ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Economics, Business and Finance
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags bitcoin

Reply
Old 26th December 2019, 10:00 AM   #401
xjx388
Philosopher
 
xjx388's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 8,269
Originally Posted by Orphia Nay View Post
It seems a bit odd that the skeptics' criticisms in here are not about any qualities about bitcoin per se, but about Sampson not being psychic enough for their liking.

(I do not own any bitcoin. I thought I'd check out this thread for knowledge. I'll look elsewhere.)


I think you’ve missed the point of the criticisms. Samson says he has an algorithm, based on Technical Analysis (something that seems akin to tea leaf reading or biorhythm analysis) that can predict the price/movement of Bitcoin. What we are pointing out is that his “algorithm” is no better than guessing what’s going to happen; he may as well claim to be psychic.
__________________
Hello.
xjx388 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th December 2019, 04:58 PM   #402
plague311
Great minds think...
 
plague311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 8,308
I just wanted to say that I've been trying to login to coinbase for the last about 10 days now. The code they send me is invalid, according to their website, and I can't get in without both the password and code.

On top of that, easily the worst customer service I've received in the last 2-3 years. Non-responsive by phone, as in a human doesn't even pick up. I select 'login issues' from the phone tree and get an automated message that basically says, "We're busy, go to the website", then it hangs up. I've submitted my 3rd request for help now through their site and have yet to hear a reply. As in, not even an automated "thank you for your email support request" type of reply. Just nothing.
__________________
"Circumcision and death threats go together like milk and cookies." - William Parcher

“There are times when the mind is dealt such a blow it hides itself in insanity. While this may not seem beneficial, it is. There are times when reality is nothing but pain, and to escape that pain the mind must leave reality behind.” - Patrick Rothfuss
plague311 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th December 2019, 02:15 PM   #403
Gord_in_Toronto
Penultimate Amazing
 
Gord_in_Toronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 19,166
In the meantime. Just to enlighten and or brighten your day:

From: vanityfair.com

Ponzi Schemes, Private Yachts, and a Missing $250 Million in Crypto: The Strange Tale of Quadriga

__________________
"Reality is what's left when you cease to believe." Philip K. Dick
Gord_in_Toronto is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th December 2019, 12:19 PM   #404
Samson
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,825
Originally Posted by xjx388 View Post
I think you’ve missed the point of the criticisms. Samson says he has an algorithm, based on Technical Analysis (something that seems akin to tea leaf reading or biorhythm analysis) that can predict the price/movement of Bitcoin. What we are pointing out is that his “algorithm” is no better than guessing what’s going to happen; he may as well claim to be psychic.
Can you post the evidence underlying this assertion hilited?
Thank you.
Samson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th December 2019, 02:36 PM   #405
The_Animus
Illuminator
 
The_Animus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,216
Originally Posted by Samson View Post
Can you post the evidence underlying this assertion hilited?
Thank you.
Actually he doesn't need evidence just like someone doesn't need evidence that a psychic's claims are no better than guessing.

It's up to you to prove otherwise and your "evidence" has never been convincing to anyone here other than yourself.
The_Animus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th December 2019, 04:52 PM   #406
Chanakya

 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,726
Originally Posted by Gord_in_Toronto View Post
In the meantime. Just to enlighten and or brighten your day:

From: vanityfair.com

Ponzi Schemes, Private Yachts, and a Missing $250 Million in Crypto: The Strange Tale of Quadriga


That was a nice, entertaining read. One knew the bare-bones facts of the case, obviously, but I enjoyed the narration and the additional detail. Recommended light read for anyone looking for a few minutes' distraction in the midst of the holiday season.
Chanakya is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st December 2019, 03:28 AM   #407
Samson
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,825
Originally Posted by The_Animus View Post
Actually he doesn't need evidence just like someone doesn't need evidence that a psychic's claims are no better than guessing.

It's up to you to prove otherwise and your "evidence" has never been convincing to anyone here other than yourself.
I am entertained by the idea
"who needs evidence?"
Witches sink apparently.
Samson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st December 2019, 07:19 AM   #408
The_Animus
Illuminator
 
The_Animus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,216
Originally Posted by Samson View Post
I am entertained by the idea
"who needs evidence?"
Witches sink apparently.
In addition to not understanding burden of proof, it seems you have poor reading comprehension too.
The_Animus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st December 2019, 12:05 PM   #409
Samson
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,825
Meanwhile at 7130 this algorithm of disputed predictive power says sell bitcoin with a stop at 7530, target 6730 at least.
Easy money.
Samson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st December 2019, 02:38 PM   #410
Leftus
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,770
Originally Posted by Samson View Post
Meanwhile at 7130 this algorithm of disputed predictive power says sell bitcoin with a stop at 7530, target 6730 at least.
Easy money.
OK, but just a week ago the target was 6860. Which was never reached. So was it wrong or is this one right?

Should I keep my 12/24 transaction at the 7280 and buy back at target 6860 or 6730?

And do I move my stop loss from 7700 to 7530?
Leftus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st December 2019, 02:44 PM   #411
Samson
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,825
Originally Posted by Leftus View Post
OK, but just a week ago the target was 6860. Which was never reached. So was it wrong or is this one right?

Should I keep my 12/24 transaction at the 7280 and buy back at target 6860 or 6730?

And do I move my stop loss from 7700 to 7530?
Note the trades are completely independent.
The short at 7280 is still live.
Samson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st December 2019, 02:56 PM   #412
Dr.Sid
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Olomouc, Czech Republic
Posts: 2,731
I have great tip too .. buy at 1000, sell at 20.000. And it's still active, if the price is not 1000, or after that, if it's not 20.000, just wait.
Dr.Sid is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st December 2019, 03:36 PM   #413
Leftus
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,770
Originally Posted by Samson View Post
Note the trades are completely independent.
The short at 7280 is still live.
But if it's going down to 6730, why am I covering my short at 6860?
and if it might bite me in the ass, why shouldn't I update my stop loss to 7530 from 7700?
Leftus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st December 2019, 04:23 PM   #414
Samson
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,825
Originally Posted by Leftus View Post
But if it's going down to 6730, why am I covering my short at 6860?
and if it might bite me in the ass, why shouldn't I update my stop loss to 7530 from 7700?
The trades are not linked
Think of them as 2 different stocks or currencies.
There are 4 possibilities

win win
win loss
loss win
loss loss.

Let nature take its course, I am supposed to be beating a coin toss remember.

Disclosure: I don't trade it myself.
Samson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 31st December 2019, 07:03 PM   #415
Dr.Sid
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Olomouc, Czech Republic
Posts: 2,731
Yes .. it's basically 50/50 .. you win, or you loose.
Btw. I'm not a rapper.
Dr.Sid is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st January 2020, 03:49 PM   #416
Samson
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,825
Originally Posted by Dr.Sid View Post
Yes .. it's basically 50/50 .. you win, or you loose.
Btw. I'm not a rapper.
Yes. It is 50 50 if you toss a coin to buy or sell at market with equidistant stop and loss and no spread.
With a spread 50 50 is impossible. It will resemble loss loss win loss loss win......................
Samson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd January 2020, 02:05 AM   #417
Samson
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,825
Meanwhile

A c-clamp formation that will be followed by a bullish Tenkan/Kijun (TK) cross and a big Ichimoku cloud E2E could open the door to $8,700.

https://u.today/bitcoin-price-remain...valentines-day

I am humbled.
Samson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd January 2020, 02:05 AM   #418
The Don
Penultimate Amazing
 
The Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sir Fynwy
Posts: 28,574
Originally Posted by Dr.Sid View Post
Yes .. it's basically 50/50 .. you win, or you loose.
Btw. I'm not a rapper.
No, its far better odds than 50/50 because Samson doesn't consider time restrictions in his "predictions" and can retrospectively choose when to "close his position".

50/50 would be right if we were just looking at the next move in price up or down but in effect Samson is saying that "at some point in the future the price of Bitcoin will be higher/lower than its current value".

For some something as volatile as Bitcoin, the chances of that happening are far greater than 50% and any "wrong" predictions just aren't "right" yet
The Don is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd January 2020, 02:22 AM   #419
Samson
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,825
Originally Posted by The Don View Post
No, its far better odds than 50/50 because Samson doesn't consider time restrictions in his "predictions" and can retrospectively choose when to "close his position".

50/50 would be right if we were just looking at the next move in price up or down but in effect Samson is saying that "at some point in the future the price of Bitcoin will be higher/lower than its current value".

For some something as volatile as Bitcoin, the chances of that happening are far greater than 50% and any "wrong" predictions just aren't "right" yet
You nonchalantly assert falsehoods when you know far better.
A price constrained trade pays no heed to time. If bitcoin stabilised at this level it would be like viewing an object entering a black hole, permanently proving something useful.
Samson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd January 2020, 04:26 AM   #420
The Don
Penultimate Amazing
 
The Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sir Fynwy
Posts: 28,574
Originally Posted by Samson View Post
You nonchalantly assert falsehoods when you know far better.
A price constrained trade pays no heed to time. If bitcoin stabilised at this level it would be like viewing an object entering a black hole, permanently proving something useful.
I was just pointing out to the uninitiated that your "predictions" aren't just 50/50 calls. For something which has a volatile price, saying that it will be higher/lower than its current price at some unspecified point in the future is both highly likely to be correct, but also functionally useless.
The Don is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd January 2020, 08:15 AM   #421
Leftus
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,770
Originally Posted by Samson View Post
The trades are not linked
Think of them as 2 different stocks or currencies.
There are 4 possibilities

win win
win loss
loss win
loss loss.

Let nature take its course, I am supposed to be beating a coin toss remember.

Disclosure: I don't trade it myself.
It doesn't matter if you don't want the trades to be linked, since they trading on the same item, they are linked. If you were betting on a sports outcome you couldn't say take the over AND the under. Don't think of them as linked, they are different bets.

Again, if the TA is guidance, and BT will follow it, why would I NOT adjust by buy price or my stoploss to the new guidance?

Why aren't you trading it yourself? You said it was "easy money" Seems like you don't have any faith in your own model.


So again, I will ask -
But if it's going down to 6730, why am I covering my short at 6860?
and if it might bite me in the ass, why shouldn't I update my stop loss to 7530 from 7700?

Since, according to you, BT is going to follow your TA, why should I not adjust my trades to the new guidance?
Leftus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd January 2020, 02:23 AM   #422
Samson
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,825
Interestingly bitcoin traded 6852 then rallied 350 dollars.
That did put the 6860 trade in the can, though purists would also point out the standard trading spread is $36, so we would not have been "filled".
Samson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd January 2020, 07:42 AM   #423
Leftus
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,770
Originally Posted by Samson View Post
Interestingly bitcoin traded 6852 then rallied 350 dollars.
That did put the 6860 trade in the can, though purists would also point out the standard trading spread is $36, so we would not have been "filled".
But it's still going to hit 6730, right? So executing it early is leaving money on the table.
Leftus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd January 2020, 09:56 AM   #424
Gord_in_Toronto
Penultimate Amazing
 
Gord_in_Toronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 19,166
Originally Posted by Leftus View Post
But it's still going to hit 6730, right? So executing it early is leaving money on the table.
AKA "Cutting one's loses"?
__________________
"Reality is what's left when you cease to believe." Philip K. Dick
Gord_in_Toronto is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd January 2020, 02:47 PM   #425
Leftus
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,770
Originally Posted by Gord_in_Toronto View Post
AKA "Cutting one's loses"?
Well, more like tearing up your slip that the Patriots would win, when they were down 28-3. or 21-3 at the half.
Leftus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd January 2020, 04:35 PM   #426
Samson
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,825
Originally Posted by Leftus View Post
But it's still going to hit 6730, right? So executing it early is leaving money on the table.
I don't know what it will hit, that trade is zstill live, profit taken on trade 1.
Therefore:
Winning in a non random game.
Samson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th January 2020, 07:32 AM   #427
Leftus
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,770
Originally Posted by Samson View Post
I don't know what it will hit, that trade is zstill live, profit taken on trade 1.
Therefore:
Winning in a non random game.
What do you mean you don't know what it will hit? Didn't you make a prediction?

Still doesn't explain why I would leave money on the table and not updating my position based on new information.
Leftus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th January 2020, 07:59 PM   #428
Chanakya

 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,726
It would be cool to have some kind of a global currency that's inflation-proof, that's not controlled by or subject to whims/policies of individual nations/governments, that's fairly easy to access and use, that isn't wasteful (unlike Bitcoin), that isn't volatile (unlike Bitcoin), and that's impervious to manipulation and profiteering. Of course, such a currency would by definition work only if people agreed to use it, but assuming people's willingness to use such aa currency, is such a thing even possible/feasible? Would any of of the economics experts/nerds here know if such a thing has been studied/discussed/been dreamt up?

eta: I'm not very clear on all of the technical details of cryptocurrency, but I guess this is what cryptos, and specifically bitcoin, started out as, or so people imagined, right? So, has such an ideal/utopian global currency been dreamt up -- and the details addressed, at least some details, at least in theory -- by economists past or cryptonerds present, is what I was wondering.

Last edited by Chanakya; 6th January 2020 at 08:09 PM.
Chanakya is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th January 2020, 11:43 AM   #429
Samson
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,825
Originally Posted by Leftus View Post
What do you mean you don't know what it will hit? Didn't you make a prediction?

Still doesn't explain why I would leave money on the table and not updating my position based on new information.
In terms of the second trade, sell at 7130 profit 400 dollars and stop 400, this trade actually went 107 dollars out of the money and 277 into the money before the big reversal. This is up to the trader to see if there is a viable strategy and of course any mathematician will affirm there is, its obvious, including trailing stops, break even stops, adding on the back foot and so on. It is the 277 to 107 ratio that is important.

I tried to explain all this on the technical analysis threads but was continually reminded of the refrain, no good deed should go unpunished.

Last edited by Samson; 9th January 2020 at 11:46 AM.
Samson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th January 2020, 11:51 AM   #430
Samson
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,825
Originally Posted by Chanakya View Post
It would be cool to have some kind of a global currency that's inflation-proof, that's not controlled by or subject to whims/policies of individual nations/governments, that's fairly easy to access and use, that isn't wasteful (unlike Bitcoin), that isn't volatile (unlike Bitcoin), and that's impervious to manipulation and profiteering. Of course, such a currency would by definition work only if people agreed to use it, but assuming people's willingness to use such aa currency, is such a thing even possible/feasible? Would any of of the economics experts/nerds here know if such a thing has been studied/discussed/been dreamt up?

eta: I'm not very clear on all of the technical details of cryptocurrency, but I guess this is what cryptos, and specifically bitcoin, started out as, or so people imagined, right? So, has such an ideal/utopian global currency been dreamt up -- and the details addressed, at least some details, at least in theory -- by economists past or cryptonerds present, is what I was wondering.
Cryptocurrencies allegedly have utility for people without access to bank accounts, and this seems an important role in pursuit of social equality. But there seems no point in this becoming a pyramid scheme like bitcoin.
Samson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th January 2020, 11:59 AM   #431
Leftus
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,770
Originally Posted by Samson View Post
In terms of the second trade, sell at 7130 profit 400 dollars and stop 400, this trade actually went 107 dollars out of the money and 277 into the money before the big reversal. This is up to the trader to see if there is a viable strategy and of course any mathematician will affirm there is, its obvious, including trailing stops, break even stops, adding on the back foot and so on. It is the 277 to 107 ratio that is important.

I tried to explain all this on the technical analysis threads but was continually reminded of the refrain, no good deed should go unpunished.
Sorry, this does nothing to explain why you need to have to separate trades to cover what was basically, identical predictions.

If BT is going to go down to 6730, it has to hit any 6800 number because that is how numbers work. So, again I ask, why would I need 2 trades to cover the same general analysis? Why wouldn't I just update my buy point with the new prediction? Is the new prediction less valid? Is it less likely to occur?

Why does each prediction have to be considered as it's own thing when they are made days apart? Especially when they make almost identical predictions, they both were declines after all.
Leftus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th January 2020, 12:27 PM   #432
Samson
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,825
Originally Posted by Leftus View Post
Sorry, this does nothing to explain why you need to have to separate trades to cover what was basically, identical predictions.

If BT is going to go down to 6730, it has to hit any 6800 number because that is how numbers work. So, again I ask, why would I need 2 trades to cover the same general analysis? Why wouldn't I just update my buy point with the new prediction? Is the new prediction less valid? Is it less likely to occur?

Why does each prediction have to be considered as it's own thing when they are made days apart? Especially when they make almost identical predictions, they both were declines after all.
I really do not see the issue. If we forget bitcoin and think of say buying apple shares.
I might buy 100 shares on monday, with a profit target, and buy another 100 shares next monday with a different profit target.The fact I now have 200 shares for a while is just fine, especially if I sell 100 at a profit one day, and the other at a profit subsequently, which in fact was the case with these two bitcoin shorts, assuming a trailing profit stop on the second.

Last edited by Samson; 9th January 2020 at 12:28 PM.
Samson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th January 2020, 02:19 PM   #433
Leftus
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,770
Originally Posted by Samson View Post
I really do not see the issue. If we forget bitcoin and think of say buying apple shares.
I might buy 100 shares on monday, with a profit target, and buy another 100 shares next monday with a different profit target.The fact I now have 200 shares for a while is just fine, especially if I sell 100 at a profit one day, and the other at a profit subsequently, which in fact was the case with these two bitcoin shorts, assuming a trailing profit stop on the second.
Here is the point. You say that Apple is going to hit 100. The NEXT DAY, you figure it's going to actually hit 120. Why would you throw away that 20 dollar change?

Prediction 2, where it's going to hit 120, will require it to hit 100. Prediction 2 updates, or clarifies prediction 1. There is no way for 2 to be right that doesn't include #1 being correct as well. So why, again, would I piss away that 20 buck change because the SAME ALGORITH predicted both DAYS APART?
Leftus is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th January 2020, 09:46 PM   #434
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 16,284
Originally Posted by Samson View Post
Meanwhile at 7130 this algorithm of disputed predictive power says sell bitcoin with a stop at 7530, target 6730 at least.
Easy money.
FAILED!!!!

Originally Posted by Samson View Post
. . . . . pyramid scheme like bitcoin.
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th January 2020, 09:57 PM   #435
Samson
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,825
Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post
FAILED!!!!


Yes I knew you would be lying in wait.
Dear psion have you heard of Turing machine?
Of course...
Samson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th January 2020, 04:04 AM   #436
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 16,284
Originally Posted by Samson View Post
Dear psion have you heard of Turing machine?
Is that anything like the "buzz-word" generator?
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th January 2020, 04:13 AM   #437
Belz...
Fiend God
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the details
Posts: 89,131
Originally Posted by Chanakya View Post
It would be cool to have some kind of a global currency that's inflation-proof (snip)
I don't know why so many people are saying that. Inflation, in moderation, is actually a good thing. It stimulates the economy.
__________________
Master of the Shining Darkness

"My views are nonsense. So what?" - BobTheCoward


Belz... is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th January 2020, 08:06 AM   #438
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 16,284
Originally Posted by Belz... View Post
I don't know why so many people are saying that. Inflation, in moderation, is actually a good thing. It stimulates the economy.
Inflation is a tax on savings and acts as a disincentive to paying down debts (let inflation do that for you).

Although a currency needs to expand to accommodate population/GDP growth, it is better to use demurrage rather than inflation to stimulate spending.
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th January 2020, 08:21 AM   #439
Belz...
Fiend God
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the details
Posts: 89,131
Originally Posted by psionl0 View Post
Inflation is a tax on savings
Say what?
__________________
Master of the Shining Darkness

"My views are nonsense. So what?" - BobTheCoward


Belz... is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th January 2020, 09:20 AM   #440
psionl0
Skeptical about skeptics
 
psionl0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 16,284
Originally Posted by Belz... View Post
Say what?
That's the part that confuses you?
__________________
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled. Where something so important is involved, a deeper mystery seems only decent." - Galbraith, 1975
psionl0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Economics, Business and Finance

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:17 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.