ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags ae911truth , cdi , Tom Sullivan

Reply
Old 12th June 2010, 12:58 PM   #1
walkyrie
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 156
CDI explosive loader Tom Sullivan / ae911 / explosive demolition

Tom Sullivan used to work for Controlled Demolitions Inc. On 9/11 and everyday since, his experience with CDI tells him that controlled demolitions were used on 9/11 to demolish World Trade Center #1, #2 and 7.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcwnJ...ayer_embedded#!
walkyrie is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 01:06 PM   #2
Quad4_72
AI-EE-YAH!
 
Quad4_72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,354
Originally Posted by walkyrie View Post
Tom Sullivan used to work for Controlled Demolitions Inc. On 9/11 and everyday since, his experience with CDI tells him that controlled demolitions were used on 9/11 to demolish World Trade Center #1, #2 and 7.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcwnJ...ayer_embedded#!
He didn't offer a SINGLE shred of evidence in support of his claims. His main argument was that since WTC7 LOOKED like a demolition that meant that it WAS a demolition. And since 7 was a demolition, that meant the rest of it probably was as well. Why did you post a nutter making claims without evidence? Very poor taste indeed.
__________________
Looks like the one on top has a magazine, thus needs less reloading. Also, the muzzle shroud makes it less likely for a spree killer to burn his hands. The pistol grip makes it more comfortable for the spree killer to shoot. thaiboxerken
Quad4_72 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 01:13 PM   #3
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
 
DGM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West of Northshore MA
Posts: 24,061
Originally Posted by walkyrie View Post
Tom Sullivan used to work for Controlled Demolitions Inc. On 9/11 and everyday since, his experience with CDI tells him that controlled demolitions were used on 9/11 to demolish World Trade Center #1, #2 and 7.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcwnJ...ayer_embedded#!
Why is it that you question the "official" story every chance you get but, accept anything that's counter without question?
__________________
"Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution" Jay Windley

"How many leaves on the seventh branch of the fourth tree?" is meaningless when you are in the wrong forest: ozeco41
DGM is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 01:13 PM   #4
TexasJack
Penultimate Amazing
 
TexasJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10,906
Isn't this the guy that CDI denies ever working for them?
TexasJack is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 01:22 PM   #5
leftysergeant
Penultimate Amazing
 
leftysergeant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,863
He worked for CDI? As what? A janitor?

Got a curriculum vitae for his life?
leftysergeant is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 01:29 PM   #6
T.A.M.
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,795
I work for CDI. Do you work for CDI? Apparently for the truth movement, the only proof needed is his word.

Did I mention I also work for the FBI, CIA, KGB, and NWO?

TAM
T.A.M. is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 01:49 PM   #7
sheeplesnshills
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,706
[quote]
Originally Posted by walkyrie View Post
Tom Sullivan used to work for Controlled Demolitions Inc. On 9/11 and everyday since, his experience with CDI tells him that controlled demolitions were used on 9/11 to demolish World Trade Center #1, #2 and 7.
Can he point to ANY CD that looked like the collapses of World Trade Center #1, #2 and 7.

The only one that looks vaguely like a CD is 7 but there were no explosions so typical of a CD. What looked even remotely "controlled" about the WTC1 and 2?
Its hard to imagine a less controlled collapse!
sheeplesnshills is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 02:56 PM   #8
332nd
Penultimate Amazing
 
332nd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,061
Originally Posted by walkyrie View Post
Tom Sullivan used to work for Controlled Demolitions Inc. On 9/11 and everyday since, his experience with CDI tells him that controlled demolitions were used on 9/11 to demolish World Trade Center #1, #2 and 7.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcwnJ...ayer_embedded#!
Well then... I guess the truth movement will finally decend on Washington and demand a new investigation. Also I imagine that in a few months when Sullivan, his family, and his friends aren't dead or had their lives ruined by the government, all of those experts (even the ones with evidence!!) Will come forward and justice will be served...

Right?
__________________
The poster formerly known as Redtail
332nd is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 03:10 PM   #9
ElMondoHummus
0.25 short of being half-witted
 
ElMondoHummus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Somewhere north of the South Pole
Posts: 12,255
Originally Posted by Quad4_72 View Post
He didn't offer a SINGLE shred of evidence in support of his claims. His main argument was that since WTC7 LOOKED like a demolition that meant that it WAS a demolition. And since 7 was a demolition, that meant the rest of it probably was as well. Why did you post a nutter making claims without evidence? Very poor taste indeed.
Funny... Danny Jowenko disagrees with Sullivan regarding the main towers. But to truthers, that's not evidence of cognitive dissonance in their stances.

And: Agreed, Quad. It's getting pretty damn tiring that all we ever see are these baseless, unsupported opinions based on superficialities. It just goes to show that most conspiracy addicts don't even know the details of the collapse, since they don't seem to realize the utter lack of evidence given by these folks they cite.
__________________
"AND ZEPPELINS!!! We haven't even begun to talk about Zeppelins yet! Marauding inflatable Teutonic johnsons waggling their way across the sky! Indecent and flammable all at once."

Last edited by ElMondoHummus; 12th June 2010 at 03:13 PM.
ElMondoHummus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 03:35 PM   #10
Cl1mh4224rd
Philosopher
 
Cl1mh4224rd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,115
This is just further evidence in support of my hypothesis that truthers aren't looking for "experts" to help them discover the truth about 9/11; they're simply looking for "experts" to tell them they already found it.
Cl1mh4224rd is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 03:43 PM   #11
Trojan
Critical Thinker
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 480
Originally Posted by walkyrie View Post
Tom Sullivan used to work for Controlled Demolitions Inc. On 9/11 and everyday since, his experience with CDI tells him that controlled demolitions were used on 9/11 to demolish World Trade Center #1, #2 and 7.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcwnJ...ayer_embedded#!
So is this expert going to publish a paper? Will he provide investigation details, evidence and conclusions?

Or is this just another argument from incredulity to sit on the thermite shelf?
Trojan is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 03:58 PM   #12
The Big Dog
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 19,077
Guys bad news.

He did work for CDI.

As a photographer.

/Photographic Phail For the Twooph Movement!
The Big Dog is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 04:04 PM   #13
BigAl
Philosopher
 
BigAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,397
Originally Posted by 16.5 View Post
Guys bad news.

He did work for CDI.

As a photographer.

/Photographic Phail For the Twooph Movement!
So he's an expert in "looks like".

Got a source for this?
__________________
------
Eric Pode of Croydon
Chief Assistant to the Assistance Chief,
Dept of Redundancy Dept.

Last edited by BigAl; 12th June 2010 at 04:07 PM.
BigAl is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 04:05 PM   #14
tsig
a carbon based life-form
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 39,049
[quote=sheeplesnshills;6027085]
Quote:

Can he point to ANY CD that looked like the collapses of World Trade Center #1, #2 and 7.

The only one that looks vaguely like a CD is 7 but there were no explosions so typical of a CD. What looked even remotely "controlled" about the WTC1 and 2?
Its hard to imagine a less controlled collapse!
Odd I just asked that in another thread.

The big argument is that it looked like CD yet I have never seen a link posted to a CD that looked like 1, 2 and 7.
tsig is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 04:39 PM   #15
Thunder
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 34,918
wow...this guy claims to have known from DAY 1, before any evidence was gathered, that the collapses were all CDs. what a schmuck.

what a bull **** schmuck.

how can ANYONE claim to be searching for the truth about what happened that day, disregarding all the findings of NIST, FEMA, and countless other organizations, but believe the stupid words of a moron who claims to have known what happened on 9/12/01???????

one cannot claim to have a shred of intellectual honesty, and yet pay attention to someone who claims to know what happened on "day 1".

Last edited by Thunder; 12th June 2010 at 04:58 PM.
Thunder is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 06:04 PM   #16
The Big Dog
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 19,077
Originally Posted by BigAl View Post
So he's an expert in "looks like".

Got a source for this?
http://www.ae911truth.org/profile.php?uid=981611
The Big Dog is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 06:06 PM   #17
Thunder
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 34,918
Originally Posted by 16.5 View Post
no degree. no certification. just lots of bold amateur/novice opinions.

sounds like a Truther's gold mine of expertise.

Thunder is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 06:16 PM   #18
ElMondoHummus
0.25 short of being half-witted
 
ElMondoHummus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Somewhere north of the South Pole
Posts: 12,255
Originally Posted by 16.5 View Post
Guys bad news.

He did work for CDI.

As a photographer.

/Photographic Phail For the Twooph Movement!
That doesn't in and of itself mean that he doesn't have any knowledge or experience. As a contrast, Brent Blanchard is an editor for Implosion World, and is an operations manager at Protec, so I don't believe he's actually implemented or supervised an explosive demolition. Yet, the knowledge he's garnered as a historian of the industry, as well as his experience from surveying, documenting, and consulting at Protec makes him eminently qualified to comment on demolitions and truther theories regarding such.

No, Tom Sullivan's failure doesn't reside in his knowledge or expertise. It lays in his lack of evidence. Accuracy or lack of such always lays in the argument itself, not the person forwarding it. Even if all he was was a photographer for CDI, I'll respect his credentials. It's his argument that matters.
__________________
"AND ZEPPELINS!!! We haven't even begun to talk about Zeppelins yet! Marauding inflatable Teutonic johnsons waggling their way across the sky! Indecent and flammable all at once."
ElMondoHummus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 06:18 PM   #19
Thunder
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 34,918
Tom Sullivan says he knew on "Day 1", that it was a CD.

This makes his views pretty worthless.

There are lots of videos on Youtube of buildings going down, and its caused by only gravity and age.
Thunder is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 06:18 PM   #20
triforcharity
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,961
Originally Posted by leftysergeant View Post
He worked for CDI? As what? A janitor?

Got a curriculum vitae for his life?
No, he worked for CDI as a FREELANCE PHOTOGRAPHER. I and Ron Weick have contacted Stacy @ CDI, and confirms that he worked as a PHOTOGRAPHER for them. Nothing more.
triforcharity is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 06:25 PM   #21
Thunder
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 34,918
Originally Posted by triforcharity View Post
No, he worked for CDI as a FREELANCE PHOTOGRAPHER. I and Ron Weick have contacted Stacy @ CDI, and confirms that he worked as a PHOTOGRAPHER for them. Nothing more.
in the video, he claims that he was an explosives technician.

was this a lie?
Thunder is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 06:34 PM   #22
triforcharity
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,961
Thunder,

It was claimed, but nothing was ever provided. CDI agrees that he worked for them as a photographer, and nothing more. You cannot become an explosive loader without having your employer verify your competence. Since he was a photographer, I highly doubt that he was a loader.

None-the-less, it doesn't really matter, as his conclusions are all based on ************.
triforcharity is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 06:40 PM   #23
Thunder
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 34,918
Originally Posted by triforcharity View Post
Thunder,

It was claimed, but nothing was ever provided. CDI agrees that he worked for them as a photographer, and nothing more. You cannot become an explosive loader without having your employer verify your competence. Since he was a photographer, I highly doubt that he was a loader.
ah...so not only is he a schmuck..but he is a lying schmuck.

great Truther material. he will probably be interviewed by AJ and Luke shortly as a hero who will "blow the lid off of 9-11!!!!!!".
Thunder is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 06:51 PM   #24
BigAl
Philosopher
 
BigAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,397
Originally Posted by triforcharity View Post
Thunder,

It was claimed, but nothing was ever provided. CDI agrees that he worked for them as a photographer, and nothing more. You cannot become an explosive loader without having your employer verify your competence. Since he was a photographer, I highly doubt that he was a loader.

None-the-less, it doesn't really matter, as his conclusions are all based on ************.
According to this page he has a FDNY explosives "loader" license.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread569606/pg1
Here's his ae911 profile. No mention of any license.

Quote:
Worked for CDI during the time of 911 as a both a site still photographer and as an explosive loader. Worked on projects such as Seattle King dome, Three Rivers Stadium, Philadelphia Naval Hospital, Key span Gas Holders among others. Went to H.S. with Doug Loizeaux so I had a unique insider look while I was employed by them. I had published work in the book Implosion published by Black Dog publishing.


http://www.ae911truth.org/profile.php?uid=981611
An Internet search finds no book called "Implosion " by this publisher.
http://blackdogonline.com/
__________________
------
Eric Pode of Croydon
Chief Assistant to the Assistance Chief,
Dept of Redundancy Dept.

Last edited by BigAl; 12th June 2010 at 06:53 PM.
BigAl is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 07:49 PM   #25
Quad4_72
AI-EE-YAH!
 
Quad4_72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,354
Originally Posted by ElMondoHummus View Post
Funny... Danny Jowenko disagrees with Sullivan regarding the main towers. But to truthers, that's not evidence of cognitive dissonance in their stances.

And: Agreed, Quad. It's getting pretty damn tiring that all we ever see are these baseless, unsupported opinions based on superficialities. It just goes to show that most conspiracy addicts don't even know the details of the collapse, since they don't seem to realize the utter lack of evidence given by these folks they cite.
Seems that there is no shortage of STUPID in the world these days. The guy in the video clearly has no idea WTF he is talking about but twoofers just slurp it up. They are so impressionable lol.
__________________
Looks like the one on top has a magazine, thus needs less reloading. Also, the muzzle shroud makes it less likely for a spree killer to burn his hands. The pistol grip makes it more comfortable for the spree killer to shoot. thaiboxerken
Quad4_72 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 07:51 PM   #26
Quad4_72
AI-EE-YAH!
 
Quad4_72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,354
Originally Posted by walkyrie View Post
Tom Sullivan used to work for Controlled Demolitions Inc. On 9/11 and everyday since, his experience with CDI tells him that controlled demolitions were used on 9/11 to demolish World Trade Center #1, #2 and 7.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcwnJ...ayer_embedded#!
Appeal to authority much too? Except in this case, I think you need to pick another authority for your logical fallacy. This one doesn't help your case much...
__________________
Looks like the one on top has a magazine, thus needs less reloading. Also, the muzzle shroud makes it less likely for a spree killer to burn his hands. The pistol grip makes it more comfortable for the spree killer to shoot. thaiboxerken
Quad4_72 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 07:52 PM   #27
T.A.M.
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,795
Originally Posted by ElMondoHummus View Post
Funny... Danny Jowenko disagrees with Sullivan regarding the main towers. But to truthers, that's not evidence of cognitive dissonance in their stances.

And: Agreed, Quad. It's getting pretty damn tiring that all we ever see are these baseless, unsupported opinions based on superficialities. It just goes to show that most conspiracy addicts don't even know the details of the collapse, since they don't seem to realize the utter lack of evidence given by these folks they cite.
Yes, I think we should call it doing a "Gage". Just like Richard Gage, who uses his "credentials" as an architect to lend a FALSE sense of authority to his words, but simply parrots the same, tire old canards of the TM without a bit of his so called "expertise" exhibited or used to back up the claims.

Sullivan is simply doing a "Gage".

TAM
T.A.M. is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th June 2010, 07:53 PM   #28
T.A.M.
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,795
Originally Posted by 16.5 View Post
Guys bad news.

He did work for CDI.

As a photographer.

/Photographic Phail For the Twooph Movement!
lol...that is priceless...absolutely priceless.

TAM
T.A.M. is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th June 2010, 06:03 AM   #29
leftysergeant
Penultimate Amazing
 
leftysergeant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,863
Is he related to Willie, by any chance?
leftysergeant is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th June 2010, 07:09 AM   #30
Thunder
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 34,918
How do we get "pulling a Gage" into the dictionary?

Last edited by Thunder; 16th June 2010 at 07:10 AM.
Thunder is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th June 2010, 09:30 AM   #31
grandmastershek
Graduate Poster
 
grandmastershek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,442
by "explosives loader" he probably means:


"Hey Tom! Can you give me hand getting this into the truck?"
__________________
For as the NWO are higher than the people, so are their ways higher than your ways, and their thoughts than your thoughts. (A amalgam of Isaiah 55:9 & truther logic)
grandmastershek is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th June 2010, 10:19 AM   #32
tsig
a carbon based life-form
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 39,049
Originally Posted by grandmastershek View Post
by "explosives loader" he probably means:


"Hey Tom! Can you give me hand getting this into the truck?"
Maybe he just had gas.
tsig is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th June 2010, 12:56 PM   #33
grandmastershek
Graduate Poster
 
grandmastershek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,442
Originally Posted by grandmastershek View Post
by "explosives loader" he probably means:


"Hey Tom! Can you give me hand getting this into the truck?"
I was close. An article at ae911truth has his permit as a "powder carrier", but he refers to himself as a "loader".

http://www.ae911truth.org/news/41-ar...-employee.html

http://www2.ae911truth.org/profile.php?uid=981611


What does that mean?

"The Powder Carrier is essentially an apprentice Blaster, assisting the Blaster with loading:
( preparing primer cartridges and charges, wiring / hookup, setting off the shots ) and paperwork,
such as recording quantities of explosives used and shot times.

Explosives loaders help the Blaster and Powder Carrier in transporting explosives to and from
the magazines and handling explosives during loading operations."

http://www.nyc.gov/html/fdny/pdf/cof...y_material.pdf

At best he's an assistant. According to him he is the assistant to the assistant...and isn't even allowed to have a set of keys.

"Only the Blaster, Powder Carrier and Magazine Keeper may have keys
to the Magazines and accept delivery of explosives at the work site."
__________________
For as the NWO are higher than the people, so are their ways higher than your ways, and their thoughts than your thoughts. (A amalgam of Isaiah 55:9 & truther logic)
grandmastershek is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th June 2010, 02:53 PM   #34
willhaven
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,049
Originally Posted by walkyrie View Post
Controlled Demolition Expert Photographer Tom Sullivan , his Statement about 9/11
willhaven is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st July 2010, 04:16 AM   #35
thecritta
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 199
Originally Posted by triforcharity View Post
No, he worked for CDI as a FREELANCE PHOTOGRAPHER. I and Ron Weick have contacted Stacy @ CDI, and confirms that he worked as a PHOTOGRAPHER for them. Nothing more.
Well actually he did work for CDI as a photographer and a explosives
loader according to the documentation contained in these links.

http://www2.ae911truth.org/images/in...van_CDI_W2.jpg

http://cms.ae911truth.org/news/41-ar...-employee.html

And it even has the the words "POWDER CARRIER" listen in his permit.

So I guess that makes Stacey Loizeaux from CDI a proven liar because
she denied ever having know him or him being an employee of CDI because
someone called CDI to confirm whether or not he was an employee.
thecritta is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st July 2010, 04:34 AM   #36
excaza
Illuminator
 
excaza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,593
Originally Posted by thecritta View Post
So I guess that makes Stacey Loizeaux from CDI a proven liar because she denied ever having know him or him being an employee of CDI because someone called CDI to confirm whether or not he was an employee.
Yes, someone did call CDI. You quoted the post. CDI confirmed he was employed as a photographer. So the above statement is false and now you're a proven liar. Gosh, this is fun!
__________________

Last edited by excaza; 1st July 2010 at 04:35 AM.
excaza is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st July 2010, 05:08 AM   #37
Scott Sommers
Illuminator
 
Scott Sommers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,807
This is very strange. The fact is, the guy is not who is he is being claimed to be. That's just a fact. So forget about the idea that an explosives expert from CDI ever said there was a controlled demolition on 911. Just forget about it, and go look for other reasons to believe this.

You guys may be able to fool some high school students or some whacked out militia types, but there's nothing you can take anywhere except a bar room conversation. You may have proof. I don't believe you do, but sure as Hell, I can tell you this isn't it. Just stop it. It embarrasses you. Maybe you don't mind looking like a mormon, but that's another thing I don't know about. Just forget about this. It's not true.
__________________
I've seen it here and in several other places that there is no Illuminati. That doesn't even make sense. There's a Wikipedia entry that talks about it. I'm not saying that everything on Wikipedia is true, but if you read it, it's just really clear how the Illuminati controls the world.
Scott Sommers is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st July 2010, 05:17 AM   #38
kookbreaker
Evil Fokker
 
kookbreaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 11,189
Originally Posted by grandmastershek View Post
At best he's an assistant. According to him he is the assistant to the assistant...and isn't even allowed to have a set of keys.

"Only the Blaster, Powder Carrier and Magazine Keeper may have keys
to the Magazines and accept delivery of explosives at the work site."
So basically he is a glorified adult Powder Monkey with some added paperwork.
__________________
www.spectrum-scientifics.com <- My store of science toys, instruments and general fun!

Thanks for helping me win Best Toys in Philly Voter in 2011,2012, and 2014! We won' be discussing the disappointment that was 2013.
kookbreaker is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st July 2010, 05:41 AM   #39
thecritta
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 199
Originally Posted by excaza View Post
Yes, someone did call CDI. You quoted the post. CDI confirmed he was employed as a photographer. So the above statement is false and now you're a proven liar. Gosh, this is fun!
No actually I am not a liar, I was reading over at debatebothsides
and I remeber reading in a topic started by Rob Balsamo boasting
about how an employee from CDI appeared on one of gages presentations
supporting the claim that building 7 was explosively demolished and how
remote thermite charges could have been used and I remeber Ronald Weick
saying that Stacy at CDI had been contacted by phone whether it was him
I cant remeber the thread seems to have been deleted and I cant find it,
anyway I remeber Ron saying she denied he was ever an employee by CDI
So if that is indeed correct and my memory is working properly I am not a
liar and she is.
thecritta is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st July 2010, 05:45 AM   #40
twinstead
Penultimate Amazing
 
twinstead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,367
Originally Posted by scott.in.taiwan View Post
Maybe you don't mind looking like a mormon, but that's another thing I don't know about
Are you saying they believe Christ visited the New World and may have more than one wife? That's harsh.
__________________
You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison
twinstead is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:39 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
2014, TribeTech AB. All Rights Reserved.
This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.