it possibly some mugs also, to the left is a white shape and on the ground is what looks like a blanket or sleeping bag, there is also some dark rectangular objects in the back ground.
My guess is it's someone with a white blanket, sleeping bag or sheet wrapped around them trying to stand up, if you look at the bottom to the left of the rear table leg, you can just about make out two shoes or sneakers were the legs and feet should be.

Jodie · 19th October 2012, 07:52 PM

That's exactly what it looked like to me too, Tim, I wasn't sure if that was what we were supposed to be looking at.

LTC8K6 · 19th October 2012, 08:55 PM

Sitting up and putting a shirt on...or taking one off...Bigfoot is a snappy dresser...

RedRatSnake · 19th October 2012, 09:00 PM

That's very good, i like it better than my take on the pic, i can visualize that easy and it fit's perfect.

Castro · 20th October 2012, 01:35 PM

Maybe someone in a mummy sleeping bag. He/she seems to have a headlamp too:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...v=r1cCgcz9pbk#!

LTC8K6 · 20th October 2012, 08:00 PM

Let's see the shots before and after as well.

RedRatSnake · 20th October 2012, 08:08 PM

I don't think that will happen, cause seeing them would take BF out of the equation.

EHocking · 21st October 2012, 01:54 AM

Originally Posted by Slocie's

I don't think that will happen, cause seeing them would take BF out of the equation.

...Yeah, a trailcam that only takes 1 second of video....

OntarioSquatch · 21st October 2012, 02:48 PM

Originally Posted by parnassus

http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/...sible.html?m=1

I am looking at this on my iphone. Appears to be a small bunch of leaves near the camera. Whatever it is it certainly isn't a Bigfoot. But it is unidentified, so, to the hysterical, it must be a Bigfoot. But wait, it can't be because, you know, they can't be photographed. And it couldn't be in camp, because, you know, they are so elusive.

Are we clear?

That turned out to be a guy in a white sweater

The Shrike · 22nd October 2012, 06:50 AM

Speaking of Ontario, that's the province in which a researcher posting on the BFF is chronicling near Area X-level bigfoot activity, again at a remote cabin in the woods. I've been enjoying some interaction with this individual whose recording at one point clearly reveals flight calls from Swainson's Thrush, but who is maintaining that the sounds in question are bigfoots imitating Swainson's Thrush. (I'm not kidding.)

Today, the owner of the cabin chimed in to make a testimonial regarding the integrity of the researcher, adding that business at the cabin has increased since he finally got a bigfoot professional in to check things out. Classic.

Check out "Sasquatch Activity 3" in the Photos/Video/Audio section if interested in hearing the recordings and reading somebody go from double-down to at least quadruple-down on the bigsanity.

Drewbot · 22nd October 2012, 07:10 AM

Yes- There is a chart someone found in Business Week (rumor), detailing this marketing tactic.

Kilaak Kommander · 22nd October 2012, 07:53 AM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

That turned out to be a guy in a white sweater

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-fDv_7Wwrmn...xtremeexp1.jpg

What's the whole story here? Here's what appears to be the original, serious-sounding press release from Extreme Expeditions: Unknown creature captured on trail camera. It says they sent the image/film to Meldrum and others for review.

But then we have an unambiguous photo of a dude in a sweater. Was this all a joke?

GT/CS · 26th October 2012, 08:19 PM

One reason there are no photos of bigfoot is because the "researchers" give up, even when they see 'foots on a regular basis.

Bipto's marketing skills seem to be coming into play as he appears to be setting the stage for giving up on his project without getting any photos, or video, or anything.

Originally Posted by Bipto @ BFF

Posted Today, 06:13 PM

Nope, we'll keep at it until we succeed or the monkeys move on.

http://bigfootforums.com/index.php?/.../page__st__960

RedRatSnake · 26th October 2012, 08:56 PM

That statement would have impressed the Kennedy's. Well not really ~ lol
So no BF bagged ( dur ) but most certainly something in the works. If I was a sheep and knew BF was real. I would hang on everything BB has to say cause he is my Hero.

Castro · 27th October 2012, 03:53 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

That turned out to be a guy in a white sweater

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-fDv_7Wwrmn...xtremeexp1.jpg

...with a headlamp

clayflingythingy · 28th October 2012, 12:55 PM

Originally Posted by GT/CS

One reason there are no photos of bigfoot is because the "researchers" give up, even when they see 'foots on a regular basis.

Bipto's marketing skills seem to be coming into play as he appears to be setting the stage for giving up on his project without getting any photos, or video, or anything.

http://bigfootforums.com/index.php?/.../page__st__960

Unlike Drew, I've never believed Bipto & Hairy Man & Co were the victims of a third party hoax. I've felt they were lying all along. If the wood apes "move on" that would seem a good indication that I'm right, and this has been Parcher's "big lie".

RedRatSnake · 4th November 2012, 03:39 PM

Hikers take flight when what they thought was a bear resembles Bigfoot

http://www.grindtv.com/outdoor/blog/...mbles+bigfoot/

Jodie · 4th November 2012, 03:45 PM

Doesn't move the way I think a bear would on a slope, could be a person. I don't see that it looked at them, it looks more like it's back.

StankApe · 4th November 2012, 03:45 PM

convenient early exit is convenient

why is it EVERY SINGLE VIDEO involves the quick turn away right when details could be observed?

answer: Bigfoot isn't real and their suit would be exposed for what it is

calwaterbear · 6th November 2012, 10:54 AM

I seriously think it's a guy taking a crap in the woods. Not even a bear ###### in the woods, but a person. BTW on the interview, they state they do not believe in bigfoot, don't know what it is, but they post the video with a bigfoot tag?

If you listen to the interview they did with the local reporter, who is qualified to be a reporter, because his undergard degree is in theology, anyway, i hear a guy lying and making up stories as he goes along!

Jodie · 6th November 2012, 05:31 PM

I'ld run from a guy crapping in the woods.

StankApe · 6th November 2012, 06:02 PM

so would I! You never know when flinging is about to ensue!

jakesteele · 9th November 2012, 10:16 AM

The reason is twofold: The creatures are extremely elusive and also, no matter what, skeptics will say it's only a flaw in the lense or a smudge of dirt.

Skeptical Greg · 9th November 2012, 10:22 AM

No matter what ?

Well, no... Just a simple unambiguous photo or video would work just fine...

LTC8K6 · 9th November 2012, 10:53 AM

Originally Posted by jakesteele

The reason is twofold: The creatures are extremely elusive and also, no matter what, skeptics will say it's only a flaw in the lense or a smudge of dirt.

I never said Patty was a flaw in the lens or a smudge of dirt...or even thought it...

Resume · 9th November 2012, 11:29 AM

Originally Posted by jakesteele

The reason is twofold: The creatures are extremely elusive and also, no matter what, skeptics will say it's only a flaw in the lense or a smudge of dirt.

Elusive to the point of nonexistence.

LTC8K6 · 9th November 2012, 12:44 PM

Originally Posted by Resume

Elusive to the point of nonexistence.

Once in a while they almost exist, and then we get a blobsquatch on camera.

StankApe · 9th November 2012, 01:05 PM

How could anyone find this ambiguous?

the latest bigfoot pic:

26th July 2012, 06:49 PM	#1081
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883	Originally Posted by parnassus I was going through some photos and found this figure in the background, could this be a bigfoot? http://www.internationalskeptics.com...pictureid=6369 A bigfoot ?? I see a family of them carefully camoe'd there. Mom, two twins (approx. ages 4), and Bobby (age 2 approx. ). I love watching their family unit hunt and work together like that ! No divorce and also they learn alot from each other. There is a zagnut wrapper but it is just off to the left of the camera frame.. that Bobby !
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883

26th July 2012, 07:09 PM	#1083
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883	Originally Posted by AlaskaBushPilot while I respect Tom's opinion on what he saw, it is either what he said, or an owl in a tree. Could someone now suggest that with two sides to every story, the truth is somewhere in between? You know.. looking closer now.. I see I forgot their eldest . Maxine ! She is getting to that BF age you know? Which would explain the wrapper thing and that empty six pack on the right. Teenagers.. ugh.
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883

28th July 2012, 11:23 PM	#1084
DennyT Master Poster Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Michigan Posts: 2,753	hopefully the footers will monitor this cam; eventually bigfoot has to show up, right?
	__________________ "Take the children, but LEAVE ME MY MONKEY!" --Dewey Cox, in "Walk Hard: the Dewey Cox Story." "The main skill of bigfoot investigators is finding ways to deny the obvious." --DFoot

29th July 2012, 07:12 PM	#1086
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883	Originally Posted by Deacondark I was just about to post this link! I've been watching it all morning. Strange that you can set up a camera in Alaska, and sit in the comfort of your living room watching bears catch salmon all day long, yet no-one has thought to pile up a bunch of Zagnut bars anywhere and put a live webcam on them... It is really interesting that event draws in the real animals. They avoid each other most of the time. I would hope that someone might get the BF's on video like that during the annual zagnut spill.. drift.. oops.. something ? It would be nice to finally see the Family Units in action !
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883

15th September 2012, 10:20 AM	#1087
DennyT Master Poster Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Michigan Posts: 2,753	Great joke: Two footers reach the pearly gates. God appears and one guy asks God, "does Bigfoot exist?" "no." says God. The Footer turns to his buddy and says, "wow, Bigfoot is even more elusive than we thought!"
	__________________ "Take the children, but LEAVE ME MY MONKEY!" --Dewey Cox, in "Walk Hard: the Dewey Cox Story." "The main skill of bigfoot investigators is finding ways to deny the obvious." --DFoot

26th July 2012, 07:01 PM	#1082
AlaskaBushPilot Illuminator Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 3,538	while I respect Tom's opinion on what he saw, it is either what he said, or an owl in a tree. Could someone now suggest that with two sides to every story, the truth is somewhere in between?

29th July 2012, 09:36 AM	#1085
Deacondark Critical Thinker Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 334	Originally Posted by parnassus hopefully the footers will monitor this cam; eventually bigfoot has to show up, right? I was just about to post this link! I've been watching it all morning. Strange that you can set up a camera in Alaska, and sit in the comfort of your living room watching bears catch salmon all day long, yet no-one has thought to pile up a bunch of Zagnut bars anywhere and put a live webcam on them...

15th September 2012, 02:10 PM	#1088
Sonny2 Muse Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 669	Originally Posted by parnassus Great joke: Two footers reach the pearly gates. God appears and one guy asks God, "does Bigfoot exist?" "no." says God. The Footer turns to his buddy and says, "wow, Bigfoot is even more elusive than we thought!" Actually, they'd probably be more likely to say something like: See, I told you God was a liar.
Sonny2 Muse Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 669

15th October 2012, 12:54 PM	#1089
Drewbot Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 5,394	I finally see something in the Scott Herriott Klamath video. A guy in a baseball hat Go to :34 of this video to see what I saw. http://www.facebook.com/video/video....25498637490948
Drewbot Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 5,394	__________________ "I dont call that evolution, I call that the survival of the fittest." - Bulletmaker "I thought skeptics would usually point towards a hoax rather than a group being duped." - makaya325 Kit is not a skeptic. He is a former Bigfoot believer that changed his position to that of non believer.- Crowlogic

15th October 2012, 01:14 PM	#1090
LTC8K6 Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail Posts: 17,827	I see the rare Tree Turtle.
	__________________ What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break?

15th October 2012, 06:02 PM	#1091
RedRatSnake Slithering Through life Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 1,622	I'll believe in the Tree Octopus, before i will in Sasquatch.

19th October 2012, 05:48 PM	#1092
DennyT Master Poster Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Michigan Posts: 2,753	http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/...sible.html?m=1 I am looking at this on my iphone. Appears to be a small bunch of leaves near the camera. Whatever it is it certainly isn't a Bigfoot. But it is unidentified, so, to the hysterical, it must be a Bigfoot. But wait, it can't be because, you know, they can't be photographed. And it couldn't be in camp, because, you know, they are so elusive. Are we clear?
	__________________ "Take the children, but LEAVE ME MY MONKEY!" --Dewey Cox, in "Walk Hard: the Dewey Cox Story." "The main skill of bigfoot investigators is finding ways to deny the obvious." --DFoot Last edited by DennyT; 19th October 2012 at 05:57 PM.

19th October 2012, 06:16 PM	#1093
RedRatSnake Slithering Through life Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 1,622	I see a picnic table with some bottles on it possibly some mugs also, to the left is a white shape and on the ground is what looks like a blanket or sleeping bag, there is also some dark rectangular objects in the back ground. My guess is it's someone with a white blanket, sleeping bag or sheet wrapped around them trying to stand up, if you look at the bottom to the left of the rear table leg, you can just about make out two shoes or sneakers were the legs and feet should be.
	Last edited by RedRatSnake; 19th October 2012 at 06:19 PM.

19th October 2012, 07:52 PM	#1094
Jodie Philosopher Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 5,219	That's exactly what it looked like to me too, Tim, I wasn't sure if that was what we were supposed to be looking at.
Jodie Philosopher Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 5,219	__________________ "When I was a child I caught a fleeting glimpse out of the corner of my eye. I turned to look but it was gone, I cannot put my finger on it now. The child is grown, the dream is gone. I have become comfortably numb. " Pink Floyd

19th October 2012, 08:55 PM	#1095
LTC8K6 Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail Posts: 17,827	Sitting up and putting a shirt on...or taking one off...Bigfoot is a snappy dresser...
	__________________ What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break?

19th October 2012, 09:00 PM	#1096
RedRatSnake Slithering Through life Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 1,622	That's very good, i like it better than my take on the pic, i can visualize that easy and it fit's perfect.

20th October 2012, 01:35 PM	#1097
Castro Muse Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 549	Maybe someone in a mummy sleeping bag. He/she seems to have a headlamp too: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...v=r1cCgcz9pbk#!
Castro Muse Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 549

20th October 2012, 08:00 PM	#1098
LTC8K6 Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail Posts: 17,827	Let's see the shots before and after as well.
	__________________ What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break?

20th October 2012, 08:08 PM	#1099
RedRatSnake Slithering Through life Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 1,622	I don't think that will happen, cause seeing them would take BF out of the equation.

21st October 2012, 01:54 AM	#1100
EHocking Philosopher Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 5,978	Originally Posted by Slocie's I don't think that will happen, cause seeing them would take BF out of the equation. ...Yeah, a trailcam that only takes 1 second of video....
EHocking Philosopher Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 5,978	__________________ "A closed mouth gathers no feet" "Ignorance is a renewable resource" P.J.O'Rourke Prayer: "a sophisticated way of pleading with thunderstorms." T.Pratchett "It's all god's handiwork, there's little quality control applied", Fox26 reporter on Texas granite Forum Birdwatching Webpage

21st October 2012, 02:48 PM	#1101
OntarioSquatch Graduate Poster Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 1,783	Originally Posted by parnassus http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/...sible.html?m=1 I am looking at this on my iphone. Appears to be a small bunch of leaves near the camera. Whatever it is it certainly isn't a Bigfoot. But it is unidentified, so, to the hysterical, it must be a Bigfoot. But wait, it can't be because, you know, they can't be photographed. And it couldn't be in camp, because, you know, they are so elusive. Are we clear? That turned out to be a guy in a white sweater

22nd October 2012, 06:50 AM	#1102
The Shrike Illuminator Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 4,170	Speaking of Ontario, that's the province in which a researcher posting on the BFF is chronicling near Area X-level bigfoot activity, again at a remote cabin in the woods. I've been enjoying some interaction with this individual whose recording at one point clearly reveals flight calls from Swainson's Thrush, but who is maintaining that the sounds in question are bigfoots imitating Swainson's Thrush. (I'm not kidding.) Today, the owner of the cabin chimed in to make a testimonial regarding the integrity of the researcher, adding that business at the cabin has increased since he finally got a bigfoot professional in to check things out. Classic. Check out "Sasquatch Activity 3" in the Photos/Video/Audio section if interested in hearing the recordings and reading somebody go from double-down to at least quadruple-down on the bigsanity.
The Shrike Illuminator Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 4,170

22nd October 2012, 07:10 AM	#1103
Drewbot Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 5,394	Yes- There is a chart someone found in Business Week (rumor), detailing this marketing tactic.
Drewbot Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 5,394	__________________ "I dont call that evolution, I call that the survival of the fittest." - Bulletmaker "I thought skeptics would usually point towards a hoax rather than a group being duped." - makaya325 Kit is not a skeptic. He is a former Bigfoot believer that changed his position to that of non believer.- Crowlogic

22nd October 2012, 07:53 AM	#1104
Kilaak Kommander Critical Thinker Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 342	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch That turned out to be a guy in a white sweater http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-fDv_7Wwrmn...xtremeexp1.jpg What's the whole story here? Here's what appears to be the original, serious-sounding press release from Extreme Expeditions: Unknown creature captured on trail camera. It says they sent the image/film to Meldrum and others for review. But then we have an unambiguous photo of a dude in a sweater. Was this all a joke?

26th October 2012, 08:19 PM	#1105
GT/CS Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Inland NW Posts: 4,660	One reason there are no photos of bigfoot is because the "researchers" give up, even when they see 'foots on a regular basis. Bipto's marketing skills seem to be coming into play as he appears to be setting the stage for giving up on his project without getting any photos, or video, or anything. Originally Posted by Bipto @ BFF Posted Today, 06:13 PM Nope, we'll keep at it until we succeed or the monkeys move on. http://bigfootforums.com/index.php?/.../page__st__960
	__________________ I may look calm on the outside but in my head I've killed you three times. Last edited by GT/CS; 26th October 2012 at 08:21 PM.

26th October 2012, 08:56 PM	#1106
RedRatSnake Slithering Through life Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 1,622	That statement would have impressed the Kennedy's. Well not really ~ lol So no BF bagged ( dur ) but most certainly something in the works. If I was a sheep and knew BF was real. I would hang on everything BB has to say cause he is my Hero.

28th October 2012, 12:55 PM	#1108
clayflingythingy Critical Thinker Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 424	Originally Posted by GT/CS One reason there are no photos of bigfoot is because the "researchers" give up, even when they see 'foots on a regular basis. Bipto's marketing skills seem to be coming into play as he appears to be setting the stage for giving up on his project without getting any photos, or video, or anything. http://bigfootforums.com/index.php?/.../page__st__960 Unlike Drew, I've never believed Bipto & Hairy Man & Co were the victims of a third party hoax. I've felt they were lying all along. If the wood apes "move on" that would seem a good indication that I'm right, and this has been Parcher's "big lie".

4th November 2012, 03:39 PM	#1109
RedRatSnake Slithering Through life Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 1,622	Hikers take flight when what they thought was a bear resembles Bigfoot http://www.grindtv.com/outdoor/blog/...mbles+bigfoot/

4th November 2012, 03:45 PM	#1110
Jodie Philosopher Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 5,219	Doesn't move the way I think a bear would on a slope, could be a person. I don't see that it looked at them, it looks more like it's back.
Jodie Philosopher Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 5,219	__________________ "When I was a child I caught a fleeting glimpse out of the corner of my eye. I turned to look but it was gone, I cannot put my finger on it now. The child is grown, the dream is gone. I have become comfortably numb. " Pink Floyd

4th November 2012, 03:45 PM	#1111
StankApe Banned Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 4,628	convenient early exit is convenient why is it EVERY SINGLE VIDEO involves the quick turn away right when details could be observed? answer: Bigfoot isn't real and their suit would be exposed for what it is
StankApe Banned Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 4,628

6th November 2012, 10:54 AM	#1112
calwaterbear Thinker Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 248	I seriously think it's a guy taking a crap in the woods. Not even a bear ###### in the woods, but a person. BTW on the interview, they state they do not believe in bigfoot, don't know what it is, but they post the video with a bigfoot tag? If you listen to the interview they did with the local reporter, who is qualified to be a reporter, because his undergard degree is in theology, anyway, i hear a guy lying and making up stories as he goes along!
calwaterbear Thinker Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 248

6th November 2012, 05:31 PM	#1113
Jodie Philosopher Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 5,219	I'ld run from a guy crapping in the woods.
Jodie Philosopher Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 5,219	__________________ "When I was a child I caught a fleeting glimpse out of the corner of my eye. I turned to look but it was gone, I cannot put my finger on it now. The child is grown, the dream is gone. I have become comfortably numb. " Pink Floyd

6th November 2012, 06:02 PM	#1114
StankApe Banned Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 4,628	so would I! You never know when flinging is about to ensue!
StankApe Banned Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 4,628

9th November 2012, 10:16 AM	#1115
jakesteele InterGalactic Repo Man® Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Rain City Posts: 1,962	The reason is twofold: The creatures are extremely elusive and also, no matter what, skeptics will say it's only a flaw in the lense or a smudge of dirt.
	__________________ Morals and scruples and ethics, oh, my! Vote for Hillary!

9th November 2012, 10:22 AM	#1116
Skeptical Greg Agave Wine Connoisseur Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 14,431	No matter what ? Well, no... Just a simple unambiguous photo or video would work just fine...
	__________________ " What if the Hokey Pokey is what it's all about? " Prove your computer is not a wimp ! Join Team 13232 !