ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags Tsunam Earthquake

Reply
Old 22nd March 2017, 10:41 PM   #3041
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
Originally Posted by Porpoise of Life View Post
The universe is not expanding into space that is already there, like an explosion. Space is a part of the expanding universe. There is no space as we know it outside the universe.

Even a high school physics student can tell you that.
.
Space is infinity, so, yes, there is no outside for eternal and infinity space.

There is outside for expanding visible universe.

Love
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd March 2017, 10:46 PM   #3042
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
Originally Posted by aleCcowaN View Post
That's what caught my attention. That and the "expanding quarks". It seems these people got rid of uncertainty playing any role in Physics. Or maybe he can explain again that of the double slit experiment and the string.

I imagine Pixie of key studied a few courses in a politeknik in Tallinn or Thessaloníki (I suspect English is his third language) and later became a lone wolf with idiosyncratic theories who needs to be pampered at web forums. Well, be it! Let's forever provide by opposition the "self reassurance" Pixie of key is needing. He's entertaining and sounds a nice fellow.
Double split experiement is easy.

Expanding nucleus of atoms recycling expanding dark light waves which our machine cant register.

So, if you put one expanding photons moving, there moving all ready expanding dark light expanding waves.

If you dont check this holes, this dark light waves can moving both holes etc.

Love
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd March 2017, 10:56 PM   #3043
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
Originally Posted by The Man View Post
Indeed, I first encountered such 'theories' of everything is expanding some decades ago. However, that space isn't also expanding (or how we measure distances in some space, a metric) seems to be at least a requirement if not a common thread of such speculations.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_(mathematics)

That, as I sit here, some distance form my monitor, me, my monitor, and everything between the two expanding. That such a metric, the distance and material elements that represent that distance between me and my monitor doesn't change. Indicates that the space (and metric, how we represent distances) must also change. The whole notion that everything is expanding and we just don't notice it, explicitly relies on an expanding metric of space (though different than the cosmological metric expansion of space).
No reason for expanding space.

Space is infinity

If expanding the space does not expand because its project into the inside space all the time?

But how is it then expands the expanding space?

Who just can not understand that the quarks are expanding because of the inside of their projects all the time what they already have.

However, the internal pressure from an expanding quarks does not grow because the curd expanding expanding the pushing force is dispersed throughout a larger and larger area of ​​the infinite space.

Sorry about googletranslation.

love
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd March 2017, 11:09 PM   #3044
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
your head "mask" from space later in the area of ​​the same size as the Earth is now expanding.

one quark "mask" from space later in the area of ​​the same size as the visible universe expanding "masks" now.

Of course all the other expansion quarks have expanded in the same proportion.

and expanding the same light. same relationship.

but space does not expand.

It is infinite. it need not expand.

how it could even expand?

Love
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd March 2017, 11:12 PM   #3045
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
but space does not expand.

It is infinite. it need not expand.

how it could even expand?

Is there space which pushing inside to expanding space?

Or what the heck is expanding space?

Love
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 03:57 AM   #3046
fagin
Illuminator
 
fagin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: As far away from casebro as possible.
Posts: 3,811
Originally Posted by smartcooky View Post
Sorry.

Poul Anderson was also one of my favorites too, I especially liked Tau Zero and Fire Time. However, in both those books, I found his style of prose at times difficult to follow, and found myself having to re-read passages because they didn't make sense the first time.
Apology accepted, and so did I.
__________________
There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda
fagin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 04:13 AM   #3047
aleCcowaN
imperfecto del subjuntivo
 
aleCcowaN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: stranded at Buenos Aires, a city that, like NYC or Paris, has so little to offer...
Posts: 7,350
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Double split experiement is easy.

Expanding nucleus of atoms recycling expanding dark light waves which our machine cant register.

So, if you put one expanding photons moving, there moving all ready expanding dark light expanding waves.

If you dont check this holes, this dark light waves can moving both holes etc.

Love
1039
I used to play those games as a kid. Replacing all words that started with some letter with some arbitrary word. In your case, you're using "expanding". Can you explain it again without playing this game? Or provide a video -Ok if it's subtitled in Suomi, Karjala, Eesti or ελληνικά, I'll find my way around them- "expanding" on this concept and explaining the variation in the pattern you get in the double slit experiment (the only time I did the experiment was at college in 1979, or 1981, don't remember if in Physics 102 or 302, so I have forgotten most of it).

It seems you become pretty silent when you have to delve in real explanations, why is that? Is it because you hypothesis only seem to hold water if expressed in a blurry fashion?
__________________
Horrible dipsomaniacs (drinkers) and other addicts, be gone and get treated!
These fora are full of scientists and specialists. Most of them turn back to pumpkins the second they log out.
I got tired of the actual schizophrenics that are taking hold part of the forum and decided to do something about it.

Last edited by aleCcowaN; Yesterday at 04:16 AM.
aleCcowaN is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 06:34 AM   #3048
Myriad
Hyperthetical
Moderator
 
Myriad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 12,527
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
I say, expanding space is naked empire.

I'm all in favor of a larger Naked Empire.
__________________
A zømbie once bit my sister...
Myriad is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 06:52 AM   #3049
Beady
Philosopher
 
Beady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 42d 45'23.3"N, 84d 35' 10.8'W, 840'>MSL
Posts: 6,034
Originally Posted by Myriad View Post
I'm all in favor of a larger Naked Empire.
Here you go:



This signature is intended to irritate people.
Beady is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 10:35 AM   #3050
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
Astronomers find unexpected, dust-obscured star formation in distant galaxy

https://m.phys.org/news/2017-03-astr...formation.html

"Pushing the limits of the largest single-aperture millimeter telescope in the world, and coupling it with gravitational lensing, University of Massachusetts Amherst astronomer Alexandra Pope and colleagues report that they have detected a surprising rate of star formation, four times higher than previously detected, in a dust-obscured galaxy behind a Frontier Fields cluster."

Galaxys born inside to outside and stars born a lot very fast when two supermassive expanding concentration collide.

Rakkautta
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 10:45 AM   #3051
Peregrinus
Critical Thinker
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 488
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Astronomers find unexpected, dust-obscured star formation in distant galaxy

https://m.phys.org/news/2017-03-astr...formation.html

"Pushing the limits of the largest single-aperture millimeter telescope in the world, and coupling it with gravitational lensing, University of Massachusetts Amherst astronomer Alexandra Pope and colleagues report that they have detected a surprising rate of star formation, four times higher than previously detected, in a dust-obscured galaxy behind a Frontier Fields cluster."

Galaxys born inside to outside and stars born a lot very fast when two supermassive expanding concentration collide.
One galaxy suddenly becomes multiple galaxies; nowhere in that quote is there any hint of any "collision." "Supermassive" is a purely relative term and is nowhere hinted at in the quoted material. "Very fast" is also entirely relative, and apparently refers only to a single instance therefore it cannot be applied to any phenomena outside the one instance cited. While expansion in myriad forms seems a fetish of yours, it's nowhere mentioned in the quoted material.
Peregrinus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 12:06 PM   #3052
aleCcowaN
imperfecto del subjuntivo
 
aleCcowaN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: stranded at Buenos Aires, a city that, like NYC or Paris, has so little to offer...
Posts: 7,350
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post

Galaxys born inside to outside and stars born a lot very fast when two supermassive expanding concentration collide.
Summarizing:

[Random piece of news] ---> tiddledee-dee! expansion is behind!

Pixie of key, the sport you're playing is called "amateur demiurge".
__________________
Horrible dipsomaniacs (drinkers) and other addicts, be gone and get treated!
These fora are full of scientists and specialists. Most of them turn back to pumpkins the second they log out.
I got tired of the actual schizophrenics that are taking hold part of the forum and decided to do something about it.
aleCcowaN is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 12:24 PM   #3053
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
"For one thing, emissions driven by star-formation in the galaxies were separated by a surprising distance from the dense gas revealed by quasar absorption, indicating that the galaxies are embedded in an extended halo of hydrogen gas. The estimated star formation rates were also unexpectedly high.

"We had expected we would see faint emissions right on top of the quasar, and instead we saw bright galaxies at large separations from the quasar," said J. Xavier Prochaska, professor of astronomy and astrophysics at UC Santa Cruz and coauthor of a paper on the new findings published March 24 in Science.

The neutral hydrogen gas revealed by its absorption of quasar light is most likely part of a large halo or extended disk of gas around the galaxy, said first author Marcel Neeleman, a postdoctoral fellow at UC Santa Cruz. "It's not where the star formation is, and to see so much gas that far from the star-forming region means there is a large amount of neutral hydrogen around the galaxy," Neeleman said. "We don't know if it's in a large, extended disk of gas that's falling in, or if it's just a really dense halo of gas around the galaxy.""

https://m.phys.org/news/2017-03-astr...-way-like.html

They dont know.

They dont know that only real force is pushing force.

Rakkautta
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 12:33 PM   #3054
Peregrinus
Critical Thinker
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 488
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
... only real force is pushing force.
For which supporting data - that's data, not speculation - is still wanting.
Peregrinus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 12:38 PM   #3055
aleCcowaN
imperfecto del subjuntivo
 
aleCcowaN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: stranded at Buenos Aires, a city that, like NYC or Paris, has so little to offer...
Posts: 7,350
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
They dont know.

NON SEQUITUR

They dont know that only real force is pushing force.
FTFY

I see you're devoted to the fine art of hindsight filling the blanks.
__________________
Horrible dipsomaniacs (drinkers) and other addicts, be gone and get treated!
These fora are full of scientists and specialists. Most of them turn back to pumpkins the second they log out.
I got tired of the actual schizophrenics that are taking hold part of the forum and decided to do something about it.
aleCcowaN is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 12:45 PM   #3056
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 19,217
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
You cant make science experiement with expanding space.
An ignorant statement that you have been persisting with for many years. No one can do experiments with space because space is not a physical thing. We do not have vats full of space to experiment with !
To put it simply: Space is what gives objects position.

We have been making science experiments with objects with space for over 500 years (starting with Galileo) or even thousands of years (ancient Greeks, Babylonians, etc.).

A lie about us "can only believe" because you have known the physical evidence for expanding space for over 4 years. It is the physical evidence that has convinced the scientific community that the universe is expanding for 90 years now.
And now we have EternalIgnorance from Pixie of key! on 19th March 2015.
29th October 2012: What is the evidence for the Big Bang? !

An ignorant fantasy about light expanding. Everywhere we look in the universe light acts a a photon which is a point particle. That includes in distant galaxies far, far away and in the past.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 02:07 PM   #3057
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
Gravitational wave kicks monster black hole out of galactic core

https://m.phys.org/news/2017-03-hubb...-galactic.html

Really?

I kick ball with pushing force.

Love
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 02:41 PM   #3058
fuelair
Cythraul Enfys
 
fuelair's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 52,012
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Gravitational wave kicks monster black hole out of galactic core

https://m.phys.org/news/2017-03-hubb...-galactic.html

Really?

I kick ball with pushing force.

Love
1039
and with what force would you pull a wagon or pull a bull to the ground ?An educational powerpoint for you and any others confused on this:
http://www.oswego.edu/~dristle/PHY_2...ces_3.3-4t.pdf
__________________
There is no problem so great that it cannot be fixed by small explosives carefully placed.

Wash this space!

We fight for the Lady Babylon!!!
fuelair is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 03:06 PM   #3059
fuelair
Cythraul Enfys
 
fuelair's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 52,012
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
when quarks expanding, there is something which pushing inside expanding quarks.

It is same thing what quarks already have.

So, expanding quarks get all a time more and more that thing what expanding quarks allready have some.

It is expanding pushing force.

Also thats why expanding quarks expanding "in" space which is eternal and infinity place which is nothing.

I just wonder, is there space which pushing inside expanding space and thats why space expanding?

If not, why and how space expanding?

Love
1039
Quarks as such do not get bigger (expand). Of your first five sentences, all are false and easily found to be false) Your last two could be if you remembered the big bang started the movement and expansion of the amount of space does not stop until an equal and opposite force is applied to it. There is, so far, no implication of any kind that that has happened or will happen though we accept it might in one way or another. Until it actually does, no way to tell, thus no evidence for you assumption(s)!!!!
__________________
There is no problem so great that it cannot be fixed by small explosives carefully placed.

Wash this space!

We fight for the Lady Babylon!!!
fuelair is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 01:54 AM   #3060
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
How you proof that quarks dont expanding all a time and recycling expanding pushing force with all other expanding quarks?

Well, also light expanding same way what quarks.

I can explain how quarks expanding.

I can explain, where is coming that all behind movement which pushing inside expanding quarks.

I can explain why there is all a time more and more that all behind movement / motion / pushing force for expanding quarks, neutrinos and for expanding light.

You cant explain expanding space.

Is there space which pushing inside expanding space or how that expanding space expanding?

Rakkautta
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 02:45 AM   #3061
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
Originally Posted by Beady View Post
Here you go:

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...094a8c3bcf.jpg

This signature is intended to irritate people.
Well, this is science experiement.

If your inside pushing more food / energy / motion/ pushing force what coming out from you, you expanding.

Ok.

If there is pushing inside expanding quarks and expanding photons all a time motion / energy / pushing force, of course quarks and photons expanding all a time.

Now they have just recycling expanding pushing force with each other.

Is there space which pushing inside expanding space?

Love
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 03:24 AM   #3062
aleCcowaN
imperfecto del subjuntivo
 
aleCcowaN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: stranded at Buenos Aires, a city that, like NYC or Paris, has so little to offer...
Posts: 7,350
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
How you proof that quarks dont expanding all a time and recycling expanding pushing force with all other expanding quarks?

Well, also light expanding same way what quarks.

I can explain how quarks expanding.

I can explain, where is coming that all behind movement which pushing inside expanding quarks.

I can explain why there is all a time more and more that all behind movement / motion / pushing force for expanding quarks, neutrinos and for expanding light.

You cant explain expanding space.

Is there space which pushing inside expanding space or how that expanding space expanding?

Rakkautta
1039
Have you notice that you explaining nothing in your posts?

Your posts lack scientific knowledge and burst with anthropological and psychological clues: you abuse of the potential verb in English (can) and almost ignore the substantive verb in English (be). That's not normal speech at all in Mentalese, so it doesn't matter English is your third, umpteenth of unknownth language, and it tells that what is expanding is you.

On top of that you drop some incredibly blurry phrases. As it's obvious you know better, I have to conclude you do that on purpose just to keep the bicycle standing and going. Like your «Is there space which pushing inside expanding space or how that expanding space expanding?» which is just the cosmological equivalent of "how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?" with the difference it's intended to twist brains and not tongues.
__________________
Horrible dipsomaniacs (drinkers) and other addicts, be gone and get treated!
These fora are full of scientists and specialists. Most of them turn back to pumpkins the second they log out.
I got tired of the actual schizophrenics that are taking hold part of the forum and decided to do something about it.
aleCcowaN is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 04:13 AM   #3063
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
You dont tell anything at all, what is expanding space etc.

If quarks expanding, we can proof that science way, because we can make a science experiement with quarks.

You cant proof that there is expanding space.

Space dont emit information.

Guardian angels dont emit information.

So, you just have to believe, there is expanding space and guardian angels.

Is there space which pushing inside expanding space?

Rakkautta
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."

Last edited by Pixie of key; Today at 04:14 AM.
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 05:42 AM   #3064
aleCcowaN
imperfecto del subjuntivo
 
aleCcowaN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: stranded at Buenos Aires, a city that, like NYC or Paris, has so little to offer...
Posts: 7,350
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
You dont tell anything at all, what is expanding space etc.

If quarks expanding, we can proof that science way, because we can make a science experiement with quarks.

You cant proof that there is expanding space.

Space dont emit information.

Guardian angels dont emit information.

So, you just have to believe, there is expanding space and guardian angels.

Is there space which pushing inside expanding space?

Rakkautta
1039


You have a formidable melange in your mind. You mixed up space with metrics. Does the paper in a book emit information or is it used to arrange the information the book contains?

Your "pusshy push" is just the product of excluding from your reasoning everything, including reality, that deranges you getting to your preselected conclusion. That's why you don't sound better than those magnetic bums following people in parks and train stations.

Why don't you start explaining your pet hypothesis by writing them in a language you have command in and using translate.google.com to convert in into English? Then, we'll be able to understand what you're saying, because now you're just babbling in what seems to be a language with only one speaker that you inventing to yourself.
__________________
Horrible dipsomaniacs (drinkers) and other addicts, be gone and get treated!
These fora are full of scientists and specialists. Most of them turn back to pumpkins the second they log out.
I got tired of the actual schizophrenics that are taking hold part of the forum and decided to do something about it.
aleCcowaN is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 05:53 AM   #3065
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
Originally Posted by aleCcowaN View Post


You have a formidable melange in your mind. You mixed up space with metrics. Does the paper in a book emit information or is it used to arrange the information the book contains?

Your "pusshy push" is just the product of excluding from your reasoning everything, including reality, that deranges you getting to your preselected conclusion. That's why you don't sound better than those magnetic bums following people in parks and train stations.

Why don't you start explaining your pet hypothesis by writing them in a language you have command in and using translate.google.com to convert in into English? Then, we'll be able to understand what you're saying, because now you're just babbling in what seems to be a language with only one speaker that you inventing to yourself.
Why you dont tell something about expanding space?

Love
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 05:54 AM   #3066
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
The universe is eternal.

The visible universe has a beginning which is based on eternal motion.

Motion is eternal.

Motion = energy.

Motion = pushing force.

Eternal circulation is based only on pushing force which is motion.

Therefore pulling force/arching space does not exist.

Thus the motion/energy of which the visible universe was born existed yet before the visible universe came into existence out of it.

In the eternal and infinite space there are extremely dense and massive objects that are very far away from each other. All of them are located far outside the visible universe and the expanding visible universe protrudes away from one such object. Thereby the expanding condensations absorb motion originally from other similar objects to themselves. This is the matter of motion/energy i.e. remains of very old detectable kind of universes.

These extremely dense and massive objects recycle the eternal motion/energy among each other and during this action there are detectable kinds of galaxies born out of the extremely dense motion/energy that is directed away from those very objects.

If there were no remains of the old universes that still have areas of different densities protruding in the contrary direction no detectable kind of visible universe could ever be born.

First the supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies are born out of zillions of individual condensations that expand and recycle the expanding motion/energy among each other.

The external motion/energy protruding towards gets the expansion of these objects to accelerate very strongly at the same time. As a result there is suddenly an extremely great pressure in the center of a large area with no gravitational force at all.

Now there is outward expanding motion/energy being pressed from the center of this area out of which new expanding stars come to existence by the aid of the external motion/energy in a similar manner. Also new detectable kind of matter is born consisting of the cores of expanding atoms that recycle among each other the expanding motion/energy with a nature of expanding light.

In this case the external motion originates from a supermassive object in another galaxy’s center that also expands in a manner that expanding motion/energy protrudes outward of it. This expanding motion/energy has the nature of expanding cores of atoms and thus it also has the nature of expanding stars.

Rakkautta
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 05:56 AM   #3067
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
Space is eternal and infinite room that is nothing at all.

Therefore space does not expand or arch.

The general redshift of light does not prove that expanding space exists.

The bending in the trajectory of light for example when passing the sun does not prove that arching space exists.

So called gravitational redshift of light does not prove that gravitation or arching space exist.

The phenomena in question are a proof of photons expanding and recycling expanding motion/energy among each other and therefore the light generally redshifts during its journey. Therefore the light bends when it passes the sun and therefore the expanding light protruding outward from the dense star gravitationally redshifts so to speak.

New expanding photons interact with old expanding photons that originate from other galaxies of the superbunch/cluster of galaxies. Interacting with new expanding photons the speed of old expanding photons increases and therefore the old light generally redshifts so to speak.

Expanding photons that are originally from billions of galaxies protrude towards the expanding sun. These photons have recycled expanding motion/energy during their journey and the motion/energy protrudes towards the sun in the areas in between the expanding photons and then collides with the expanding photons that are protruding past the sun getting their trajectory to bend towards the expanding sun.

Love
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 05:59 AM   #3068
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
!!!

Expanding photons is small part of expanding light.

There is dark light which also expanding and have a nature of waves.

expanding light waves is dark for us.

We can "see" Light waves nature, because of expanding photons.

Entropy working in every level, also very small! I mean, inside quarks and photons too! Of course! Or if not, WHY NOT?

Rakkautta
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."

Last edited by Pixie of key; Today at 06:00 AM.
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 06:02 AM   #3069
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
Expanding condensations vs. expanding space

Those who believe in the Big Bang theory, believe in the existence of a an expanding
space! But no one is capable of explaining of what is making the expanding space
expand, or how it does it! No one can tell what happens to the expanding space when
it expands!

I have asked and I have received these kinds of answers!

Question: What happens to the expanding space when it expands?

Answer: The metric coordinate system of the space is growing.

Question: Where is based on?

Answer: It is based on the expanding of the space.

As you can see, there doesn´t exist a well founded answer to this, not yet anyway!
No one can tell what kind of system the expanding space in itself is!

The Onesimpleprinciple- model is able to explain how the condensations of the
visible universe are expanding all the time three-dimensionally outwards to already
existing space, which is an eternal and infinite space of nothing!

Every system/condensation contains movement which is always pushing force! The inner
motion/pressure is based on recycling. That means that the expanding system consists
of smaller expanding systems which are recycling expanding motion/energy among each
other.

With this inner motion/pushing force the expanding system/condensation is able to
slow down the speed of the energy of the pushing motion/energy expanding from the
outside, making some of the pushing motion from outside to its own inner motion.
This newfound inner motion/pushing force can be used to do the same again and all
the while gain increasing motion/energy which, as an inner motion, is object´s inner
pushing force/pressure which makes the condensation expand/scatter to bigger and
bigger area to an eternal and infinite space of nothing!

Love
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 06:03 AM   #3070
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
The condensation itself consists of smaller condensations that recycle the eternal motion in a corresponding way and therefore the inner motion/pressure gets the thing in the system to scatter to wider and wider band with help from pushing force.

The bigger band the expanding motion of the subject scatters to, the more motion of all background protrudes through it and the more it gets that motion to its own inner motion/energy/pushing force.

So the condensations that form all the backgrounds motion no longer expand in the same ratio as the expanding motions that form the visible universe do and that is exactly why they keep pushing more and more through the expanding condensations of the visible universe all the time.

The further forward the visible universe protrudes, the less motion/energy (not dark energy) of all background have the expanding condensations ahead been able to eat/absorb to themselves. That is also why there is more and more motion/energy of all background available for the expanding condensations of the visible world all the time.

In this way the Onesimpleprinciple model is able to explain how and why the expanding condensations expand outward to the already existing space. And since a portion of the inner expanding motion/energy is directed out of the expanding condensation, functions that expanding motion/energy as a pushing force by the aid of which the expanding condensation is able to push other similar expanding condensations/concentrations away from itself.

Love
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 06:15 AM   #3071
aleCcowaN
imperfecto del subjuntivo
 
aleCcowaN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: stranded at Buenos Aires, a city that, like NYC or Paris, has so little to offer...
Posts: 7,350
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Why you dont tell something about expanding space?
If an articulated person asked, maybe I would...
__________________
Horrible dipsomaniacs (drinkers) and other addicts, be gone and get treated!
These fora are full of scientists and specialists. Most of them turn back to pumpkins the second they log out.
I got tired of the actual schizophrenics that are taking hold part of the forum and decided to do something about it.
aleCcowaN is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 06:43 AM   #3072
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
The surprising discovery of a new class of pulsating X-ray stars

https://m.phys.org/news/2017-03-disc...ray-stars.html

"Data recently returned for d Cep from the Chandra X-ray Observatory, combined with previous X-ray measures secured with the XMM-Newton X-ray satellite, have shown that d Cep has X-ray variations occurring in accord with the supergiant star's 5.4 day pulsation period. X-rays are observed at all phases of the star's pulsations, but sharply rise by ~400% near the times when the star swells to its maximum diameter of about 45 times that of the Sun."

"Its light variations are the result of radial pulsations, in which the star contracts and expands with the same 5.4 day period as its brightness variations. The surface of d Cep reaches supersonic speeds of about 82,000 miles per hour, while the star shrinks and grows by roughly 2 million miles during each pulsation period. Thousands of Cepheids have been found in our galaxy as well as in other galaxies hundreds of millions of light years away."

Do you have any observations from space that expands?

No you dont have. you have expanded the observation light.

protrudes into the expanding space space?

Love
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 06:48 AM   #3073
aleCcowaN
imperfecto del subjuntivo
 
aleCcowaN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: stranded at Buenos Aires, a city that, like NYC or Paris, has so little to offer...
Posts: 7,350
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
The universe is eternal.
False.

Do you want to give it a try and prove your assertion?
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
The visible universe has a beginning NON SEQUITUR which is based on eternal motion.
What's the matter? You're breaking appart!
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Motion is eternal.
This may be true for certain circumstances and values of "eternal". But as a principle, FALSE again.
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Motion = energy.
Motion is energy as much as a flame is a living being that needs food to burn and grow and that reproduces.

Didn't you ever follow a course of basic Physics?

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Eternal circulation is based only on pushing force which is motion.
And Jesus heals and saves (basically both assertions are of equal value: they tend asymptotically to zero).

So far, five lines of yours and five pieces of unarticulated tomfoolery that let see the most thundery storm behind.

You're coming out a high maintenance boy, so I'm leaving you to those with OCD whose needs may complement the ones you experience from whatever happens to you. I can't become complicit in promoting public unhealth.

Toodle-oo!
__________________
Horrible dipsomaniacs (drinkers) and other addicts, be gone and get treated!
These fora are full of scientists and specialists. Most of them turn back to pumpkins the second they log out.
I got tired of the actual schizophrenics that are taking hold part of the forum and decided to do something about it.
aleCcowaN is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 07:55 AM   #3074
The Man
Scourge, of the supernatural
 
The Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 11,556
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Expanding condensations vs. expanding space

Those who believe in the Big Bang theory, believe in the existence of a an expanding
space! But no one is capable of explaining of what is making the expanding space
expand, or how it does it! No one can tell what happens to the expanding space when
it expands!

I have asked and I have received these kinds of answers!

Question: What happens to the expanding space when it expands?

Answer: The metric coordinate system of the space is growing.

Question: Where is based on?

Answer: It is based on the expanding of the space.
No, the answer you were given here is that it is "based on" a coordinate system and the application of general relativity to that system. Why do you continue to lie about some "answers" you have evidently, and apparently intentionally, only given to yourself?


So have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.
__________________
"Not a seat but a springboard” (1942 Winston Churchill) "As he who, seeking asses, found a kingdom" (1671 Milton "Paradise Regained") "for it seem'd A void was made in nature, all her bonds Crack'd; and I saw the flaring atom-streams And torrents of her myriad universe, Ruining along the illimitable inane, Fly on to clash together again, and make Another and another frame of things For ever." (1868 Tennyson "Lucretius")
The Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 08:11 AM   #3075
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,413
"Why do you continue to lie about some "answers" you have evidently, and apparently intentionally, only given to yourself?"

It is not my answer.

Big Bang people given that answer for me.

Expanding space is naked empire.

Rakkautta
1039
__________________
Originally Posted by Maartenn100

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 08:25 AM   #3076
The Man
Scourge, of the supernatural
 
The Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 11,556
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
"Why do you continue to lie about some "answers" you have evidently, and apparently intentionally, only given to yourself?"

It is not my answer.

Big Bang people given that answer for me.

Expanding space is naked empire.

Rakkautta
1039
It is your answer as it is the only one you keep repeating here and has only been asserted here by, well, you. "Big Bang people"? What exactly constitutes "Big Bang people"? If you want to actually find out about cosmological expansion you should probably look to cosmologists.



So have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.
__________________
"Not a seat but a springboard” (1942 Winston Churchill) "As he who, seeking asses, found a kingdom" (1671 Milton "Paradise Regained") "for it seem'd A void was made in nature, all her bonds Crack'd; and I saw the flaring atom-streams And torrents of her myriad universe, Ruining along the illimitable inane, Fly on to clash together again, and make Another and another frame of things For ever." (1868 Tennyson "Lucretius")

Last edited by The Man; Today at 08:27 AM.
The Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:01 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2014, TribeTech AB. All Rights Reserved.
This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.