triforcharity
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 13,961
Ah Roberts who loved to state his opinions as if they were facts.
Too funny.
MM
Ah, MM, who, as opposed to getting facts, goes for quotemines and lies.
Twoof funny.
Tri.
Ah Roberts who loved to state his opinions as if they were facts.
Too funny.
MM
I don't know Erik Lawyer but I am a signer of the petition at Firefighters For 9-11 Truth calling for a new investigation. If you go to the website, you can read Erik Laywer's reasoning why there is a problem with the official "investigation".
Without explaining everything in great detail, I can say the rules for investigation were not followed according to the NFPA (National Fire Protection Agency). All we are saying is, that there is enough evidence pointing to the need to test for accelerants in the collapse of WTC7. If the tests show no accelerants were present, great. We can tend to believe the official story. NIST did not even look for accelerants. An investigation needs to ask "Why?". This is kind of important.
Do you realize what a rookie this makes you look? Accelerants? Well, freaking DUH! There were tons of accelerants used. Jet fuel at the Pentagon and diesel in WTC7. We saw the kerosene delivered to one of the towers on live TV. It was delivered by an aircraft flying at speeds that would deadline it on landing, had the religoous whackadoodle flying it ever intended to land safely.
I don't know Erik Lawyer but I am a signer of the petition at Firefighters For 9-11 Truth calling for a new investigation. If you go to the website, you can read Erik Laywer's reasoning why there is a problem with the official "investigation".
Without explaining everything in great detail, I can say the rules for investigation were not followed according to the NFPA (National Fire Protection Agency). All we are saying is, that there is enough evidence pointing to the need to test for accelerants in the collapse of WTC7. If the tests show no accelerants were present, great. We can tend to believe the official story. NIST did not even look for accelerants. An investigation needs to ask "Why?". This is kind of important.
Dude...if you really are a fireman and signed up for this crap, then I'm ashamed to have met you.
Does your chief know that he hires ignorant people?
Did anyone think to check for high-speed collisions?
Damn, I bet it's too late now!
On that note, I did in fact contact the Seattle FD, and yes, Erik does in fact have a job there, but they IMMEDIATLY said they do NOT under ANY circumstances, support his conclusions, and that they, as a department, disagree 100% with his conclusions.
I talked to him on the phone briefly, and I told him that he is a disgrace to the badge he wears. He didn't like that very much. At all actually.
How did you get his phone number?
He also sells real estate. Not that hard.How did you get his phone number?
How did you get his phone number?
On that note, I did in fact contact the Seattle FD, and yes, Erik does in fact have a job there, but they IMMEDIATLY said they do NOT under ANY circumstances, support his conclusions, and that they, as a department, disagree 100% with his conclusions.
I talked to him on the phone briefly, and I told him that he is a disgrace to the badge he wears. He didn't like that very much. At all actually.
Molten steel like a foundry- like lava from a volcano
Did you phone these NYC firemen or their chief yet ? Be sure to mention that you
were there at the WTC and saw everything on 911 so these men also are likewise
liars and a disgrace to the badge they wear.
Better yet, ask to talk to these firemen and tell them directly .
I'll bet they won't like it very much either.
Maybe a letter to the mayor and a phone call to their local newspaper will start the
discipline actions that result in the loss of pension or jobs of these disgraceful NYC firemen.
Got any friends on the NYC fire dept. ? See if you can instigate a "outraged fireman"
movement to get these disgraceful men what they deserve . BIC ?
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=5879201#post5879201
If this post disappears members can find it in the JREF sewer.
NON members are prohibited from viewing the sceptic system.
Have any of those firemen claimed that the WTC were brought down by controlled demolition as opposed to fire induced collapse (in the case of the Twin Towers combined with aircraft damage)? If not, why do you equate them with Erik Liar?
Maybe they fear a pusillanimous bagopus will phone their chief.
Here are some NYC firefighter testimonies.
BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM
http://911lies.org/fire_fighters_911_wtc_tapes.html
Absolutely disgraceful !
Where do these firemen think they live ? AMERICA ?
You seem to believe mis-spelling words and names will intimidatetruthtwoof-seekers.
How's that working out for you so far ?
Did you phone these NYC firemen or their chief yet ? Be sure to mention that you
were there at the WTC and saw everything on 911 so these men also are likewise
liars and a disgrace to the badge they wear.
Better yet, ask to talk to these firemen and tell them directly .
Better yet, ask to talk to these firemen and tell them directly .
I'll bet they won't like it very much either.
Maybe a letter to the mayor and a phone call to their local newspaper will start the
discipline actions that result in the loss of pension or jobs of these disgraceful NYC firemen.
Got any friends on the NYC fire dept. ? See if you can instigate a "outraged fireman"
movement to get these disgraceful men what they deserve . BIC ?
Have you considered walking into a New York fire station and asking the firemen there whether they're deliberately covering up the murder of several hundred of their colleagues in order to keep their jobs? If so, let me advise you very strongly not to, because advocation of suicide would be a serious breach of the membership agreement.
Dave
Oh God not the boom boom boom thing again.
What sound do you think would be made by floors falling on each other? Would it sound different from what was described?