ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 11th January 2019, 12:08 PM   #121
Dancing David
Penultimate Amazing
 
Dancing David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: central Illinois
Posts: 39,500
“Hey Rocky, watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat!” said Bullwinkle
__________________
I suspect you are a sandwich, metaphorically speaking. -Donn
And a shot rang out. Now Space is doing time... -Ben Burch
You built the toilet - don't complain when people crap in it. _Kid Eager
Never underestimate the power of the Random Number God. More of evolutionary history is His doing than people think. - Dinwar
Dancing David is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th January 2019, 01:33 PM   #122
Lrrr
Stealth Hug Ninja
 
Lrrr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North of Reality
Posts: 241
Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
I did some calculation of the mysterious Oumuamua acceleration
Any chance of seeing these calculations?
__________________
“Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.” - Calvin from Calvin and Hobbes
Lrrr is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th January 2019, 01:34 PM   #123
Hellbound
Merchant of Doom
 
Hellbound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Not in Hell, but I can see it from here on a clear day...
Posts: 13,290
Originally Posted by Lrrr View Post
Any chance of seeing these calculations?
Sorry, you'll have to find a local 10 year old if you want to see the calculations.

Hellbound is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th January 2019, 02:06 PM   #124
steenkh
Philosopher
 
steenkh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 5,467
Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
This aspect is a HUGE step forward for the MTR theory, - now it predict a remarkable strong upwards acceleration also for the ISS, during the period the ISS is under the Earth ( south)
So you have realised that your theory is busted because no such acceleration has been observed for the ISS or any orbit?
__________________
Steen

--
Jack of all trades - master of none!
steenkh is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th January 2019, 02:09 PM   #125
Crawtator
Critical Thinker
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 327
Yay! He actually killed his own theory!!!

....

Again!
Crawtator is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th January 2019, 02:17 PM   #126
Bjarne
Illuminator
 
Bjarne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,178
Originally Posted by steenkh View Post
So you have realised that your theory is busted because no such acceleration has been observed for the ISS or any orbit?
RRKE was predicted 3 years ago, here at the forum
Long before Oumuamua
This law of nature is perfect described
There are no conflict according what I claim now
http://www.internationalskeptics.com...&postcount=102

Last edited by Bjarne; 11th January 2019 at 02:27 PM.
Bjarne is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th January 2019, 02:21 PM   #127
Bjarne
Illuminator
 
Bjarne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,178
Oumuamua reached perihelion at 38,100.000 km from the Sun
Acceleration due to gravity of the Sun was 0,039 m/s2 - much more than sufficient to release the full potential of Dark Flow RRKE

Read more about RRKE written 3 years ago.... http://www.internationalskeptics.com...highlight=edfa

Based on that we know the mysterious (none gravitational) acceleration of Oumuamua is measured to be to be 0.000005 m/s2
We can conclude that that according to principle 3 ( the link above) , RRKE, and therefore also RR and DFA also is 0.000005 m/s2



This correspond to (reveals) that the solar system is moving 950 km/s (south) – this is 350 km/s more as Dark Flow is measured to be.
Maybe our universe as a hole is on the move too etc….

To exposure of the full range of RRKE connected to Dark Flow, - Oumuamua (or other objects) must be (more or less) under the Sun (south).

The ISS is 400 km from the surface of the Earth
Acceleration due to gravity is 8,7 m/s2 at that altitude.
This is also more than sufficient to release the full potential of RRKE

The ISS orbital period = 5561 seconds, lets assume that the ISS is (more or less) under the Earth 5% of the time, = 278 seconds

278 second multiplied with 0.000005 m/s2 = a speed increment at 0.00139 m/s

This too should be possible to meassure

Last edited by Bjarne; 11th January 2019 at 02:36 PM.
Bjarne is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th January 2019, 02:43 PM   #128
sts60
Illuminator
 
sts60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,154
“The ISS orbital period = 5561 seconds, lets assume that the ISS is (more or less) under the Earth 5% of the time, = 278 seconds“

What exactly is this supposed to mean? You previously included “under the earth” with “south“. Under the Earth with respect to what, exactly? “South” of what, exactly?
sts60 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th January 2019, 02:49 PM   #129
MRC_Hans
Penultimate Amazing
 
MRC_Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 21,850
Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
Oumuamua reached perihelion at 38,100.000 km from the Sun
Acceleration due to gravity of the Sun was 0,039 m/s2 - much more than sufficient to release the full potential of Dark Flow RRKE

Read more about RRKE written 3 years ago.... http://www.internationalskeptics.com...highlight=edfa

Based on that we know the mysterious (none gravitational) acceleration of Oumuamua is measured to be to be 0.000005 m/s2
We can conclude that that according to principle 3 ( the link above) , RRKE, and therefore also RR and DFA also is 0.000005 m/s2

http://pubs.sciepub.com/FAAC/4/1/4/image/equ1.png

This correspond to (reveals) that the solar system is moving 950 km/s (south) – this is 350 km/s more as Dark Flow is measured to be.
Maybe our universe as a hole is on the move too etc….

To exposure of the full range of RRKE connected to Dark Flow, - Oumuamua (or other objects) must be (more or less) under the Sun (south).

The ISS is 400 km from the surface of the Earth
Acceleration due to gravity is 8,7 m/s2 at that altitude.
This is also more than sufficient to release the full potential of RRKE

The ISS orbital period = 5561 seconds, lets assume that the ISS is (more or less) under the Earth 5% of the time, = 278 seconds

278 second multiplied with 0.000005 m/s2 = a speed increment at 0.00139 m/s

This too should be possible to meassure
Bjarne, get off it. You're just rambling.

Hans
__________________
Experience is an excellent teacher, but she sends large bills.
MRC_Hans is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th January 2019, 03:20 PM   #130
Dancing David
Penultimate Amazing
 
Dancing David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: central Illinois
Posts: 39,500
It a cow drives a tractor to an elevator to the ISS does it make sound?
__________________
I suspect you are a sandwich, metaphorically speaking. -Donn
And a shot rang out. Now Space is doing time... -Ben Burch
You built the toilet - don't complain when people crap in it. _Kid Eager
Never underestimate the power of the Random Number God. More of evolutionary history is His doing than people think. - Dinwar
Dancing David is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th January 2019, 03:29 PM   #131
jonesdave116
Illuminator
 
jonesdave116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,194
Originally Posted by Dancing David View Post
It a cow drives a tractor to an elevator to the ISS does it make sound?
Bloody good question that! Don't know the answer.
__________________
“There is in every village a torch - the teacher; and an extinguisher - the priest.” - Victor Hugo

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” - George Carlin
jonesdave116 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th January 2019, 03:40 PM   #132
hgus
Critical Thinker
 
hgus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 341
Originally Posted by sts60 View Post
“The ISS orbital period = 5561 seconds, lets assume that the ISS is (more or less) under the Earth 5% of the time, = 278 seconds“

What exactly is this supposed to mean? You previously included “under the earth” with “south“. Under the Earth with respect to what, exactly? “South” of what, exactly?
South of North duh!
hgus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th January 2019, 02:45 AM   #133
Bjarne
Illuminator
 
Bjarne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,178
Originally Posted by sts60 View Post
“The ISS orbital period = 5561 seconds, lets assume that the ISS is (more or less) under the Earth 5% of the time, = 278 seconds“

What exactly is this supposed to mean? You previously included “under the earth” with “south“. Under the Earth with respect to what, exactly? “South” of what, exactly?
Principle 3 of the MTR theory claims:

RR is a reversible process. This means that if no force pushes / pulls an object (further) towards the RR direction (see principle 4), the object will decelerate.
The RR affecting an object can be compared to a retracted arrow. All that is required for the retracted, potential, kinetic energy of the arrow to be released is that the force of the string is released (which also illustrates that motion opposite DFD will cause less RR, also simple to calculate based on the Lorentz equation).
Release of Retracted Potential Kinetic Energy (in short RRPKE) will affect any object moving more or less away from DFD (or any other RR affected direction) , depending on the angle of movement away from DFD.

Written 3 years ago, - source : http://www.internationalskeptics.com...highlight=edfa

So if you want to release (Dark Flow Related) Retracted Relativistic Potential Kinetic Energy ( RRPKE ) - all you need is a force to counteract the force responsible for DFA

We have seen that the mysterious none gravitational acceleration of Oumuamua was 0.000005 m/s2
Lets therefore assume that this acceleration ALL original from Dark Flow related RRPKE .
When Oumuamua travelled under the Sun the upwards acceleration from the Sun was 0,09 m/s2
Which mean 18000 stronger as necessary to cancel out DFA.

Which mean the DFA (that was effecting Oumuamua) was canceled out completely many weeks before and after Oumuamua 's perihelion.
Therefore we have reason to conclude, - that the full potential of the Dark Flow related RRPKE (that was effecting Oumuamua ) began to release it self, - right after Oumuamua went "under" the sun..

If it is fair to say that ALL the mysterious none gravitational acceleration was caused by RRPKE, then we can calculate which absolut speed we are moving ( Dark Flow + etc...)

A model that compare none gravitational acceleration, - 1.) observation and 2.) calculation must off course be made before we can get this more exact.

Anyway now we have a good right to claim
  • MTR is the ONLY theory able to predict, calculate and explain what really was happening
  • A absolute reference frame must exist
  • The theory of (especially) special relativity must be modified.
  • RR is true
  • DFA is true
  • And absolute relativistic frame of motion is true
  • And much much much more.

Last edited by Bjarne; 12th January 2019 at 03:09 AM.
Bjarne is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th January 2019, 04:14 AM   #134
abaddon
Penultimate Amazing
 
abaddon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 18,423
Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
I did some calculation of the mysterious Oumuamua acceleration
To my big surprise I need a force almost 100 times stronger as the MTR predict.
I checked the data agian and again but the forces was indeed much too weak.
Then suddenly tonight the solution striked me.

I discovered a new aspect of the theory, - not quite new, but rather overlooked aspect of an old principle.
This aspect is a Principle 3 aspect http://www.internationalskeptics.com...&postcount=102

So long Oumuamua is under the Sun, the upwards acceleration of the Sun will simply counteract a large part of the Dark Flow Acceleration affecting Oumuamua , this is allowing a huge part (maybe) all of the Retracted Potential Kinetic Energy connected to the Dark Flow to be Released, - or rather to start a releasing process. The result is a SIGNIFICANT acceleration.

This aspect is a HUGE step forward for the MTR theory, - now it predict a remarkable strong upwards acceleration also for the ISS, during the period the ISS is under the Earth ( south)

It opens the doors to how the MTR in a cheap way can be further confirmed. (satellites experiment VERY close to Earth).
Such will blow a GIGANTIC hole in the prevailing theory of relativity, that never never never agian will be the same.
TODAY is a GREAT day.
Oh great, you are admitting that everything you posted up to now was wrong and are replacing it with a new thing you extracted from your hinterland.
__________________
Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive?


...love and buttercakes...
abaddon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th January 2019, 08:44 AM   #135
8enotto
Muse
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Mexico
Posts: 501
Bjarne, now you need to prepare a paper with all related math and proper references.

Then submit it for peer review.

Let them declare your great achievement or explain why it cannot be.
Self declaration is hollow.
8enotto is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th January 2019, 08:52 AM   #136
Bjarne
Illuminator
 
Bjarne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,178
Originally Posted by 8enotto View Post
Bjarne, now you need to prepare a paper with all related math and proper references.

Then submit it for peer review.

.

Dont worry
Bjarne is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th January 2019, 09:25 PM   #137
Bjarne
Illuminator
 
Bjarne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,178
Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
Oumuamua reached perihelion at 38,100.000 km from the Sun
Acceleration due to gravity of the Sun was 0,039 m/s2 - much more than sufficient to release the full potential of Dark Flow RRKE

Read more about RRKE written 3 years ago.... http://www.internationalskeptics.com...highlight=edfa

Based on that we know the mysterious (none gravitational) acceleration of Oumuamua is measured to be to be 0.000005 m/s2
We can conclude that that according to principle 3 ( the link above) , RRKE, and therefore also RR and DFA also is 0.000005 m/s2

http://pubs.sciepub.com/FAAC/4/1/4/image/equ1.png

This correspond to (reveals) that the solar system is moving 950 km/s (south) – this is 350 km/s more as Dark Flow is measured to be.
Maybe our universe as a hole is on the move too etc….

To exposure of the full range of RRKE connected to Dark Flow, - Oumuamua (or other objects) must be (more or less) under the Sun (south).

The ISS is 400 km from the surface of the Earth
Acceleration due to gravity is 8,7 m/s2 at that altitude.
This is also more than sufficient to release the full potential of RRKE

The ISS orbital period = 5561 seconds, lets assume that the ISS is (more or less) under the Earth 5% of the time, = 278 seconds

278 second multiplied with 0.000005 m/s2 = a speed increment at 0.00139 m/s

This too should be possible to measure
Edith
The ISS will increase speed at least 40% of the orbit time and hence reach a speed increment per orbit close to 0,01 m/s - This is easy to measure. I wonder why this not have been discovered so fare.
Bjarne is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th January 2019, 10:33 PM   #138
sts60
Illuminator
 
sts60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,154
Originally Posted by sts60 View Post
“The ISS orbital period = 5561 seconds, lets assume that the ISS is (more or less) under the Earth 5% of the time, = 278 seconds“

What exactly is this supposed to mean? You previously included “under the earth” with “south“. Under the Earth with respect to what, exactly? “South” of what, exactly?
Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
Principle 3 of the MTR theory claims:
http://science27.com/forum/bue.jpg
[i]RR is a reversible process. This means that if no force pushes / pulls an object (further) towards the RR direction (see principle 4), the object will decelerate..,
1. You didn’t answer the questions.
2. That’s not what “reversible” means.
sts60 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 03:34 AM   #139
MRC_Hans
Penultimate Amazing
 
MRC_Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 21,850
Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
Edith
The ISS will increase speed at least 40% of the orbit time and hence reach a speed increment per orbit close to 0,01 m/s - This is easy to measure. I wonder why this not have been discovered so fare.
It is because it doesn't happen.

Hans
__________________
Experience is an excellent teacher, but she sends large bills.
MRC_Hans is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 04:22 AM   #140
Mojo
Mostly harmless
 
Mojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 30,833
Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
Edith
The ISS will increase speed at least 40% of the orbit time and hence reach a speed increment per orbit close to 0,01 m/s - This is easy to measure. I wonder why this not have been discovered so fare.

If your theory predicts an “easy to measure” result that you have not observed, what might we conclude about your theory?
__________________
"You got to use your brain." - McKinley Morganfield

"The poor mystic homeopaths feel like petted house-cats thrown at high flood on the breaking ice." - Leon Trotsky

Last edited by Mojo; 13th January 2019 at 04:24 AM.
Mojo is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 08:04 AM   #141
The Man
Scourge, of the supernatural
 
The Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 13,655
Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
If you really knew what relativity was about then tell us all what is the cause-effect of time dilation.

Its is not enough to say:, - because of relative motion bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla.

Tell me as i wrote, the cause-effect of that strange phenomena.
We have been over this before but you simply continue to ignore it.

If you are going to ascribe "time dilation" as the "effect" then the "cause", in SR, is relative motion and the local consistency of the speed of light.

Fundamentally it is just the result of choosing different frames of reference with the local consistency of the speed of light.


Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
And tell WHAT is the curvature of space made of
Again a physical space is "made of" physical locations, whether that space is curved or flat. The difference between those topologies, flat or curved, is how those locations relate to each other (the metic, or manifold of, the space).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_space

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifold


Again, what is your space "made of" if not at least locations?

Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
Tell me also what is the cause effect of the curvature of space.
Again in general relativity the cause of the curvature of space-time is the stress energy tensor.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress...3energy_tensor

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ativ/vec4.html



Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
Again, I don’t need bla bla bla
I need the cause -effect for these 3 phenomena’s..
"time dilation" and "the curvature of space" are only 2 "phenomena’s" and as noted in the links the invariance of the space-time as well as the energy-momentum four vectors is associated with the invariance of the speed of light and the rest mass of the particle respectively.


Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
You cannot, because this theory is full of huge holes of emptiness.
Many have accepted the theory, - but don’t tell me anyone have understood what this theory really is about.


'
As you have been advised of all this before it is evidently only you who hasn't "understood what this theory really is about." Even after having been advised of such, multiple times.
__________________
BRAINZZZZZZZZ
The Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 09:19 AM   #142
Bjarne
Illuminator
 
Bjarne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,178
Originally Posted by sts60 View Post
You previously included “under the earth” with “south“. Under the Earth with respect to what, exactly? “South” of what, exactly? .
Ecliptic
Bjarne is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 09:42 AM   #143
Bjarne
Illuminator
 
Bjarne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,178
Originally Posted by MRC_Hans View Post
It is because it doesn't happen.
Hans
You will see.

After using a couple of hour today I found the RRPKE aspect of the theory was just a little more complicated as I thought yesterday, but easy to grasp, and easy to solve.
  • Some spacegraft is only effected by Flyby Anomalies causing the craft speed to decrease (eg. Galileo II),
  • Some is only increasing speed (eg Galileo-1 and Near),
  • And finally some crafts, - is some of the path, - first decreasing and then increasing speed. - This is the case for ISS, and I believe will will discover that too very soon, now when test is going on onboard. Exact speed Measurement I belive is part of the research. So a new kind of anomaly will be seen. We will see first -0,005 m/s - then - 0,005 m/s, this path of the Orbit the ISS is under the earth / South, effecting the ISS..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flyby_anomaly

All these 3 anomalies are caused by RRPKE effect.

One of many evidences showing you don't understand the theory you are criticizing , - is that you dont know why the same force (RRPKE) is effecting spacecraft completely different.
You have really no idea why thee RRPKE aspect is causing such strange oppesite results, right ?

Agian, it will be a honour for me to tell you, the solution.
However first I will give you a chance to solve this kindergarten piece of cake yourself…

Agian you will see Measurement and theory correspond exactly to observations
Agian today is a GREAT day.

Last edited by Bjarne; 13th January 2019 at 10:11 AM.
Bjarne is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 10:12 AM   #144
MRC_Hans
Penultimate Amazing
 
MRC_Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 21,850
Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
You will see.

After using a couple of hour today I found the RRPKE aspect of the theory was just a little more complicated as I thought yesterday, but easy to grasp, and easy to solve.
  • Some spacegraft is only effected by Flyby Anomalies causing the craft speed to decrease (eg. Galileo II),
  • Some is only increasing speed (eg Galileo-1 and Near),
  • And finally some crafts, - is some of the path, - first decreasing and then increasing speed. - This is the case for ISS, and I believe will will discover that too very soon, now when test is going on onboard. Exact speed Measurement I belive is part of the research. So a new kind of anomaly will be seen.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flyby_anomaly

All these 3 anomalies are caused by RRPKE effects.
Ah, I see. Very handy! Your theory means whatever you like it to mean in each case.

Quote:
One of many evidences showing you don't understand the theory you are criticizing , - is that you dont know why the same force (RRPKE) is effecting spacecraft completely different.
You have really no idea why thee RRPKE aspect is causing such strange oppesite results, right ?
Oh, Quite! It is because you want it to do so. Things are so easy in fantasy land where you can just make stuff up as you go, right?

Hans
__________________
Experience is an excellent teacher, but she sends large bills.
MRC_Hans is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 10:18 AM   #145
MRC_Hans
Penultimate Amazing
 
MRC_Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 21,850
Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
This is the case for ISS, and I believe will will discover that too very soon, now when test is going on onboard. Exact speed Measurement I belive is part of the research.
Oh, Bjarne, exact speed measurement is basic to the project. Otherwise space vehicles carrying crew and supplied to it could not find it and match velocity so they could dock. Do you even realize how exactly you need to know the speeds involved, to achieve that?

Hans
__________________
Experience is an excellent teacher, but she sends large bills.
MRC_Hans is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 10:20 AM   #146
Bjarne
Illuminator
 
Bjarne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,178
Originally Posted by MRC_Hans View Post
Ah, I see. Very handy! Your theory means whatever you like it to mean in each case.

Oh, Quite! It is because you want it to do so. Things are so easy in fantasy land where you can just make stuff up as you go, right?

Hans
No Hans, but because of sometimes spacecraft moves upwards (only) by flyby, sometime downwards (only) by flyby.
However the ISS is moving first downward and then upwards, thats why a similar anomaly will be completely different as seen before

No Hans NOT fantasy, - have you ever hear about Wikipedia ?

Theory and Observation goes so nice hand in hand in hand as these possible can.
The Galileo-I and Near was during the flyby only mowing upwards
Galileo II only moving downwards

The RRPKE can either slow down or speed up a space probe, - all depending of which direction it is heading relative to RRPKE

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flyby_anomaly

Last edited by Bjarne; 13th January 2019 at 10:25 AM.
Bjarne is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 10:28 AM   #147
MRC_Hans
Penultimate Amazing
 
MRC_Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 21,850
Originally Posted by sts60 View Post
“The ISS orbital period = 5561 seconds, lets assume that the ISS is (more or less) under the Earth 5% of the time, = 278 seconds“

What exactly is this supposed to mean? You previously included “under the earth” with “south“. Under the Earth with respect to what, exactly? “South” of what, exactly?
To Bjarne's defence, "south", "north", "under", and "over" are actually valid expressions when describing an object's position relative to the ecliptic.

Unfortunately, this also shows how little Bjarne understands of orbital mechanics.

An object orbiting Earth will spend equal times "over" and "under" the ecliptic, because it is orbiting Earth's center. It can't be only 5%(or 40% as he seems to amend it later) in one of the hemispheres.

Also, the "ecliptic" has no relevance to a galactic phenomenon as the dark flow that Bjarne is talking about. The ecliptic is an arbitrary (if observational relevant) plane, defined to be the plane of Earth's orbit around the sun.

Hans
__________________
Experience is an excellent teacher, but she sends large bills.
MRC_Hans is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 10:40 AM   #148
Bjarne
Illuminator
 
Bjarne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,178
Originally Posted by MRC_Hans View Post
To Bjarne's defence, "south", "north", "under", and "over" are actually valid expressions when describing an object's position relative to the ecliptic.
Unfortunately, this also shows how little Bjarne understands of orbital mechanics. ;
BS
just few post above you can read this http://www.internationalskeptics.com...&postcount=142

Quote:
An object orbiting Earth will spend equal times "over" and "under" the ecliptic, because it is orbiting Earth's center. It can't be only 5%(or 40% as he seems to amend it later) in one of the hemispheres.
Still you have not understood that the acceleration due to gravity (of the object the spacecraft is orbiting) ( or fly by) must pull the spacecraft upwards at at least 0,000005 m/s2 to be able to release the full potential of RRPKE

Therefore
  1. The space craft orbit / trajectory inclination
  2. The angle of the spacecraft orbit / trajectory relative to Earth
  3. The space craft Distance from the Earth
Are all important factors, that all must be known and taken into account when calculating how stong RRPKE will effect an object.

Furthermore if the full effect of RRPKE must result in full possible speed increment, the spacecraft must move 100% opposite RRPKE, - if only moving lets say 45° then only 50% of RRPKE force will be converted to speed increment, the remaining 50% will cause orbit inclination change.

Quote:
Also, the "ecliptic" has no relevance to a galactic phenomenon as the dark flow that Bjarne is talking about. The ecliptic is an arbitrary (if observational relevant) plane, defined to be the plane of Earth's orbit around the sun.
EDFA and RR will force planet inclinations perpendicular, relative to the Dark Flow axis, - first the inner planet, then slower the out planet. This is an integrated part of the theory.

ASAM can change this , but everything points to that this influence is weak for our solar system

Last edited by Bjarne; 13th January 2019 at 10:58 AM.
Bjarne is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 01:43 PM   #149
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23,981
Thumbs down Insane insults when my post uses Bjarne's deluded equation

Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
My dear, after ....
14 January 2019 Bjarne: Insane insults when my post uses Bjarne's deluded equation
Bjarne's deluded equation gives that there will be a "resulting force acting on the particle the speed of the particle will correspond to the force" in the LHC. Thus:
11 January 2019 Bjarne: An insane statement that no deceleration will happen at LHC, etc. according to his delusions!
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 01:46 PM   #150
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23,981
Thumbs down Irrelevant gibberish is still not an answer to high school level arithmetic

Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
In this context there ....
Irrelevant gibberish is still not an answer to high school level arithmetic:
10 January 2019 Bjarne: v^2/c^2 is < 1 for v < c so what is 1 - v^2/c^2? The square root? The reciprocal? 1 - that?
10 January 2019 Bjarne: Explain how an equation producing negative values is plotted as positive values in a graph
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 01:52 PM   #151
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23,981
Thumbs down An inanely lying question when SR has the cause-effect of time dilation

Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
If you really knew what relativity was about then tell us all what is the cause-effect of time dilation.
14 January 2019 Bjarne: An inanely lying question when special relativity has the cause-effect of time dilation (cause = speed, effect = time dilation).
A lying question because it is answered in my post (special relativity). The insanity of the lie is that Bjarne has been writing his delusions about special relativity for over 10 years and so must know the basics of special relativity.

11 January 2019 Bjarne: A completely ignorant and rather deluded question about time dilation (my post was about units and acceleration).
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 02:05 PM   #152
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23,981
Thumbs down A delusion that yet another delusion fixes his delusions

Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
I did some calculation of the mysterious Oumuamua acceleration....
14 January 2019 Bjarne: A delusion that he can debunk his delusions and lie that yet another delusion fixes it !

A feature of real world, working science is that tae laws of physics are generally applicable. Thus when we apply the laws of physics to various situations, we get results that match the real world.

We do not do the stupidity of making up a physical law that can only be applied to a single situation such as 'Oumuamua ! The stupidity is obvious. If applying the law fixes this situation then it will probably break all of the other situations where it was not applied. For example, what happens to Bjarne's delusions about the Pioneer anomaly?
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 02:12 PM   #153
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23,981
Thumbs down A "RRKE was predicated" lie when all he has is yet another delusio

Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
RRKE was predicted 3 years ...
14 January 2019 Bjarne: A "RRKE was predicted" lie when all he had and still has is yet another delusion.

The original post on 3rd February 2016 in this thread is a spate of deluded gibberish. One obvious delusion is the 10 year old RR insanity. Adding a ignorant "potential kinetic energy" to RR to make RRPKE just makes RRPKE insane. Bjarne's deluded RR is a magical acceleration that always acts. It is not his ignorant gibberish of a "retracted arrow" that can be released.

Last edited by Reality Check; 13th January 2019 at 02:16 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 02:22 PM   #154
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23,981
Thumbs down Some "potential of Dark Flow RRKE " released stupidity

Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
Oumuamua reached perihelion at 38,100.000 km from the Sun...
14 January 2019 Bjarne: Some "potential of Dark Flow RRKE" suddenly released stupidity.

Potential energy is not suddenly released - it is continuously converted. A high school physics example is that a body falling toward Earth loses gravitational potential energy which is converted onto kinetic energy.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 02:26 PM   #155
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23,981
Thumbs down A "We can conclude" lie about his RRPKE delusion

Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
We can conclude ...
14 January 2019 Bjarne: A "We can conclude" lie about his RRPKE delusion

Bjarne is the only person in the world with his RRPKE delusion. There is not "we" !.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 02:28 PM   #156
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23,981
Thumbs down Repeats his stupid "good right to claim" lie when all he has is delusions

Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
...Anyway now we have a good right to claim
14 January 2019 Bjarne: Repeats his stupid "good right to claim" lie when all he has is delusions.

What would give him the right to make claims would be knowledge of physics applied to the real world to produce predictions that match observsions. Digging himself deeper into a pit of ignorance and delusions is not that.

Last edited by Reality Check; 13th January 2019 at 02:31 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 02:39 PM   #157
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23,981
Thumbs down A stupid question - because his delusions do not exist

Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
...I wonder why this not have been discovered so fare.
14 January 2019 Bjarne: A stupid question - because his delusions do not exist and so his "speed increment per orbit" is just another fantasy.

He does understand how insane a "speed increment per orbit close to 0,01 m/s" for the ISS is. This is the International Space Station launched in 1998 and with an orbital speed of 7.66 km/s. The ISS got to 100,000 orbits in 2016. That is a insanely obvious speed increment of 1 km/s.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 02:43 PM   #158
Robin
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,402
Originally Posted by Dancing David View Post
It a cow drives a tractor to an elevator to the ISS does it make sound?
In space, no-one can hear you moo.
__________________
The non-theoretical character of metaphysics would not be in itself a defect; all arts have this non-theoretical character without thereby losing their high value for personal as well as for social life. The danger lies in the deceptive character of metaphysics; it gives the illusion of knowledge without actually giving any knowledge. This is the reason why we reject it. - Rudolf Carnap "Philosophy and Logical Syntax"
Robin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 02:47 PM   #159
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23,981
Thumbs down More lying RRPKE delusions about the Flyby anomaly

Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
After using a couple of hour today I found the RRPKE ....
14 January 2019 Bjarne: More lying RRPKE delusions about the Flyby anomaly

No match for the observations means Bjarne is lying that his RRPKE delusion explains the Flyby anomaly.
Usual complete ignorance about the trajectory of the flybys means Bjarne is lying that his RRPKE delusion explains the Flyby anomaly.
The insanity of expecting us to use his delusions means Bjarne is lying that his RRPKE delusion explains the Flyby anomaly.
"Measurement and theory correspond exactly to observations" is an insane lie when he has not theory or match to the measurements.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th January 2019, 06:36 PM   #160
halleyscomet
Philosopher
 
halleyscomet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 9,253
Originally Posted by Bjarne View Post
BS
just few post above you can read this http://www.internationalskeptics.com...&postcount=142


Still you have not understood that the acceleration due to gravity (of the object the spacecraft is orbiting) ( or fly by) must pull the spacecraft upwards at at least 0,000005 m/s2 to be able to release the full potential of RRPKE

Therefore
  1. The space craft orbit / trajectory inclination
  2. The angle of the spacecraft orbit / trajectory relative to Earth
  3. The space craft Distance from the Earth
Are all important factors, that all must be known and taken into account when calculating how stong RRPKE will effect an object.

Furthermore if the full effect of RRPKE must result in full possible speed increment, the spacecraft must move 100% opposite RRPKE, - if only moving lets say 45° then only 50% of RRPKE force will be converted to speed increment, the remaining 50% will cause orbit inclination change.



EDFA and RR will force planet inclinations perpendicular, relative to the Dark Flow axis, - first the inner planet, then slower the out planet. This is an integrated part of the theory.

ASAM can change this , but everything points to that this influence is weak for our solar system


Yeah, if you could stop making things up and do the math to support your claims for a change. That’d be great.
__________________
Look what I found! There's this whole web site full of skeptics that spun off from the James Randy Education Foundation!
halleyscomet is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:02 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.