Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
For the record, I've filed a request to have this moved to the paranormal section, given that this thread has nothing to do with science, or mathematics, or medicine, or technology.

Dutch said:
When an anticipated event finds its expression on a pre-determined timeframe, how can it be after the fact?
Click to expand...

Because you generalize and then shoehorn in "hits". Even to the point of arbitrarily redefining the value of pi. You yourself admit you cannot and do not make predictions.
 
Last edited:
Dutch said:
man, I was making a comparison to the 'uncertainty principle ' at quantum level. do you disagree such an uncertainly exists? Have you ever thought about what this could mean at macro level?
You seem to have to expand the habbit of ignoring each 'confirmation' that finds its expression eventually based on the HDdesign material. everytime again.
Click to expand...


Again. please try harder Dutch.
 
Dutch said:
fact is that in these 2 threads, in the first one the timing was correct and in the second one the underlying theme. Its there to review, period.
Click to expand...


Fact is "the first one" you admit you “had no idea what could have happened. Because that's impossible” so there was nothing for you to be, well, timing. "The second the underlying theme" was your timing of the 'exit of Sun King' which you associated to the death of Mandela and got wrong. You still seem to simply want to pretend your "themes" and "timing" are not codependent and based singularly on your intuition, which, if you haven't noticed yet, is often just wrong.
 
Dutch said:
When an anticipated event finds its expression on a pre-determined timeframe, how can it be after the fact?.
Click to expand...

By your own assertions they didn't "finds its expression on a pre-determined timeframe" until after the fact.


Dutch said:
I would agree with you if I had posted the 'july 7 London Bombings' and 'exit of Sun King' stuff after the london bombings and the passing of Mandelea
Click to expand...

Have you now forgotten you “had no idea what could have happened. Because that's impossible” and “It took an exact Venus Transit timeframe to express”? You don't have to agree with me Dutch but just don't pretend you do agree with yourself. An aspect you should try to indulge and explore in a more critical and quantitative fashion.
 
Dutch said:
I would agree with you if I had posted the 'july 7 London Bombings' and 'exit of Sun King' stuff after the london bombings and the passing of Mandelea
Click to expand...
The first problem is that you have presented no evidence that you posted this stuff before the events. Not even links to a forum post or blog entry. They probably exist but you have not cited them. Of course the 'july 7 London Bombings' post will state that there will be Bombings in London on july 7, Dutch :eek:.

The next problem is that you have posted no citation to a prediction that there would be a bombing in London on July 7 2005. I suspect that this is your usual something will happen somewhere in the world around this day.

The next problem is the insanely vague term "exit of Sun King". Why not 'departure of the small dwarf'? You are basically predicting that someone will "exit" (not even die!) somewhere in the world around some date. You then attach this vague wish of yours to a personally important person and get it wrong :jaw-dropp!

The next problem is that you do not post-predict this "exit of Sun King" to the actual exit of the actual Sun King :rolleyes:.
 
Last edited:
To emphasize the point at hand (in case anyone has missed it)...


Dutch said:
In HDDesign it is the same with our perception of time and the underlying themes that are about to be expressed. The more you know about the timing, the less you know about the underlying theme, only enhanched investigation can bring you closer. Back in 2005 I had the time to do so and it's all there.
Click to expand...

...as both the "underlying theme" and " timing" are based, by your own assertions, only on your intuition and...

Dutch said:
You cannot have an instant out of the bleu perception of what is about to be expressed, both in sense of exact timing and the exact expression of the expected underlying theme that is about to be expressed.
Click to expand...

So your " instant out of the bleu perception" is wrong just as often as it is right simply by your own accounting and "cannot" be otherwise by your own above assertion. That's no better than chance.

Now, we are pattern seeking creatures, it's part of our evolutionary survival skills. The downside being that we tend to ascribe patterns (or more specifically agency) where there may be none. On the plus side, finding patterns, modeling them and utilizing said models is what has given us our modern technological society. Lots of things have recurring or semi-recurring patterns. So just perhaps intuitively recognizing some potential patterns ain't such a bad thing even if you get it wrong some times. Ascribing those intuitively discerned (subjective) patterns some agency (other than your own) and particularly some hyper-dimensional agency (especially when you use only one dimension for said patterns) will not work out well. As that pattern tends to be obvious to the more objective pattern seeking individuals of our species.

The ball is in your court Dutch and you've now given yourself a very tough row to hoe. By your own attempt at excuses you have asserted your intuition is no better than chance (as would be expected). It is up to you now to improve and quantify your accounting to demonstrate otherwise. Heck, you may have some intuitive insight into some patterns but just making excuses that just give you nothing better than chance wont help you demonstrate that to anyone but yourself.
 
Dutch, where do you get your numbers for the orbital periods of the planets/objects?

Just a link will suffice. Preferably a link to a list of the planets/objects with the periods tabled.
 
Reality Check said:
Oh dear another fantasy demanding another question, Dutch :eek:
Dutch: Show your mathematics from before 7 July 2005 (i.e. predetermined) that showed that 7 July 2005 is a "timing".
11 December 2013

And you did not actually answer the question:
Dutch: Please explain what 7-4-7-based HDDesign is
9th December 2013
Click to expand...

Being on a holiday and having flown in a Jumbo Jet when the next thought about this HDD came?

Having read quit a large part of this thread it is as good an explanation as any in my opinion.
 
All of Dutch's maths work out exactly if you use sufficiently large or small enough values of Pi.
 
Mister Earl said:
For the record, I've filed a request to have this moved to the paranormal section, given that this thread has nothing to do with science, or mathematics, or medicine, or technology.
Click to expand...

Curious. I made just such a request a couple of years ago and it was ignored. I believed I even quoted Dutch's remark that it wasn't science.
 
Mister Earl said:
For the record, I've filed a request to have this moved to the paranormal section, given that this thread has nothing to do with science, or mathematics, or medicine, or tech.
Click to expand...

I has everything to do with mathematics and within a few decades you would be amazed how science will catch up with it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom