Discussion of the Pentagon taxi cab driver's impossible account.

It is being compiled and will be released as soon as possible hopefully by the end of the month.

The taxi cab info presented is relevant and already released information that can spark discussion about the subject.

Although I am claiming that my beliefs of the "impossibility" of his account are verified by this unreleased evidence.....the discussion is only meant to be strictly on the merits of Lloyd's claim.

Thank you for conceding that his account is implausible. Others already have as well.

In fact nobody has doubted that it is implausible except for one guy that preferred "improbable".

Do any of you jref'ers consider Lloyd's account to not be implausible?

Better way to word it......

Reader poll:

"DO YOU BELIEVE LLOYD ENGLAND'S ACCOUNT IS IMPLAUSIBLE?"

Yes or no answers only please.

I'll answer your question once you answer mine.

Have you performed any calculations supporting your work? Yes or no?
 
Regardless of the opposing force of the weight of the car......

there is no super force field on the hood that would save it from being scratched.

The name of that "super force field" would be the dashboard.

LLOYD: The dashboard held it up.
RUSSELL: Was it resting on the hood or was it up [still gesturing up]
LLOYD: I can't say, I don't know. But it was out here.

One must wonder if you even listen to your own evidence......



Actually, one doesn't wonder, one pretty much knows.....
 
I believe it is impossible.

I am simply curious as to how many of you are as stupid as I am.
So?
Fixed that for you... :rolleyes:

Please stop the insults, and don't use the quote function to misquote users.

Lyte Trip's actual remark is in post #659.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Patricio Elicer
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You don't quite get it do you Trip?

I don't like the way you keep using the word implausible, but just for you.

Any one outcome, regarding the taxi/pole, is as implausible as any other.

Why?

If a 757 knocks over a light pole onto the highway what is so implausible about a car being hit?


The implausible aspect are the details of LLoyd's account.

Pole speared through the windshield..........car skidding sideways to a complete stop with the pole remaining speared in the car........hood remains unscratched.

None of these details about Lloyd's account are up for debate as they have been repeated many times.

Is his account implausible?
 
Why?

If a 757 knocks over a light pole onto the highway what is so implausible about a car being hit?


The implausible aspect are the details of LLoyd's account.

Pole speared through the windshield..........car skidding sideways to a complete stop with the pole remaining speared in the car........hood remains unscratched.

None of these details about Lloyd's account are up for debate as they have been repeated many times.

Is his account implausible?

Thanx for proving you don't get it.
 
Why?

If a 757 knocks over a light pole onto the highway what is so implausible about a car being hit?


The implausible aspect are the details of LLoyd's account.

Pole speared through the windshield..........car skidding sideways to a complete stop with the pole remaining speared in the car........hood remains unscratched.

None of these details about Lloyd's account are up for debate as they have been repeated many times.

Is his account implausible?

No,I will not play your silly games. If his account as you suspect is implausible, offer a more plausible account.

Right now.
 
Craig, (aka lyte trip) did you go to college? Because your critical thinking skills are at about a zero from a scale of 1-10.

No offense. I see that you're in the San Diego area. I'm from the valley (in LA) and I barely (but I did) made it into UCLA.

When I say "the valley", I mean that they filmed "Fast Times at Ridgemont High" at my high school. I "was" Spicoli, if you know what I mean.

So, yes, I can relate to the the whole 'SoCal Dude who knows his ****, knows how to pick up chicks, gets stoned 24/7 and wants, more than anything else, to look cool.'

Do you know what's funny? I know plenty of guys who pulled it off! LOL!

But, you're not one of them. You're just a fool getting his ass handed to him on a platter here and NOT EVEN REALIZING WHAT'S HAPPENING!

I'll leave it to the better guys, and gals, here to hand you your nuts in a bag.

But, damn dude, are you what their 'movement' is all about?

Because if so, they're ****ed.
 
I'll answer your question once you answer mine.

Have you performed any calculations supporting your work? Yes or no?

My "work" was investigative.

I examined the light poles, obtained their specifics, and talked to the witness and others in the area.

My conclusions are based on the total body of evidence that I have collected in the investigation.

I have not used mathematical calculations to determine that the well over 20 foot pole that allegedly speared the cab and allegedly remained in the cab until it was physically removed should have scratched the hood.

Feel free to use them to prove that it could happen if that floats your boat.

I answered your question now you answer mine....

Can you concede that Lloyd's account of what happened is implausible?
 
I believe it is impossible.

I am simply curious as to how many of you are honest enough to at least admit that it is implausible.

So?

You never took physics. Who said you were not very good at math? It seems CA is a small world after all.

So later you will have the one and only proof of a plane flying south of some CITGO station.

How much do we bet you have the wrong CITGO station cause you did not want to drive them over to the CITGO station! You know there is a another CITGO station down the street.

WOW. wrong station, bad witnesses, poor research.

Bet if you went to see the car you could have proven the taxi story right or wrong. But you know it does not matter if his story is correct to the T. He still got hit by the pole, which was hit by 77, which hit the big P.
 
LT, can you provide a more plausible scenario for the damage to the light poles and England's car?

Of course you can't. But thanks for playing!
 
No,I will not play your silly games. If his account as you suspect is implausible, offer a more plausible account.

Right now.

I believe the more "plausible" account will include explosives planted by MIBs to fake the damage both outside and inside the Pentagon.
 
My "work" was investigative.

I examined the light poles, obtained their specifics, and talked to the witness and others in the area.

My conclusions are based on the total body of evidence that I have collected in the investigation.

I have not used mathematical calculations to determine that the well over 20 foot pole that allegedly speared the cab and allegedly remained in the cab until it was physically removed should have scratched the hood.

Feel free to use them to prove that it could happen if that floats your boat.

I answered your question now you answer mine....

Can you concede that Lloyd's account of what happened is implausible?

You have not clearly or satisfactorally answered my question.

Have you performed any calculations supporting your work? Yes or no?

I require only a one word (yes or no) answer. You may elaborate on that word if you wish.
 
You have not clearly or satisfactorally answered my question.

Have you performed any calculations supporting your work? Yes or no?

I require only a one word (yes or no) answer. You may elaborate on that word if you wish.

The question was answered.

My conclusion is not based on mathematical equations...no.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom