Killtown: some unanswered questions

I've never met any first responders or investigators personally. I don't believe they were all in on the plan. I've read and researched loads of testimony. I believe that a transparent investigation would have produced a more clear account of the event and less inconsistancies, anomolies and questions. I personally would not trust anything from the first responders/investigators inherently because I believe they may have had involvement in drill teams. For the most part I have put aside the witness testimony for now to investigate other pressing questions. The evidence of complicity may be circumstancial or weak in some cases but in others it's clear and with the overwhelming amount of clues, smoking guns, red flags, coverups, etc., it paints a damning picture.

More likely, another, costly investigation would reach the same conclusion, assuming reasonable people would conduct it. And that would say a lot about the twoofers' ability to research. Hey! Maybe we SHOULD have another go at it.

Physical evidence is one of the easiest things to fake.

In Clancy novels, maybe.

I find it hard to believe that the tail incinerated while a bandana and paper survived unscathed.

Don't you guys read ANYTHING ? I've seen that one debunked about four months ago.

I was under the impression that the tail was made of titanium and the ground was soft. I have seen other tails survive crashes that seem WAY more believable.

Boy, those conspirators really are clumsy.

I believe an explosion/detonation is what caused the holes in the inner rings. I have speculated on the exact device used but I remain open minded.

Careful nothing falls out of there.
 
Notice to anyone else how chooses to debate with me. If you insult me, I won't debate with you anymore. If I insult you, you shouldn't debate with me anymore either.
Gives you an easy out, doesn't it? Such as in this exchange:

Killtown said:
(DJLegacy2k1 @ Aug 14 2006, 03:41 PM)Some people here ALWAYS have an excuse not to answer questions...
whistlingb.gif

Hey look, it's piece of ◊◊◊◊ DumbJLegacy!

Hi!

wave.gif
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=10490&view=findpost&p=6692274
 
chucksheen;1842398 For the most part I have put aside the witness testimony for now to investigate other pressing questions. [/QUOTE said:
"Putting aside" witness testimony huh? Usually a sure fire way to finding the truth :)
 
Just so all of you know, chucksheen gets 5 dollars from his Illuminati handler everytime he whores universalseed.
 
If the quotes attributed to you are correct, mv had it right in one.
My comment was childish, but was born of frustration at Killtown's daily refusal to answer my questions, and his deletion of my comments on his blog that conclusively refuted his claims. But I needn't have stooped to calling him dumb. His website and forum posts are ample proof of his intellect.
 
Please, everyone take a deep breath and step away from the keyboard for a minute. I understand that 9/11 is an extemely volatile topic, but please stick to arguing the topic and not insulting other posters. Thank you.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson
 
Last edited:
I might add that United 585 (a 737) nose-dived into the ground in a way very similar to United 93 (although there were probably differences in speed), and also in a similar type of terrain. Again, few recognizable pieces of aircraft were left, and certainly no complete tail sections were present.
OMFG!!11111!1!! This must have been the practice run for Flight 93!!!1!!1!!!11

:D
 
Interesting how paper survived that impact too.

This is not uncommon. For one example I remember a high speed impact of an F-111 that spread debris for miles; but a book of postage stamps one of the aircrew was carrying survived.
 
This is not uncommon. For one example I remember a high speed impact of an F-111 that spread debris for miles; but a book of postage stamps one of the aircrew was carrying survived.

This shows the danger of forming opinions based on gut feelings about issues outside your area of expertise.

It seems that paper shouldn't survive something like the crash into the WTC. On the basis of that premise, concluding that the passports were planted is the simplest explanation.

However, a little bit of research shows that it is not uncommon for paper to survive something like this. Therefore, the assumption that paper shouldn't have survived the crash is not logical and the conclusion that the passports were planted becomes the more convoluted option.

Edited to add: I am not saying that you thought this way. Its the metaphorical you.
 
Last edited:
It seems that both Killtown and Chucksheen have gone away? It is a shame.
 
I find it hard to believe that the tail incinerated while a bandana and paper survived unscathed.

You dont usually break any soft object by throwing into the ground. Isn't funny that not very many hard objects prone to shattering survived?

Next, nothing incinerated. Incineration inplies burning to ashes. Was the tail burned to ashes, or was it fragmented?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom