|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
27th November 2012, 08:51 AM | #1 |
Jedi Consular
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,077
|
Enlightenment, Science, and the Cosmos
Enlightenment: Is Science Ready to Take it Seriously?
"I’m not given to making grand predictions, but in this case I can’t resist: the very real spiritual transformation at the heart of mysticism is about to explode into the secular mainstream, and the consequences may just revolutionize our scientific understanding of the mind. [...] For expediency’s sake, I’ll define enlightenment as a complex and multi-faceted process by which the mind comes to know – and over time rest more securely in – its own ground. As this happens, our habitual sense of being a separate and bounded self begins to fade. Ultimately, the person for whom this happens no longer feels themselves to be an autonomous entity looking out at an external world; rather, they feel themselves, more and more, to be an intimate part of that world’s humid expression, an unfolding natural process no different than anything else in nature. As a result, practitioners report a liberating sense of freedom, ease, spontaneity. The volume of self-referential thought often decreases, although, since enlightenment happens along a deepening continuum, they are still routinely trapped in old habits of dualistic thinking. Despite the fact that this transformation has been painstakingly described in virtually every contemplative tradition – from Buddhism, Taoism and Hinduism through to the mystical branches of the Western Abrahamic religions – and is the central drama in the lives of thousands of lucid and intelligent human beings, here in the West there is zero mention of the phenomenon in any of our bastions of intellectual respectability. You’ll never read about spiritual enlightenment in a Malcolm Gladwell book, or the pages of The New York Review of Books. This is true even in most Western Buddhist books, where enlightenment may be mentioned as a general principle or orientation, but almost never as a tangible transformation that happens to real 21st-century human beings. [...] In the multidisciplinary world of consciousness studies, the buzzword is nonduality, a translation of Advaita (literally “not two”), an ancient branch of Hindu philosophy. I’ve presented at two ‘Toward a Science of Consciousness’ meetings, a terrific annual assembly of the biggest names in neuroscience and philosophy of mind, among them Antonio Damasio, David Chalmers, Wolf Singer, Susan Greenfield, Stuart Hameroff and others. For the past few years nonduality has been a popular subject of discussion. There is even a dedicated ‘Science and Nonduality’ conference - now in its fourth year – that features some of the same speakers, many of them offering straight-to-the-bone “Direct Path” instruction in books and DVDs and weekend workshops." [...] Science might be waking up to the fact that enlightenment is real! Which means that sooner or later, JREF might have to wake up to that too. Or else become a bastion of rebellious scientism heretics. For many people, a very real spiritual transformation is coming very soon... ...not through meditation or chanting or wishful thinking... ...but through the upcoming winter solstice. Cosmic events can and do put people on a period of rapid and miraculous spiritual growth. Open up to the possibility and maybe you will be surprised. Happy Holidays! |
__________________
"Faith in what?" he asked himself, adrift in limbo. "Faith in faith," he replied. "It isn't necessary to have something to believe in. It's only necessary to believe that somewhere there's something worthy of belief." |
|
27th November 2012, 09:05 AM | #3 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,001
|
humid expression? human expression?
As for separateness and self-absorption: Concentrating on (almost) anything will get you beyond that feeling of separateness: It could be math, science, art, or just cleaning the house. We're all connected by ideas, by activities, by disciplines, by basic neural structure and many other things we have in common. However, each of us is separate. After enlightenment, or a taste of it, the laundry. |
27th November 2012, 09:10 AM | #4 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 8,066
|
|
__________________
45 es un titere |
|
27th November 2012, 09:16 AM | #5 |
Deleterious Slab of Damnation
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Biggest Little City in the World
Posts: 29,577
|
Taoism is all about balance, not transformation.
Methinks someone has still failed to read the key texts of major religions before making claims about them. |
__________________
"Oh god...What have you done, zooterkin? WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?!?!?!" - Cleon |
|
27th November 2012, 09:17 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 35,398
|
|
27th November 2012, 10:37 AM | #7 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,620
|
This Winter Solstice specifically? Like, 2012 and all that?
|
27th November 2012, 10:39 AM | #8 |
Troublesome Passenger
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 21,844
|
|
27th November 2012, 10:46 AM | #9 |
Scholar
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 109
|
Some quotes from the link that the OP did not include:
"I have stopped quibbling. People I’ve known for years tell me about their enlightenment experiences and I believe them. I believe them because my curiosity about what may be happening in the mind is greater than my allegiance to an outdated and uninformed scientific consensus. Western psychology is still outgrowing a reactive skepticism towards the subjective anecdote that it inherited from behaviorism." What is it about psychologists? I still kind of grieve that they're not more sensible. For some reason I expect them to be. |
27th November 2012, 01:06 PM | #10 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,911
|
|
27th November 2012, 01:13 PM | #11 |
Great Dalmuti
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,266
|
|
__________________
"If it's real, then it gets more interesting the closer you examine it. If it's not real, just the opposite is true." - aggle-rithm |
|
27th November 2012, 01:38 PM | #12 |
Jedi Consular
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,077
|
Indeed music can help! Do you guys like Bach? Bach to the Future “Bach’s incomparably forceful expression, his urge to pile up structures of unheard-of dimensions in densest polyphonic weaving and a final unification, are all typical of the closing Baroque in his country. And more so is his mystic absorption in things transcending reason. Through the often feeble, pompous, redundant words of contemporary Protestant poetry, he looked into the last, unutterable depths of religious awareness. He gave expression to religious wisdom at the eleventh hour, when the rationalism of the dawning Enlightenment was blocking its way.” -Curt Sachs |
__________________
"Faith in what?" he asked himself, adrift in limbo. "Faith in faith," he replied. "It isn't necessary to have something to believe in. It's only necessary to believe that somewhere there's something worthy of belief." |
|
27th November 2012, 01:49 PM | #13 |
Jedi Consular
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,077
|
From unenlightened to enlightened. From Clark Kent to Superman. From Thomas Anderson to Neo. From farmer to Jedi. Pick a monomyth metaphor...they are all mere fingers pointing to the moon.
Quote:
I predict that if you a) take the right psychological approach to the question of enlightenment and b) maybe make a few lifestyle changes, then you can experience a 'spiritual transformation' yourself. |
__________________
"Faith in what?" he asked himself, adrift in limbo. "Faith in faith," he replied. "It isn't necessary to have something to believe in. It's only necessary to believe that somewhere there's something worthy of belief." |
|
27th November 2012, 01:56 PM | #14 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 8,066
|
So no testable predictions then.
Here is the thing. The solstice is real. We know where and when it will happen with a high degree of certainty. If this were to have some sort of effect on conciseness then there should be a mechanism for it. So what would it be gravity? The amount of daylight/darkness? If you cannot connect this to a property of the solstice and just make it an arbitrary linkage, then you really don't have anything. Try again. |
__________________
45 es un titere |
|
27th November 2012, 02:12 PM | #15 |
Jedi Consular
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,077
|
|
__________________
"Faith in what?" he asked himself, adrift in limbo. "Faith in faith," he replied. "It isn't necessary to have something to believe in. It's only necessary to believe that somewhere there's something worthy of belief." |
|
27th November 2012, 02:20 PM | #16 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 8,066
|
Everything you are writing looks like a re-tread of the harmonic convergence. I would expect the same results.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_Convergence |
__________________
45 es un titere |
|
27th November 2012, 02:40 PM | #17 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,911
|
Wasn't there a solstice last year?
|
27th November 2012, 02:52 PM | #18 |
Dental Floss Tycoon
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,371
|
|
__________________
Counterbalance in the little town of Ridgeview, Ohio. Two people permanently enslaved by the tyranny of fear and superstitution, facing the future with a kind of helpless dread. Two others facing the future with confidence - having escaped one of the darker places of the Twilight Zone. |
|
27th November 2012, 02:53 PM | #19 |
a carbon based life-form
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 39,049
|
|
27th November 2012, 02:58 PM | #20 |
a carbon based life-form
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 39,049
|
|
27th November 2012, 02:59 PM | #21 |
Ovis ex Machina
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sir Ddinbych
Posts: 7,001
|
|
27th November 2012, 04:30 PM | #22 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,800
|
Psychology is one of the very best arguments that Reason alone doesn't get you squat. The field has good, sciencey intentions (the same way Colbert is "truthy"), but the lack of falsifiability means the kind of people who know they are right have no good way to recognize when they're horribly, utterly wrong.
|
27th November 2012, 06:20 PM | #23 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,294
|
|
__________________
"I offer the world my genius. All I ask in return is that the world cover my expenses." Hugo Rune |
|
27th November 2012, 06:52 PM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 58,581
|
|
27th November 2012, 06:53 PM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 58,581
|
|
27th November 2012, 06:55 PM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 58,581
|
|
27th November 2012, 07:03 PM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 35,398
|
I notice that Limbo won't tell me if he's been dancing on the Moon again. Or taking a stroll inside a mountain with a goddess (name unknown).
|
27th November 2012, 08:18 PM | #28 |
Jedi Consular
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,077
|
|
__________________
"Faith in what?" he asked himself, adrift in limbo. "Faith in faith," he replied. "It isn't necessary to have something to believe in. It's only necessary to believe that somewhere there's something worthy of belief." |
|
27th November 2012, 08:34 PM | #29 |
Up The Irons
Tagger
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 34,458
|
I much prefer The Enlightenment, thanks.
|
__________________
i loves the little birdies they goes tweet tweet tweet hee hee i loves them they sings to each other tweet twet tweet hee hee i loves them they is so cute i love yje little birdies little birdies in the room when birfies sings ther is no gloom i lobes the little birdies they goess tweet tweet tweet hee hee hee i loves them they sings me to sleep sing me to slrrp now little birdies - The wisdom of Shemp. |
|
28th November 2012, 02:33 AM | #30 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 6,057
|
I prefer Enlightenment, and imlib is pretty useful.
|
__________________
"Here we go again.... semantic and syntactic chicanery and sophistic sleight of tongue and pen.... the bedazzling magic of appearing to be saying something when in fact all that is happening is diverting attention from the attempts at shoving god through the trapdoor of illogic and wishful thinking." - Leumas |
|
28th November 2012, 02:56 AM | #31 | |||
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,331
|
Yes.
Here's Bach's take on transformation. Via death and faith in Our Saviour:
That's also my reaction. All we need now are offers of a high priced crystal du jour to clutch as we await the moment. Ouch. |
|||
28th November 2012, 03:36 AM | #32 |
No longer the 1
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 30,145
|
|
__________________
As human right is always something given, it always in reality reduces to the right which men give, "concede," to each other. If the right to existence is conceded to new-born children, then they have the right; if it is not conceded to them, as was the case among the Spartans and ancient Romans, then they do not have it. For only society can give or concede it to them; they themselves cannot take it, or give it to themselves. |
|
28th November 2012, 03:51 AM | #33 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 430
|
Quote:
It’s true, of course, that the trick is to find a way to experience that fact subjectively. And I suppose that contemplating the ceaseless relative movement of the earth and the sun as part of the great dance of gravity does to our daily experience as conscious objects on its surface might be a good way to do this. I’ll even admit that a point such as a solstice, where our personal, subjective sense of the sun’s movement happens to tell us precisely where we are in the dance might well be a good time to do this. I’m not sure what claiming that something magical is going on adds to the experience – indeed, it actively damages it and turns it into something exclusive. You’re just dressing up simple, direct awareness of what’s actually, you know, happening as obscure, wibbly-wobbly stuff going on just past the doors of perception that you have to be in some kind of special head-space to ‘get’. |
28th November 2012, 04:12 AM | #34 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,331
|
About the must-have crystal for the 21 December do-
I should have known, silly me! Crystal skulls, of course. http://www.crystalskulls.com/2012.html ETA: Where I am, the solstice will be at precisely 12:12 CET. Spooky, nicht wahr? |
28th November 2012, 04:13 AM | #35 |
Mostly harmless
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nor Flanden
Posts: 38,373
|
|
__________________
"You got to use your brain." - McKinley Morganfield "The poor mystic homeopaths feel like petted house-cats thrown at high flood on the breaking ice." - Leon Trotsky |
|
28th November 2012, 06:29 AM | #37 |
Muse
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 713
|
|
28th November 2012, 06:40 AM | #38 |
Sarcastic Conqueror of Notions
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,814
|
I find meme theory to be a much more parsimonious theory of religion and its twin, politics, with much greater explanatory and even predictive power. Like programming robots, memes are mental positions which bind you to other people in attempts to seize power and foist said memes on other people, either by force and/or as background societal noise.
|
__________________
"Great innovations should not be forced [by way of] slender majorities." - Thomas Jefferson The government should nationalize it! Socialized, single-payer video game development and sales now! More, cheaper, better games, right? Right? |
|
28th November 2012, 07:07 AM | #39 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: St. Louis, Mo.
Posts: 13,231
|
Musashi claimed to have attained enlightenment after brutally chopping up some 60 opponents in duels.... He then retired to a life of contemplation, poetry, and craftsmanship.
Not a route that would be in much favor today.... |
28th November 2012, 07:16 AM | #40 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 35,398
|
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|