Plume in Flight 93 photo is different

Is the plume in this photo from Flight 93 crashing?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 129 90.8%
  • No.

    Votes: 13 9.2%

  • Total voters
    142
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't know how

O.K., stick a fork in him. Kurzburg's done.

"I don't know how"?????
"I DON'T" frikkin' well "know HOW"?????????????????

Hey Kurztown--sorry, Killburg--with this final confession that you just plucked your entire "case" against Ms. McClatchey out of thin air, will you NOW turn your blog into a dedicated apology page?

And then go to your Mossad paymasters and ask them what's next on the Giant List of eeeeeevil Zionist plans. Perhaps training Bigfoot to use telekinesis to kill the reincarnated spirit of JFK?

If you can't prove to me that you AREN'T training Bigfoot, you realize, we're going to have say that that's another closed case.
 
I'm not scared of the "Mossad."

Killtown, I showed you how to do it. It's ruddy simple.

If you don't know how to do it, then what the heck are your claims based on? Video with no measurements of a weapons test, that's your evidence? I remind you, you are the one who brought up this subject. Our derivations don't even need to consider the fireball (yet you ignored them anyway).
 
I can't believe you guys can't give me your fireball estimates so we can move on? What are you guys waiting for?
 
I don't know how and if I did, you guys would say i was trying to low-ball the width to my favor

Stop it, right there. It isn't a matter of favour or who's right, here. We're not playing games. We're discussing an event that killed THOUSANDS, that day.

Maybe if we drop the BS and focus on what we actually know, instead of looking for useless estimates for a complex event that you, sir, can't possibly understand, we'd get somewhere.

Of course, we wouldn't, really, because the only evidence we have for that explosion is the photograph, which an expert told us, and I agree, cannot be used to conclusively draw a conclusion.

I'm sorry, Killtown, was this post too long for you ? I don't tend to tailor my posts for people suffering from attention deficit disorder.
 
I'm not scared of the "Mossad."

Killtown, I showed you how to do it. It's ruddy simple.

If you don't know how to do it, then what the heck are your claims based on? Video with no measurements of a weapons test, that's your evidence? I remind you, you are the one who brought up this subject. Our derivations don't even need to consider the fireball (yet you ignored them anyway).
Well if you are so smart, what are you waiting for? post your estimates so we can move on to the next stage and hopefully finish this experiment by X-mas.
 
Well if you are so smart, what are you waiting for? post your estimates so we can move on to the next stage and hopefully finish this experiment by X-mas.
It is your experiment. I have done every single thing for you except plug in the numbers, and hold your hand.

But you'd rather go watch videos. That is NOT our problem.
 
I don't know how and if I did, you guys would say i was trying to low-ball the width to my favor, so to avoid all that and since YOU seem to know how to do it, give me your estimates.

I am having trouble typing because I'm laughing so hard.
Do you think he realises what he just said?
 
It is your experiment. I have done every single thing for you except plug in the numbers, and hold your hand.

But you'd rather go watch videos. That is NOT our problem.
If you don't know how to figure your fireball size estimates, that's ok. there is nothing to be ashamed about. Just ask one of your OCT friends to help you.
 
If you don't know how to figure your fireball size estimates, that's ok. there is nothing to be ashamed about. Just ask one of your OCT friends to help you.

Won't work here. It is patently obvious who knows how to figure, and who does not.

So, given that you have no evidence for your alternate theory, will you be altering your blog and apologizing?
 
"I am rubber, you are glue..."

Every time I think you're done, you top yourself. I Told You how to compute it. You Said that you still didn't know how.

Now read back what you just said, and try not to laugh.
 
Possibly. But I'm more interested in your work than the numbers themselves. How did you come up with those numbers? Be explicit.
 
Hi everyone,

Not sure who is familiar with this article, but I've come across an article from the Pittsburg Tribune-Review talking about the debris field from UA93. It even includes a map. Not the direction of the debris field from impact... neatly fits in with the mushroom plume drift direction.

Crash debris found 8 miles away

The debris field

-Andrew
 
Sorry, in that case, your answer is totally wrong. You can't add a speed to a length. Do you understand this?

This is why the method is more important than the numbers. Anybody can make up a number. You appear to have made up more than your share.
 
Sorry, in that case, your answer is totally wrong. You can't add a speed to a length. Do you understand this?

This is why the method is more important than the numbers. Anybody can make up a number. You appear to have made up more than your share.
Ok, so what are your best estimates of the min/max width of the fireball? I would really, really, really, like to know this so we can move on to the color change of the plume (if there is any color change).
 
Hi everyone,

Not sure who is familiar with this article, but I've come across an article from the Pittsburg Tribune-Review talking about the debris field from UA93. It even includes a map. Not the direction of the debris field from impact... neatly fits in with the mushroom plume drift direction.

Crash debris found 8 miles away

The debris field

-Andrew
Excellent work!

Since smoke is a special class of "debris," namely ultra-fine particulate soot, the plume necessarily expanded to be larger than the area in the map, which considered heavier-than-air fragments only.

Surprising no one, of course, except for Killtown. But perhaps he can be taught.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom