|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
24th October 2015, 06:51 AM | #401 |
Hostile Nanobacon
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rachel, KS
Posts: 33,127
|
As you've been unwilling to answer this question repeatedly, Robert, I will take it as read that you understand that your lay opinion isn't evidence. You also understand that it isn't compelling to anyone other than yourself since you've also been unable to show any actual evidence for the phantom gunshots you've invented.
It's as JayUtah said many months ago, the purpose of CTists is to prolong the discussion, not to bring closure. |
24th October 2015, 11:02 AM | #402 |
Philosopher
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 9,071
|
One has to ask. Why would a person spend their time trying to convince others of something when said person believes the others are so biased that they will not accept his ideas no matter what 'evidence' is provided. Wouldn't the person trying to change the mind of such biased persons himself be a bit of a nutter?
|
24th October 2015, 12:05 PM | #403 | |||
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 13,087
|
Not to give your assertions any credence, but to again point out the limits of your knowledge in the subject matter, the rifle test I linked to featured a specialized version of the SIG rifle in a SBR configuration (Short Barreled Rifle) w/ a 9" barrel chambered in 300 AAC Blackout:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/300_AA...7.62%C3%9735mm) Far from being as you assert "loudest, supersonic rifles on the planet" the 300 BLK out of the 9" barrel will run at approximately 2,200 fps w/ the 115 grain projectile, 2030 fps w/ the 125 grain projectile, right in there with the 6.5 Carcano that LHO used: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6.5%C3%9752mm_Carcano Comparing the two cartridges, the Carcano comes in with an MV of 2170 or 2300 fps with a 139 grain projectile depending on the load. The 300 BLK out of the 9" barrel is actually less powerful than the Carcano. Here's a video of test firing an unsuppressed 16" barrel version of the 300 BLK, viewers can make up their own minds
|
|||
27th October 2015, 10:01 AM | #404 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
|
The evidence hasn't been presented to the FBI because, in its proponent's judgment, the FBI are tainted and would presumably just bury his evidence and (continue to) ignore it.
Now we're told that Robert's critics "have hit rock bottom," albeit without any details regarding how. So he's taking another break, after which he says he hopes to publish a few more "presentations." The cycle of hiding from ones critics, avoiding any real accountability for correctness, and the ubiquitous fringe-reset phenomenon seems to fit quite well with an interpretation that this particular theory serves only itself. |
27th October 2015, 12:25 PM | #405 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 21,398
|
|
__________________
Gunter Haas, the 'leading British expert,' was a graphologist who advised couples, based on their handwriting characteristics, if they were compatible for marriage. I would submit that couples idiotic enough to do this are probably quite suitable for each other. It's nice when stupid people find love. - Ludovic Kennedy |
|
27th October 2015, 04:17 PM | #406 |
New Blood
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 11
|
Excuse me Mr. Harris. Tell our kind viewers *exactly* which post of mine deleted the above arguments from you? It is true I did not bother to address them, having referred our kind viewers to our prior exchanges on this topic back at AAJKF, but I did not intentionally delete anything with the exception of your URL's. The forum software still won't even allow me to post anything containing a proper URL even when quoting another poster. BT George |
22nd November 2015, 01:17 PM | #407 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The old Same place
Posts: 11,138
|
What a sad, distressing article:
Inside the plot to kill JFK: The secret story of the CIA and what really happened in Dallas Disappointed in Salon for publishing such a poor piece. |
__________________
My heros are Alex Zanardi and Evelyn Glennie. |
|
22nd November 2015, 02:57 PM | #408 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 25,302
|
Sorry if this is the wrong thread to post this, but its the most recent JFK thread on the board that I could find, and I didn't want to resurrect a really old one.
I know I am a bit behind on this, but I have just seen JFK: The Smoking Gun for the first time last night. This is the one in which an Australian former Police investigator concluded that JFK was shot by LHO, but the final "kill shot" was an accidental discharge by a Secret Service agent in the back seat of the trailing car. I found his forensic and ballistic investigation sound, and his conclusions difficult to refute. What do others here think? NOTE: I was formerly an "old believer" in the conspiracy aspects of the JFK assassination, the whole 9 yards; CIA/Mob/Cuban involvement, multiple shooters on the grassy knoll, the usual stuff, but the more I have read, watched and heard about the issue, the more I have been turned to believe that there was no conspiracy before the fact, but I am still open to the possibility that there may have been a cover of aspects that took place after the fact. |
__________________
If you're not a scientist but you think you've destroyed the foundation of a vast scientific edifice with 10 minutes of Googling, you might want to consider the possibility that you're wrong. Its TRE45ON season... convict the F45CIST!! |
|
24th November 2015, 04:50 AM | #409 |
Mistral, mistral wind...
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Embedded and embattled, reporting from Mississippi
Posts: 5,203
|
Haven't seen the program, so I can't speak to the validity of his specifics; but, just as a broad general rule, there's a difference between a scenario that's possible and one that's sufficient. If he concedes LHO shot Kennedy, why is it necessary to add another (accidental) shooter, when that introduces its own complications? For instance, if you posit this, you also have to posit that either nobody in the follow-up car noticed this accidental discharge (hard to believe), or that they all covered it up. That's possible, I suppose- but is it necessary to explain what happened, does it explain things better?
|
__________________
I'm tired of the bombs, tired of the bullets, tired of the crazies on TV; I'm the aviator, a dream's a dream whatever it seems Deep Purple- "The Aviator" Life was a short shelf that came with bookends- Stephen King |
|
24th November 2015, 07:40 PM | #410 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 13,087
|
If you go back in the thread, Donahue and The Smoking Gun has been discussed in detail, but the short story is Donahue started out with the theory that LHO couldn't have fired the shots that murdered JFK and worked backwards from that until he came up with an explanation that fit his theory - the follow on documentary TSG doesn't improve the theory any.
Do officers out on the road party and chase women? Yes. Do they have a fatal ND on POTUS and pull off a cover up? No. Much is made in TSG about the withdrawal of the AR from the SS issue list, but that had more to do with the awkwardness of using a 39" OAL rifle as a defensive piece in close protection than covering up an ND on the POTUS - Colt didn't develop (semi- reliable) short barreled (10.5" and 11.5") variants until 1966 and although everybody that saw them wanted one asap, production versions weren't known for reliability and if it didn't have the "Sound Moderator" they were brutal on the ears for the shooter and anybody nearby. I've had a bunch of them pass through my hands over the years and built a bunch of registered ones before 5-19-86. It wasn't until Tim Lafrance came up with his patented "twin tube" gas system that you could get one of these things to run 100%. Had all the improvements been available in '63 the SS would most likely adopted the platform for GI, and SBR versions of AK's and the AR platform have been all the rage for PSD's (Personal Security Details) even long before 9/11. The suppressed SIG in .300 Blackout that I linked to above is specifically intended for PSD use. |
25th November 2015, 12:19 PM | #411 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 25,302
|
There are just a couple of things for me to add.
A sequence of events might be unlikely, but that is not evidence that it didn't happen. Unlikely things do happen; for example, what if some Aircraft Engineers use a forklift to support an engine while refitting it to a DC10 and then knock-off for lunch with only one mount in place. During the lunch break, the forklift's hydraulic pressure gradually leaks away and the full weight of the engine is placed on the one mount, damaging it unseen. A couple of months later, the mount breaks during take-off, the engine falls off and the DC10 crashes! Unlikely sequence of events? Yes, but it happened, Flight 191, Chicago O'Hare, 25 May 1979. While I believe that LHO acted alone (i.e. that there was no conspiracy before the fact), I have always had difficulty in accepting that a man who was not considered a particularly good shot was able to fire a Carcano three times in 5.6 seconds and hit a target that was both receding and moving in both azimuth and elevation, and hit that target two out of three times at his first and only attempt. It took investigators many attempts to achieve this in testing, with a very experienced shooter finally able to do it at his third attempt. Admittedly, my opening sentence in this post would apply; just because it was unlikely and difficult, does not mean that it could NOT have happened, however there is another challenge, and that is to explain how so many witnesses said that the three shot were not evenly spaced... BANG......... BANG..........BANG. They said that it was more like... BANG................... BANG-BANG. If what they claim to have heard was right, that would seem to rule out any kind of bolt action rifle for both of the last two shots, although there is of course the possibility that what they heard was just an echo, but then if so, how do we account for three shell casings at LHOs firing point, and the lack of any witness testimony of a fourth shot. If the SS agent really did fire the kill shot with an accidental discharge, that might account for LHO insisting that he did not kill JFK because he would known that he didn't fire it, but would have seen its impact. He would have thought that there was another shooter. |
__________________
If you're not a scientist but you think you've destroyed the foundation of a vast scientific edifice with 10 minutes of Googling, you might want to consider the possibility that you're wrong. Its TRE45ON season... convict the F45CIST!! |
|
26th November 2015, 01:10 PM | #412 |
Thinker
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 186
|
Smartcooky, you should read the thread. The time frame for the three shots is more like eight seconds. The target was virtually stationary from Oswald's viewpoint once the limo started down Elm Street. Etc. etc.
|
27th November 2015, 02:06 AM | #413 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 5,229
|
Except that was the time between the neck shot and the head shot.
It has been accepted that the first shot is the one that missed, not the one in the middle. This gives at least 8 seconds (and up to 12, if the theory it occurred before Zapruder started filming is correct). |
27th November 2015, 04:40 AM | #414 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Republic of Ireland
Posts: 23,499
|
Once more...
Mannlicher Carcano 6 shots in 5.1 seconds 3 shots in 8 seconds is hardly a stretch, is it? |
__________________
Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive? ...love and buttercakes... |
|
28th November 2015, 02:04 AM | #415 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 25,302
|
Hang on! LHO is on the 6th floor of a building (at an elevation of at least 320 feet) shooting down at a target that moves away from him, starting at 170 feet away, moving to 270 feet away over the period of time of the shots. Therefore, The shoot down angle starts at at least 60° below horizontal.....Elm Street ain't that steep!!
Every simulation I have ever seen shows that from LHO's point of view, the target angle changes up by 10° and to the right at an angle of about 45° over the 6 or so seconds At a stationary target, using a well-set up bench rest and we have no indication of how accurate he was. Hell, I could shoot that fast with a .303 Lee-Enfield if I didn't actually have to aim and hit anything! Look, I'm not saying this guy has got it right, but there are some questions that are not adequately answered or explained by the official story. The Dallas PD collected many witness statements on Nov. 22, 1963 1. How do we account for all the witness statements from people who say they heard two shots in quick succession at the time of the head shot? Echoes? If so, why didn't all three shots echo, why just the last one? 2. How do we account for all the witness statements from people who say they smelled gun smoke at ground level? 3. How do we account for all the witness statements from people who say they saw a Secret Service agent with a rifle in his hand? Of course, the JFK:TSG narrative also raises its own awkward questions... how could an AR15 accidentally discharge without civilian witnesses near the following car hearing it? I also think that the Bronson film pretty much kills the idea that George Hickey could have fired that AR15 since it shows that at the time JFK was shot in the head, GH still had not stood up. |
__________________
If you're not a scientist but you think you've destroyed the foundation of a vast scientific edifice with 10 minutes of Googling, you might want to consider the possibility that you're wrong. Its TRE45ON season... convict the F45CIST!! |
|
28th November 2015, 06:22 AM | #416 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,726
|
I don't know how tall the buildings are where you live, but the sixth floor of a building should be around 52 feet above the ground. http://www.oakville.ca/assets/2011%2...elevations.pdf
The Pythagorean theorem then tells us the first shot is about 178 feet and the last is about 274 feet, less than 100 yards for both shots.
Quote:
|
__________________
Questions, comments, queries, bitches, complaints, rude gestures and/or remarks? |
|
28th November 2015, 11:56 AM | #417 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Republic of Ireland
Posts: 23,499
|
|
__________________
Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive? ...love and buttercakes... Last edited by Agatha; 30th November 2015 at 10:46 AM. Reason: Edited yards to feet at poster's request. |
|
28th November 2015, 12:37 PM | #418 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 25,302
|
That's my bad. I misread elevation as height in the specifications, however, the sixth floor would be closer to 80 feet. The top of the first floor is almost 20 feet above the ground.
I agree, but that is still a considerable shoot-down angle at a target moving up and to the right from the shooter's POV That's one shot every four seconds. The video is showing a rate of 70 shots per minute, not 15 I have both shot and drilled (on a parade ground) with the Lee-Enfield, the full stock version. Actually, my grandfather was a "filer" at the small arms factory Enfield. Middx where they were made. |
__________________
If you're not a scientist but you think you've destroyed the foundation of a vast scientific edifice with 10 minutes of Googling, you might want to consider the possibility that you're wrong. Its TRE45ON season... convict the F45CIST!! |
|
30th November 2015, 05:14 AM | #419 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Never Mind
Posts: 5,074
|
The height of the sixth floor window sill was determined by the FBI in 1964. It was, is and will remain 60.7 feet above the street at the corner of Elm and Houston.
They used that, and the known distance of eyewitness Howard Brennan from the building to determine Brennan's line of sight to the shooter in the sniper's nest window. They determined it was 120.2 feet -- 40 yards -- from Brennan to the window. http://www.history-matters.com/archi...ol22_0439a.htm Hank |
__________________
I have never ”refused” to provide evidence. I provide evidence if requested to do so in a specific and relevant manner. Hanks ”method” [of requesting evidence] is not going to [get me to] provide any evidence since it has a completely different purpose. To create the the illusion of me not providing evidence when requested to do so. - Manifesto |
|
1st December 2015, 04:20 PM | #420 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,906
|
Anyone here who knows what happened with HSCA's acoustic studies and a 95% probable conspiracy?
|
1st December 2015, 09:05 PM | #421 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,906
|
Anyone here who knows what happened to HSCA's acoustics studies? They confers at least one second rifle shot from the gassy knoll.
Shouldn't the Justice Department initiate a new broad investigation trying to solve the conspiracy? |
3rd December 2015, 07:55 AM | #422 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
|
The Justice Department did open a new investigation on the basis of the acoustic evidence from the HSCA. They found that the sound on the tape alleged to be an additional shot did not actually occur at the time of the firing from the Depository. The HSCA investigators were mistaken about the timing. Since this was the only bit of evidence from which HSCA inferred there must have been a conspiracy, it's really a moot issue now.
|
3rd December 2015, 10:23 AM | #423 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,906
|
Yes, they (NRC acoustic panel) got that from a musician, I know. But there are big problems with this as I see it:
1. The tapes was not in sync, depending on different possible factors. 2. The cross over-talk appears I believe five times över the ca five minutes of the recording and the closest cross over is spot on. You have to consider the extraordinary high probability for five (not four) rifle shots appearing as they do on the recording. According to Donald Thomas there is P=1/100 000 for this configuration to be anything other than five typical rifle shots in the Dealey Plaza that day. The teams from BB&N and Queens College where the world leading in acoustics at the time. They solved the shooting at Kentucky State Uni, designed the sonar systems for US Navy's nuclear submarines and mobile real time sniper detection, among other things. The panel you are referring to included exactly zero nil experts on acoustic analysis. Never wondered why? |
4th December 2015, 11:10 AM | #424 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
|
If you're familiar with Thomas' work then why did you ask whether the HSCA results should have motivated a Dept. of Justice investigation? Thomas specifically studied their results. And now that you are familiar with Thomas' work, can you tell us what subsequent researchers found to be his error?
|
5th December 2015, 02:27 AM | #425 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,906
|
HSCA's acoustic evidence of JFK conspiracy?
I feel that this subject needs its own thread.
Why did not the Justice Department follow up on the HSCA recommendation and initiate an investigation on the probable conspiracy behind the assassination of president John F. Kennedy? I know that a NRC acoustic panel came to the conclusion that a cross talk appeared to refute the HSCA findings of five shots (not four) recorded on the DPD dictabelt. This was plain wrong though. There is five instances of cross talk on the ca five minutes recording from a stuck microphone and none of them is in perfect sync. One of them, the one closest to the shots are spot on and refutes NRC's findings. Donald Thomas says that the probability for the five echo configurations being something other than typical rifle shots in Dealey Plaza is P=1/100 000. Thats is, if you are disputing the HSCA findings you have two choices: 1. Find flaws in the HSCA acoustics findings. 2. Find some other data/incidents that's even more improbable being wrong. NRC couldn't do "1", so they tried "2" after being tipped of by a musician, but as I said, they where wrong and that contradicts the HSCA analysis. The HSCA's two research team was world leading in acoustic analysis, solving the Kent. State shooting, inventing the sonar system for US Navy's nuclear submarines and real time mobile sniper detection for urban warfare. The NRC acoustic panel included two Nobel prize winners but none was an expert on acoustics. What a peculiar bias, don't you think? |
5th December 2015, 02:47 AM | #426 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,001
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F...belt_recording
I'm satisfied that the Dictabelt recording has been discredited. It was weak evidence to begin with. People are too credulous about sound. |
5th December 2015, 03:12 AM | #427 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,906
|
|
5th December 2015, 04:16 AM | #428 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,001
|
Make your case, if you like.
|
5th December 2015, 04:25 AM | #429 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,906
|
|
5th December 2015, 04:57 AM | #430 |
Mistral, mistral wind...
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Embedded and embattled, reporting from Mississippi
Posts: 5,203
|
Not even really sound, not even quite echoes; "impulse patterns" is what the whole thing turns on. One of the scientists of the NAS who studied the recording said it was "probably static"; it's one thing for the CTists to hang their hats on static, that's the basic methodology of CT, but it's quite another to suggest the US government should waste more taxpayer money chasing the ghosts of echoes to satisfy them.
|
__________________
I'm tired of the bombs, tired of the bullets, tired of the crazies on TV; I'm the aviator, a dream's a dream whatever it seems Deep Purple- "The Aviator" Life was a short shelf that came with bookends- Stephen King |
|
5th December 2015, 05:32 AM | #431 |
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through a scribbled morning waving necessary ankles
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cair Paravel, according to XKCD
Posts: 34,249
|
Sorry, are we talking about the dictabelt recording of a transmission of unknown origin, whose validity has been flatly denied by the man whose motorbike it was supposed to have come from, but has been assumed by conspiracy theorists to have been from near the Presidential limousine because that's where they want it to come from? And this from the movement that disputes the chain of custody on every piece of evidence they don't like the look of, on whatever grounds they can dream up? Motes and beams spring to mind; the chain of custody on this evidence is non-existent. There's no reason to suppose it was recorded from anywhere within earshot of the assassination.
Dave |
__________________
There is truth and there are lies. - President Joseph R. Biden, January 20th, 2021 |
|
5th December 2015, 05:35 AM | #432 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,906
|
|
5th December 2015, 06:01 AM | #433 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,906
|
Ah, you mean McLain? Yes. You take his subjective 'expertise' instead of careful research from the top two of the the worlds leading research teams in acoustics analysis?
Why? No, not assumed. Carefully researched by the top two world leading research teams in acoustics analysis. And no, I do not want people get killed by evil conspiracies, all I want is the truth. Heard of that? So, chain of custody is an over estimated concept? You are the one dreaming, making a fool of yourself. I'm here to help you. You do not need a chain of custody in this case. The patterns are unique. It's impossible to fake them. Sorry, not completely impossible. There is a 1/100 000 possibility that the patterns isn't five typical rifle shots fired from behind (four) the limo and from the front (one), the grassy knoll in Dealey Plaza ca 12:00 on nov 22 1963. You are willing to take that chance? |
5th December 2015, 06:05 AM | #434 |
Mistral, mistral wind...
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Embedded and embattled, reporting from Mississippi
Posts: 5,203
|
|
__________________
I'm tired of the bombs, tired of the bullets, tired of the crazies on TV; I'm the aviator, a dream's a dream whatever it seems Deep Purple- "The Aviator" Life was a short shelf that came with bookends- Stephen King |
|
5th December 2015, 07:05 AM | #435 |
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through a scribbled morning waving necessary ankles
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cair Paravel, according to XKCD
Posts: 34,249
|
Because the recording is supposed to come from his bike. The eyewitness on the spot denies the validity of the basic premise behind the evidence.
You just blew all your credibility. No evidence is of any value unless you know where it came from. Dave |
__________________
There is truth and there are lies. - President Joseph R. Biden, January 20th, 2021 |
|
5th December 2015, 07:46 AM | #436 |
Mistral, mistral wind...
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Embedded and embattled, reporting from Mississippi
Posts: 5,203
|
What you're here on this forum for is one thing- we can agree or disagree (or even agree to disagree) on the evidence and what it shows, no harm, no foul. But you apparently want a (presumably official) re-re-re-investigation of a whole event, and a conclusion about it based on total consilience, because of one isolated and only possibly anomalous data point- your not liking the NAS analysis doesn't make the anomaly more meaningful in context.
Look, I've been to Dealey Plaza- - and the idea that a conspiracy that wanted to remain a hidden one could have, or would have, put a rifleman in such an exposed spot as the knoll (or even a Badgeman behind the fence right next to it) is ludicrous. You need more than just this one disputed data-point to justify the expense of continued investigation. Realistic trajectories, unaccounted-for bullet fragments, independent and convergent eyewitness testimony that puts a man with a rifle there- c'mon, you need consilience to overturn consilience, and your stand-alone "impulse patterns" aren't gonna get you there. |
__________________
I'm tired of the bombs, tired of the bullets, tired of the crazies on TV; I'm the aviator, a dream's a dream whatever it seems Deep Purple- "The Aviator" Life was a short shelf that came with bookends- Stephen King |
|
5th December 2015, 08:15 AM | #437 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,906
|
|
5th December 2015, 08:22 AM | #438 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,906
|
Yes, but eyewitness is not hard evidence. That goes for DPD in particular.
Is this a blanket statement? The acoustic signature i unique and if it fits the experimental data (test firing in D Plaza) with a P = 1/100 000 you pretty much know where it came from. |
5th December 2015, 08:28 AM | #439 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,906
|
If the acoustic analysis says there is five rifle shots on the dictabelt and a conspiracy, well, a critic has three choices:
1. Show thats something is wrong with the investigation. 2. Show other secondary data that contradicts the finding and with a stronger confidence. 3. Don't give a ****. Wich is it? |
5th December 2015, 08:36 AM | #440 |
121.92-meter mutant fire-breathing lizard-thingy
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northern St. Louis County, Missouri.
Posts: 42,180
|
So the "two gunners" people are down to counting echoes?
|
__________________
Guns that are instantly available for use are instantly available for misuse. World War II Diplomatic and Political Resources Hyperwar, WWII Military History Buying conspiracy books is a voluntary tax on stupid. |
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|