Not true, not every solar event launched from the Solar Disc into space is liable to contact Earth's Magnetosphere.
true, but it all happens at the side of the sun facing the Earth ...
if you want to say something, then say what you mean, what you meant was events that would impact the earth and NOT earth facing stuff
but then, you don't care being specific in your wording now do you?
Well, the hypothesis is actually triggering not creates, an important distinction that recognises the stress is already present in the Earth's crust.
And actually HOW is it triggering the earthquake?
What is the mechanism?
I expect no answer.
Welll someone did not proof read their press release.
Consequently, the center of the holes stayed firmly pointed towards wind at Earth begin to slow down.
This is gramatically and physically not a correct sentence. Can
you haig explain what is meant with this sentence?
There are other trigger mechanisms
Then please clear us up with actually published papers on these triggers, or do you mean non-solar related mechanisms?
You and Bruce Tsurutani actually think that solar activity creating triggering earthquakes is so laughable and yet you both are unaware that studies have already taken place.
oh yes, completely
there is one (1) peer reviewed paper, talking about this, which came to a negative conclusion. The authors are investigating precursors of earthquakes, something that is being done at my institute too with the DEMETER mission.
The Love & Thomas 2013 paper has been cited once (by themselves) and no refutation of their results has been published so far.
To argue
your case, there is one chinese paper by Han et al. which relate the triggering of some very specific earthquakes to heating of the rock by eddy currents. But then the question is WHY do
I have to make
your case? Why can't you find appropriate peer reviewed papers? Lazyness I guess, it is much easier to watch boobtube than to actually try to find out something.
Here's one paper from 2013
Insignificant solar-terrestrial triggering of earthquakes PDF
As the title suggests, they couldn't confirm any statistical significant relationship between solar-terrestrial variables and earthquake occurrence.
It was a historical statistical analysis but
NOT recognising that all solar activity on the solar disc is
NOT "Earth facing" A lot misses Earth by being too North or South also Forward or Behind yet it was all regarded as the same risk. The current view doesn't make that error.
Yes stuff misses the earth, and who cares.
You don't have a model,
haig, only if you answer finally, how exactly a CME is supposed to trigger an earthquake, then we can discuss something for real. But how much energy is in a CME. how much of it is actually transferred to the magnetosphere, and how much of that (most of which is transformed from magnetic energy to particle energy of the plasma in the magnetosphere, i.e. heating) could be used to trigger an earthquake?
I am glad that now we are at "triggering" and earthquake and not creating an earthquake.
However, they finish be saying this ...
That what's happening here and
No, that is NOT being done, at least now at what you have presented that can be read (I don't do boobtube). Just doing correlation, to repeat once more, does not show anything UNLESS you have an underlying model. And Mr. SuspiciousObserver together with Holloman and U-yen have all no, zero, zilch knowledge about earthquakes, the former two not even about physics period. So why would we believe anything they are claiming within the wooniverse of Mr. Davidson?