IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » General Skepticism and The Paranormal
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags bigfoot , lawsuits , sasquatch

Reply
Old 17th October 2012, 07:04 AM   #201
DennyT
Illuminator
 
DennyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,216
In the interviews, they say they are now 100% convinced they are seeing wood apes. Perhaps this is a legal strategy. If they parade 50 members of their group to the witness stand all saying that, that is pretty impressive for a jury I would think. Not to mention all the television videos they would show. If the shooter was a combat vet they might try to plead post traumatic stress disorder. Of course, the perp would be portrayed by the OK prosecutor as an ahole Texan. I think some sort of manslaughter would be the likely verdict, depending on who the victim was, etc, and what sort of lawyer the shooter could afford. But would the group finance an expensive lawyer for a slightly whack over-eager shooter? I think not. Then it might come down to whether some criminal lawyer would do the case for free just for the publicity.
__________________
"Take the children, but LEAVE ME MY MONKEY!"
--Dewey Cox, in "Walk Hard: the Dewey Cox Story."
"The main skill of bigfoot investigators is finding ways to deny the obvious." --DFoot

Last edited by DennyT; 17th October 2012 at 07:17 AM.
DennyT is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th October 2012, 07:09 AM   #202
Drewbot
Philosopher
 
Drewbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,712
You just pumped 10 rounds of buckshot into something you were specifically told was most likely a person in a suit.
__________________
"I dont call that evolution, I call that the survival of the fittest." - Bulletmaker
"I thought skeptics would usually point towards a hoax rather than a group being duped." - makaya325
Kit is not a skeptic. He is a former Bigfoot believer that changed his position to that of non believer.- Crowlogic
Drewbot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th October 2012, 05:08 PM   #203
Beanbag
Illuminator
 
Beanbag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,468
Originally Posted by parnassus View Post
In the interviews, they say they are now 100% convinced they are seeing wood apes. Perhaps this is a legal strategy. If they parade 50 members of their group to the witness stand all saying that, that is pretty impressive for a jury I would think. Not to mention all the television videos they would show. If the shooter was a combat vet they might try to plead post traumatic stress disorder. Of course, the perp would be portrayed by the OK prosecutor as an ahole Texan. I think some sort of manslaughter would be the likely verdict, depending on who the victim was, etc, and what sort of lawyer the shooter could afford. But would the group finance an expensive lawyer for a slightly whack over-eager shooter? I think not. Then it might come down to whether some criminal lawyer would do the case for free just for the publicity.
Smile when you say that, Pilgrim.



Beanbag
__________________
Nothing divides an indivisible nation quite as well as religion.

Know god, no peace.
No god, know peace.

If Jesus is the answer, it must be a real dumb question.
Beanbag is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th October 2012, 05:20 PM   #204
RedRatSnake
Slithering Through life
 
RedRatSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plymouth, MA
Posts: 1,661
I wonder if they really sat down and put thought into how they will feel for the rest of their lives if they kill someone. With this subject of BF it will be a long life of constant badgering and harassment for not only the persons responsible, but i would have to think their family's also.

Think long and hard ~ Harry And The Remingtons ~ it's a long life ahead.
__________________
The man who never alters his opinions is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind.
W B
RedRatSnake is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th October 2012, 07:58 PM   #205
Manzer
Student
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 45
Are any of you lawyers practicing in Oklahoma? It seems you are giving a lot of "legal" speculation without the benefit of having a legal background.
Manzer is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th October 2012, 08:02 PM   #206
Drewbot
Philosopher
 
Drewbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,712
No, but I watch a lot of True Crime shows on cable.
__________________
"I dont call that evolution, I call that the survival of the fittest." - Bulletmaker
"I thought skeptics would usually point towards a hoax rather than a group being duped." - makaya325
Kit is not a skeptic. He is a former Bigfoot believer that changed his position to that of non believer.- Crowlogic
Drewbot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th October 2012, 08:17 PM   #207
RedRatSnake
Slithering Through life
 
RedRatSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plymouth, MA
Posts: 1,661
Originally Posted by Manzer View Post
Are any of you lawyers practicing in Oklahoma? It seems you are giving a lot of "legal" speculation without the benefit of having a legal background.
Really don't need to be a lawyer do ya ! cause it is very simple. Shoot at a Bigfoot and kill a person, Bigfoot's do not exist they are a fairy tale or myth, people love this kind of thing, some like to pretend they are a BF and will do so, it has been demonstrated time and time again over many years. I just can't for the life of me understand why this BS continues, no only looking for this thing but now some go hunting and justify shooting at it blindly, i feel sorry for anyone in a Ghillie Suit i really do.
__________________
The man who never alters his opinions is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind.
W B
RedRatSnake is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th October 2012, 10:40 PM   #208
Manzer
Student
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 45
Are you a lawyer? Do you know the laws in Oklahoma?
Manzer is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th October 2012, 11:22 PM   #209
rockinkt
Master Poster
 
rockinkt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,342
One doesn't have to be a lawyer to know that if you blast away 8 shots with a shotgun at such a close distance with nothing to show for it you are either not competent to have such a deadly weapon in your possession - or you are shooting at imaginary creatures.

Either way - a person like that and the people who support him are a tragedy waiting to happen.
__________________
"Townes Van Zandt is the best songwriter in the whole world and I'll stand on Bob Dylan's coffee table in my cowboy boots and say that." Steve Earle

"I've met Bob Dylan's bodyguards and if Steve Earle thinks he can stand on Bob Dylan's coffee table, he's sadly mistaken." Townes Van Zandt
rockinkt is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2012, 04:17 AM   #210
LTC8K6
Penultimate Amazing
 
LTC8K6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail
Posts: 21,423
Originally Posted by Manzer View Post
Are you a lawyer? Do you know the laws in Oklahoma?
You can't shoot at something you can't see clearly. I think the rangers and police tend to frown on such behavior in every state.

At any rate, I did read this from the OK regs.

Quote:
Shotgun Pellet Size

No person in the field may possess or attempt to harvest any wildlife, except waterfowl and crane, with a shotgun using shot larger than conventional BB (.180 in. diameter).

Hogs are not wildlife, see Hog Regulations for shotgun provisions.
So, unless you are hog hunting, you shouldn't be hunting in OK with buckshot as far as I can tell.

If you are waterfowl hunting, then you'd have birdshot, and be limited to 3 rounds in the magazine.

In general, it seems like the OK wildlife folks would not like you being in the woods with a high capacity shotgun loaded with buckshot.

In order to be legal with a high cap shotgun and buckshot, it looks like you'd have to convince authorities that you were hog hunting.

But that's just from a quick look at the online info, and could be wrong.

http://www.wildlifedepartment.com/huntregs.htm

Probably, a bigfoot is not considered "wildlife", since it doesn't exist, and it would fall between the regulation cracks.
__________________
What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing.

2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break?

Last edited by LTC8K6; 18th October 2012 at 04:27 AM.
LTC8K6 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2012, 04:56 PM   #211
Jodie
Philosopher
 
Jodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,231
As you say, just based on reading the web site, I think the fact that it is on private land changes how the regs are applied. There are some regs in the general gun laws section that deal with OC on private land.
__________________
"When I was a child I caught a fleeting glimpse out of the corner of my eye. I turned to look but it was gone, I cannot put my finger on it now. The child is grown, the dream is gone. I have become comfortably numb. " Pink Floyd
Jodie is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th October 2012, 06:06 AM   #212
Drewbot
Philosopher
 
Drewbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,712
Anatomy of a Bigfoot Habituation Situation.

__________________
"I dont call that evolution, I call that the survival of the fittest." - Bulletmaker
"I thought skeptics would usually point towards a hoax rather than a group being duped." - makaya325
Kit is not a skeptic. He is a former Bigfoot believer that changed his position to that of non believer.- Crowlogic
Drewbot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th October 2012, 08:56 AM   #213
DennyT
Illuminator
 
DennyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,216
The probability of a killing or killings of humans by "Bigfoot" hunters moved substantially closer to 1 with the announcement by Spike TV of a 10 million dollar reward. This strikes me as irresponsible, and possibly criminally so. Of course ianal; I could be mistaken. For example, I never thought that Prince Fielder would try to score from first on a no-out double.
__________________
"Take the children, but LEAVE ME MY MONKEY!"
--Dewey Cox, in "Walk Hard: the Dewey Cox Story."
"The main skill of bigfoot investigators is finding ways to deny the obvious." --DFoot

Last edited by DennyT; 26th October 2012 at 09:52 AM.
DennyT is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th October 2012, 08:58 AM   #214
GT/CS
Illuminator
 
GT/CS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Inland NW
Posts: 4,942
There will also be a lot of bears shot and left in the woods.
__________________
Normal in a weird way.
GT/CS is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th October 2012, 09:02 AM   #215
Drewbot
Philosopher
 
Drewbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,712
Reality shows often offer alcohol to participants to 'loosen them up'. I am scared for people.
__________________
"I dont call that evolution, I call that the survival of the fittest." - Bulletmaker
"I thought skeptics would usually point towards a hoax rather than a group being duped." - makaya325
Kit is not a skeptic. He is a former Bigfoot believer that changed his position to that of non believer.- Crowlogic
Drewbot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th October 2012, 09:53 AM   #216
DennyT
Illuminator
 
DennyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,216
Originally Posted by Drewbot View Post
... I am scared for people.
Especially Prince Fielder.
__________________
"Take the children, but LEAVE ME MY MONKEY!"
--Dewey Cox, in "Walk Hard: the Dewey Cox Story."
"The main skill of bigfoot investigators is finding ways to deny the obvious." --DFoot
DennyT is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th October 2012, 11:20 AM   #217
John Albert
Illuminator
 
John Albert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,140
So what's to stop a pathologically depressed person from putting on a bigfoot costume and strolling through woods where armed bigfoot hunters are known to congregate? I wouldn't be surprised if at some point we start seeing cases of "suicide by cryptozoologist."
__________________
“In religion and politics, people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second-hand, and without examination, from authorities who have not themselves examined the questions at issue but have taken them at second-hand from other non-examiners, whose opinions about them were not worth a brass farthing.”
—Mark Twain
John Albert is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th October 2012, 01:49 PM   #218
GT/CS
Illuminator
 
GT/CS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Inland NW
Posts: 4,942
Well, since the goobers in Oklahoma claim they can't hit a bigfoot from 30 my guess is that would be a poor way to commit suicide. Most Bigfoot hunters would run away, hide in the cabin, and wet themselves.

A better suicide plan would be to walk around where others with beer and guns hang out.
__________________
Normal in a weird way.

Last edited by GT/CS; 26th October 2012 at 01:52 PM.
GT/CS is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th October 2012, 02:26 PM   #219
DozingConsciously
Student
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 31
I'm imagining more a scenario where multiple groups in the same area all get into a long-range Reservoir Dogs-type thing when one group opens fire and the next group interprets it as tree knocking and opens fire in their direction, causing a runaway feedback cascade.
DozingConsciously is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th October 2012, 04:14 PM   #220
Beanbag
Illuminator
 
Beanbag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,468
Originally Posted by DozingConsciously View Post
I'm imagining more a scenario where multiple groups in the same area all get into a long-range Reservoir Dogs-type thing when one group opens fire and the next group interprets it as tree knocking and opens fire in their direction, causing a runaway feedback cascade.
I hate to say this, but there's a screenplay in that idea...


Beanbag
__________________
Nothing divides an indivisible nation quite as well as religion.

Know god, no peace.
No god, know peace.

If Jesus is the answer, it must be a real dumb question.
Beanbag is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th October 2012, 04:17 PM   #221
mike3
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,466
Originally Posted by parnassus View Post
The probability of a killing or killings of humans by "Bigfoot" hunters moved substantially closer to 1 with the announcement by Spike TV of a 10 million dollar reward. This strikes me as irresponsible, and possibly criminally so. Of course ianal; I could be mistaken. For example, I never thought that Prince Fielder would try to score from first on a no-out double.
To me, it sounds like just an evidence challenge. It doesn't explicitly claim they should go out and shoot. Do you think that there should be no Bigfoot evidence challenges? Should we be more careful when demanding evidence from Bigfoot believers, lest they shoot and end up hitting a human?
__________________
“Ego is subversive and devolutionary, truly destructive and terrible; ego is the generator of privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. Ego is the fire that burns within the pit of hell, devouring and consuming everything that enters and leaving utterly nothing behind. Ego is horrible, cruel, and restraining, the darkness of the world, and the doom and bane of man.” – my reaction to that famous Bertrand Russell quote.

Last edited by mike3; 26th October 2012 at 04:20 PM.
mike3 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th October 2012, 04:52 PM   #222
DennyT
Illuminator
 
DennyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,216
^lol
Name another evidence challenge in which the contestants see the only possible way to win is by killing an upright bipedal North American primate. What will result? And some are already trying to do it.

Should we place a bounty on Santa Claus? Or "be cautious?" do you not think that amount of money will cause some people to be "imprudent?"
__________________
"Take the children, but LEAVE ME MY MONKEY!"
--Dewey Cox, in "Walk Hard: the Dewey Cox Story."
"The main skill of bigfoot investigators is finding ways to deny the obvious." --DFoot

Last edited by DennyT; 26th October 2012 at 05:04 PM.
DennyT is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th October 2012, 05:06 PM   #223
RedRatSnake
Slithering Through life
 
RedRatSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plymouth, MA
Posts: 1,661
Originally Posted by mike3 View Post
To me, it sounds like just an evidence challenge. It doesn't explicitly claim they should go out and shoot. Do you think that there should be no Bigfoot evidence challenges? Should we be more careful when demanding evidence from Bigfoot believers, lest they shoot and end up hitting a human?
Only a body or parts of is going to prove BF is real. So the challenge is for a body or parts, that means having to kill one or find a dead one. Since they are just a myth that leaves shooting at known animals or people in camouflage or posing as BF.

I see this as something that could be very dangerous, my guess is these people proposing the challenge, just don't realize how serious some people take this BF thing.
__________________
The man who never alters his opinions is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind.
W B
RedRatSnake is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th October 2012, 07:08 PM   #224
AlaskaBushPilot
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,314
The answer to the OP is found by examining the reasons such an event has never occurred. We don't even have incidents where bear or deer or moose or whatever are shot by people thinking they are bigfoot. Or dead husbands mistaken for bigfoot.

In the examples of the TBRC, it is most telling that the more they talk the more reckless they sound, and criminally so: in Oklahoma, like elsewhere the hunting regs for various species with some exceptions like frogging are from 1/2 hr before sunrise to 1/2 hr after sunset - in other words, for when you can see. Spotlighting in Oklahoma is forbidden, again with special exceptions like frogging.

The incident where the shotgun was fired off numerous times in the daytime led to a settlement of over $2,000.00 to the people who fled from them. Here again they couldn't see what they were shooting at. Or more correctly, they weren't and don't shoot at something looking like a bigfoot in the first place because they know they don't exist so the risk of prosecution is far too high. Paying this money demonstrates they knew what they were doing was reckless and negligent - just shooting off rounds at nothing. If they had shot one of those people they'd be in jail right now, and the immediate payment just for scaring them proves they know this.

There is an incident where Matt Moneymaker is sending an email describing the "assault" on this area X cabin where they are shooting off rounds as Matt is speaking to them on the phone. Who calls a television show personality when they are under attack and fear for their lives? That call is proof they didn't. If they had hit a person then, at night, while on the phone to Matt Moneymaker instead of 911 - straight to jail.

They know "hunting bigfoot" cannot be used in court as a legitimate defense because there is no season for that. So they have no intention of killing anything in the first place. You cannot even kill a deer out of season by saying you were hunting bigfoot.

We can infer that even the craziest are not shooting at an actual "thing" they are seeing. They're purposefully NOT shooting at a living thing, and even that turns out to be recklessly negligent. That's how hard it is to make a case for innocently shooting something looking like bigfoot.

People dressed in a suit are obviously worried about their behavior in that suit. There are plenty of examples of them being filmed. But no examples of them drawing fire. So we don't have examples of people in suits doing things that give a legitimate excuse to fire, like attacking. It doesn't matter if it is a pig or a moose or a live person with no suit on: the legitimate excuse for firing is defense of life and property. So "I thought it was bigfoot" is irrelevant.

So what example can you conjure up where someone is wearing a suit and fired upon? Either the person in the suit is out of their minds and doing something that gets them shot for good reason, or the people who are armed are being criminally negligent.
AlaskaBushPilot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th October 2012, 06:48 AM   #225
Jodie
Philosopher
 
Jodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,231
For once I agree with something ABP has said and the world didn't come to an end as a result. I'm hoping we don't have enough of the details about what they are doing to make a valid judgement.

I can't get past the risk of hurting a person in all of this if you are blindly shooting at things in the dark. Bipto said the other shooting incidents happened at night and gave that as a reason for why the target was missed, I can only form an opinion based on what is said, though. Surely the risk would not be worth it.
__________________
"When I was a child I caught a fleeting glimpse out of the corner of my eye. I turned to look but it was gone, I cannot put my finger on it now. The child is grown, the dream is gone. I have become comfortably numb. " Pink Floyd
Jodie is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th October 2012, 09:15 AM   #226
jerrywayne
Graduate Poster
 
jerrywayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,083
As usual, the Bigfoot "evidence" is advanced by pro-Bigfoot folks, either to be believed or ignored. I would give more credence to the otherwise exciting stuff in the Oklahoma hills if their group had neutral or even skeptical scientists embedded. And some Radford or Nichols skeptical type expositors.

That they should bring along a journalist is a bad idea, I think. Journalism today is not into exposing as much as it is into promoting. Just today on a tv news broadcast, because of upcoming Halloween, a "journalist" went to a cemetary with "ghost hunters" who had a device that picked up "spirit communication." The reporter did not dig into this amazing feat and presented it straightfoward almost to the point of endorsement.
jerrywayne is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th October 2012, 09:30 AM   #227
jerrywayne
Graduate Poster
 
jerrywayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,083
Alaska's comments are worth pondering. It is possible that group members are just firing off shots at the local flora, not fauna. The shooting incident of last year was witnessed by no one but the shooter.

If we remove from the table a population of actual Oklahoma apes, a pattern remains. The group spends a couple of years discerning nothing more than tree knocks and woops. More of the same until the dramatic sighting and firing of shots. Then another sighting. Next year all hell breaks loose. Multiple sightings, multiple gun shots. Wood Apes surround in the dark. Wood Apes harassing the Wood Apers via rock and nut bombardments. The whole thing looked at this way comes across as a scenario.

If Alaska is right, we need not worry about innocent hunters or hikers or innocent-less hoaxers getting shot. The aim will be around seven feet off the ground, or higher.

Last edited by jerrywayne; 27th October 2012 at 09:31 AM. Reason: adding plural
jerrywayne is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th October 2012, 09:43 AM   #228
Ace!
Scholar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 75
Depends on the jurisdiction. In Oregon, Oregon State Police are fish/wildlife hunting law enforcement. I've had the conversation about the legality of hunting bigfoot in Oregon and it was explained to me that bigfoot is not a protected animal/game species in the State of Oregon and there is no reason you couldn't shoot one in Oregon. As they are the experts in fish/wildlife regulations I have to believe what they've stated and it wouldn't any different than a kid wearing a bear or mountain lion costume in the woods.
Ace! is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th October 2012, 12:10 PM   #229
GT/CS
Illuminator
 
GT/CS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Inland NW
Posts: 4,942
Originally Posted by jerrywayne View Post
As usual, the Bigfoot "evidence" is advanced by pro-Bigfoot folks, either to be believed or ignored. I would give more credence to the otherwise exciting stuff in the Oklahoma hills if their group had neutral or even skeptical scientists embedded. And some Radford or Nichols skeptical type expositors.

That they should bring along a journalist is a bad idea, I think. Journalism today is not into exposing as much as it is into promoting. Just today on a tv news broadcast, because of upcoming Halloween, a "journalist" went to a cemetary with "ghost hunters" who had a device that picked up "spirit communication." The reporter did not dig into this amazing feat and presented it straightfoward almost to the point of endorsement.
Three "e"s.
Sorry, just a pet peeve of mine since I work in that field.
__________________
Normal in a weird way.
GT/CS is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th October 2012, 07:17 PM   #230
Jodie
Philosopher
 
Jodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,231
You see dead people GT/CS?
__________________
"When I was a child I caught a fleeting glimpse out of the corner of my eye. I turned to look but it was gone, I cannot put my finger on it now. The child is grown, the dream is gone. I have become comfortably numb. " Pink Floyd
Jodie is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th October 2012, 07:28 PM   #231
RedRatSnake
Slithering Through life
 
RedRatSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plymouth, MA
Posts: 1,661
Originally Posted by jerrywayne View Post
Alaska's comments are worth pondering. It is possible that group members are just firing off shots at the local flora, not fauna. The shooting incident of last year was witnessed by no one but the shooter.
Most likely what's going on, but for them to post such incidents on their web page is cause for concern at some level.
__________________
The man who never alters his opinions is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind.
W B
RedRatSnake is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th October 2012, 07:32 PM   #232
shawmutt
Squirrel Murderer
 
shawmutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,037
I've seen something similar to this on the Skate 3 intro...
shawmutt is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th October 2012, 07:38 PM   #233
GT/CS
Illuminator
 
GT/CS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Inland NW
Posts: 4,942
Originally Posted by Jodie View Post
You see dead people GT/CS?
Fairly often.
__________________
Normal in a weird way.
GT/CS is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th October 2012, 07:50 PM   #234
RedRatSnake
Slithering Through life
 
RedRatSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plymouth, MA
Posts: 1,661
Originally Posted by shawmutt View Post
I've seen something similar to this on the Skate 3 intro...
That's the image i get in my head also ~ lmao
__________________
The man who never alters his opinions is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind.
W B
RedRatSnake is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 27th October 2012, 09:08 PM   #235
Jodie
Philosopher
 
Jodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,231
Originally Posted by GT/CS View Post
Fairly often.
__________________
"When I was a child I caught a fleeting glimpse out of the corner of my eye. I turned to look but it was gone, I cannot put my finger on it now. The child is grown, the dream is gone. I have become comfortably numb. " Pink Floyd
Jodie is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th October 2012, 06:36 PM   #236
jerrywayne
Graduate Poster
 
jerrywayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,083
Originally Posted by GT/CS View Post
Three "e"s.
Sorry, just a pet peeve of mine since I work in that field.
Thanks. Missed the spell check.
jerrywayne is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th October 2012, 12:07 AM   #237
rockinkt
Master Poster
 
rockinkt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,342
Originally Posted by GT/CS View Post
Three "e"s.
Sorry, just a pet peeve of mine since I work in that field.
Are you "dead" certain about that spelling?
__________________
"Townes Van Zandt is the best songwriter in the whole world and I'll stand on Bob Dylan's coffee table in my cowboy boots and say that." Steve Earle

"I've met Bob Dylan's bodyguards and if Steve Earle thinks he can stand on Bob Dylan's coffee table, he's sadly mistaken." Townes Van Zandt
rockinkt is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th October 2012, 04:12 AM   #238
LTC8K6
Penultimate Amazing
 
LTC8K6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail
Posts: 21,423
I've also heard many times that witnesses would/could not shoot bigfoot because it looked too human.
__________________
What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing.

2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break?
LTC8K6 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th November 2012, 08:00 PM   #239
manofthesea
2wu4u
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,668
http://triblive.com/news/2821187-74/...rities-charges

Any kooks still think it's okay to send a child into the forest in a fur suit?
manofthesea is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th November 2012, 09:03 PM   #240
RedRatSnake
Slithering Through life
 
RedRatSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plymouth, MA
Posts: 1,661
Originally Posted by manofthesea View Post
http://triblive.com/news/2821187-74/...rities-charges

Any kooks still think it's okay to send a child into the forest in a fur suit?

First of all it's old news. Second who here has ever mentioned sending there child out into the forest with a Skunk suit on. You feeling ok tonight ? Or is this just another one of those strange / weird posts you hit and run with once in a while.
__________________
The man who never alters his opinions is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind.
W B
RedRatSnake is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » General Skepticism and The Paranormal

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:08 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.