ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » General Skepticism and The Paranormal
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 12th May 2009, 04:33 PM   #161
Pogo
Scholar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 86
Originally Posted by kookbreaker View Post
I think the admins pushed that thread into oblivion.
Hilariously, shortly before the Magic Cafe management 'disappeared' that thread, in it, The Professor (aka Psychic Samurai) complained that threads here on the JREF forum were always being moved, edited and deleted.
Pogo is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th May 2009, 11:19 PM   #162
Klimax
NWO Cyborg 5960x (subversion VPUNPCKHQDQ)
 
Klimax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Starship Wanderer - DS9
Posts: 12,758
Originally Posted by Pogo View Post
Hilariously, shortly before the Magic Cafe management 'disappeared' that thread, in it, The Professor (aka Psychic Samurai) complained that threads here on the JREF forum were always being moved, edited and deleted.
I see,two out of three correct.IT IS DA RECORD!!! (As thread to be delted or hidden it has to be quite bad and Professors thread didn't get that far)
__________________
ModBorg

Engine: Ibalgin 400
Klimax is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd May 2009, 08:20 PM   #163
The Professor
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 718
Originally Posted by Broadsword View Post
Nope, not I... I have posted some posts on that Magic Cafe forum in rebuttal to past questions...

By the way, I have a copy of the Randi Recordings, just as most everyone who really seeks the truth in the matter...

Signed,
Riley G (Matthews)
Retired NYPD Police Officer
Actor & Entertainer
Great to see you here Riley !!!!!!
They will ask you to share soon
The Professor is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd May 2009, 01:10 PM   #164
VisionFromFeeling
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,361
Quoting a Mr. Kapnistos,
Originally Posted by Questioninggeller View Post
I met a Man in Black who telepathically revealed to me a metal seal
Not even I mention the telepathic men in black!

Originally Posted by Questioninggeller View Post
If they [small beings with outsized heads and locust eyes] feed on human endocrine products
I knew that yellow stuff they gave me tasted like pancreas!
VisionFromFeeling is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd May 2009, 01:33 PM   #165
Azrael 5
Philosopher
 
Azrael 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,886
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
Great to see you here Riley !!!!!!
They will ask you to share soon
Professor not seen you post much on Magic Cafe lately,any reason for this?
__________________
"I achieve these results through a mixture of magic,misdirection,suggestion and showmanship"-Derren Brown
Azrael 5 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd May 2009, 04:47 PM   #166
desertgal
Illuminator
 
desertgal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,198
Originally Posted by VisionFromFeeling View Post
Not even I mention the telepathic men in black!
Of course not. The telepathic men in black aren't about your favorite topic: you.
__________________
"It's obvious that you seem to be threatened by me for some reason and I find that extremely amusing." - Jodie
desertgal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd May 2009, 05:40 PM   #167
Jeff Corey
New York Skeptic
 
Jeff Corey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 13,714
And her 4.0 average. Is she on the Chancellor's list now that the semester in which she was supposed to eliminate her F is over? What was that U again? UNCC?
ETA, not updated since 2/26/2009.
We will have to be patient skeptics.

Last edited by Jeff Corey; 23rd May 2009 at 05:48 PM. Reason: 2.0 average
Jeff Corey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd May 2009, 06:53 PM   #168
Whiplash
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,443
Telepathic Men in Black? That sounds awesome.
Whiplash is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th May 2009, 04:48 AM   #169
zooterkin
Nitpicking dilettante
Deputy Admin
 
zooterkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Berkshire, mostly
Posts: 42,491
Originally Posted by Whiplash View Post
Telepathic Men in Black? That sounds awesome.
Is that the sequel to MIB II?
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.Bertrand Russell
Zooterkin is correct Darat
Nerd! Hokulele
Join the JREF Folders ! Team 13232
Ezekiel 23:20
zooterkin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th May 2009, 05:59 AM   #170
The Professor
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 718
Originally Posted by jahbrations View Post
I just read this crazy article called "Uri Geller and the YouTube Video Smear" by Peter Fotis Kapnistos, and I was blown away by the lowdown accusations of the author.

He basically is accusing James Randi of being an online child predator based on the fact that some internet user who goes by the name Randi Schimnosky - posts pro pedophile content on Mother Jones' website.

It's a shockingly absurd article that borders on pure slander. I was wondering if anyone from the JREF community has seen this?

I can't posts links yet, but if you google Uri Geller and the YouTube Video Smear, you'll find the article.

Sorry if this was posted already, I did a search for the author's last name and didn't turn up any results in the forum.
No one has refuted this crazy talk yet. Someone should!
The Professor is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th May 2009, 09:54 AM   #171
Ashles
Pith Artist
 
Ashles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The '80s
Posts: 8,689
Originally Posted by VisionFromFeeling View Post
Quoting a Mr. Kapnistos,
Not even I mention the telepathic men in black!

I knew that yellow stuff they gave me tasted like pancreas!
I know what you mean about the synesthesia.

Every time you post a claim like this, I perceive a distinctive accompanying smell.
__________________
With extraordinary few exceptions no educated person in the history of Western Civilization from the third century B.C. onward believed that the earth was flat. - Jeffrey Burton Russell
It is obvious to any scientist that the bumblebee can fly because experiment proves it. - Zetie 1996
Ashles is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st May 2009, 11:29 PM   #172
The Professor
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 718
I'm surprised that James hasn't put the kabosh on these crazy innuendo's.
How hard can it be?
The Professor is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st June 2009, 08:29 AM   #173
Azrael 5
Philosopher
 
Azrael 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,886
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
I'm surprised that James hasn't put the kabosh on these crazy innuendo's.
How hard can it be?
Maybe he doesn't need to. Because only people with anti Randi agendas believe them.. PErhaps if you belive them you could outright state he is a peadophile? On YouTube as you are so fond. Then await the lawsuit.

Alternatively stop trolling.
__________________
"I achieve these results through a mixture of magic,misdirection,suggestion and showmanship"-Derren Brown
Azrael 5 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st June 2009, 12:38 PM   #174
Gord_in_Toronto
Penultimate Amazing
 
Gord_in_Toronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 18,647
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
I'm surprised that James hasn't put the kabosh on these crazy innuendo's.
How hard can it be?
There is a degree of difficulty. In the most recent case I know of (that Earl G Curley) the defendant committed suicide (or fell over dead, depending on your sources) before the case came to court.
__________________
"Reality is what's left when you cease to believe." Philip K. Dick
Gord_in_Toronto is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st June 2009, 08:24 PM   #175
rjh01
Gentleman of leisure
Tagger
 
rjh01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Flying around in the sky
Posts: 24,502
Originally Posted by Azrael 5 View Post
Maybe he doesn't need to. Because only people with anti Randi agendas believe them.. PErhaps if you belive them you could outright state he is a peadophile? On YouTube as you are so fond. Then await the lawsuit.

Alternatively stop trolling.

Alternatively stop feeding the member. Unless of course you enjoy his posts?
rjh01 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd June 2009, 03:27 AM   #176
Azrael 5
Philosopher
 
Azrael 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,886
Originally Posted by rjh01 View Post
Alternatively stop feeding the member. Unless of course you enjoy his posts?
Excuse me? You have offical status? When I am the only FM who replies to his posts then maybe you could have a claim. On this page there are two replies by me out of 14 posts in total.
__________________
"I achieve these results through a mixture of magic,misdirection,suggestion and showmanship"-Derren Brown
Azrael 5 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th June 2009, 08:25 PM   #177
The Professor
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 718
Originally Posted by Gord_in_Toronto View Post
There is a degree of difficulty. In the most recent case I know of (that Earl G Curley) the defendant committed suicide (or fell over dead, depending on your sources) before the case came to court.
Interesting thought, but I haven't fallen over dead yet or met with foul play so I guess I'm still in the running. In all actuality, randi has lost every legal case so far so why would you ever expect he'd win one? Uri, Byrd ... Everyone .... everyone else has won and randi has lost.

I hear there is an offer on the table that would clarify everything all at once.
I think randi should take it.
It would put an end to all of these crazy innuendo's!
The Professor is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th June 2009, 12:12 AM   #178
zooterkin
Nitpicking dilettante
Deputy Admin
 
zooterkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Berkshire, mostly
Posts: 42,491
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
randi has lost every legal case so far
Really? Are you sure?
Quote:
It would put an end to all of these crazy innuendo's!
What about the crazy apostrophes?
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.Bertrand Russell
Zooterkin is correct Darat
Nerd! Hokulele
Join the JREF Folders ! Team 13232
Ezekiel 23:20
zooterkin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th June 2009, 01:11 AM   #179
Georg
Graduate Poster
 
Georg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 1,344
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post

snip

In all actuality, randi has lost every legal case so far so why would you ever expect he'd win one? Uri, Byrd ... Everyone .... everyone else has won and randi has lost.

snip
Originally Posted by zooterkin View Post
Really? Are you sure?

well........

Quote:
In 1991 Geller filed a USD$15 million lawsuit against Randi and Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP) over slander concerning Randi when he said Geller had "tricked even reputable scientists" with tricks that "are the kind that used to be on the back of cereal boxes when I was a kid".[1] The court found against Geller, who eventually settled the case at a cost of $120,000.[1] In April 1992 Geller sued the Prometheus Books in Miami, Florida for $4 million alleging libel made in two other books.[2] This was thrown out in 1994 and the judge ordered Geller to pay $20,272.89 in legal fees.[2]

In February 1992, Geller sued Randi, Prometheus and local book distributors in London, England for libel concerning The Magic of Uri Geller.[3] The lawsuit centered on the sentence: "He began his career as a stage magician in Israel where he was once arrested for claiming his feats were performed with psychic power."[3] Randi commented in 1993, "My position is that I made an unintended factual error in misinterpreting the words 'brought to court' and 'guilty' as 'arrested,' and that this was done without malice or reckless disregard for the truth."[3] Geller lost this case as well and had to pay Randi's legal fees.[3] After Geller's three lawsuits, Randi "never paid even one dollar or even one cent to anyone who ever sued me, and certainly not to Geller".[4]

Bolding done by me.
__________________
I wonder if there's any quadruple amputee dwarfs on death row? quarky
I am 38 years old. I think I can handle a horny priest! -Fran-
I think it's possible it will turn out that the whole point of human evolution is only as an intermediate step in the creation of robot hookers. -Piscivore-
Georg is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th June 2009, 01:19 AM   #180
TSR
Illuminator
 
TSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,783
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
Interesting thought, but I haven't fallen over dead yet or met with foul play so I guess I'm still in the running.
.
Except for the tiny, insignificant detail that being "in the running" in this case would mean "filing or being the target of a court case" which you haven't the guts nor the relevance for.
.
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
In all actuality, randi has lost every legal case so far so why would you ever expect he'd win one? Uri, Byrd ... Everyone .... everyone else has won and randi has lost.
.
Demonstrably wrong -- but then, you should be used to that by now.

Uri's 1991 suit was settled with Randi after it was found that his inclusion of PSICOP was frivolous and he was order to pay PSICOP substantial damages. The settlement included a clause forbidding Uri from collecting on any past or current court awards.

Byrd had not been actually *convicted* of child molestation, but merely had admitted to such under a plea bargain. As such, Randi was incorrect in his claim of the former, but the truth of the matter was such that Byrd was awarded no damages.

Randi's libel suit again Curley was dropped for lack of a defendant after the latter died.

Sniffex's suit against Randi and the JREF failed, and Sniffex was later charged with fraud.

By my count, that's two "lost" with no damages, one won, one dropped and one settled. By what definition is this "every legal case?"
.
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
I hear there is an offer on the table that would clarify everything all at once.
.
Of course, you won't tell us who has made this offer nor what the offer actually is, because it is yet another lame attempt to garner attention for yourself.
.
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
I think randi should take it.
It would put an end to all of these crazy innuendo's!
.
No, in fact, it would not: you would continue your attempts to lie about Randi, and then whine because he won't dignify your lies with any response.
.
TSR is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th June 2009, 05:14 AM   #181
The Professor
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 718
So randi himself has never won, just as I've stated.

I found this very interesting also.
http://www.mindspring.com/%7Eanson/r...1996/0085.html
It claims that randi insisted that the pedophile tapes be played at the Byrd trial (Which randi also lost) when we all know that is not the case. The judge ordered it done over the objection of randi's lawyer.
What say you now?
The Professor is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th June 2009, 05:41 AM   #182
Georg
Graduate Poster
 
Georg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 1,344
You said Randi lost every legal case. You are wrong. What a surprise.
__________________
I wonder if there's any quadruple amputee dwarfs on death row? quarky
I am 38 years old. I think I can handle a horny priest! -Fran-
I think it's possible it will turn out that the whole point of human evolution is only as an intermediate step in the creation of robot hookers. -Piscivore-
Georg is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th June 2009, 09:15 AM   #183
desertgal
Illuminator
 
desertgal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,198
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
So randi himself has never won, just as I've stated.

I found this very interesting also.
http://www.mindspring.com/%7Eanson/r...1996/0085.html
It claims that randi insisted that the pedophile tapes be played at the Byrd trial (Which randi also lost) when we all know that is not the case. The judge ordered it done over the objection of randi's lawyer.
What say you now?
That your failure to go to law school has been a boon for an appellate court somewhere.
__________________
"It's obvious that you seem to be threatened by me for some reason and I find that extremely amusing." - Jodie
desertgal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th June 2009, 09:49 AM   #184
Gord_in_Toronto
Penultimate Amazing
 
Gord_in_Toronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 18,647
Originally Posted by desertgal View Post
That your failure to go to law school has been a boon for an appellate court somewhere.
But what about the rest of us?
__________________
"Reality is what's left when you cease to believe." Philip K. Dick
Gord_in_Toronto is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th June 2009, 11:59 AM   #185
The Professor
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 718
So it appears that randi is not telling the truth according to his own article....

I see you are all dodging that point!
The Professor is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th June 2009, 12:01 PM   #186
The Professor
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 718
Originally Posted by TSR View Post
.
Except for the tiny, insignificant detail that being "in the running" in this case would mean "filing or being the target of a court case" which you haven't the guts nor the relevance for.
.

.
Demonstrably wrong -- but then, you should be used to that by now.

Uri's 1991 suit was settled with Randi after it was found that his inclusion of PSICOP was frivolous and he was order to pay PSICOP substantial damages. The settlement included a clause forbidding Uri from collecting on any past or current court awards.

Byrd had not been actually *convicted* of child molestation, but merely had admitted to such under a plea bargain. As such, Randi was incorrect in his claim of the former, but the truth of the matter was such that Byrd was awarded no damages.

Randi's libel suit again Curley was dropped for lack of a defendant after the latter died.

Sniffex's suit against Randi and the JREF failed, and Sniffex was later charged with fraud.

By my count, that's two "lost" with no damages, one won, one dropped and one settled. By what definition is this "every legal case?"
.

.
Of course, you won't tell us who has made this offer nor what the offer actually is, because it is yet another lame attempt to garner attention for yourself.
.

.
No, in fact, it would not: you would continue your attempts to lie about Randi, and then whine because he won't dignify your lies with any response.
.
I notice you have not provided a single link to support your claims.

Better start digging!
The Professor is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th June 2009, 12:03 PM   #187
Ashles
Pith Artist
 
Ashles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The '80s
Posts: 8,689
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
I notice you have not provided a single link to support your claims.

Better start digging!
Just to check - are you disputing TSR then? Are you saying his information is incorrect?
__________________
With extraordinary few exceptions no educated person in the history of Western Civilization from the third century B.C. onward believed that the earth was flat. - Jeffrey Burton Russell
It is obvious to any scientist that the bumblebee can fly because experiment proves it. - Zetie 1996
Ashles is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th June 2009, 12:25 PM   #188
desertgal
Illuminator
 
desertgal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,198
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
So it appears that randi is not telling the truth according to his own article....

I see you are all dodging that point!
Where does it appear?

In the view of any good defense lawyer, the contents of the tape would not have been relevant to the crux of the case, which was whether Randi misspoke when he used the term "convicted" instead of "confessed". Thus, any good lawyer would want to enter an objection into the record over the contents of the tape being played for the jurors. He does not need his client's direction to do so.

See, that's why lawyers go to law school - to learn about the finer points of law, courtroom procedure, rules of evidence, etc.

Please show us, in the court transcript of this case, where Randi protested the playing of the tape, or anything else Randi said in the courtroom that contradicts his statement that he insisted the tape be played for the jury. Otherwise, all you have is your own conjecture, as usual, that Randi isn't telling the truth.
__________________
"It's obvious that you seem to be threatened by me for some reason and I find that extremely amusing." - Jodie
desertgal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th June 2009, 03:23 PM   #189
kookbreaker
Evil Fokker
 
kookbreaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 12,019
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
So randi himself has never won, just as I've stated.

I found this very interesting also.
http://www.mindspring.com/%7Eanson/r...1996/0085.html
It claims that randi insisted that the pedophile tapes be played at the Byrd trial (Which randi also lost) when we all know that is not the case. The judge ordered it done over the objection of randi's lawyer.
What say you now?
The Professor's statement is deceptive to say the least.

Randi and his lawyer initially did not want the tapes played. That much is true, but their objection was that it was not relevant to the case at hand. However the judge disagreed.

So Randi (and his lawyer) insisted that what the jury hear was not Eldon 'kid luvin' clown' Byrd's heavily, heavily edited tape, but the entire original tape of the phones calls. The judge agreed with this, and the jury heard the whole thing.
__________________
www.spectrum-scientifics.com <- My store of science toys, instruments and general fun!

Thanks for helping me win Best Toys in Philly Voter in 2011,2012, and 2014! We won' be discussing the disappointment that was 2013.
kookbreaker is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th June 2009, 03:24 PM   #190
kookbreaker
Evil Fokker
 
kookbreaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 12,019
Originally Posted by Ashles View Post
Just to check - are you disputing TSR then? Are you saying his information is incorrect?
Then apparently Earl Curley isn't dead. Clever fellow!
__________________
www.spectrum-scientifics.com <- My store of science toys, instruments and general fun!

Thanks for helping me win Best Toys in Philly Voter in 2011,2012, and 2014! We won' be discussing the disappointment that was 2013.
kookbreaker is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th June 2009, 03:38 PM   #191
desertgal
Illuminator
 
desertgal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,198
Originally Posted by kookbreaker View Post
The Professor's statement is deceptive to say the least.

Randi and his lawyer initially did not want the tapes played. That much is true, but their objection was that it was not relevant to the case at hand. However the judge disagreed.

So Randi (and his lawyer) insisted that what the jury hear was not Eldon 'kid luvin' clown' Byrd's heavily, heavily edited tape, but the entire original tape of the phones calls. The judge agreed with this, and the jury heard the whole thing.
Ah. Thank you. That is decidedly clearer than "Randi's attorney objected, so Randi must be lying, blah blah blah."
__________________
"It's obvious that you seem to be threatened by me for some reason and I find that extremely amusing." - Jodie
desertgal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th June 2009, 03:42 PM   #192
Azrael 5
Philosopher
 
Azrael 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,886
Originally Posted by kookbreaker View Post
The Professor's statement is deceptive to say the least. *Snip
Understatement of the year.
__________________
"I achieve these results through a mixture of magic,misdirection,suggestion and showmanship"-Derren Brown

Last edited by Azrael 5; 9th June 2009 at 04:12 PM. Reason: Correct tense added.
Azrael 5 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th June 2009, 03:52 PM   #193
Gord_in_Toronto
Penultimate Amazing
 
Gord_in_Toronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 18,647
Originally Posted by kookbreaker View Post
Then apparently Earl Curley isn't dead. Clever fellow!
Damn. I'll have to head out to Mount Pleasant Cemetery next weekend with a stake then.
__________________
"Reality is what's left when you cease to believe." Philip K. Dick
Gord_in_Toronto is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th June 2009, 05:30 PM   #194
George 152
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,012
Originally Posted by Gord_in_Toronto View Post
Damn. I'll have to head out to Mount Pleasant Cemetery next weekend with a stake then.
Give the stake an extra hit for me and all those others who faced up to that piece of work.
George 152 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th June 2009, 01:05 AM   #195
TSR
Illuminator
 
TSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,783
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
I notice you have not provided a single link to support your claims.

Better start digging!
.
Which specific claim are you disputing?

And one notes that you have not even provided a real claim, let alone attempted to support them in anyway whatever.

Hypocrite much? < trick question -- your posting history makes the answer obvious >

.

Last edited by TSR; 10th June 2009 at 01:08 AM.
TSR is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th June 2009, 04:57 AM   #196
Ashles
Pith Artist
 
Ashles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The '80s
Posts: 8,689
Originally Posted by kookbreaker View Post
Then apparently Earl Curley isn't dead. Clever fellow!
I wanted to clarify which of TSR's statements the Professor was flat out saying were incorrect. Because his criticism was actually quite vagualy worded - he wasn't necessarily saying they were untrue, just that they hadn't been backed up by links.

So to save TSR time I wanted to check which of those statements The Professor believed were actually untrue, versus which he did not actually dispute, just wanted to know if there was evidence for them.

A minor distinction maybe, but it appears that such vaguaries and deceptive language are the Porfessors usual MO.
__________________
With extraordinary few exceptions no educated person in the history of Western Civilization from the third century B.C. onward believed that the earth was flat. - Jeffrey Burton Russell
It is obvious to any scientist that the bumblebee can fly because experiment proves it. - Zetie 1996
Ashles is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 10th June 2009, 11:24 AM   #197
Azrael 5
Philosopher
 
Azrael 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,886
Ashles you have to remember The Professor gets all his forum posts written for him by Jim Callahan, so thats why they are deliberately vague and make no sense.
__________________
"I achieve these results through a mixture of magic,misdirection,suggestion and showmanship"-Derren Brown
Azrael 5 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2009, 09:35 AM   #198
TSR
Illuminator
 
TSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,783
Originally Posted by TSR View Post
Quote:
.
I notice you have not provided a single link to support your claims.

Better start digging!
.
.
Which specific claim are you disputing?

And one notes that you have not even provided a real claim, let alone attempted to support them in anyway whatever.

Hypocrite much? < trick question -- your posting history makes the answer obvious >
.
.
Bump for TP
.
TSR is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th June 2009, 01:49 AM   #199
The Professor
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 718
I see many rallying to the defense of The Pedophile Tapes.
It's actually quite interesting to see who supports this kind of thing.
You attack me and avoid the truth.
I guess in this forum that is standard, everyone being critical thinkers and all.
But doesn't it betray you inner thinking?
Many claim that randi has put out a printed response to the tapes (An excuse as to why they were made)
Does anyone have this, or must I proceed without it?

PS... If anyone can show me where the authorities gave randi the OK to do this, I'll never post here again!
How's that for a reward?

Last edited by The Professor; 15th June 2009 at 01:52 AM.
The Professor is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th June 2009, 01:56 AM   #200
TSR
Illuminator
 
TSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,783
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
I see many rallying to the defense of The Pedophile Tapes.
.
By what definition of "many?
.
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
It's actually quite interesting to see who supports this kind of thing.
.
Supports *what* king of thing?
.
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
You attack me and avoid the truth.
.
You mean like the truth that you are lying about a legitimate "offer on the table that would clarify everything all at once?"
.
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
I guess in this forum that is standard, everyone being critical thinkers and all.
But doesn't it betray you inner thinking?
.
Pointing out your lies?

Absolutely.
.
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
Many claim that randi has put out a printed response to the tapes (An excuse as to why they were made)
.
By what definition of "many?"
.
Originally Posted by The Professor View Post
Does anyone have this, or must I proceed without it?
.
Whether you "must" or not, the bottom line is you will proceed with or without it, and whether or not it actually supports your crap.

When are you going to tell us which of my assertions specifically you dispute?

When are you going to document the claims you have made about this "offer?"
.
TSR is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » General Skepticism and The Paranormal

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:21 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.