ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » USA Politics
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags voting , voting machines , voting systems

Reply
Old 16th April 2019, 09:40 AM   #81
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 14,072
Originally Posted by Upchurch View Post
Since we’re going crazy with the voting practices, I’m going to throw in ranked choice voting in there, too.
That's not enough to stop gerrymandering. You lot better implement MMP.
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th April 2019, 09:53 AM   #82
lomiller
Philosopher
 
lomiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 9,623
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
They're obviously more secure than voting machines.
The more popular choice is to slap a card skimmer on the ATM, but I can be pretty easy to get into an ATM. Eg:

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/0...g_lunch_break/
__________________
"Anything's possible, but only a few things actually happen"
lomiller is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th April 2019, 09:57 AM   #83
Hlafordlaes
Disorder of Kilopi
 
Hlafordlaes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: State of Flux
Posts: 9,781
Yes to most of the reasonable stuff, especially paper ballots only, automatic registration, and making voting day a holiday (I'd prefer it be a Wednesday). To not be discriminatory, it should be a paid holiday, and any public transport be free that day. Finally, given North Carolina, mandatory state-by-state audits by some other state, maybe even another country.
__________________
Driftwood on an empty shore of the sea of meaninglessness. Irrelevant, weightless, inconsequential moment of existential hubris on the fast track to oblivion.
His real name is Count Douchenozzle von Stenchfahrter und Lichtendicks. - shemp
Hlafordlaes is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th April 2019, 10:01 AM   #84
Donal
Illuminator
 
Donal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,776
I think any state, no matter where they are what their history is, should have to submit any voting requirements to a neutral third party to ensure they aren't "inadvertently" targeting certain demographics. Like we had with the VRA for Jim Crow states before SCOTUS killed that provision.
Donal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th April 2019, 10:12 AM   #85
Upchurch
Papa Funkosophy
 
Upchurch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 31,171
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
They're obviously more secure than voting machines.


See what I mean? ATMs don't have these problems.
The thing is, ATMs are not secure. If someone skims your card and steals your number, it's going to be detected because charges start deviating from your usual spending habits.

If someone steals your vote, what happens? Do you want the government recording and analyzing your voting history to determine if it thinks your vote is wonky? And how would they do that when you only vote a few times in a year? There really isn't the kind of data banks have to determine variance from a trend.
__________________
"There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact." -- Sherlock Holmes.
"It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled." -- Mark Twain, maybe.
Upchurch is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th April 2019, 10:41 AM   #86
jimbob
Uncritical "thinker"
 
jimbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 20,377
Originally Posted by Upchurch View Post
The thing is, ATMs are not secure. If someone skims your card and steals your number, it's going to be detected because charges start deviating from your usual spending habits.

If someone steals your vote, what happens? Do you want the government recording and analyzing your voting history to determine if it thinks your vote is wonky? And how would they do that when you only vote a few times in a year? There really isn't the kind of data banks have to determine variance from a trend.

Indeed. And especially the highlighted.

Originally Posted by lomiller View Post
What makes you think ATM’s are secure?


Setting aside the fact that many of the published hacks involve Wi-Fi or exposed USB ports that can easily be exploited using the type of access voters require. Even setting aside the fact that a myriad of people need access to the machines to move them, set them up and store them, and most of these have all the access they need to hack them.

BY FAR the most common culprit for cheating in an election is the people running the election, in which case none of your points apply. Even plausibility of the reported results doesn't prevent the winning party from simply ignoring the complaints. TBH it doesn’t’ matter how many anomalies there are, you can bet that if Republicans win an election Fox will be on the air 24/7 telling the faithful that there is nothing wrong with the results, and most Republicans will not just accept it many will come to forums like this one and fervently defend the results even though they are completely bogus.

Paper counts with candidates or their representatives present is about as transparent as it gets.

Elections need to be transparent, so that people can trust that they are valid.
__________________
OECD healthcare spending
Expenditure on healthcare
http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-data.htm
link is 2015 data (2013 Data below):
UK 8.5% of GDP of which 83.3% is public expenditure - 7.1% of GDP is public spending
US 16.4% of GDP of which 48.2% is public expenditure - 7.9% of GDP is public spending
jimbob is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th April 2019, 10:57 AM   #87
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 33,150
Originally Posted by wareyin View Post
It appears not.
Maybe from ahhell you can, since he's the one who actually seems to think it's a bad thing.

But this is the same problem all over again.

I have no animosity towards the idea.

I don't think it's a bad thing.
theprestige is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th April 2019, 11:07 AM   #88
The_Animus
Illuminator
 
The_Animus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,007
Originally Posted by kellyb View Post
Yeah, that is what it looks like. I like that system a whole lot, too. Thanks! I had never heard of it before!
You're welcome
The_Animus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th April 2019, 11:39 AM   #89
wareyin
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 6,711
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
Maybe from ahhell you can, since he's the one who actually seems to think it's a bad thing.

But this is the same problem all over again.

I have no animosity towards the idea.

I don't think it's a bad thing.
You opposed the idea when you answered no to it. No matter how the question is phrased, you seen unable to explain why you oppose it. Yet you don't think it's a bad thing.

Again, I was hoping you had some sort of reasoning as to why you oppose automatic voter registration. Apparently you do not. Oh well.
wareyin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th April 2019, 12:23 PM   #90
wareyin
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 6,711
Originally Posted by ahhell View Post
I do have animosity towards it, mostly because I'm from CA where they've taken democracy to the its nearly stupidest extreme. Automatic registration wouldn't actually matter if you don't have mandatory voting, the initiative process, or legal vote harvesting.
It matters because it makes registering to vote easier, rather than harder, for legal voters.

Originally Posted by ahhell View Post
I used work with a women who I would describe as stupid, ugly, lazy, and mean(I wouldn't bother with the first two if she hadn't been the last) any rate, she was registered to vote but had know idea what if any party she was registered in. Fortunately, she'd never voted. So, who cares really. I would be very concerned if she had actually been required to. And recently the state has made it legal for someone to go collect her vote, so she may actually be voting, or someone might just be collecting her ballot and turning it in. Sure, anecdote, I know but still. That does concern me, I really don't understand why anyone thinks its a good idea to register folks to vote who have literally know interest in doing so, unless its for just base politics in because they figure those folks, if they vote, will vote for their side.

I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but you don't actually need to register with either party to vote in the general election.
wareyin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th April 2019, 05:48 PM   #91
applecorped
Rotten to the Core
 
applecorped's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 19,114
If you chose not to decide you still have made a choice
__________________
All You Need Is Love.
applecorped is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th April 2019, 02:40 PM   #92
ahhell
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,194
Originally Posted by wareyin View Post
I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but you don't actually need to register with either party to vote in the general election.
That's fairly insulting but as I said, she didn't know what if any party she was registered in.
ahhell is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th April 2019, 02:54 PM   #93
wareyin
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 6,711
Originally Posted by ahhell View Post
That's fairly insulting but as I said, she didn't know what if any party she was registered in.
You don't need to register as a party to vote in the general, and you don't need to register in a party to register to vote at all. Her lack of knowledge of something irrelevant to voting doesn't mean she should not be voting.

I've heard it said that if you don't care or are ignorant of the issues, you should not be making decisions about those issues, nor should you be given the opportunity to without some effort on your part to demonstrate at least an interest. I'm not sure I'm as comfortable as you arewith some sort test to demonstrate effort or understanding of the relevant issues, as I think it might just come back and bite a proponent of that idea in the rear end.
wareyin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th April 2019, 02:55 PM   #94
Upchurch
Papa Funkosophy
 
Upchurch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 31,171
Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post
That's not enough to stop gerrymandering. You lot better implement MMP.
And a wrench is not enough to drive a nail. You need a toolbox to do all the things.
__________________
"There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact." -- Sherlock Holmes.
"It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled." -- Mark Twain, maybe.
Upchurch is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 06:42 AM   #95
ahhell
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,194
Originally Posted by wareyin View Post
You don't need to register as a party to vote in the general, and you don't need to register in a party to register to vote at all. Her lack of knowledge of something irrelevant to voting doesn't mean she should not be voting.

I've heard it said that if you don't care or are ignorant of the issues, you should not be making decisions about those issues, nor should you be given the opportunity to without some effort on your part to demonstrate at least an interest. I'm not sure I'm as comfortable as you arewith some sort test to demonstrate effort or understanding of the relevant issues, as I think it might just come back and bite a proponent of that idea in the rear end.
You keep missing something, I fully understand that you don't need to register in a party to vote in the general. She didn't even know if she had or had not register in a party. She was registered to vote but wasn't engaged enough to do more than check a box. I'm not sure I would call knowing what your party affiliation is, irrelevant to voting considering that's pretty much all most people need to know before making a decision.
ahhell is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 09:04 AM   #96
wareyin
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 6,711
Originally Posted by ahhell View Post
You keep missing something, I fully understand that you don't need to register in a party to vote in the general. She didn't even know if she had or had not register in a party. She was registered to vote but wasn't engaged enough to do more than check a box. I'm not sure I would call knowing what your party affiliation is, irrelevant to voting considering that's pretty much all most people need to know before making a decision.
Wait, is checking a box demonstrating an understanding of the issues or not? You seem to think it does not for her, but it does for most people.

And again, you seem to not understand that you don't need to fill in a party to register to vote at all. It's irrelevant to understanding the issues you are voting on. It does not matter. If you want people to understand the issues they are voting on before making a decision, your insistence that she must vote party line for whichever party she registered as whenever she registered to vote does not demonstrate any understanding of the issues at all.
wareyin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 11:32 AM   #97
ahhell
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,194
Originally Posted by wareyin View Post
Wait, is checking a box demonstrating an understanding of the issues or not? You seem to think it does not for her, but it does for most people.

And again, you seem to not understand that you don't need to fill in a party to register to vote at all. It's irrelevant to understanding the issues you are voting on. It does not matter. If you want people to understand the issues they are voting on before making a decision, your insistence that she must vote party line for whichever party she registered as whenever she registered to vote does not demonstrate any understanding of the issues at all.
Oy vey.
ahhell is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 12:20 PM   #98
wareyin
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 6,711
Originally Posted by ahhell View Post
Oy vey.
That response never seemed to work well for TBD. I don't think it's doing you any favors either.

Let's try this a different way. You claimed that this woman shouldn't be voting because she doesn't remember which party, if any, she wrote down when she registered to vote. Rather than me pointing out in some other way that this doesn't matter, how about you explain why you think it does matter?
wareyin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 12:29 PM   #99
Cabbage
Muse
 
Cabbage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 848
In support of wareyin's position: I like to think I'm a reasonably well informed voter. Sure, there are many things I could stand to learn much more about, but I think I'm informed enough to at least not make a bone headed decision (like voting for Trump).

I honestly don't know if I'm registered in any particular party. Back in 1988 I voted for GHWB. I don't think I voted Republican in the primary, but I can't say for sure (I live in VA, not even sure if they had a primary that year).

In 2016 I voted for Bernie in the primary. I'm pretty sure in some states you have to be registered for the specific party if you want to vote in the primary. I don't recall if VA is one of those states. Maybe I was automatically registered as a Republican if I voted in the 1988 primary. Maybe I was automatically registered as a Democrat when I voted in the 2016 primary.

I voted in the primary. That was important to me. It's not important to me whether or not that constituted a formal registration into that party.

So there you go.
Cabbage is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 01:26 PM   #100
lomiller
Philosopher
 
lomiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 9,623
Originally Posted by ahhell View Post
I'm not sure I would call knowing what your party affiliation is, irrelevant to voting considering that's pretty much all most people need to know before making a decision.
This sounds like you think voting should be based on what “team” you are on, when in fact it should be completely irrelevant. People should vote based on the candidate’s position on the issues, not who “the party” tells them to vote for.
__________________
"Anything's possible, but only a few things actually happen"
lomiller is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 04:17 AM   #101
wareyin
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 6,711
Originally Posted by lomiller View Post
This sounds like you think voting should be based on what “team” you are on, when in fact it should be completely irrelevant. People should vote based on the candidate’s position on the issues, not who “the party” tells them to vote for.
That was a point I was trying to make. If one only votes based on "team", then one has demonstrated absolutely no knowledge or understanding of any issues other than checking a box for R or D. To understand the issues, people need to be able to actually look into the candidate's stance on those issues and vote accordingly.
wareyin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 06:28 AM   #102
BStrong
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 11,938
Originally Posted by Kestrel View Post
Paper ballots that can be counted by hand are a good start. Real election security requires one additional step.

Require a statistical audit of the election results. If the margin of victory in a statewide race was 10%, a hand count of 100 randomly selected ballots would be enough to confirm the winner. A race with a margin of 3% would require a hand count of about 2,000 randomly selected ballots.
But there's always this:

http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/i...sociated-Press

"SAN FRANCISCO — Elections officials spent Thursday counting 240 ballots found more than three weeks after Election Day, another in a string of embarrassments that has infuriated some city leaders.

The ballots mistakenly were left in locked boxes at polling places across the city on Election Day, Department of Elections officials said. Though their number would not overturn the results of any major race or ballot initiative, discovery of the ballots comes days after the lids of eight ballot boxes were found floating in San Francisco Bay."


And this:

https://www.sfgate.com/politics/arti...ns-3302604.php

"The corrugated plastic ballot box lids, each marked with the city seal and the words "Provisional and Absentee Ballots," first raised the concerns of election watchdogs shortly after the city's November election, when eight of them were found near the Golden Gate Bridge by the crew of a U.S. Coast Guard vessel.

Since then, despite assurances from city elections Director Tammy Haygood that the box lids merely blew into the bay while election workers cleaned them on a city pier, the issue has resurfaced time and again."
__________________
"When a man who is honestly mistaken, hears the truth, he will either cease being mistaken or cease being honest." - Anonymous

"Dulce bellum inexpertīs." - Erasmus
BStrong is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » USA Politics

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:34 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.