Loose Change - Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
WildCat said:
.....What is it w/ these people and movies? Does everything have to be in movie form to be admissable as evidence?
Click to expand...

I have noticed that too, Wildcat; it seems that virtually every thread is some type of video, usually "proving" a particular POV.

My hypothesis is that many of who we are talking to over there are fairly young (20-somethings) who have grown up and with video and computer/internet all of their lives. To them, what is on tape and played over the net IS REALITY--and they accept it as same. I won't say all of us here are old fogeys, but most of us have been known to read a book or to or search for solid and verifiable sources, with the math and science to back it up.

And that, IMHO, is very scary for the future. Very scary indeed.
 
Hutch said:
I have noticed that too, Wildcat; it seems that virtually every thread is some type of video, usually "proving" a particular POV.

My hypothesis is that many of who we are talking to over there are fairly young (20-somethings) who have grown up and with video and computer/internet all of their lives. To them, what is on tape and played over the net IS REALITY--and they accept it as same. I won't say all of us here are old fogeys, but most of us have been known to read a book or to or search for solid and verifiable sources, with the math and science to back it up.

And that, IMHO, is very scary for the future. Very scary indeed.
Click to expand...
Don't worry. I was young and stupid once, too--and not terribly long ago.
 
chucksheen said:
I challenge any rational, reasonable, critical thinker here.

Here is the challenge should you accept:

a) Visit UniversalSeed.org
b) Watch all documentaries and get informed
c) Form an opinion
d) Respond and THEN debunk the claims

Practice tollerance. Character assasination attempts help no one. I am looking for informed, honest, researched discussion. I have looked at all the information put forth advocating the official story. If you have smoking guns I will be willing to listen to you AFTER you watch the documentaries/films.

UniversalSeed.org, for all your truth needs. If you're not appalled, you're not paying attention. Wilfull ignorance and childish naivity is like blood to the coyotes, we can smell/taste the ignorance.
Click to expand...


Dear CHUCKSHEEN,

Thank you for your submission of _STOCK PHRASES_ and _CHEST BEATING COMMENTARY_.

We regret that we must refuse your sumbission for now as it:

( ) Does not suit our present needs
( ) Clashes with the decor
( ) Is not OCEA certified
(*) We already have ample supply of _STOCK PHRASES & CHEST BEATING COMMENTARY_

Please note that if 'ample supply' is checked, we request that you do not resubmit your submission, as in many cases a little of these things goes a long way.

Thank you for your continued interest,

The Management
 
Hutch said:
I have noticed that too, Wildcat; it seems that virtually every thread is some type of video, usually "proving" a particular POV.

My hypothesis is that many of who we are talking to over there are fairly young (20-somethings) who have grown up and with video and computer/internet all of their lives. To them, what is on tape and played over the net IS REALITY--and they accept it as same. I won't say all of us here are old fogeys, but most of us have been known to read a book or to or search for solid and verifiable sources, with the math and science to back it up.

And that, IMHO, is very scary for the future. Very scary indeed.
Click to expand...

Chucksheen's: "Here is the challenge should you accept" did sound alot like "Mission Impossible".
 
chucksheen said:
I challenge any rational, reasonable, critical thinker here...[typical CT stupidity that proves he doesn't know the meaning of rational, reasonable, or critical...or thinker for that matter]
Click to expand...

Welcome, chucksheen. Assuming that you're the real Chuck Sheen (and not just one of those lonely little boys who wishes he were), are you still dating whores?

(I know I know, ad hom, ad hom...)
 
Stellafane said:
Welcome, chucksheen. Assuming that you're the real Chuck Sheen (and not just one of those lonely little boys who wishes he were), are you still dating whores?

(I know I know, ad hom, ad hom...)
Click to expand...
Oh, leave him alone! He's only little - go pick on somebody your own size...

Anyway, welcome Chuck. In response to your challenge, how about you reading through every single post on this thread, then giving us your opinion?
 
chipmunk stew said:
I was never this stupid, though:
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=4831
Click to expand...

According to these CT nuts, there seems to have been an inordinate number of flashes of light that day (on the second plane, on helicopters, before and during the collapse). Wouldn't it be possible that it was because this was early in the morning and the sun was still low when these pictures were taken (thus these flashes could be simply light reflections on metal) ? Why jump to the conclusion that these were explosions?

100% proof? Give me a break.
 
Last edited:
Gravy said:
I'll admit I forgot that the sigs could be turned off. If I get more requests I'll reconsider what I've done. Here's why I posted the link in my sig:

Visibility: I've made 716 posts. If anyone, from here or via any search engine, goes to any post of mine, they'll see the links in my sig.

Flexibility: I've already revised the document twice, and plan to do so weekly.
Click to expand...

Great ressource, Gravy. Once again, you are our saviour.

Didn't expect to find some of my own posts in there. Thanks!
 
More from the wacky world

dubfan said:
If that wasn't enough to get your attention, the site also features a prominent, highlighted link to Jesse MacBeth.

FWIW, I started your challenge. Viewed Pentagon Strike, Thermite Experiments, South Tower Collapse, and of course, have already seen Loose Change.

Nothing new in any of these.

Not an auspicious debut, chuck.
Click to expand...

What amuses and frightens me at the same time about these conspiracy theories is that they all seem to wind down to the same basic idea, in the end: rehashing the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion." In the end, they all blame the same target: Satan's tools, the evil Jews.

If there hadn't been so much genocidal slaughter over the centuries because of this idiotic theory -- more survivable than cockroaches after a nuclear war -- it would be funny.

And if there really was a "Jewish conspiracy," I'd be earning a LOT more money.
 
So that's three JREF bans in one day at LC? Does anyone have any idea why? Did group 2 forget to stay after class?
Click to expand...

Four. I was also suspended. No idea why.
 
Thanks for the welcome and more on 9/11 mania

Regnad Kcin said:
Excellent post, Kiwiwriter. And welcome to the forum!
Click to expand...

And your warm words.

I also applaud your use of Mr. Peabody as your avatar. He was always one of my favorite cartoon characters.

Back in my misspent days as a Navy radio broadcaster, I did Bullwinkle the Moose on radio spots, but we had a guy who did him better, so we did a spot in which Bullwinkle (him) pulls Marvin the Martian (me) out of that hat.

The conspiracy theories about 9/11 irritate me on so many levels. Not only because of my intense dislike of such nonsense, but because I'm on Newark's Emergency Operations and Homeland Security Committees. On 9/11, I wrote the press releases and statements from the city to our residents from our command center. All the federal, state, county, and city agencies were there, activated.

I can assure you...they were taken by complete surprise, too.

Another one that irritates me is the story that 4,000 Jews were "warned to leave" New York and the World Trade Center. Those obviously did not include my brother, my wife, my best friend's wife, the executive director of the Port Authority (Neil Levin); and the executive secretary of the PA, who was a high school classmate, Daniel Bergstein. The latter two died in the North Tower.

It never ceases to amaze me that people can understand extremely complicated conspiracy theories, heavily dependent on "dangerous speculation," but can't accept or understand simple answers. I often wonder if the conspiracy theory precedes the event or the other way around.
 
1984 meets 9/11

Arkan_Wolfshade said:
Well that's double-plus ungood!
Click to expand...

Obviously, you don't "bellyfeel Ingsoc."

I'm amused that the authors of a conspiracy theory DVD that questions the government would ban commentary on their own words. But I've noticed a similar thing in Holocaust denial...they will tolerate no criticism of Adolf Hitler, no matter how mild.

"Loose Change is double-plus goodful duckspeak!" :D
 
Kiwiwriter said:
Obviously, you don't "bellyfeel Ingsoc."

I'm amused that the authors of a conspiracy theory DVD that questions the government would ban commentary on their own words. But I've noticed a similar thing in Holocaust denial...they will tolerate no criticism of Adolf Hitler, no matter how mild.

"Loose Change is double-plus goodful duckspeak!" :D
Click to expand...

Loose change forum rectify. Milliplentyfy skeptic thoughtcrime. Rectify. Skeptic unperson. Minitrue forum plusgood Goodthink. Dylan Avery doubleplusgood!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom