
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. 
5th January 2020, 03:40 PM  #1241 
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 620

Finite Theory: Historical Milestone in Physics
Finite Theory is able now to explain:
 The popular "gravitational redshift": http://www.internationalskeptics.com...postcount=1223  The famous light bending: http://www.internationalskeptics.com...postcount=1198  The perihelion shift: http://www.internationalskeptics.com...postcount=1205  And I calculated that the position of the Moon is off by 7 meters in contrast with what is predicted by General Relativity: http://www.internationalskeptics.com...postcount=1211  Lastly the mass of the invisible universe which is 738 times the mass of the visible universe! http://www.internationalskeptics.com...6#post12944016 Thanks to those who participated in the conversation, it helped me correct the extra division by 2 and so I will be happy adding names in the acknowledgment for gratitude. I will be offline for a few days again but I pretty much concluded everything I could possibly imagine. There is more in the book than what you saw in this thread so I encourage you to encourage independent researchers doing what they do because the mainstream is definitely misleading us! Thank you and Happy New Year 2020! 
5th January 2020, 04:01 PM  #1242 
Unbanned zombie poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 14,294

Who cares how many times you get the "same" outside the universe "solution" for inside the universe?
Well, then at least it might look like you were trying to do math and not numerology. However, since you think "that will always be "eliminated"", even just approaching that appearance of doing math seems a bridge too far. So why even bother with any of the pretense then, just declare what the values shall be by edict... "Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three." ... It's essentially what you're doing already. Great, so fudge out your arse all the way down then and evidently just outside of the entire universe. Who'd a'thunk I err'd in crediting your notions with being able to distinguish inside the universe from outside the universe. 
__________________
BRAINZZZZZZZZ 

5th January 2020, 04:17 PM  #1243 
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 620


5th January 2020, 05:04 PM  #1244 
Unbanned zombie poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 14,294


__________________
BRAINZZZZZZZZ 

5th January 2020, 05:54 PM  #1245 
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 620


5th January 2020, 09:45 PM  #1246 
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 620

Thank you for playing Streets of Rage!
https://youtu.be/mW03QgubN0M?t=1880 
6th January 2020, 04:34 AM  #1247 
Master Poster
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,602


__________________
20 minutes into the future This message is brabrabrought to you by zzzzik zak AndAndAnd I'm going to be back with you  on Network 23 after these realrealrealreally exciting messages (Max Headroom) follow me on twitter: @tusenfem, or follow Rosetta Plasma Consortium: @Rosetta_RPC 

6th January 2020, 09:59 AM  #1248 
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 620


6th January 2020, 10:36 AM  #1249 
Unbanned zombie poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 14,294


__________________
BRAINZZZZZZZZ 

6th January 2020, 10:38 AM  #1250 
Unbanned zombie poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 14,294


__________________
BRAINZZZZZZZZ 

6th January 2020, 12:00 PM  #1251 
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 620

That’s not criticism that’s trash talk. Just like the conversation with Reality Check which turned into a deadlocked deadend... Whether you like it or not FT comes down to 1 + 1 = 2 now so you need to validate it or else your own credibility will drop. It’s that simple. 
6th January 2020, 12:03 PM  #1252 
Fiend God
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the details
Posts: 87,580


6th January 2020, 12:06 PM  #1253 
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 620


6th January 2020, 12:09 PM  #1254 
Fiend God
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the details
Posts: 87,580

And yet our GPS satellites can tell me where I am to the nearest meter. Clearly their relativistic calculations work.
So explain why our GR calculations match reality if it's a hoax? Explain how your own math will improve GPS and other GR applications. You've admitted that you fit your variables to match reality depending on the context, so it's not as if you're on firm ground. 
6th January 2020, 01:01 PM  #1255 
Unbanned zombie poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 14,294

I wan't calling your trash talk criticism.
What would you expect, you're already at a dead end. If you want to actually go somewhere, you have to change what you are doing. My credibility isn't dependent on your FT, while your credibility depends upon you thinking critically about your FT. Since others will think critically about it, if you don't do it yourself, you'll remain unprepared and credulous. 
__________________
BRAINZZZZZZZZ 

6th January 2020, 05:53 PM  #1256 
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 620

Finite Theory: Historical Milestone in Physics

6th January 2020, 05:58 PM  #1257 
Philosopher
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,389


__________________
Caption from and old New Yorker cartoon  Why am I shouting? Because I'm wrong!" 

6th January 2020, 06:09 PM  #1258 
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 620


6th January 2020, 06:40 PM  #1259 
Philosopher
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,389


__________________
Caption from and old New Yorker cartoon  Why am I shouting? Because I'm wrong!" 

6th January 2020, 07:26 PM  #1260 
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 620

Finite Theory: Historical Milestone in Physics
I just said what GR does, FT can do better more efficiently plus more. Did you guys disregarded the articles on the CMB and dark energy blunders? How many more blunders and paradoxes are you expecting? Last call: join the forces of good before it’s too late. You have all the mathematical evidence on a silver plate. I did my homework. If you don’t then keep on researching the CMB and dark energy until you run out of grants. 
6th January 2020, 07:42 PM  #1261 
Fiend God
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the details
Posts: 87,580


6th January 2020, 09:10 PM  #1262 
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 11,312


__________________
The nontheoretical character of metaphysics would not be in itself a defect; all arts have this nontheoretical character without thereby losing their high value for personal as well as for social life. The danger lies in the deceptive character of metaphysics; it gives the illusion of knowledge without actually giving any knowledge. This is the reason why we reject it.  Rudolf Carnap "Philosophy and Logical Syntax" 

7th January 2020, 12:47 AM  #1263 
Master Poster
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,602


__________________
20 minutes into the future This message is brabrabrought to you by zzzzik zak AndAndAnd I'm going to be back with you  on Network 23 after these realrealrealreally exciting messages (Max Headroom) follow me on twitter: @tusenfem, or follow Rosetta Plasma Consortium: @Rosetta_RPC 

7th January 2020, 02:08 AM  #1264 
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 620

Well Einstein forgot a simple elementary addition in his light bending 1911 calculations and he never figured out his mistake. Mine took a few minutes to figure out. And this is not going to stop the government from allowing or disallowing grants on the CMB and dark energy. I know how hard these are to get in the first place! 
7th January 2020, 02:46 AM  #1265 
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 620

Well then be a good Samaritan and tell your friends in the physics department 3/4 of GR is nonsense.
Quote:
Well that is how solving the atlas of the universe works; by reverse engineering. And if the Moon is farther away by 7 meters then the galaxies we see are easily much farther away as well...! 
7th January 2020, 07:37 AM  #1266 
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 3,238

Why are you spending your precious time posting here (the ISF)?
Shouldn’t you be devoting yourself to writing up FT in a clear and logical way? Or writing the killer paper that will overthrow 300 years of physics (and incidentally earn you a free first class return trip to Stockholm)? You see, to me, the fact that you spend so much time here is yet another proof that FT is a joke. 
7th January 2020, 07:41 AM  #1267 
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 3,238


7th January 2020, 09:35 AM  #1268 
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 620

I can do that easily now that the gravitational redshift works like a charm... I’ll be able to estimate better the real size of the visible universe by using the same equation I used for the Moon. I was just hoping to get some assistance but it’s so easy to handle now that I don’t really need any anymore. 
7th January 2020, 10:51 AM  #1269 
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Detroit
Posts: 5,806

Yay!

__________________
Fill the seats of justice with good men; not so absolute in goodness as to forget what human frailty is.  Thomas Jefferson What region of the earth is not filled with our calamities?  Virgil 

7th January 2020, 11:00 AM  #1270 
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 620


7th January 2020, 01:16 PM  #1271 
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 3,238


8th January 2020, 09:14 AM  #1272 
Fiend God
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the details
Posts: 87,580


8th January 2020, 01:33 PM  #1273 
Master Poster
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,602


__________________
20 minutes into the future This message is brabrabrought to you by zzzzik zak AndAndAnd I'm going to be back with you  on Network 23 after these realrealrealreally exciting messages (Max Headroom) follow me on twitter: @tusenfem, or follow Rosetta Plasma Consortium: @Rosetta_RPC 

8th January 2020, 01:47 PM  #1274 
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,575

Poop actually, well more precisely Higgs poop. Physics Girl channel.
Inside the world's largest science experiment https://youtu.be/nrXhK3Gh5EE 
12th January 2020, 02:47 PM  #1275 
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 26,208

Stupidity that his equation for the Moon that fails abysmally is valid cosmology
Supposedly ends a thread of containing deep ignorance and his FT delusions with
13 January 2019 philippeb8: Stupidity that his equation for the Moon that fails abysmally is valid cosmology. His equation for the Moon is the distance as measured by a laser beam bouncing of reflectors placed by the Apollo and Luna missions. There are no laser reflectors at the boundary of the visible universe ! The real laser experiment measures the correct distance to the Moon to millimeters. His equation gets the measured distance wrong by 100's of kilometers ! 20 December 2019 philippeb8: Persists with "GR’s equation" ignorance about a classical round trip equation, etc.
Quote:
A bit of "I made a mistake because I neglected the arbitrary constant of the integral C = a value" (or later "C can be neglected) idiocy. An integration constant is not arbitrary (cannot be set to any random value). Integration of a function f'(x) produces f(x) + C where C is a constant. We get "Correction of Correction of Correction" posts which still debunk his FT delusions. Magically his "corrections" get closer to the real measured distance to the Moon reducing from ~2000 kilometers to 14.6 meters for a distance that is accurate to millimeters. Persists in "Remember FT can solve ..." lies.
"Radar Gun Experiment (Correction of Correction of Correction)" basically moves the goalposts to a car going uphill or downhill or changing speed when the question did not have those conditions. A deluded GR can make the light bending prediction because it was tuned up with the perihelion shift before ... the biggest deliberate hoax ... lie and insult of Einstein. "Perihelion Shift & Light Bending" is the repeated lie of plugging his h_{solar} fudge factor into GR's solutions and claiming that is an FT solution. A "I just proved it’s impossible to get the right light bending without knowing in advance the perihelion shift" delusion. Listing the GR perihelion shift equation and then the GR light bending equation does not make it impossible to derive the GR light bending equation first . A deluded This is also the proof the light bending “prediction” of GR is a hoax lie. His replacement of constants in GR solutions with a "h_{solar}" symbol does make GR a hoax. A deluded GR and its nonEuclidean geometry are not deductive and represent security through obscurity lie. SR already showed that the universe is nonEuclidian. GR is deduced from its postulate. The real universe happens to obey complex mathematics. A deluded Einstein extended his SR into GR which doesn’t work at greater scales than the solar system lie. We observe GR effects outside of the solar system. Many of the passed tests of GR are GR matching external stellar systems (Hulse–Taylor binary), galaxies (Hubble's law!), gravitational waves, etc. The LambdaCDM model is GR + dark matter and works for the entire universe ! 
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! 

12th January 2020, 04:23 PM  #1276 
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 26,208

More abysmal ignorance and some delusions and lies from philippeb8
More abysmal ignorance and some delusions and lies from philippeb8.
In fact Poincaré is the one who predicted the gravitational waves and Einstein is the one taking all the credit! In fact: The possibility of gravitational waves was discussed in 1893 by Oliver Heaviside using the analogy between the inversesquare law in gravitation and electricity. Poincaré predicted nonGR gravitational waves by adding consideration od SR. Einstein predicted GR gravitational waves and then "unpredicted" them for the first, erroneous draft of the 1936 paper with Nathan Rosen. The corrected draft said that GR allowed gravitational waves. It was not until 1956 that it was shown that gravitational waves were valid solution in GR. A "The rest you are mentioning are simply derivatives" delusions about the tests of GR. GR fitted existing data in 1915 (perihelion shift) and made predictions that fit new data (bending of light, gravitational waves, etc.). That is how scientific theories work ! Deep "What does the CMB has to do with GR?" ignorance. The mere existence if the CMB is a prediction of GR. GR predicts Hubble's law. We measure Hubble's law. Run an expanding universe backwards and we get a hot dense state. Let that hot dense state expand and we get the CMB! Abysmal "How can the CMB be isotropic and uniform if it is "originated" by the Big Bang?"" ignorance from someone writing about cosmology. The Big Bang is the expansion of a isotropic and uniform universe ! A "Relativistic / Kinetic Doppler Shift & PoundRebka Experiment" post debunking his FT delusions by emphasizing that FT does not match the real world ! Relativistic Doppler Shift has been measured and matches SR. He lies about the Pound–Rebka experiment which matched GR. A lying "Fallacy of General Relativity (excerpt)" post. GR uses the constants c and G. This is not a fallacy. Lying "Perihelion Shift" and "Perihelion Shift (Correction)" posts. That looks like his plagiarized (no citation) equation form a paper not about his FT delusions. A deluded "And here's the proof the CMB is unreliable" lie when he cites Measured values of the Hubble constant. The Hubble constant tension just changes when the CMB was emitted from a hot dense universe. More "Lunar Laser Ranging Experiment (Correction of Correction of Correction of Correction)" idiocy. Now he debunks his FT delusions with a 7.4 meter error in an measurement accurate to millimeters. Repeats "Can FT explain the entire universe? Yes. ..." etc. delusions. "Relativistic / Kinetic Doppler Shift & PoundRebka Experiment (Correction)" repeats his lie that relativistic Doppler shift support his FT delusions (they match SR). He "corrects" his FT delusion to get a value that only matches the PoundRebka experiment value from 1956. As written he lies about FT because his h is  (negative) c^2/G. This results in a negative "velocity" x and a negative factor. That is a blueshift, not the measured redshift. Ignorant fantasy that adjusting his invalid distance to the Moon equation will magically reproduce the classical d= ct/2 value. A post of "Fudge Factor & Mass of the Invisible Universe (excerpt)" gibberish. Mostly Finite Theory is able now to explain lies. He did "correct" FT calculations to close to the absolute value of the PoundRebka experiment. His "mass of the invisible universe which is 738 times the mass of the visible universe" may be insanely wrong. The universe may be infinite. The universe versus the observable universe
Quote:
FT does not predict the bending of light by the Sun. Replacing constants in GR's prediction is not an FT prediction . FT does not predict the perihelion shift of Mercury. Plagiarizing (not citing) a nonFT paper is not a FT prediction. He has not shown that FT gets a better value than GR for gravitational redshift. Bending of light by the Sun, the perihelion shift of Mercury and gravitational redshift are only 3 of the passed tests of general relativity. A probable delusion that "more efficiently" = a more valid theory. What makes one scientific theory better than another starts with replicating all of the results of the previous theory. That makes them equal. More importantly the better theory has to make predications that the previous one cannot make and have those predications verified. Look at Einstein's 1915 paper which predicted the correct bending of light as measured by the 1919 Eddington and later experiments. "The GR hype and its costly CPU cycles square roots will die on its own" gibberish. A the articles on the CMB and dark energy blunders lie. He cited the Hubble constant tension. He cited a recent paper (New evidence shows that the key assumption made in the discovery of dark energy is in error) that is yet to be verified. A deluded Well Einstein forgot a simple elementary addition in his light bending 1911 calculations and he never figured out his mistake lie. philippeb8 has never cited any evidence of a "simple elementary addition" missing in Einstein's 1911 paper. The 1911 paper made an approximation that gave the same results as previous calculations for the bending of light in Newtonian gravity. The approximation in the 1911 paper was removed in Einstein's 1915 paper which predicted the correct bending of light as measured by the 1919 Eddington and later experiments. 
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! 

12th January 2020, 06:02 PM  #1277 
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Alexandria, VA Home to the Deep State.
Posts: 19,429


__________________
A MAGA hat = a Swastika arm band. A vote for Trump is a vote for treason. 

Bookmarks 
Thread Tools  

