Shower me with April Stundie Nominations

And with a name like Homo Erectus, they probably didn't need either girls or Viagra.
 
Horatius said:
Well, no, but at least they died from Excessive Tiger Interaction*, and not cancer, like us!






*Tell your Homo erectus to speak to his shaman today about the heartbreak of ETI![/PSA]
Click to expand...

I thought Excessive Tiger Interaction was what caused Mr. Woods divorce.
 
It's bright Jim, but not as we know it....

http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=nR9J-E8BQoM

"If doesn't matter about the exposure setting, if the setting was the problem, there wouldn't have been any pictures on the moon that they claimed the went to. It would've been too bright to take pictures, because the surface of the moon at pointblank range is brighter than the sun in the lunar darken sky without any atmospheric hinderance."

:jaw-dropp

From one of the prolific youtube trolls GuardianTrooper. When you believe in the Apollo moon hoax, it helps if you have the cognitive abilities of a garden shed.
 
Horatius said:
Well, no, but at least they died from Excessive Tiger Interaction*, and not cancer, like us!






*Tell your Homo erectus to speak to his shaman today about the heartbreak of ETI![/PSA]
Click to expand...

And when was the last time a Tiger died of cancer?. They haven't because they only eat raw meat.
 
Call Me Crazy But said:
From the wonderland called Icke

"On 911 did they make any attempt to catch people (in trampoline type things) who fell from the towers ? If not, why not ? I would have thought that plans would be in place for something like that."

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=242252

I know it's wrong but I couldn't stop the images that this put in my head.
Click to expand...

The idiocy on that thread continues.

Apparently they threw dead bodies out the windows. The evidence for it is faked, but they really did it anyway. Really.

I think they threw dead people they got from the morgue out the windows:

I do realize some pics are fake, but I still think they did that.

And the people who were doing the explosives in the towers, throwing the bodies, smoke machines, etc- they died in the towers. Less witnesses - don't have to be paid off & they can't turn against the top. Win situation for the planners for 911.
Click to expand...

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1061444330&postcount=4
 
Maybe epix meant that detergent and religion are both irritating. Did you ever get detergent in your eye? Ouch!
 
threadworm said:
Wow, that's pretty amazing info considering it's raw meat that gets cancer.
Click to expand...

The thing you have to remember about these people is that they always pick the opposite of whatever everyone else is doing. We all know that eating raw meat gives you cancer, but to them that's a CONSPIRACY to trick you into eating cooked meat which REALLY gives you cancer.

I think what happened to these people is that as kids they were playing opposite day one day and forgot the game is over.
 
Smoking and drinking will extend your lifespan and keep you healthy. Therefore all anti-smoking and anti-drinking campaigns are a conspiracy to kill you:
http://hawaiianlibertarian.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-longevity-paradox.html

EVERYONE knows smoking tobacco and drinking alcohol are bad for your health, right?!?!!!!?

Of course. We are all familiar with the stories of those who've been killed by drunk drivers. Of alcoholic parents who were abusive and neglectful.Of lifetime chain smokers who died of emphysema and lung cancer.

What is not commonly recognized however, is the role that these substances play in extending the longevity of most folks, when used over a lifetime of sensible moderation. In the statistical long run, the moderate consumption of alcohol and usage of tobacco products actually extend the lives of those who are able to do so without crossing the line of use into heavy overuse and abuse.

Statistically speaking, if we were to live in a world in which Alcohol and Tobacco were completely unregulated and ONLY controlled by social mores, MOST would not cross over into the threshold of addictive abuse...which would lead to increased longevity of the populace on average. Like anything else, you will always have a certain sub-section of people with addictive personalities and self-destructive tendencies who will eschew moderation. But overall, I believe most people wouldn't. And it would be even less harmful and destructive on a larger scale, if the large corporations that have gained control of the production of these substances did not exist to produce their corrupted fare for mass consumption.

This, in my humble opinion, is the ultimate rationale behind why it is official Government policy to allow the adulteration of these substances with harmful additives, why it discourages the sensible and moderate use of these substances, and why it produces deceptive and dishonest propaganda to keep the masses from discovering the long term health benefits of sensible, moderate usage.
Click to expand...

By his own admission he doesn't have actual proof that smoking is good for you, but he "knows" it to be true:
http://hawaiianlibertarian.blogspot...howComment=1366392742561#c1830228407947698072

However, I would warn ya'all not to expect some sort of iron clad, proof beyond a reasonable doubt kind of documentation...at least when it comes to smoking. This is more about a case I've put together in my mind regarding a lot of circumstantial evidence, rather than one research paper that convinced me of this point of view.
Click to expand...
 
dudalb said:
That is fine. So much more coffee for the rest of us.

The US Navy runs on coffee. The great Naval Historian Samuel E Morrison said it best when he wrote in his history of the US Navy In World War 2:

"The US Navy could probably win a war without coffee.But they would really not have to try it."
Click to expand...

Never drank any coffee in the RN.
When I was in it was Tea, Beer ration and Kai.

Now, at the risk of infringing the Official Secrets Act, the recipe for Kai

Break a bar of plain dark chocolate into pieces. at least 70% cocoa
Place pieces in a saucepan with hot water.
Heat up until the chocolate has melted.
Add one tin of condensed milk.
Bring to the boil and serve in mugs.
Add copious amounts of sugar

It's right when the spoon stands up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom