Ugly facts have a remarkable ability to kill beautiful theories. Best avoid them.
Sorry, jeffreyw, but since that essay contains a fantasy about the proto-planetary disk, nebular hypothesis model for solar system formation being falsified "extensively", you have wanted your time posting it.Here I have published the notion that our solar system has origins from different parts of the galaxy. ...very invalid essay snipped...
Whoops, jeffreyw: this is basically wrong. An object being in thermal equilibrium does not stop energy from being radiated from its surface - you are (roughly!) in thermal equilibrium and you have a temperature!I think the damnation of the stellar evolution models rests in their assumption that young stars are in local thermodynamic equilibrium.
This outright contradicts basic thermodynamics, because stars radiate.
You are wrong, jeffreyw, because it is impossible to see an exoplanet with the naked eye and the discoveries of exoplanets have been written down...Here I have made a video showing who made the discovery of the first exoplanet. Hint: ....
This is an academic who had probably access to thousands of dollars of grant money. He spoke English since he worked at Pennsylvania State University. He wrote down what he found.The first true extrasolar planet discovery came in 1994, when Dr. Alexander Wolszczan, a radio astronomer at Pennsylvania State University, reported what he called "unambiguous proof" of extrasolar planetary systems
Sorry, jeffreyw, but since that essay contains a fantasy about the
proto-planetary disk, nebular hypothesis model for solar system formation being falsified "extensively", you have wanted your time posting it.
There is a lot of evidence for the standard model of solar system formation including looking at soar systems being formed!
In this universe, jeffreyw, stars are seen to explode and the remains of those explosions are studied.I am a subscriber to uniformitarianism of stellar evolution. ...
Maybe you should add a score of the number of times jeffreyw cites cranks as if he cannot understand that they are cranks!Score update:
I know - judging by his inability to respond to any poster in this thread so far, I fear that jeffreyw is just spamming the forum.I fear you might be talking to yourself. Jeffery seems to have abandoned his unsupported musings on all things stellar.
I can't begin to tell you the beautiful theories I have had over time, and these even fit the facts I had available to me at the time (unlike jeffreyw's theory), only to have the entire theory killed by one or two new facts that were inconsistent with my theory. But then, my membership in the scientific conspiracy required me to kill it.
I once heard as a joke, that when asked about the controls to their experiments, a scientist says, "Controls? No way! I've had my ideas ruined by controls too often in the past!"
Nah he's been peddling his nonsense for a while, he's just moved on from here.I fear you might be talking to yourself. Jeffery seems to have abandoned his unsupported musings on all things stellar.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axwxPbrE5Yk
Here I have made a new video outlining why no protoplanetary disk is needed. It is called, "How Are Planets Formed".
Nah he's been peddling his nonsense for a while, he's just moved on from here.
Wrong jeffreyw: That is a video containing an ignorant fantasy about how planets were formed.Here I have made a new video outlining why no protoplanetary disk is needed. It is called, "How Are Planets Formed".
!He totally ignores this, Wolrab.Of you brave souls that did, does he explain how all these starplanets all end up orbiting in a plane around a central sun?
I am not watching his video. Of you brave souls that did, does he explain how all these starplanets all end up orbiting in a plane around a central sun?
I don't want to read the whole thread or watch his videos, did he try to explain away the fact that we've directly observed protoplanetary disks, or is he unaware or ignoring that?