Windows Breaking From Heat

TruthSeeker1234

Banned
T
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
1,756
In another thread I had said:
Actually, the 1st interstate bank building in Los Angeles is quite like the twin towers - square footprint, tube-within-a-tube steel superstructure, 67 stories.
3 1/2 hour fire, far hotter than WTC, as evidenced by breaking windows. No breaking windows from heat at WTC.
Click to expand...

To which MRC Hans asked:

Oh? What then are all those holes from which flames and smoke is seen belching? Toilet vents?
Click to expand...

The answer is they are damage from aircraft impact, not windows breaking from heat. Clearly Hans is suggesting that heat broke windows at WTC. I think that's wrong. Can anyone provide evidence of windows breaking from heat at WTC? This would be video of windows popping out and falling, after the jet impacts are over with.

If someone can show this, I will stand corrected.
 
Between your post and Hans' reply, Mancman gave you an excellent answer. Why ignore it?
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
In another thread I had said:


To which MRC Hans asked:



The answer is they are damage from aircraft impact, not windows breaking from heat. Clearly Hans is suggesting that heat broke windows at WTC. I think that's wrong. Can anyone provide evidence of windows breaking from heat at WTC? This would be video of windows popping out and falling, after the jet impacts are over with.

If someone can show this, I will stand corrected.
Click to expand...

Seriously, what's the point? Say the windows didn't break from the heat. What does that mean?
 
Last edited:
TS1234, you've been proven wrong on every point you've tried to make here. And still, you go for more... amazing.
 
TroofSeeker1234, look up the video "September 11, 2001 - What we saw" and around approx 5:15 smoke starts to billow out from a window near the north-west top.

Given the amount of smoke coming out at that moment, I doubt somebody could be alive at that moment to smash the window. It didn't break from the impact either.
 
Last edited:
why must he make a new thread when his questions were addressed in the original thread they appeared in?
 
I have the fool on ignore, but I can get the gist from the replies here. Has he posted the physical properties of the type of glass on the affected floors? If not, then on what does he base his claims?

And does anyone know if he's apologized for his Holocaust denier remark?
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
In another thread I had said:


To which MRC Hans asked:



The answer is they are damage from aircraft impact, not windows breaking from heat. Clearly Hans is suggesting that heat broke windows at WTC. I think that's wrong. Can anyone provide evidence of windows breaking from heat at WTC? This would be video of windows popping out and falling, after the jet impacts are over with.

If someone can show this, I will stand corrected.
Click to expand...
and no, he never apologized
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
In another thread I had said:


To which MRC Hans asked:



The answer is they are damage from aircraft impact, not windows breaking from heat. Clearly Hans is suggesting that heat broke windows at WTC. I think that's wrong. Can anyone provide evidence of windows breaking from heat at WTC? This would be video of windows popping out and falling, after the jet impacts are over with.

If someone can show this, I will stand corrected.
Click to expand...

For clarity, to which WTC building are you referring?
 
This is ironic. I've had another CTist show me videos of windows breaking and smoke coming out and using that as evidence of controlled demolition. Now there are windows that didn't break and that's because of controlled demolition?

How are you supposed to argue against a conspiracy theory that has no form?
 
Johnny Pixels said:
This is ironic. I've had another CTist show me videos of windows breaking and smoke coming out and using that as evidence of controlled demolition. Now there are windows that didn't break and that's because of controlled demolition?

How are you supposed to argue against a conspiracy theory that has no form?
Click to expand...
"In the beginning, there was the plan
And the plan was without form or function
and the laborers did say unto supervision
"this is a crock of ***** and it doeth stink..."
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
In another thread I had said:


To which MRC Hans asked:



The answer is they are damage from aircraft impact, not windows breaking from heat. Clearly Hans is suggesting that heat broke windows at WTC. I think that's wrong. Can anyone provide evidence of windows breaking from heat at WTC? This would be video of windows popping out and falling, after the jet impacts are over with.

If someone can show this, I will stand corrected.
Click to expand...
You stand corrected, have you learned your lesson? Time will tell.

449fjf8.jpg


Repsoted from one of your other many threads, courtesy of Mancman(who you completely ignored because MRC Hans' reply was just below his).
 
Seriously, what's the point? Say the windows didn't break from the heat. What does that mean?
Click to expand...
It means that other fires in other buildings were hotter. Like the 1st interstate bank building, which did have windows popping out, and which burned for 3 1/2 hours, and which is still standing just fine.
 
Last edited:
I'm not interested in tables. It's too easy to just make up stuff and type it in. The whole point is we don't believe the government reports. I'm looking for actual evidence, that is videos of windows falling and flames licking out. Next best would be a set of two pictures of the same window taken at two different points in time.

Evidence please.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
I'm not interested in tables. It's too easy to just make up stuff and type it in. The whole point is we don't believe the government reports. I'm looking for actual evidence, that is videos of windows falling and flames licking out. Next best would be a set of two pictures of the same window taken at two different points in time.

Evidence please.
Click to expand...

Are you seriously claiming that if there is no photographic/video evidence of an event that it can not be established if it occurred or not?
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
I'm not interested in tables. It's too easy to just make up stuff and type it in. The whole point is we don't believe the government reports. I'm looking for actual evidence, that is videos of windows falling and flames licking out. Next best would be a set of two pictures of the same window taken at two different points in time.

Evidence please.
Click to expand...

why is it that truthers must have "photographic" or "video" evidence, despite the numerous TEXT written reports stating otherwise? What does a picture prove? It captures one moment in time, and depending on angle, lighting, the quality of the image and how close one is to taking that image, photo/video evidence doesn't prove anything except what was true at that one moment.

What if no one took a picture or videoed what you want? What then? are you just going ot say "well, that means it didn't happen" despite evidence and eye witness testimony?
 
Better yet, since you don't believe the table provided to be accurate; you provide a picture that shows it to be inaccurate.

ETA: We could provide videos/pics all day and you could come up with some excuse why they don't prove our claim. All you have to do is provide one, objective, corroboratable example that shows the table to be false to get it thrown out as evidence.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
I'm not interested in tables. It's too easy to just make up stuff and type it in.
Click to expand...

Isn't this your M.O.?

The whole point is we don't believe the government reports.
Click to expand...

Yes, that is the point! You refuse to consider anything but your hair-brained schemes.

I'm looking for actual evidence, that is videos of windows falling and flames licking out.
Click to expand...

No you're not! You demanding that others do the searching for you!

If the evidence is provided you will ignore it, run off and start another thread.

Stop wasting our time!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom