There is no paranormal things in homeopathic potencies

we are not interested in winning any prize we are in a position to award prizes. You can win a prize if you could justify yourself what you are saying.
 
Dr. MAS said:
I am going to invite you and your all family members (aliases you have). :D
Click to expand...
Wasn't it you who asked, in another thread, if people accusing others of having aliases without providing evidence, could be banned for it?

Hans :rolleyes:
 
Dr. MAS said:
we are not interested in winning any prize we are in a position to award prizes. You can win a prize if you could justify yourself what you are saying.
Click to expand...

Fine:

I am saying that you cannot distinguish a remedy of 12C or higher from a blank that is prepared in the same way, but without starting substance.

I am also saying that if you make a double blind placebo controlled test of homeopatic treatment, you will not be able to distinguish it from placebo.

....
Where's me prize?

Want more?

I am also saying that you will not be able to defend the theortical idea of homeopathic remedies on a dose-dependent basis.

I am also saying that you will not be able to present a viable theory on how remedies are able to have other effects than those of chemically identical controls (whether they contain MT or not).

Hans
 
Dr. MAS said:
we are not interested in winning any prize we are in a position to award prizes. You can win a prize if you could justify yourself what you are saying.
Click to expand...

Do you speak for all homeopaths when you say 'we', or some specific subset that are willing to be represented by you?
 
petre said:
Do you speak for all homeopaths when you say 'we', or some specific subset that are willing to be represented by you?
Click to expand...
Interestingly, this slightly odd use of "we" is shared by Sheikh. I'm still wondering who else Sheikh was including when he said:
We will prove it with double blind test. if we will fail then we will leave homeopathic practice for ever.
Click to expand...
 
Mojo said:
Interestingly, this slightly odd use of "we" is shared by Sheikh. I'm still wondering who else Sheikh was including when he said:
Click to expand...

That's what I was trying to clear up. I was allowing for the fact that with a less-solid grasp of English, one might use 'we' in different ways than would normally be considered acceptable. Perhaps a clarification is forthcoming.
 
MRC_Hans said:
Fine:

I am saying that you cannot distinguish a remedy of 12C or higher from a blank that is prepared in the same way, but without starting substance.

I am also saying that if you make a double blind placebo controlled test of homeopatic treatment, you will not be able to distinguish it from placebo.

....
Where's me prize?

Want more?

I am also saying that you will not be able to defend the theortical idea of homeopathic remedies on a dose-dependent basis.

I am also saying that you will not be able to present a viable theory on how remedies are able to have other effects than those of chemically identical controls (whether they contain MT or not).

Hans
Click to expand...

You are eligible and qualified in preliminary test now provide the justification of your challenge / demand as MAS pointed out and win your prize. Easy job no problem. No filin of application too.
 
Dr. A Sheikh said:
We means mas and drmas.org members.
Click to expand...
Ah yes, I do love the drmas.org motto, it's so pithy and profound. What is it again? Ah yes...

This is the placeholder for domain hostingcare.net. If you see this page after uploading site content you probably have not replaced the index.html file.

This page has been automatically generated by Plesk.
Click to expand...

Superb.
 
Dr. A Sheikh said:
We means mas and drmas.org members.
Click to expand...
You posted:
Originally posted by Dr. A. Sheikh:
We will prove it with double blind test. if we will fail then we will leave homeopathic practice for ever.
Click to expand...
So Dr. MAS is included in the promise to prove that homoeopathy works in a double blinded test or quit homoeopathic practice.
 
Mojo said:
How about 7 days? ;)
Click to expand...

Just something finite was good with me. An open-ended duration promise is kind of weak:

I vow I will prove god exists before I die, or I will stop posting.

See, I'm pretty likely to stop posting anyway when I die, so it's not much of a statement.

ETA: Really, a more responsible duration would be, "We will prove homeopathy works in a double-blind test before we treat another patient"
 
petre said:
Just something finite was good with me. An open-ended duration promise is kind of weak:

I vow I will prove god exists before I die, or I will stop posting.

See, I'm pretty likely to stop posting anyway when I die, so it's not much of a statement.

ETA: Really, a more responsible duration would be, "We will prove homeopathy works in a double-blind test before we treat another patient"
Click to expand...

If you don't, where should we send the one million dollars?
 
Rasmus said:
If you don't, where should we send the one million dollars?
Click to expand...

Well, assuming I can find someone willing to notarize an application from the deceased, I'd consider investing heavily in any research in returning spirits to corporeal form :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom