Haig and his Sun caused earthquakes

I have not looked at Ben Davidson's tweets before. It certainly exposes his stupidity.
Outgoing longwave radiation
Outgoing Longwave Radiation (OLR) is the energy radiating from the Earth as infrared radiation at low energy to Space.
OLR is electromagnetic radiation emitted from Earth and its atmosphere out to space in the form of thermal radiation.
Click to expand...
Ben Davidson tweeted:
Nov 10: Chile/Peru have OLR anomalies and TEC/Ionospheric anomalies.
Nov 11: A small but strong OLR anomaly is seen over Central America.
Nov 13: OLR analysis in the AM. [but seems to never appear!]
Nov 18? OLR anomalies shifting east from Greece.
This seems to be the idiocy that OLR anomalies cause earthquakes. OLR anomalies are actually indicators of cloud coverage. Outgoing Longwave Radiation (OLR)
The raw data are converted into a standardized anomaly index. Negative (Positive) OLR are indicative of enhanced (suppressed) convection and hence more (less) cloud coverage typical of El Niño (La Niña) episodes. More (Less) convective activity in the central and eastern equatorial Pacific implies higher (lower), colder (warmer) cloud tops, which emit much less (more) infrared radiation into space.
Click to expand...
Those "OLR anomalies shifting east from Greece" are probably clouds drifting east from Greece :eek:!
 
Last edited:
Do you know what? I know a lady, and, to put it politely, she is kind of 'out of action' for a few days a month. Whenever I check with earthquake data, there seems to be one at the precise time that that she is 'out of action'. Kind of weird, huh? Anybody think that there might be something in this, or should I just go back to boring old geology, tectonics etc?
 
jonesdave116 said:
Do you know what? I know a lady, and, to put it politely, she is kind of 'out of action' for a few days a month. Whenever I check with earthquake data, there seems to be one at the precise time that that she is 'out of action'. Kind of weird, huh? Anybody think that there might be something in this, or should I just go back to boring old geology, tectonics etc?
Click to expand...

Your anecdote is 73% more reliable than anything Haig has dribbled into the thread.
 
Ben Davidson goes on about SOHO data "dropouts" as if they were a conspiracy to hide CME data from him :p.
What he does not mention or is unaware of is that the SOHO spacecraft is not in 24 hour communications with the Earth. SOHO communicates via the Deep Space Network and has a few ours a day allocated to it. Even then there is a ~1 hour telemetry buffer delay.
SOHO/LASCO 1. Why is there a 16 hour gap in the "real-time" movie ?
 
Thanks for sharing guys :D

Ben finishes his enhanced earthquake watch with a review from the 8th to 19th Nov including success in the M7 quake and with a two day prior earthquake warning for the both the Solomon Is and Argentina. :thumbsup:

Ben on twitter
‏
@TheRealS0s We should also monitor the OLR over Solomon Is., Argentina to determine what is rain/pre-quake signals on the charts.

6:49 p.m. - 17 Nov 2015
Click to expand...


M7 Earthquake - Predicted, Magnetic Storm | S0 News Nov.19.2015


Give credit where credit is due guys :D
 
Haig said:
M7 Earthquake - Predicted, Magnetic Storm | S0 News Nov.19.2015
Click to expand...

More hindsight predictions. I'm glad Ben-who-is-not-Haig-:rolleyes: cherrypicked a run of the mill uneventful shake in the border of my country (M4.6 measured locally). He missed the one a few days earlier 500 miles SSE of that, magnitude 5.8; and he missed also the one 250 miles SE of that position, magnitude 5.9, very shallow, knocking down a few dozen buildings from 1880-1910, that killed a 93 y.o. lady just one month ago.

It's interesting to hear the special interest of Ben-who-is-not-Haig regarding my country and saying "taking a tremor not as large, but again..." (there never was a first instance) "...Argentina doesn't shake as often as Chile and Peru" while he's ignoring 6 quakes magnitude from 5.0 to 5.9 (reported as even more intense by the Usaian USGS using remote means) in my country during the previous 30 days, including the one I described.

So the pattern of ill-intentioned cherrypicking with commercial purposes shown by Ben-who-is-not-Haig and parroted here by Haig-who-is-not-Ben is basically this:

  • Making some "tea leaves" reading using assorted colourful data, like A-K index or OLR maps. This changes permanently as the deception is called off (changes are introduced as "improvement of the technique")
  • Betting about some quakes in some fuzzy areas for some dates
  • Shouting success when luck makes a big quake to match a prediction (the Jeane Dixon effect)
  • Mumbling excuses when some run of the mill quake happens within the parameters of the prediction or when a quake happens on a different time frame and region.
  • Keeping the mouth shout when it all fails miserably
 
Haig said:
You're welcome aleCcowaN :) Glad to have you on our side ;)

Why don't you follow Ben on twitter for early warnings of eathquakes triggered by the Sun :thumbsup:
Click to expand...

Haig-who-is-not-Ben, you got it all wrong again, as usual. I thought you have definitively caved in and abandoned such wrong ways, but I see the easy money is still a temptation.

As a side note, the "I am predicting something each day" is so exaggerated that I predict it to be short-lived. There's a pattern of fatigue in subscribers to Ben-who-is-not-Haig's, always around 30,000 views to each crap video though the number of subscribers who didn't cancelled their subscription yet continue to grow and people continue to be driven away by their remaining shards of common sense.
 
aleCcowaN said:
Haig-who-is-not-Ben, you got it all wrong again, as usual. I thought you have definitively caved in and abandoned such wrong ways, but I see the easy money is still a temptation.

As a side note, the "I am predicting something each day" is so exaggerated that I predict it to be short-lived. There's a pattern of fatigue in subscribers to Ben-who-is-not-Haig's, always around 30,000 views to each crap video though the number of subscribers who didn't cancelled their subscription yet continue to grow and people continue to be driven away by their remaining shards of common sense.
Click to expand...


He who laughs last aleCcowaN :D
 
Haig: Ben Davidson tweets his ignorant delusions about OLR again

Haig said:
Ben finishes ...
Click to expand...
With his usual ignorance and delusions, Haig :p.

19November 2015 Haig: Ben Davidson tweets his ignorant delusions about outgoing longwave radiation (OLR).
20 November 2015 Haig: Ben Davidson tweets his ignorant delusions about outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) again!
17 Nov: We should also monitor the OLR over Solomon Is., Argentina to determine what is rain/pre-quake signals on the charts.

20 November 2015 Haig: Links to Ben Davidson lying about predicting an M7 quake.
 
Haig said:
He who laughs last aleCcowaN :D
Click to expand...

That emoticon hides you're not laughing today.

When you have a false advocacy like sun-caused earthquakes you have to resort to propaganda and bits that sound optimistic. If we can trust in something lasting is that you'll keep embraced to this nonsense and become more delusional in the future for this thread to keep account of that for others to learn.

Enough with you and let's define some ground data:

Each year...

... there are about 16 earthquakes M7.0 or higher -about one each three weeks-
... there are about 135 earthquakes M6.0 to 6.9 -almost three per week-
... there are about 1650 earthquakes M5.0 to 5.9 -almost five a day-

That's why the mention of that Argentine earthquake because of some OLR weather anomalies around Peru and Chile ends up being such a blunder.

The ignorance of that social parasite Ben D. is limitless.
 
aleCcowaN said:
That emoticon hides you're not laughing today.

When you have a false advocacy like sun-caused earthquakes you have to resort to propaganda and bits that sound optimistic. If we can trust in something lasting is that you'll keep embraced to this nonsense and become more delusional in the future for this thread to keep account of that for others to learn.

Enough with you and let's define some ground data:

Each year...

... there are about 16 earthquakes M7.0 or higher -about one each three weeks-
... there are about 135 earthquakes M6.0 to 6.9 -almost three per week-
... there are about 1650 earthquakes M5.0 to 5.9 -almost five a day-

That's why the mention of that Argentine earthquake because of some OLR weather anomalies around Peru and Chile ends up being such a blunder.

The ignorance of that social parasite Ben D. is limitless.
Click to expand...

But, but...

The sun was shining somewhere for ALL of those earthquakes!
 
Haig said:
You guys need a recap ;)

The Sun and Earthquakes

Once you understand that then ...

... these updates HERE show and explain what's happening :D
Click to expand...

Sales are your passion. You try to sell, even when your product is defective and you've already tried to sell it. That's called spam. And you were kinda making yourself a laughing stock here recently.

But I see your training in sales told you to never accept rejection and to try to sell your product anyway.

For the rest of the readers: the first link was analysed and rejected earlier in this thread. The second one is, again, a link to the general youtube page of Ben-who-is-not-Haig that Haig-who-is-not-Ben has posted here dozens of times. This Haig person is basically spamming "deedle-dee, earthquakes!" once and again, can't explain what he's selling and evades engagement in any kind of intellectual debate.
 
aleCcowaN said:
For the rest of the readers: the first link was analysed and rejected earlier in this thread. The second one is, again, a link to the general youtube page of Ben-who-is-not-Haig that Haig-who-is-not-Ben has posted here dozens of times. This Haig person is basically spamming "deedle-dee, earthquakes!" once and again, can't explain what he's selling and evades engagement in any kind of intellectual debate.
Click to expand...


Mmmm "analysed and rejected" you say ... I missed that ... care to link to it? ;)

All I see is ad homs and abuse, is THAT what you claim as analysed and rejected?

One test of a science hypothesis is if it can make successful predictions.

He has been doing that and becoming more and more accurate as he refines his hypothesis.
 
I have to congratulate suspiciousHaig for predicting an earthquake exactly as it was:

219rmux.png


Linky

The predicted quake (exact time and magnitude)

It was predicted four hours before it happened, wasn't it? Way to do! Tea leaves and OLR anomalies really work!!!
 
haig said:
Mmmm "analysed and rejected" you say ... I missed that ... care to link to it?
Click to expand...


How about it aleCcowaN ? I've already asked nicely. Have you got a source for that claim "analysed and rejected" ? :D

Put up or shut up :p
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom