
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. 
Today, 07:41 AM  #2561 
Designated Hitter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: On in memory
Posts: 2,869

I apologize. I should have been more specific. Is there a specific numerical result that differs from standard mathematics as a result of your approach? Is there some currently unsolved mathematical problem for which your mathematics provides a solution?
If the only thing your mathematics does is predict Unity Consciousness(tm), then your thread is truly in the correct subforum and I shall give it the attention it deserves here. 
Today, 07:51 AM  #2562 
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,508

The agreements that are based on standard mathematics can't deal with the real nature of endless larger or endless smaller things (where numbers are some particular case of such things) exactly because it defines the endless larger or endless smaller in terms of fixed values.

__________________
As long as Comparison is impossible because of the imbalance of one's mind, new glasses will not help.  If a tree falls in the forest, and no one’s there to see it, the tree and ground still measure each other. ( http://www.askamathematician.com ) 

Today, 08:09 AM  #2563 
Designated Hitter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: On in memory
Posts: 2,869

That would be a "no", then.
Thanks for the response. 
Today, 01:38 PM  #2564 
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,508

For you and any other person that defines endless larger or endless smaller things by fixed values, and as a result he\she does not understand the noncomposed substance of them.
More details are already given in http://www.internationalskeptics.com...postcount=2342, but you simply ignore them, exactly because you get open mathematical challenges in terms of symboliconly reasoning, where my mathematical framework is based on at least visual AND symbolic brain skills (which is a fundamental term that your seek after symboliconly solutions simply can't comprehend). Take, for example, the fundamental concept of set as defined by using visual AND symbolic brain skills ( http://www.internationalskeptics.com...postcount=2438). Standard Mathematics can't actually comprehend this fundamental concept exactly because its reasoning is based on symboliconly bran skills. 
__________________
As long as Comparison is impossible because of the imbalance of one's mind, new glasses will not help.  If a tree falls in the forest, and no one’s there to see it, the tree and ground still measure each other. ( http://www.askamathematician.com ) 

Today, 02:02 PM  #2565 
ETcorngods survivor
Moderator Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 19,815

That would be Mathematics you are talking about. It works. It tends to be consistent. You don't like it. We get that.
Quote:
One would suspect it is because you have nothing. 
__________________
A proud member of the Simpson 15+7, named in the suit, Simpson v. Zwinge, et al., and founder of the ET Corn Gods Survivors Group. "He's the greatest mod that never was!"  Monketey Ghost 

Today, 03:02 PM  #2566 
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,508

Your argument has no basis.
In order to realize it, all is needed is to observe http://www.internationalskeptics.com...postcount=2564 inducing all the attached links. 
__________________
As long as Comparison is impossible because of the imbalance of one's mind, new glasses will not help.  If a tree falls in the forest, and no one’s there to see it, the tree and ground still measure each other. ( http://www.askamathematician.com ) 

Today, 04:59 PM  #2567 
ETcorngods survivor
Moderator Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 19,815

Others would disagree.
Quote:
In the linked post, you begin with: That's riddled with negativity. Then you conclude with:
Quote:
So, yeah, my post is not baseless at all. You even provided a fine example to support my post. 
__________________
A proud member of the Simpson 15+7, named in the suit, Simpson v. Zwinge, et al., and founder of the ET Corn Gods Survivors Group. "He's the greatest mod that never was!"  Monketey Ghost 

Bookmarks 
Thread Tools  

