ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 17th April 2019, 01:36 PM   #161
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down Pixie of key: Usual gibberish, ignorance and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Where did these supernovae occur in relation to the Solar System and in relation to that particular mass of small mass?
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

An insane question. Supernovae are produced by the stars by themselves, e.g. running out of fuel for fusion, not his ignorant delusions about stars maybe thousands of light years away.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th April 2019, 01:37 PM   #162
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down Pixie of key: Usual gibberish, ignorance and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
That is, either of these supernovae combines with that small star of a strong eruption if either of those supernovae were noticed by that star until about 250 years ago.
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

An abysmally ignorant delusion.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th April 2019, 01:39 PM   #163
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down Pixie of key: Usual gibberish, ignorance and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
2019 - 1572 = 447
...
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

Stupid random arithmetic.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th April 2019, 01:44 PM   #164
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down Pixie of key: Usual gibberish, ignorance and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
...the pushing of energy / pushing force from that place took to that either 165 years or 197 years longer than it pushed to us.
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

His insane delusion that only pushing forces exist. Children know that they pull toys with strings!
Usual delusions from insane ignorance - the position of all of these stars can be found by anyone with enough few brain cells to Google !

What makes this ignorance really insane is he has many years spewing abysmal stupidity about astronomy and he still knows nothing about astronomy, e.g. that databases of star positions exist.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th April 2019, 01:47 PM   #165
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down Pixie of key: Usual gibberish, ignorance and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
I predict that one of these two supernovae will settle in a galaxy area that can be combined with this small star-wide eruption in August 2017.
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

A deluded "prediction" because he is too abysmally ignorant to actually test it.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th April 2019, 01:52 PM   #166
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down Pixie of key: Usual gibberish, ignorance and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Ps. If there are other stars close to this little star, they can also be expected to have their own powerful eruptions.
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

A display of massive ignorance and delusion.
There will be stars close to that star because it is in a galaxy!
Supernovae do not magically make other stars produce flares because of simple physics and facts such as the facts about supernovae and the inverse square law.
The same for stellar flares doing whatever his delusions want..
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th April 2019, 01:53 PM   #167
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down Pixie of key: Usual gibberish, ignorance and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
It is also worth considering from this point of view the strong eruptions of the stars of our own galaxy.
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

It is not worth considering many years of gibberish, ignorance and lies about science
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th April 2019, 01:55 PM   #168
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down Pixie of key: Usual gibberish, ignorance and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Therefore, the location of the strong star of the strong eruption in us and one of the observed supernovae in 1572 and 1604.
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

There fore we have the same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th April 2019, 01:57 PM   #169
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
A few minutes in Wikipedia that Pixy of key is ignorant about!
SN 1572
Kepler's Supernova
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2019, 05:07 AM   #170
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,102
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Explosion on Jupiter-sized star 10 times more powerful than ever seen on the sun

"A stellar flare ten times more powerful than anything seen on our sun has burst from an ultracool star almost the same size as Jupiter."

https://m.phys.org/news/2019-04-expl...erful-sun.html

"Lead author James Jackman, a Ph.D. student in the University of Warwick's Department of Physics, said: "The activity of low mass stars decreases as you go to lower and lower masses and we expect the chromosphere (a region of the star which support flares) to get cooler or weaker. The fact that we've observed this incredibly low mass star, where the chromosphere should be almost at its weakest, but we have a white-light flare occurring shows that strong magnetic activity can still persist down to this level."

.
.
.

Well. This is just a thrill.

How do we combine one of our own galaxies in the years 1572 or 1604 with the supernova that was discovered by that small mass for massive eruption?

This is the help of astronomers.

Where did these supernovae occur in relation to the Solar System and in relation to that particular mass of small mass?

That is, either of these supernovae combines with that small star of a strong eruption if either of those supernovae were noticed by that star until about 250 years ago.

2019 - 1572 = 447
447-250 = 197

2019 - 1604 = 415
415-250 = 165

So now, but to check out, either one of the supernova found in an area in our galaxy that the pushing of energy / pushing force from that place took to that either 165 years or 197 years longer than it pushed to us.

I predict that one of these two supernovae will settle in a galaxy area that can be combined with this small star-wide eruption in August 2017.

Ps. If there are other stars close to this little star, they can also be expected to have their own powerful eruptions.

It is also worth considering from this point of view the strong eruptions of the stars of our own galaxy.

Therefore, the location of the strong star of the strong eruption in us and one of the observed supernovae in 1572 and 1604.

🤔
Just check it out.

Proof is out there.

And now we can predict some other star strong burst.

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th April 2019, 01:06 AM   #171
Little 10 Toes
Graduate Poster
 
Little 10 Toes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,956
So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces.
Little 10 Toes is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th April 2019, 01:41 AM   #172
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,102
Research on disk galaxies sheds light on movement of stars

https://m.phys.org/news/2019-04-disk...ent-stars.html

"Although the research provides evidence for why the spiral arms maintain their shape, questions remain. It's easy to understand why a traffic jam occurs when you get to a car accident that reduced three lanes to one, but determining what creates the denser waves is still an open question."

It is not open anymore!!!

Here's the answer to the types.

Pushing force

Nothing else.

As the expanding star protrudes towards an area with more stars, it is subjected to a pushing force that slows its pace and thus spiral absorbs itself into a new expanding star.

This star continues through the spiral branch extending with the other expanding stars, and on the other side it is subjected to the force of the spiraling branch of the renewed spiral branch that pushes it away from the spiral branch.

This is how the spiral branch is still the same spiral branch as before, even though all the stars have changed in it.

The same spiral branch consisting of different stars.

The same lake, different water.

Same man, different cells.

The same quark, different expanding pushing force.

Same spiral branch, different stars.

Eternal recycling is always in the infinite 3 D space that itself is nothing.

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th April 2019, 04:06 AM   #173
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,102
Mystery of the Universe's Expansion Rate Widens with New Hubble Data

http://hubblesite.org/news_release/n...OKbWUGxdZYaSY8

"New physics may be needed to rectify the universe's past and present behavior.

There is something wrong with our universe. Or, more specifically, it is outpacing all expectations for its present rate of expansion.

Something is amiss in astronomers' efforts to measure the past and predict the present, according to a discrepancy between the two main techniques for measuring the universe's expansion rate – a key to understanding its history and physical parameters."



Space dont expanding at all.

Nucleus of atoms expanding and recycling expanding pushing force which have nature of expanding electrons and expanding light.

All expanding lights interactive with eachother and get others expanding faster. Thats why expanding light moving faster and faster same way what matter and light expanding.

Expanding lightwaves is dark for us and that dark waves / dark pushing force have lot of more mass what expanding photons have.

��
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100

Last edited by Pixie of key; 26th April 2019 at 04:08 AM.
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th April 2019, 11:49 AM   #174
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,102
Space dont expanding!

Expanding space is the Emperor's naked.

The nuclei of the atoms expand and recycle the expanding pushing force with e.g. the nature of expanding light to us the dark waves.

These expanding waves of dark pushing force carrying expanding photons contain most of the mass of expanding light.

These waves of expanding light interact with each other, accelerating each other's expansion, and the pace of such expanding light accelerates in the same proportion as the substance and light expand.

And there is an explanation for these findings, which are contradictory to current theories.

.

"It was considered as a possible explanation for the contradictory speed of expansion of the growth of the influence of dark energy as the universe evolved."

🤣🤣🤣

Doesn't these types really realize WHAT ???

Wake Up Cardboard !!!

What's more in space, more and more from every direction in every direction?!?

Well what about

LIGHT !!!

Expanding light so that expanding lights interact with each other and accelerate each other's expansion

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th April 2019, 08:38 PM   #175
Little 10 Toes
Graduate Poster
 
Little 10 Toes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,956



So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces.
Little 10 Toes is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th April 2019, 05:54 PM   #176
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down Usual gibberish, ignorance and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Just check it out....
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

Last edited by Reality Check; 28th April 2019 at 06:11 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th April 2019, 05:57 PM   #177
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down Usual gibberish, ignorance and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Research on disk galaxies sheds light on movement of stars

https://m.phys.org/news/2019-04-disk...ent-stars.html

"Although the research provides evidence for why the spiral arms maintain their shape, questions remain. It's easy to understand why a traffic jam occurs when you get to a car accident that reduced three lanes to one, but determining what creates the denser waves is still an open question."
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
Starts with "expanding star" insanity. Utter stupidity that that a spiral arm is a star. Then it gets worse!

Last edited by Reality Check; 28th April 2019 at 06:10 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th April 2019, 06:10 PM   #178
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down Usual gibberish, ignorance and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Mystery of the Universe's Expansion Rate Widens with New Hubble Data

http://hubblesite.org/news_release/n...OKbWUGxdZYaSY8

"New physics may be needed to rectify the universe's past and present behavior.

There is something wrong with our universe. Or, more specifically, it is outpacing all expectations for its present rate of expansion.

Something is amiss in astronomers' efforts to measure the past and predict the present, according to a discrepancy between the two main techniques for measuring the universe's expansion rate – a key to understanding its history and physical parameters."
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

An insane lie that the universe is not expanding when he cites a measurement of the universe expanding (the Hubble constant) !
Deluded atom/electrons/light expanding gibberish.
Deluded dark wave gibberish.

For others:
Mystery of the Universe's Expansion Rate Widens with New Hubble Data
Quote:
Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope say they have crossed an important threshold in revealing a discrepancy between the two key techniques for measuring the universe's expansion rate. The recent study strengthens the case that new theories may be needed to explain the forces that have shaped the cosmos.

A brief recap: The universe is getting bigger every second. The space between galaxies is stretching, like dough rising in the oven. But how fast is the universe expanding? As Hubble and other telescopes seek to answer this question, they have run into an intriguing difference between what scientists predict and what they observe.

Hubble measurements suggest a faster expansion rate in the modern universe than expected, based on how the universe appeared more than 13 billion years ago. These measurements of the early universe come from the European Space Agency's Planck satellite. This discrepancy has been identified in scientific papers over the last several years, but it has been unclear whether differences in measurement techniques are to blame, or whether the difference could result from unlucky measurements.
This known issue is that cosmological (early universe) measurements of the Hubble constant do not agree with galactic (late universe) measurements of the Hubble constant. They are close but recent results show that they are different. This could be new physics. A possibility could be an error in the cosmic distance ladder. This study shows that the standard candle of Cepheid variables are unlikely to be a cause of the issue.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st May 2019, 10:21 AM   #179
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,102
Solar storm of 1859 September 1–2,

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm_of_1859

"The solar storm of 1859 (also known as the Carrington Event)[1] was a powerful geomagnetic storm during solar cycle 10 (1855–1867). A solar coronal mass ejection (CME) hit Earth's magnetosphere and induced one of the largest geomagnetic storms on record, September 1–2, 1859."

So, also some dark expanding pushing force deep inside expanding Earth and later there pushing out energy and thats what happening?


Royal Charter Storm 25 and 26 October 1859

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Charter_Storm

"The Royal Charter Storm (also known as the Great storm of 1859)[1] of 25 and 26 October 1859 was considered to be the most severe storm to hit the Irish Sea in the 19th century,"


��
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st May 2019, 02:34 PM   #180
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Solar storm of 1859 September 1–2,...
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

The Solar storm of 1859 (Carrington Event) and Royal Charter Storm (almost 2 months later ) are nothing to do with insane delusions about no pulling forces, cosmology, galaxies, earthquakes, weather, etc.

Last edited by Reality Check; 1st May 2019 at 02:36 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd May 2019, 12:32 AM   #181
steenkh
Philosopher
 
steenkh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 5,561
Pixie of key, what, if anything, would you accept as evidence that could contradict your ideas?
__________________
Steen

--
Jack of all trades - master of none!
steenkh is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd May 2019, 12:40 AM   #182
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,102
Originally Posted by steenkh View Post
Pixie of key, what, if anything, would you accept as evidence that could contradict your ideas?

https://youtu.be/Qs7fbwpypVM

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd May 2019, 01:23 AM   #183
steenkh
Philosopher
 
steenkh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 5,561
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
I do not waste my time on videos. Is it that difficult to write it down?
__________________
Steen

--
Jack of all trades - master of none!
steenkh is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd May 2019, 02:53 PM   #184
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down Deluded "Reason why there was Sunspots 1940 - 2000, even should not be" video

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
...
10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

The usual insanely deluded crank video. His ignorant delusions do not explain sunspots.
"Reason why there was Sunspots 1940 - 2000, even should not be"
He is the only one deluded enough to think that there should be no sunspots from 1940 to 2000. Intelligent people learn about the real Sun. These are the real, known grand solar minimum
Homeric Minimum [8] 950BC 800BC
Oort minimum (see Medieval Warm Period) 1040 1080
Wolf minimum 1280 1350
Spörer Minimum 1450 1550
Maunder Minimum 1645 1715
Dalton Minimum 1790 1820
A list of historical Grand minima of solar activity[9] includes also Grand minima ca. 690 AD, 360 BC, 770 BC, 1390 BC, 2860 BC, 3340 BC, 3500 BC, 3630 BC, 3940 BC, 4230 BC, 4330 BC, 5260 BC, 5460 BC, 5620 BC, 5710 BC, 5990 BC, 6220 BC, 6400 BC, 7040 BC, 7310 BC, 7520 BC, 8220 BC, 9170 BC."
It is a blatant lie that grand solar minimum are separated by 330 years. It is a complete delusion that we should be in a grand solar minimum.

Sunspots.are caused by the Sun, not his insanity about our supermassive black hole, gas giants, pushing forces, dark matter, matter bubbles, etc.

An insane delusion that Uranus and Neptune line up on one side of the Sun every 330 years. The insanity is their orbital periods (64 and 165 years) make this obviously impossible and asking viewers to do the research or calculations he has not done.

An insane delusion about supernova in 1572 and 1604 preventing his delusion that there should have been no sunspots 1940-2000.

Usual insanity about Jupiter's Red Spot. Weather on our gas giants are powered by the Sun and internal heat.

Usual insanity about the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami (he cannot even get the order correct!). That insanity is applied to the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season. That insanity is applied to a new storm on Jupiter in 2006. That insanity is applied to all storms on all gas giants.

Repeats his insane delusion about Uranus and Neptune then vague muttering about changing the value of 330 years. Maybe this. Maybe that. Maybe keep with the 330 lie! Maybe a different value !
Repeats his insane bubbles and supernova delusions.

Last edited by Reality Check; 2nd May 2019 at 03:18 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th May 2019, 09:03 AM   #185
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,102
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
After 33 days price is going to be 138 000 000 euros.

🤔

Too cheap prize now 😃😃😃


No niin pösilöt😃😃😃

Tästä se löhtöö työntymään 😃

"In principle, it is not unusual for the magnetic activity of a star like the sun to undergo cyclic oscillation. And yet past models have been unable to adequately explain the very regular cycle of the sun. The HZDR research team has now succeeded in demonstrating that the planetary tidal forces on the sun act like an outer clock, and are the decisive factor behind its steady rhythm. To accomplish this result, the scientists systematically compared historical observations of solar activity from the last thousand years with planetary constellations, statistically proving that the two phenomena are linked. "There is an astonishingly high level of concordance: what we see is complete parallelism with the planets over the course of 90 cycles," said Frank Stefani, lead author of the study. "Everything points to a clocked process.""

https://phys.org/news/2019-05-corrob...dal-solar.html

Tästähän minä jo juttua olen jonnii aikoo esillä pitänyt 😃

Tyypeiltä ilmeisesti puuttuu vielä syvällisempi ymmärrys, mutta pittää minun ensin lukea tuo juttu loppuun.

Ei paha tämä!!!

Ei paha yhtään 😃😃😃

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th May 2019, 09:05 AM   #186
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,102
"In the long term, a more precise model of the solar dynamo would help scientists to quantify climate-relevant processes such as space weather more effectively, and perhaps even to improve climate predictions one day. The new model calculations also mean that, besides tidal forces, potentially other, hitherto neglected mechanisms would have to be integrated into the solar dynamo theory, mechanisms with weak forces that can nevertheless—as researchers now know—have a major impact. To be able to investigate this fundamental question in the laboratory, too, the researchers are currently setting up a new liquid metal experiment at HZDR."

Hyvä meininki.

Mutta onko tyypeillä munaa luopua nykyisestä atomimallista?

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th May 2019, 09:24 AM   #187
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,102
Does the Sun get a new perceptible substance from the dark matter that would push through it all the time, so that a small part of it would expand within the Sun as a new observable substance and penetrate the Sun's surface with a delay of about 330 to 495 years?

What would be essential would be the expanding pushing force of the gas planets and also only if the Sun were in the area between the supermassive object of the gas planet and the center of the galaxy, where the dark matter from the supermassive object would come deep into the densities of the pushing force from the gas planet inside the Sun?

Long choppy episodes in the Sun.

Wolf's minimum 1280 - 1350

Spörer is mentioned in 1460-1540

Maunderin Minimum 1645 - 1715

Dalton was mentioned in 1790-1830

Alright. Just look at this and wonder!

Wolf's minimum 1320 +165 = 1485 aka Spörer

Spörer minimum 1485 + 165 = 1650 or Maunder

Maunder's minimum 1650 + 165 = 1815 or Dalton

Dalton's minimum 1815 + 165 = 1980, ie global warming.

About 165 years is Neptune's lap time around the sun.

But Neptune is not the only gas planet. One must also consider Uranus and Saturn who mix the pack.

Of course, Jupiter plays the most important role when thinking about the way sunspots are born, but other gas planets are involved in influencing when a new substance is pushed to the surface of the Sun and when not.

When Neptune was in the area between the supermassive object of the Sun and the center of the galaxy, there was also Uranus.

I saw it in the last 1000 years, though Uranus's lap time is only about 84 years, not in sync with Neptune.

But apparently so close that Uranus has been on the same side of the Sun with Neptune whenever Neptune has been in the area between the supermassive object of the Sun and the center of the galaxy.

Of course, Uranus has always been in that area once, while Neptune has been on the other side of the Sun.

But anyway, Jupiter's accomplishments did not help Neptune and Uranus for a long time whenever they were in the area between the supermassive object of the Sun and the center of the galaxy.

And with a delay of about 165 years, I saw long choppy episodes.

Such would have been the supernovae discovered in the 1900s without the 1572 and 1604 whose energy pushed deep into the Sun and accelerated the speed of Jupiter's efforts towards the surface of the Sun and thus the planet's warming energy towards the planets?

So the Sun is in the area between the supermassive object of the center of Jupiter and the galaxy every 12 years.

When Neptune and Uranus were at the same time in the influence area, they received a dark substance from the supermassive object to expand extensively deep inside the Sun, and thus, with the Jupiter achievements, more new, heavily expanded matter was pushed to reach the rate of escape up to the Sun.

At a certain depth, the effect was more intense, and so the upward movement of those in this area accelerated more than those of Jupiter that had already passed that area.

I saw a new heavily expanded substance on the surface of the Sun every 11 years, even though Jupirer's lap time is about 12 years.

🤔


Saako Aurinko itselleen uutta havaittavaa ainetta siitä pimeästä aineesta jota työntyisi sen läpi koko ajan, niin että pieni osa laajenisi Auringon sisällä uudeksi havaittavaksi aineeksi ja työntyisi Auringon pinnalle noin 330 - 495 vuoden viiveellä?

Oleellista olisi kaasuplaneetoista peräisin oleva laajeneva työntävä voima ja sekin vain silloin kun Aurinko olisi kyseisen kaasuplaneetan ja galaksin keskustan supermassiivisen kohteen välisellä alueella, jolloin supermassiivisesta kohteesta peräisin oleva pimeä aine törmäisi syvällä Auringon sisällä kaasuplaneetasta peräisin oleviin työntävän voiman tihentymiin?

Pitkät pilkuttomat jaksot Auringossa

Wolfin minimi 1280 - 1350

Spörerin minimi 1460 - 1540

Maunderin minimi 1645 - 1715

Daltonin minimi 1790 - 1830

Ok. Katsokaapa tämä ja ihmetelkää!!!

Wolfin minimi 1320 +165 = 1485 eli Spörer

Spörerin minimi 1485 + 165 = 1650 eli Maunder

Maunderin minimi 1650 + 165 = 1815 eli Dalton

Daltonin minimi 1815 + 165 = 1980 eli ilmaston lämpeneminen.

About 165 vuotta on Neptunuksen kierrosaika Auringon ympäri.

Mutta Neptunus ei ole ainut kaasuplaneetta. Pitää ottaa huomioon myös Uranus ja Saturnus jotka sekoittavat pakkaa.

Jupiter on tietysti tärkeimmässä roolissa kun Auringonpilkkujen syntytapaa ylipäätään mietitään, mutta muut kaasuplaneetat ovat omalta osaltaan mukana vaikuttamassa milloin uutta ainetta työntyy Auringon pinnalle asti ja milloin ei.

Silloin kun Neptunus oli Auringon ja galaksin keskustan supermassiivisen kohteen välisellä alueella, siellä oli myös Uranus.

Näin viimeisen 1000 vuoden aikana, vaikka Uranuksen kierrosaika onkin vain about 84 vuotta eli ei ihan synkronissa Neptunuksen kanssa.

Mutta ilmeisesti kuitenkin niin lähellä että Uranus on ollut samalla puolella Aurinkoa Neptunuksen kanssa aina silloin kun Neptunus on ollut Auringon ja galaksin keskustan supermassiivisen kohteen välisellä alueella.

Toki Uranus on aina käynyt uudestaan tuolla alueella kertaalleen sillä aikaa kun Neptunus on ollut toisella puolella Aurinkoa.

Mutta anyway, Jupiterin aikaansaannokset eivät saaneet apuja Neptunukselta ja Uranukselta pitkään aikaan aina silloin kun ne molemmat olivat Auringon ja galaksin keskustan supermassiivisen kohteen välisellä alueella.

Ja näin about 165 vuoden viiveellä pitkät pilkuttomat jaksot.

Sellainen olisi ollut myös 1900 luvulla ilman 1572 ja 1604 havaittuja supernovia joiden energia työntyi syvälle Auringon sisälle ja kiihdytti Jupiterin aikaansaannosten vauhtia kohti Auringon pintaa ja näin planeettojen ilmastoa lämmittävää energiaa kohti planeettoja?

Ja Aurinko siis Jupiterin ja galaksin keskustan supermassiivisen kohteen välisellä alueella vajaan 12 vuoden välein.

Kun Neptunus ja Uranus olivat vaikutusalueella yhtä aikaa, ne saivat supermassiivisesta kohteesta peräisin olevaa pimeää ainetta laajenemaan voimakkaasti syvällä Auringon sisällä ja näin Jupiterin aikaansaannoksien mukana työntyi enemmän uutta voimakkaasti laajentunutta ainetta, jolloin ne yhdessä saavuttivat pakonopeuden Auringon pinnalle asti.

Tietyssä syvyydessä vaikutus oli voimakkaampaa ja näin tällä alueella ylös päin työntyneiden vauhti kiihtyi enemmän kuin tuon alueen jo ohittaneiden Jupiterin aikaansaannosten.

Näin Auringon pinnalle uutta voimakkaasti laajentunutta ainetta noin 11 vuoden välein vaikka Jupirerin kierrosaika onkin about 12 vuotta

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th May 2019, 09:58 AM   #188
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,102
"When I first read about ideas linking the solar dynamo to planets, I was very skeptical," Stefani recalled. "But when we discovered the current-driven Tayler instability undergoing helicity oscillations in our computer simulations, I asked myself: What would happen if the plasma was impacted on by a small, tidal-like perturbation? The result was phenomenal. The oscillation was really excited and became synchronized with the timing of the external perturbation.""

https://phys.org/news/2019-05-corrob...dal-solar.html

I just wonder 🤔

"When I first read about ideas linking the solar dynamo to planets"

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th May 2019, 01:27 PM   #189
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Too cheap prize now ...
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

Last edited by Reality Check; 28th May 2019 at 01:31 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th May 2019, 01:29 PM   #190
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
"...
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

Last edited by Reality Check; 28th May 2019 at 01:31 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th May 2019, 01:31 PM   #191
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Does...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

This is an insane delusion that dark matter does magic when dark matter does not interacted with matter except gravitationally !
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th May 2019, 01:32 PM   #192
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
"...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th May 2019, 01:50 PM   #193
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Study corroborates the influence of planetary tidal forces on solar activity is a slightly dubious result for the well known reason that correlation does not mean causation. The classic example comes from economics where the length of dresses relates to economic indicators. That does not mean that economic systems are controlled by woman's fashions!

A Model of a Tidally Synchronized Solar Dynamo
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th May 2019, 05:19 PM   #194
Little 10 Toes
Graduate Poster
 
Little 10 Toes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,956
Pixie of key:

So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces?
Little 10 Toes is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th May 2019, 05:21 PM   #195
Little 10 Toes
Graduate Poster
 
Little 10 Toes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,956
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
"When I first read about ideas linking the solar dynamo to planets, I was very skeptical," Stefani recalled. "But when we discovered the current-driven Tayler instability undergoing helicity oscillations in our computer simulations, I asked myself: What would happen if the plasma was impacted on by a small, tidal-like perturbation? The result was phenomenal. The oscillation was really excited and became synchronized with the timing of the external perturbation.""

https://phys.org/news/2019-05-corrob...dal-solar.html

I just wonder ��

"When I first read about ideas linking the solar dynamo to planets"

��
From that same article (bold added)
Quote:
However, the HZDR researchers then found evidence of a potential indirect mechanism that may be able to influence the solar magnetic field via tidal forces

Last edited by Little 10 Toes; 29th May 2019 at 05:24 PM.
Little 10 Toes is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd June 2019, 03:46 AM   #196
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,102
Neptune & Uranus Control Grand Minima & Solar Modulation?


https://landscheidt.wordpress.com/20...-grand-minima/


"I am looking forward to contributing to this alternative view on how we interact with the cosmos. I will be reporting on news and scientific papers concerning planetary involvement connected with influencing the Sun and the global climate. Carl’s work has inspired me, and this first article is a work in progress report that was born by his SSB graph which showed to me the importance of Neptune and Uranus. We are living in exciting times and may witness a brand new area of science, especially if we DO experience a Grand Minimum beginning with Solar Cycle 24."

.

When you read that thing, it is inevitable that you are in the right footsteps, but some essential factor is missing.

According to my own model, that missing factor is the supermassive target of the center of the galaxy and the dark matter that originates from it, which is expanding into a perceptible substance within the Sun and the planets.

And, in addition, the dark energy from the supernovae discovered in 1572 and 1604 would have a role to play with a delay of several hundred years. So first, deep inside the Sun, there's an interaction with a new observable substance that had expanded into a perceptible substance within the Sun, and so its pace accelerated toward the surface of the Sun and the Sunspots at a time when the rate of the new detectable substance would not have been enough to be pushed onto the Sun .

🤔

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd June 2019, 05:18 AM   #197
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,102
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Explosion on Jupiter-sized star 10 times more powerful than ever seen on the sun

"A stellar flare ten times more powerful than anything seen on our sun has burst from an ultracool star almost the same size as Jupiter."

https://m.phys.org/news/2019-04-expl...erful-sun.html

"Lead author James Jackman, a Ph.D. student in the University of Warwick's Department of Physics, said: "The activity of low mass stars decreases as you go to lower and lower masses and we expect the chromosphere (a region of the star which support flares) to get cooler or weaker. The fact that we've observed this incredibly low mass star, where the chromosphere should be almost at its weakest, but we have a white-light flare occurring shows that strong magnetic activity can still persist down to this level."

.
.
.

Well. This is just a thrill.

How do we combine one of our own galaxies in the years 1572 or 1604 with the supernova that was discovered by that small mass for massive eruption?

This is the help of astronomers.

Where did these supernovae occur in relation to the Solar System and in relation to that particular mass of small mass?

That is, either of these supernovae combines with that small star of a strong eruption if either of those supernovae were noticed by that star until about 250 years ago.

2019 - 1572 = 447
447-250 = 197

2019 - 1604 = 415
415-250 = 165

So now, but to check out, either one of the supernova found in an area in our galaxy that the pushing of energy / pushing force from that place took to that either 165 years or 197 years longer than it pushed to us.

I predict that one of these two supernovae will settle in a galaxy area that can be combined with this small star-wide eruption in August 2017.

Ps. If there are other stars close to this little star, they can also be expected to have their own powerful eruptions.

It is also worth considering from this point of view the strong eruptions of the stars of our own galaxy.

Therefore, the location of the strong star of the strong eruption in us and one of the observed supernovae in 1572 and 1604.

🤔

Giant Stellar eruption detected for the first time

https://phys.org/news/2019-06-giant-...-eruption.html

"The team analyzed a particularly favorable flare, which took place on the active star HR 9024, about 450 light-years away from us. The High-Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer, or HETGS, aboard Chandra is the only instrument that allows measurements of the motions of coronal plasmas with speeds of just a few tens of thousands of miles per hour."

.

It would mean that that star would be in the position of the supernova that had caused that eruption, so that the supernova of 1572 would have been discovered by that time at about the same time as we did.

And the 1604 supernova would have been discovered for that reason about 30 years later than we did.

🤔



Giant stellar eruption detected for the first time

https://phys.org/news/2019-06-giant-...-eruption.html

"The team analyzed a particularly favorable flare, which took place on the active star HR 9024, about 450 light-years away from us. The High-Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer, or HETGS, aboard Chandra is the only instrument that allows measurements of the motions of coronal plasmas with speeds of just a few tens of thousands of miles per hour."


No niin, havaittiinko tuon tähden luona 1572 tai 1604 vuosien supernovista tuon about 450 vuotta sitten?

Tarkoittaisi sitä että tuo tähti olisi tuon purkauksen aikaan saaneeseen supernovaan nähden sellaisessa asemassa että vuoden 1572 supernova olisi havaittu tuon tähden luona about samaan aikaan kuin meillä.

Ja vuoden 1604 supernova olisi havaittu tuon tähden luona about 30 vuotta myöhemmin kuin meillä.

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd June 2019, 07:33 PM   #198
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Neptune & Uranus Control Grand Minima & Solar Modulation?
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

This is a crank web page about the dead astrologer Theodor Landscheidt and his delusions abut solar activity and climate. The delusion is not that solar activity may be influenced by the planets (but a delusion may be that Neptune caused grand minima), the delusion is that the Sun currently controls global temperatures. Solar radiation intensity has decreased slightly since the 1970's while global temperatures have gone up! Climatic effects of a new Maunder Minimum will be minimal so no delusion of a new Little Ice age soon.

A recent paper that suggests that the 11 year cycle can be matched by plugging in the tidal forces of Venus, Earth and Jupiter into a model of the solar magnetic field: Study corroborates the influence of planetary tidal forces on solar activity
But what about Mercury? What about Saturn? A little thing called the inverse square law suggests neglecting Mercury is dubious. It may explain neglecting Saturn. It definitely explains ignoring Neptune and Uranus.

Last edited by Reality Check; 3rd June 2019 at 07:57 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd June 2019, 07:40 PM   #199
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 24,656
Thumbs down The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Giant Stellar eruption detected for the first time

https://phys.org/news/2019-06-giant-...-eruption.html

"The team analyzed a particularly favorable flare, which took place on the active star HR 9024, about 450 light-years away from us. The High-Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer, or HETGS, aboard Chandra is the only instrument that allows measurements of the motions of coronal plasmas with speeds of just a few tens of thousands of miles per hour."
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
OU Andromedae (also designated as HR 9024) is a still existing variable star.

A total delusion that some supernova somewhere caused that flare.
A total delusion that HR 9024 was at the position of "the supernova of 1572"?
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 12:15 PM   #200
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,102
Jupiter and Saturn cycle Suns magnetic field twisted and broken.

Also explanation why south and north pole change.

https://youtu.be/hbV1bNMGDzo

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:21 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.