Star Wars Beam Weapon and the WTC Bathtub

TruthSeeker1234 said:
Please give a scientific explanation of how steel in a car melts and yet right next to the car there is paper not burned.

Please give a scientific explanation for why car engines spontaneously expoded.

Please give a scientific explanation for the small seismic readings in consideration of the potential energy.

Please give a scientific explanation for the multitude of round vertical cutouts.

Please give a scientific explanation for what happened to WTC3.

Please give a scientific explanation for the absence of building material inside WTC6.

Please give a scientific explanation for the disappearance of of the south wing of WTC4.
Click to expand...

Hey... stuff happens.
 
Please give a logical explaination how undated, uncredited photographs prove anything regarding 9/11.

Oh, never mind...you have been asked this question several times before by various posters and you have never responded.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Kent, I know you're smarter than this. The fact that you have resorted to playing dumb shows me that you guys don't have any scientific explanations for the data sets of Wood/Reynolds.

Kent, what I'm asking you to explain/debunk is the data in Wood/Reynolds, which the authors explain via beam weapons.
Click to expand...

There is nothing to debunk when you start with the dolts who propose a beam weapon! You are nuts, Wood is nuts, Reynolds is nuts. You have to be nuts to present evidence with no facts, zero calculations of merit.

So when you show your work we can start to help you with a beam weapon. But you must be nuts since there have been many posts that provided evidence why a beam weapon would not work. Did you miss it?

Only complete idiots would say a beam weapon did 9/11 and not explain how. The only question now is the number of people who believe it, and do we need to add your name to the list of idiots?

This has to be one of the top ten dumb ideas for why 9/11 happened.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Please give a scientific explanation of how steel in a car melts and yet right next to the car there is paper not burned.
Click to expand...
please provide evidence the steel melted as opposed to being crushed by debris

not that it matters, paper only needs to be a few inches away from a fire to keep from being burned

Please give a scientific explanation for why car engines spontaneously expoded.
Click to expand...
please provide evidence that any engines spontaneously exploded

Please give a scientific explanation for the small seismic readings in consideration of the potential energy.
Click to expand...
please provide evidence these seismic readings actually were small, comparing them to the kingdome doesnt count, they are two fundemantally different buildings, destroyed in 2 fundementally different manners

secondly, much of the potential energy went to destroying the rest of the building

and you truthers really shoudl get your stories straight, i got a guy on another forum telling me how the seismic evients were so large they prove explosives

Please give a scientific explanation for the multitude of round vertical cutouts.
Click to expand...
please explain why these are odd, what shape hole shoudl falling debris make?

Please give a scientific explanation for what happened to WTC3.
Click to expand...
2 110 story buildigns fell on it, it was crushed and burried

Please give a scientific explanation for the absence of building material inside WTC6.
Click to expand...
please provide evidence of an absence of material, high altitude photos dont show the interior well enough to draw conclusions

Please give a scientific explanation for the disappearance of of the south wing of WTC4.
Click to expand...
see explanation of WTC3
 
Only complete idiots would say a beam weapon did 9/11 and not explain how.
Click to expand...

It was powered by Karnak's Fire Crystal. You know. Magic.

Oh, and just so you know, TroofSeeker: Your physics aren't good enough for a movie. Or even Star Trek.
 
Last edited:
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Please give a scientific explanation of how steel in a car melts and yet right next to the car there is paper not burned.

Please give a scientific explanation for why car engines spontaneously expoded.

Please give a scientific explanation for the small seismic readings in consideration of the potential energy.

Please give a scientific explanation for the multitude of round vertical cutouts.

Please give a scientific explanation for what happened to WTC3.

Please give a scientific explanation for the absence of building material inside WTC6.

Please give a scientific explanation for the disappearance of of the south wing of WTC4.
Click to expand...

I think we've explained everything here except the "car engines spontaneously expoded" part, which I think is the first time I've sen you post it, and you haven't actually explained what it means to "spontaneously expode". Based on your past history, I'm guessing that's something else you've just pulled out of thin air.

Why should we spend any more time explaining things, when you simply won't accept our expanations, or offer any reason to reject them beyond your personal incredulity?

Seriously, there have been explanations for almost all of these. Why don't you post even one "scientific" explanation for why you don't accept them? Start with the "round holes", it shoulld be pretty easy. Once you've actually addressed the (unpaid!*) work I've done for you, we can move on.



*I should really post a greivance with F.A.L.S.E. What else is a union good for?
 
Quick question: If a million tons of dust hit the ground, and a million tons of concrete do the same, which one makes a bigger earthquake?
 
My God this woman is stupid. I just read the newest version of her paper. She shows a seismograph for an earlier earthquake in Manhattan and compares it to a seismograph from one of the towers falling. She says they look suspiciously different, and suggests it was altered. Well duh, one happened from a naturally occuring seismic event, while the other from a large building collapsing, they should look different.

Charles Darwin was wrong.
 
Its almost as if he's on auto pilot. He doesn't answer my questions and he doesn't seem to realize much of this was already covered.

But the first one is my favorite.

"Please give a scientific explanation of how steel in a car melts and yet right next to the car there is paper not burned."

Here's the picture by the way.
http://s18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image175.jpg
"Figure 66(o). Why doesn't the paper burn?"

A: The car was on fire. Burning debris caused car to catch on fire. It looks like there is burning around the car. Looks like some paper is on fire around the car? Some paper around the fire hasn't reached 451F.

B. Paper was made out of special fire proof materical made by the goverment to make cool looking gee wiz effect when cars burned along side paper piles. Guy took invisible space oribiting superlaser out on joy ride ....started frying cars for fun.

Truthseeker have you ever thought about seeking professional help? Honestly?
Does Judy honestly think the pentagon was hit my a laser beam also? I wonder if because she was in a coma for 10 years has anything to do with her poor mental condition.
 
My favorite "just asking questions" that Wood proposes is, "car burned, door handle mysteriously gone". Huh? Is her theory that space mounted death rays are stealing door handles?
 
Oh, look. More cars on fire.







Maybe it's just me but I don't see anything suspicious about cars catching fire during the events of September 11, 2001.

I also don't see any "melted" steel cars or any "spontaneously exploded car engines".

Does one require special troofseeker CT glasses for that?
 
Topspy said:
Quick question: If a million tons of dust hit the ground, and a million tons of concrete do the same, which one makes a bigger earthquake?
Click to expand...


Trick question. Only explosions make earthquakes.

-Gumboot
 
twinstead said:
If the US possessed a beam capable of that amount of damage the world would be ours for the taking. It would make nuclear weapons seem like messy child toys.

Who would need an excuse to go to war?
Click to expand...



Yeah but the Ion Cannon took forever to charge, and in that time NOD would hit you with their flame tanks, stealth units, and tiberium cyborgs...

Oh wait. We're talking about real life.

Sorry.

-Gumboot
 
gumboot said:
Trick question. Only explosions make earthquakes.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

( CT hat on )

It's true, it's true I tell you.
Felt like an explosion, with ground shaking
Click to expand...
Felt explosion with rumbling.
Click to expand...
like an explosion; thought it was an earthquake
Click to expand...
thought it could have been a sonic boom or distant explosion.
Click to expand...
sounded like explosion with 2-3 seconds of slight shaking; glasses rattled
Click to expand...
there was this tremendous BOOM which rattled windows and shook the house; thought it was an explosion of some sort.
Click to expand...
Felt like a small explosion.
Click to expand...

Etc, etc, etc

http://www.eas.slu.edu/Earthquake_Center/NEW/980115/980115fltrpt.html

See,only explosions cause earthquakes.

( CT hat off).
 
Last edited:
JamesB said:
My God this woman is stupid. I just read the newest version of her paper. She shows a seismograph for an earlier earthquake in Manhattan and compares it to a seismograph from one of the towers falling. She says they look suspiciously different, and suggests it was altered. Well duh, one happened from a naturally occuring seismic event, while the other from a large building collapsing, they should look different.

Charles Darwin was wrong.
Click to expand...
You can't be serious; I'm amazed she was even allowed to teach at a University.

If she actually bothered to research things she'd have known that earthquakes initially produce seismic wave forms called P Waves, then S Waves. P for primary as these are the fastest wave forms and thus are recorded on the seismograph first and S for secondary.

The WTC collapse caused what's known as Rayleigh Waves.

So the fact that these seismic wave forms are completely different because they are produced by two totally different events (as you say) is it any wonder they are different, jeez.
 
Last edited:
LashL said:
Oh, look. More cars on fire.





[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_11103455aaab1c9160.jpg[/qimg][qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_11103455aaac1003af.jpg[/qimg]

Maybe it's just me but I don't see anything suspicious about cars catching fire during the events of September 11, 2001.

I also don't see any "melted" steel cars or any "spontaneously exploded car engines".

Does one require special troofseeker CT glasses for that?
Click to expand...

Apparently you do, along with the evapourating steel, and rocket-propelled debris.

But also note, the front of that one car is on fire, but the back is pristine! How can that happen, regardless of how the fire starts? Maybe because fire spreads upwards a lot easier than sideways?

Haven't any of these people ever played with a fireplace or bonfire? You usually have to move the logs around a bit to get the ends to burn completely, and they're only a few inches away from the center of the fire, and they're made of wood, not steel....Again, more evidence for my "Troothers never actually do anything real" theory. They've never built anything, taken anything apart, knocked anything down, or set anything on fire. I always thought the "get off your couch" thing was just a bit of baseless taunting, but now I'm not so sure......
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Please give a scientific explanation of how steel in a car melts and yet right next to the car there is paper not burned.

Please give a scientific explanation for why car engines spontaneously expoded.

Please give a scientific explanation for the small seismic readings in consideration of the potential energy.

Please give a scientific explanation for the multitude of round vertical cutouts.

Please give a scientific explanation for what happened to WTC3.

Please give a scientific explanation for the absence of building material inside WTC6.

Please give a scientific explanation for the disappearance of of the south wing of WTC4.
Click to expand...


You mean you HAVEN'T read my response ?
 
Horatius said:
Apparently you do, along with the evapourating steel, and rocket-propelled debris.

But also note, the front of that one car is on fire, but the back is pristine! How can that happen, regardless of how the fire starts? Maybe because fire spreads upwards a lot easier than sideways?

Haven't any of these people ever played with a fireplace or bonfire? You usually have to move the logs around a bit to get the ends to burn completely, and they're only a few inches away from the center of the fire, and they're made of wood, not steel....Again, more evidence for my "Troothers never actually do anything real" theory. They've never built anything, taken anything apart, knocked anything down, or set anything on fire. I always thought the "get off your couch" thing was just a bit of baseless taunting, but now I'm not so sure......
Click to expand...
I think they all expect that an explosive charge is supposed to detonate under the rear axle and flip the car over, blowing the doors open in the process.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom