You love to start new threads. How about you start one to explain why wave-particle duality is nonsense? Please try to avoid aggravating ad-homs and vague hints. Just explain the science, as if you were teaching grown-ups instead of showing off. Thanks.
This is a science section and your inquiry is short of humor but i will share something most do not.
Please no rants unless you have run the experiment yourself and taken into account the parameters of defining the receiving mass (plate).
For definition: The mass of the receiving plate that renders the pattern of the double-slit experiment.
As a real solid method of getting ahead on the concept; Graphene is a rare elemental structure and will offer a fine method of directly proving much of what is being said on this thread.
core concept to maintain: the energy affects the mass
So when sending your em (electromagnetic energy; photons (per se)) thru the double slit to the receiving plate, both the double slit and receiving plate will render different effects to various wavelengths that are exposed to them.
Colors prove that point in itself.
Now the particle aspect is directly going to be affected by maintaining a clean experiment in which the receiving plate is important. To send a single photon (per se) that reflects the 'same' patter as the bath of the same light is what many find as the particle wave duality.
But this will be affected by the mass (its thresholds). The first evidence will be that when the double slit is exposed and the background, to change each will affect the next exposure, one at a time.
That mass is very important in the double slit experiment.
The experiment is not showing that particles called 'photons' exist but that each wave (single unit of the state of energy (the per se photon)) is affecting the mass exposed and that the points that show themselves as a particle are the threshold points for that specimen from that exposure in that environment. That 'point' (per se particle) of the mass on the specimen plate is already resonating with energy upon it and the combining elements are resonating like the surface of a pond and the point we see is the threshold like the white cap on a pond. That single threshold of energy to 'react' (release its inner energy; an exothermic reaction for that point over the total exposed).
The original DSE is not maintaining the interractions of the energy (light) and its wavelength (in meters) and the effects it has on the exposed mass (the double slit nor the plate receiving the exposure). As simple as it sounds any of science know that the mass is not held as relevant to the experiment (an error).
for some reason, the photo electric effect nor even the concept of how colors work is held as relevant to the experiments of the double slit or the black body (catastrophe) radiation.
The concept to record the reaction thresholds, of the mass will also affect the black body experiment. (ie.... graphene will be perfect and to measure the resonant affects in itself will be a important, especially when doping the material as that will be how to tune in wavelength frequencies (mark my words))
This is a science section and your inquiry is short of humor but i will share something most do not.
Please no rants unless you have run the experiment yourself and taken into account the parameters of defining the receiving mass (plate).
For definition: The mass of the receiving plate that renders the pattern of the double-slit experiment.
As a real solid method of getting ahead on the concept; Graphene is a rare elemental structure and will offer a fine method of directly proving much of what is being said on this thread.
core concept to maintain: the energy affects the mass
So when sending your em (electromagnetic energy; photons (per se)) thru the double slit to the receiving plate, both the double slit and receiving plate will render different effects to various wavelengths that are exposed to them.
Colors prove that point in itself.
Now the particle aspect is directly going to be affected by maintaining a clean experiment in which the receiving plate is important. To send a single photon (per se) that reflects the 'same' patter as the bath of the same light is what many find as the particle wave duality.
But this will be affected by the mass (its thresholds). The first evidence will be that when the double slit is exposed and the background, to change each will affect the next exposure, one at a time.
That mass is very important in the double slit experiment.
The experiment is not showing that particles called 'photons' exist but that each wave (single unit of the state of energy (the per se photon)) is affecting the mass exposed and that the points that show themselves as a particle are the threshold points for that specimen from that exposure in that environment. That 'point' (per se particle) of the mass on the specimen plate is already resonating with energy upon it and the combining elements are resonating like the surface of a pond and the point we see is the threshold like the white cap on a pond. That single threshold of energy to 'react' (release its inner energy; an exothermic reaction for that point over the total exposed).
The original DSE is not maintaining the interractions of the energy (light) and its wavelength (in meters) and the effects it has on the exposed mass (the double slit nor the plate receiving the exposure). As simple as it sounds any of science know that the mass is not held as relevant to the experiment (an error).
for some reason, the photo electric effect nor even the concept of how colors work is held as relevant to the experiments of the double slit or the black body (catastrophe) radiation.
The concept to record the reaction thresholds, of the mass will also affect the black body experiment. (ie.... graphene will be perfect and to measure the resonant affects in itself will be a important, especially when doping the material as that will be how to tune in wavelength frequencies (mark my words))
Last edited:
and 
