IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 13th April 2020, 04:02 AM   #321
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
This scientific experiment proves that, for example, a chicken egg consists of an expanding substance, and in this way the expanding substance of the chicken egg itself always protrudes where it is pushed away the least due to its own internal pressure.

That is, the chicken egg does not protrude into the flask as a whole, but as separate expanding nuclei of atoms that push each other away from each other in the same proportion as they expand.

In this video, the expanding chicken egg appropriately still breaks / tears due to the pushing force.

https://youtu.be/o7aCWFcuKJE

🤔

All matter consists of expanding densities that recycle the expanding pushing force that always protrude where they are pushed away the least.

Watch and marvel at how the expanding egg's own internal pressure causes it to push inside the expanding bottle.

🤔

So, the internal pressure of the expanding substance is automation because the expanding substance consists of expanding densities that recycle the expanding pushing force.

For example, each expanding quark in an expanding egg pushes each expanding quark away from itself, and therefore the expanding atomic cores of the expanding egg closest to the bottom of the expanding bottle protrude toward the bottom of the expanding bottle because they are pushed least away from there.

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 13th April 2020, 03:00 PM   #322
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,732
Exclamation Pixie of key's usual gibberish, ignorance, delusions, lies and insanity

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Insanity of an chicken egg "experiment" and insane gibberish about it.
Put an egg say in the neck of a flask. Heat them. The egg expands more than the flask neck. The flask can explode because the expanding egg puts too much pressure on it but the egg usually forces itself into the flask.

Pixie of key takes this real world fact and writes insane gibberish about "expanding densities", pushing forces which no one here denies exist !, quarks, etc.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th April 2020, 06:34 AM   #323
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Cosmic tempest: Astronomers detect most energetic outflow from a distant quasar

https://phys.org/news/2020-04-cosmic...c-outflow.html

Expanding galaxies born inside to outside?!?

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th April 2020, 02:14 PM   #324
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,732
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Cosmic tempest: Astronomers detect most energetic outflow from a distant quasar

https://phys.org/news/2020-04-cosmic...c-outflow.html
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Usual ignorant gibberish.
This is an observation that an existing (not being born) quasar has the most energetic "wind" from its supermassive black hole that we have detected.

Last edited by Reality Check; 15th April 2020 at 02:16 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2020, 03:09 PM   #325
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Leonardo da Vinci knew the Earth was expanding all the time?!?

I think Leonardo di ser Piero da Vinci knew the Earth was expanding all the time?!?

He painted Mona Lisa where a woman smiles just as if she knew something very essential about something.

"The distant, dreamlike vista behind the Mona Lisa's head seems to be higher on the right-hand side than on the left. It is hard to see how the landscape would join up. This is subliminally unsettling: Mona Lisa appears taller, more erect, when one's gaze drifts to the left than when it is on the right."

🤔
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screenshot_20200418-234031.jpg (49.9 KB, 6 views)
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2020, 03:12 PM   #326
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Expanding supermassive objects, expanding stars, expanding electrons, and expanding photons are created on the same principle without pulling forces

Entropy, of course, also on a small scale all the time.

Yes, there is no need for tensile forces because it is sufficient that the expanding condensations circulating zillions of expanding pushing force begin to expand much faster at the same time, explosively.

Immediately, a very high pressure is applied to the center / fulcrum of the system formed by the rapidly expanding densities.

See and wonder how easily that can be described with 3D animation.

https://youtu.be/QboDTgped1E

Then try to find a video that describes the expansion of expanding space using 3D animation.

You wonít find that because the expansion of expanding space cannot be described in words, nor visually.

Expanding supermassive objects emerged at about the same time completed far apart. It was then that expanding light was released which is now perceived as background radiation.

Later, as the trajectories of these expanding supermassive objects met, expanding galaxies emerged from the inside out. That is, a lot of expanding stars from that dark expanding matter for us that protrudes from expanding supermassive objects.

And the principle is the same as in the way of expanding supermassive objects created without pulling forces.

That is, the expanding dark matter densities protruding from the expanding supermassive object met the expanding dark matter densities protruding from the other expanding supermassive object, their mutual interaction and the expansion of the zillions of separate expanding densities immediately intensified into an explosive one.

The expanding atomic nuclei continue to recycle, with all the other expanding atomic nuclei, the expanding pushing force in the form of zillions as separate expanding densities of dark energy which, by the same principle, give rise to new expanding electrons and new expanding photons.

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2020, 03:13 PM   #327
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Few logical assumptions about the ever-existing really really large-scale recycling where galaxies are expanding "particles" of a degree larger scale that convey information about objects that are really really far from the expanding galaxies of the visible universe.

And the expanding galaxies of the expanding visible universe originate from one such object that "radiates" an expanding pushing force with which the nature of the expanding galaxies.

Currently, it is the closest target, but the accelerating push away from it takes the expanding push force in the expanding galaxies of the expanding visible universe all the time toward another target of a similar size.

Recycling is everything A and O.

Recycling requires nothing more than what is being recycled, so that is also what is being recycled.

That is, this one and the same physical concretely existing thing is in itself a pushing force.

With the pushing force, the system consisting of this pushing force causes the pace of the pushing force pushing towards itself to slow down and thus it is continuously absorbed into the system consisting of this pushing force. Of course, it is also diverted out of it and recycling is explained.

Recirculation maintains the internal pressure of the system and thus the system of pushing force expands outward in space into already existing space.

1. What everything in the expanding visible universe consists of, disperses / expands in space into a larger and larger area.

2. There is no force that could prevent scattering into a larger and larger area of space. Has not been, is not, will not be.

3. Therefore, everything that is now dispersing in space must sometimes later be pushed into an area where it is the same thing that basically consists of everything and must be very densely compressed there, but still exploding / dispersing / expanding into less dense space all the time.

4. The insertion of such a very dense and massive object, which explodes all the time, results in the protruding inside being once again compressed into an extremely dense pushing force.

5. Prior to that, the pushing force pushing into that area collides with the very dense and massive expanding densities that circumvent the expanding pushing force that it encounters, causing their expansion to accelerate.

The collisions slow down the pace of the pushing force pushing into that area until it stops at the area where extreme pressure compresses it once again into an extremely dense pushing force. As a new high-density raw material which starts to push with the surrounding very dense push force towards the less dense push force region, so that this very dense push force later creates new expanding supermassive objects without pulling forces.

That is, it is essential that these expanding densities that recycle the expanding thrust encounter a very rapid thrust that causes their expansion to accelerate to explosive, creating larger entities from the center of which protrude toward the surface of the new expanding supermassive object. Thus, in such a way that the expanding densities recirculating the expanding pushing force of dark matter meet the expanding densities of dark matter from another expanding supermassive object, they interact with each other, causing each other's expansion to accelerate to an explosive shape and thus new detectable expanding stars.

6. That is, the new expanding supermassive objects collide with each other at a steep angle from their initial journey and thus the new expanding galaxies from the inside out so that the expanding galaxies circulate the expanding pushing force with each other and thus with the expanding visible universe. to a dense and massive object from which the galaxies of the expanding visible universe protrude away and within which the pushing force was once again compressed into an extremely dense pushing force.

That is, so that a very dense, ever-expanding pushing force is constantly pushing away from the center of that object, creating new expanding supermassive objects that collide with each other, and thus new expanding galaxies pushing ahead away from the object from which the expanding pushing force originates.

7. The motion of the expanding visible universe thus accelerates from a certain direction to a certain direction, and the momentum is so rapid that the whole expanding visible universe moves in an instant away from the area to which it had moved a moment ago. Here it is good to understand that the expanding matter of the expanding visible universe was born into a motion that took it already at that stage from a certain direction to a certain direction at a very rapid rate.

Of course, the expanding lights interact with each other, accelerating the expansion of each other, and thus the speeds of the expanding lights accelerate in the same proportion as the substances and lights expand.

8. One can only imagine how the expanding pushing force of the rapidly expanding visible universe will eventually collide with another extremely massive and dense object that is very very far outside the expanding visible universe and that recycles the ever-existing pushing force with other similar objects and even so that in these very massive and the pushing force in dense objects changes completely with time.

10. It is essential, of course, to understand that the thrust of these ever-exploding objects outside the expanding visible universe is the nature of the expanding galaxies.

That is, expanding galaxies are like expanding "particles" that transmit information from / about these Huge Massive and Very Very Density Expanding Objects, so that the pushing force at these all-time exploding objects changes completely with time.

One expanding photon is small, not so density and expanding star is big, density object.

One expanding galaxy is small, not so density and one HMaVVDEO, Huge Massive and Very Very Density Expanding Object is big, very very density object.

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2020, 03:15 PM   #328
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
With expanding energy fields of light, internal pressures of different magnitudes in different regions = explanation for the general redshift of light.

1. Expanding light has a lot of mass, but our devices can't register the expanding waves of the expanding light that are dark to us, which is the expanding thrust that all expanding nuclei of atoms circulate with one another.

2. We can study expanding light with the help of available photons.

3. Expanding photons are a very small part of the expanding light. They are like foam heads of waves of expanding light.

4. The wavy nature of the expanding light is projected by the available photons.

5. In the double gap test, send single photons and see where the waves of expanding light are transporting us.

6. For us, the dark waves of expanding lights interact with each other, accelerating each other's expansion out of space into existing space.

7. The denser the individual expanding densities of the waves of the expanding light, the greater the internal pressure of the expanding energy field formed by the expanding light and the more widely expanding the energy field will diffuse / expand outward into existing space.

8. In a large "empty" space between galaxy clusters, the expanding energy field of the expanding light field is not as large as within the galaxy cluster.

9. Due to lower internal pressure, the rate of expanding light does not accelerate away from its own galaxy cluster as quickly as the rate of expanding light accelerates within the forward galaxy clusters.

10. When the old expanding light finally projects inside or past another expanding galaxy, the new, more energetic and slightly faster expanding light accelerates the old expanding light to its own, thus extending the old expanding light, that is, generally redshifting.

11. The more expansive light that has passed through / past the galaxy cluster, the more elongated or generally redshifted the expanding light.

Expanding light vs. expanding space.

1. Space does not radiate information. You can't try to manipulate space to get information about it. In other words, expanding space is a completely religious concept. Expanding space is emperor naked.

2. Light can be studied scientifically. If and when the lights expand and interact with each other, we can change the trajectory of the expanding light with billions of years of expanding light by conducting a scientific experiment.

Why do cosmologists believe in the existence of expanding space trapped in a hat even though they cannot scientifically prove its existence?!?

Expanding space is a concept similar to the gods of antiquity.

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2020, 03:19 PM   #329
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 49,674
Betteridge's Law of Headlines.
theprestige is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2020, 03:21 PM   #330
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Is the claim of expanding space just a myth?

There is no observation of expanding space !!!

Space itself does not radiate information.

Space itself cannot be perceived.

It cannot be studied scientifically

It cannot be manipulated in such a way as to provide information on the success of the manipulation.

Are expanding space and curving space naked emperors?

There is an observation that the older the light, the more redshifted the light is.

Nowadays, it is assumed that the old light is stretched i.e. generally / Cosmologys way redshifted during its journey due to the expanding space.

What about when the nuclei of atoms expand and recycle with each other a dark expanding pushing force that has the nature of expanding light.

Expanding lights interact with each other, causing each other to expand and accelerate in the same proportion as matter and light expand.

This is a scientific argument because light can be studied scientifically.

Attempts can be made to manipulate the trajectory of light with the help of light that has experienced entropy for billions of years.

If and when this is done and it is stated that it succeeds, it is concepts captured from the Goodbye hat that can be compared to the gods, i.e. now it is an expanding and curving space.

🤔

The fact that the lights are expanding and interacting with each other explains

1. General / cosmologys way redshift of light

2. Due to the bending of the path of light and the passing of the galaxy.

3. The so-called gravitational redshift of light.

4. Double slit tests

5. That all lights move at the same speed in each area.

And all five phenomena are explained without hat-drawn concepts that can be compared to the gods.

Five flies with one scientific claim.

So could it be that the theory of expanding space is just a myth?

"In everyday language, a myth refers to a fictional thing, an imagination, a belief, a misconception, or something unreasonable."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myth

🤔

Ps. Has the existence of an expanding pushing force circulated by the nuclei of expanding atoms already been scientifically proven in a way?

That is, it would be about the dark waves of expanding light for us, the existence of which explains the results of the double-gap experiments. In a double-slit experiment, send individual photons in motion and check where the dark waves of expanding light carry them 😃

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2020, 03:25 PM   #331
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
In order to be inside someone, it should also have an outside.

There is no outside in space.

So there can be no space outside.

And not inside, because there is no outside either.

When you understand this, you have a better chance of understanding an even much easier thing.

Namely, the fact that space cannot be dynamic.

It canít change in any way, and it canít affect anything in any way.

It is, being nothing at all.

Yes, you can push in and out if the pusher has an outside. If there is an outside, there is also an inside.

There is no outside "in" space.

So you can't get inside it.

That is, space has no inside.

And you can't push outside of it.

This is just the basic thing about space.

It should not be a difficult thing to perceive and understand.

Special that for some it is.

If space had an exterior, then it would mean that the space itself was in some place / background space.

If this were the case, then space could also change, because then it could consist of separate parts moving relative to each other and thus bringing motion in the background space behind the space.

But then this changing space would be similar to a matter changing in space?!?

Yeah, it's useless to develop a theory where there would be another space / background space behind the space.

That is, space itself is an infinite state which in itself is absolutely nothing and therefore cannot change in any way.

🤔

How many think that we are inside space?

We are not inside space.

We are not outside space.

Yet we are, we move and we change "in" space.

The change is based on the MOVEMENT OF SEPARATE PARTS "IN" SPACE.

What is space expansion based on?

What allows space to expand?

What happens when space expands?

Are some moving then somewhere and if so, which ones and where this things moving?

🤔

Letís use our imagination and take everything out of space that moves there. Really impossible. Nothing can be taken out of space. There is no outside space where a person moving "in" space could be moved.

But now the imagination is used and everything "in" space is removed from space and moves in relation to others moving in space.

All that remains is space.

Describe how this space could supposedly expand.

It's impossible.

You canít describe the expansion of space in words, not visually.

Expanding space is a concept drawn from manís hat that can be compared to the gods.

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2020, 03:31 PM   #332
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 49,674
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Is the claim of expanding space just a myth?
No.
Quote:
There is no observation of expanding space !!!
Actually there is.
Quote:
Space itself does not radiate information.
Actually it can.
Quote:
Space itself cannot be perceived.
Actually it can.
Quote:
It cannot be studied scientifically
Actually it can.
Quote:
It cannot be manipulated in such a way as to provide information on the success of the manipulation.
Actually it can.
Quote:
Are expanding space and curving space naked emperors?
They are not.
Quote:
There is an observation that the older the light, the more redshifted the light is.
Yes there is.
Quote:
Nowadays, it is assumed that the old light is stretched i.e. generally / Cosmologys way redshifted during its journey due to the expanding space.
Not assumed. Observed.
Quote:
What about when the nuclei of atoms expand and recycle with each other a dark expanding pushing force that has the nature of expanding light.
The claim of expanding nuclei is a myth.

There is no observation of expanding nuclei !!!

Expanding nuclei do not radiate information.

Nucleonic expansion itself cannot be perceived.

It cannot be studied scientifically

It cannot be manipulated in such a way as to provide information on the success of the manipulation.

Nucleic expansion and dark expanding pushing force are naked emperors.

Quote:
Expanding lights interact with each other, causing each other to expand and accelerate in the same proportion as matter and light expand.

This is a scientific argument because light can be studied scientifically.
Scientific arguments arise from the actuality of scientific study, not the possibility of scientific study.

... And I'm done.
theprestige is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2020, 03:37 PM   #333
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Only objects "in" space which moving "in" space, and changing "in" space radiate information that moves and changes "in" space.

Space itself does not move.

The space itself does not change.

Space itself does not radiate information or anything else.

This is FACTS

Ugh, I have spoken, i mean written.
*
🙂
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2020, 03:47 PM   #334
William Parcher
Show me the monkey!
 
William Parcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 25,769
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
If there is an outside, there is also an inside.

There is no outside "in" space.

So you can't get inside it.

That is, space has no inside.

And you can't push outside of it.

This is just the basic thing about space.

It should not be a difficult thing to perceive and understand.
You stole those lyrics from Funkadelic.
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot.
William Parcher is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2020, 07:47 PM   #335
Thermal
Penultimate Amazing
 
Thermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 13,540
Somebody drop this puppy in R&P. They'll eat this **** up.
__________________
We find comfort among those who agree with us, growth among those who don't -Frank A. Clark

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect -Mark Twain
Thermal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2020, 08:00 PM   #336
bruto
Penultimate Amazing
 
bruto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Way way north of Diddy Wah Diddy
Posts: 27,789
Wow, that's deep, man. It's almost as if everything there is is, like, all of it.
__________________
I love this world, but not for its answers. (Mary Oliver)

Quand il dit "cuic" le moineau croit tout dire. (When he's tweeted the sparrow thinks he's said it all. (Jules Renard)
bruto is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2020, 08:15 PM   #337
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 16,822
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
I think Leonardo di ser Piero da Vinci knew the Earth was expanding all the time?!?

He painted Mona Lisa where a woman smiles just as if she knew something very essential about something.

"The distant, dreamlike vista behind the Mona Lisa's head seems to be higher on the right-hand side than on the left. It is hard to see how the landscape would join up. This is subliminally unsettling: Mona Lisa appears taller, more erect, when one's gaze drifts to the left than when it is on the right."

🤔
__________________
I want to thank the 126 Republican Congress members for providing a convenient and well organized list for the mid-terms.
- Fred Wellman (Senior VA Advisor to The Lincoln Project)
If you don't like my posts, my opinions, or my directness then put me on your ignore list. This will be of benefit to both of us; you won't have to take umbrage at my posts, and I won't have to waste my time talking to you... simples! !
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2020, 08:41 PM   #338
EHocking
Philosopher
 
EHocking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,549
Originally Posted by smartcooky View Post
Even better, that Mona Lisa quote, is from Readers Digest online.
__________________
"A closed mouth gathers no feet"
"Ignorance is a renewable resource" P.J.O'Rourke
"It's all god's handiwork, there's little quality control applied", Fox26 reporter on Texas granite
You can't make up anything anymore. The world itself is a satire. All you're doing is recording it. Art Buchwald
EHocking is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2020, 09:49 PM   #339
Steve
Philosopher
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,428
Old times come around again!
__________________
Caption from and old New Yorker cartoon - Why am I shouting? Because I'm wrong!"
Steve is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th April 2020, 11:08 PM   #340
steenkh
Philosopher
 
steenkh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 6,158
It is amazing that Pixie of Key continues this idiocy that cannot even make a planet orbit a star.
__________________
Steen

--
Jack of all trades - master of none!
steenkh is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th April 2020, 12:36 AM   #341
Little 10 Toes
Master Poster
 
Little 10 Toes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,322
So, have you actually tried that rope experiment as described yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces?
Little 10 Toes is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th April 2020, 05:37 AM   #342
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Originally Posted by steenkh View Post
It is amazing that Pixie of Key continues this idiocy that cannot even make a planet orbit a star.
Why not.

With expanding pushing force is only logigal explanation.

Expanding Sun expanding nucleus of atoms pushing expanding planets expanding nucleus of atoms away from expanding Sun same way what Sun and planets expanding.

It is spiral orbit.

Lets explain pulling / drawing force.

Or try to explain curving space.

You cant

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th April 2020, 02:26 PM   #343
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,732
Exclamation Delusion about Leonardo di ser Piero da Vinci and the Mona Lisa painting

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Delusion about Leonardo di ser Piero da Vinci and the Mona Lisa painting
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th April 2020, 02:27 PM   #344
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,732
Exclamation The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Usual gibberish

Last edited by Reality Check; 19th April 2020 at 02:29 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th April 2020, 02:28 PM   #345
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,732
Exclamation The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Same gibberish.

Last edited by Reality Check; 19th April 2020 at 02:29 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th April 2020, 02:29 PM   #346
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,732
Exclamation The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Yet more gibberish and lies.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th April 2020, 02:52 PM   #347
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,732
Exclamation Pixie of key's insane lies about an expanding universe

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Yet more gibberish and repeats his insane lies about an expanding universe.

Insane and lies because he has been told the facts about the real world many times over the last 11 years.
  • Spacetime cannot be measured directly because it is not a physical thing .
    Spacetime is whatever separates objects in space and time. We can observe those objects. We cannot see spacetime.
  • We observe spacetime expanding.
    We measure Hubble's law as predicted by spacetime expanding.
    We measure the CMB that can only have been emitted when the universe was smaller, denser and hotter.
    etc. etc.
    What is the evidence for the Big Bang?
  • We do study spacetime scientifically.
  • We do "manipulate" spacetime to provide information.
    This may be the insanity that we change the entire universe, e.g. stop it expanding to see what happens !
    If it is a more sane lie: The universe runs experiments ("manipulates") spacetime for us and we get information from those experiments.
    What is the evidence for the Big Bang?
  • "There is an observation that the older the light, the more redshifted the light" is Hubble's law that tells us that the universe is expanding .
His ignorant gibberish explains nothing except that author is abysmally ignorant.
Insane lies that his ignorant gibberish explains cosmological redshift, bending of light, the real and measured gravitational redshift of light, the double slit experiments, or a "That all lights move at the same speed in each area" delusion (might be that the speed of light in vacuum is the same for all inertial observers).
An insane question. No one will try to test abysmally ignorant gibberish. Anyone who has learned about the double slit experiment knows that real (without any of his dark wave insanity) single particle double slit experiment have been done. The results are the same with multiple particles. An interference pattern builds up unless the particle path is measured in which case classical behavior is observed.

Last edited by Reality Check; 19th April 2020 at 03:01 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th April 2020, 10:34 PM   #348
steenkh
Philosopher
 
steenkh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 6,158
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Originally Posted by steenkh View Post
It is amazing that Pixie of Key continues this idiocy that cannot even make a planet orbit a star.
Why not.



With expanding pushing force is only logigal explanation.
The idiocy continues: I point out that your ideas is contradicted by one of the most simple facts in physics, and you claim that your ideas are the only logical explanation!

Come back when you can simulate orbits.
__________________
Steen

--
Jack of all trades - master of none!
steenkh is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th April 2020, 01:51 AM   #349
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Originally Posted by steenkh View Post
The idiocy continues: I point out that your ideas is contradicted by one of the most simple facts in physics, and you claim that your ideas are the only logical explanation!

Come back when you can simulate orbits.
No problem with spiral orbits.

Maybe too much for you.

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th April 2020, 02:01 AM   #350
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Originally Posted by steenkh View Post
The idiocy continues: I point out that your ideas is contradicted by one of the most simple facts in physics, and you claim that your ideas are the only logical explanation!

Come back when you can simulate orbits.


When the expanding planet is in the region between the expanding Sun and the expanding supermassive object, its expanding atomic nuclei are subjected to more expanding pushing force from the center of the galaxy than when it is on the other side of the expanding Sun.

Can you tell me what it is based on according to my model?

Apparently you know how to claim that my model does not explain the orbits of the planets?

Prove that you are familiar with my model and answer my question.

So, I know you canít answer my question because youíre not familiar with the Onesimpleprinciple model.

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th April 2020, 09:57 AM   #351
Little 10 Toes
Master Poster
 
Little 10 Toes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,322
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
No problem with spiral orbits.

Maybe too much for you.

🤔
Except the planes don't have spiral orbits.
Little 10 Toes is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th April 2020, 02:00 PM   #352
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Originally Posted by Little 10 Toes View Post
Except the planes don't have spiral orbits.
Expanding planets which pushing away from expanding Sun have.

🤔
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th April 2020, 02:35 PM   #353
The Man
Unbanned zombie poster
 
The Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 15,187
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Expanding planets which pushing away from expanding Sun have.

🤔

How much further has the Earth been pushed away from the Sun today as compared to yesterday?
__________________
BRAINZZZZZZZZ
The Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th April 2020, 03:03 PM   #354
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,732
Exclamation The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
A demented rant about his delusions about "space", no pushing forces, his pathological "no expanding space" lie.

Space has an "inside" and an "outside". Space does not exist on the surface of the Earth because we are not dead !

The universe by definition has no "outside" because it is everything hat there is - including any "outside".

What is the evidence for the Big Bang?
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th April 2020, 03:05 PM   #355
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,732
Exclamation The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Demented gibberish, e.g. that his delusions are facts.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th April 2020, 03:06 PM   #356
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,732
Exclamation The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
"No problem with spiral orbits" lie when he does not have any orbits at all in his delusions.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th April 2020, 03:09 PM   #357
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,732
Exclamation The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
More "expanding planet/Sun/supermassive object/atomic nucleus" gibberish.

Last edited by Reality Check; 20th April 2020 at 04:19 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th April 2020, 03:12 PM   #358
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,732
Exclamation The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
More "expanding planet/Sun/supermassive object/atomic nucleus" gibberish.

Last edited by Reality Check; 20th April 2020 at 04:19 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th April 2020, 04:07 PM   #359
Pixie of key
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,287
Originally Posted by The Man View Post
How much further has the Earth been pushed away from the Sun today as compared to yesterday?

Ask how "big" one quark can grow.

Well, one quark will “cover” space later as large an area as the expanding visible universe now.

Ask if it can still expand after that.

Of course, it will continue to expand, and later it will "cover" space of the same size as what the expanding visible universe "covered" at the beginning of the second phase.

Space is infinity 3 D place, the expansion of quarks in space outward into an already existing space is not a problem for infinity space.

Too much for you?!?

��
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100

Last edited by Pixie of key; 20th April 2020 at 04:08 PM.
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th April 2020, 04:19 PM   #360
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 27,732
Exclamation The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
...
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
More "expanding planet/Sun/supermassive object/atomic nucleus/quark" gibberish rather than answering the question.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:24 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.