ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Social Issues & Current Events
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags police incidents , police issues , police misconduct charges

Reply
Old 16th September 2020, 02:27 AM   #2201
erlando
Graduate Poster
 
erlando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,790
Originally Posted by shuttlt View Post
It would be nice, but I don't know what can be done about that that wouldn't result in the police not being allowed to shoot people who meant them genuine harm. Even the ones you are counting as "suicide by cop", I'm not sure how we know that the officer wouldn't have been harmed if they hadn't fired.
In other words, "shoot first, ask questions later".
__________________
"If it can grow, it can evolve" - Eugenie Scott, Ph.D Creationism disproved?
Evolution IS a blind watchmaker
erlando is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 02:39 AM   #2202
shuttlt
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,798
Originally Posted by erlando View Post
In other words, "shoot first, ask questions later".
If the cop has a reasonably belief that they are about to be seriously injured/killed and lethal force is needed to eliminate the threat, then sure. What do you expect police to do, wait to find out what you intend to do when you get up close to them? There are certainly cases where people got shot despite obeying police, but at that point you are talking about a very small number of cases indeed.
shuttlt is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 02:46 AM   #2203
Darat
Lackey
Administrator
 
Darat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 93,750
Originally Posted by erlando View Post
In other words, "shoot first, ask questions later".
Nah - more like. "Shoot first and get a tattoo"
__________________
I wish I knew how to quit you
Darat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 03:09 AM   #2204
Captain_Swoop
Penultimate Amazing
 
Captain_Swoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 28,102
Originally Posted by Darat View Post
Nah - more like. "Shoot first and get a tattoo"
Find someone to shoot.
Anyone will do, you can just say that you were in fear of your life.
Captain_Swoop is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 04:40 AM   #2205
SuburbanTurkey
Philosopher
 
SuburbanTurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 6,069
Quote:
New video footage shows the moment two Department of Homeless Services police officers handcuffed, detained and searched a Queens man after he photographed them without masks, in what their own agency has called an "absolutely unacceptable abuse of authority."
https://patch.com/new-york/astoria-l...tographed-them

Guy took a pic of two NYPD pigs not wearing masks, so they arrested him and fabricated a story of unlawful harrassment. They later tried to access his phone illegally by removing his mask and trying to force a face-id unlock while he was under arrest.

Contempt of cop is the most serious crime there is.
__________________
Gobble gobble
SuburbanTurkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 06:18 AM   #2206
Suddenly
No Punting
 
Suddenly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not In Follansbee
Posts: 3,933
Originally Posted by shuttlt View Post
If the cop has a reasonably belief that they are about to be seriously injured/killed and lethal force is needed to eliminate the threat, then sure. What do you expect police to do, wait to find out what you intend to do when you get up close to them?
Yes. Yes. Yes. This is what cops should be doing rather than placing the risks on innocent people.

"Reasonable" is way to low of a bar. Not to mention too vague. "Certain" is more where it should be. If even that.
Quote:

There are certainly cases where people got shot despite obeying police, but at that point you are talking about a very small number of cases indeed.
There are certainly cases where people come up with a surprise weapon and shoot cops, but at that point you are talking about a very small number of cases indeed.
Suddenly is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 06:26 AM   #2207
jimbob
Uncritical "thinker"
 
jimbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 22,160
Originally Posted by shuttlt View Post
Originally Posted by jimbob View Post
Like being black and seeing a cop?
No, that would be ridiculous. If you are compliant and not up to violent criminal ****, your odds of getting shot by the cop are infinitesimal.
The odds are small but far higher than the odds of an unarmed person or a compliant person shooting a cop.

What happens if you see a cop with a tattoo celebrating their use of lethal force?


Or a cop in one of the areas where no-knock warrant raids have killed as many people as there were murders?
__________________
OECD healthcare spending
Expenditure on healthcare
http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-data.htm
link is 2015 data (2013 Data below):
UK 8.5% of GDP of which 83.3% is public expenditure - 7.1% of GDP is public spending
US 16.4% of GDP of which 48.2% is public expenditure - 7.9% of GDP is public spending
jimbob is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 06:28 AM   #2208
Steve
Philosopher
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,912
Originally Posted by shuttlt View Post
If the cop has a reasonably belief that they are about to be seriously injured/killed and lethal force is needed to eliminate the threat, then sure.What do you expect police to do, wait to find out what you intend to do when you get up close to them? There are certainly cases where people got shot despite obeying police, but at that point you are talking about a very small number of cases indeed.
Yes. That is exactly what I expect. Shooting people on spec is just plain unacceptable.
__________________
Caption from and old New Yorker cartoon - Why am I shouting? Because I'm wrong!"
Steve is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 06:33 AM   #2209
JoeMorgue
Self Employed
Remittance Man
 
JoeMorgue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 27,151
Originally Posted by shuttlt View Post
If the cop has a reasonably belief that they are about to be seriously injured/killed and lethal force is needed to eliminate the threat, then sure. What do you expect police to do, wait to find out what you intend to do when you get up close to them? There are certainly cases where people got shot despite obeying police, but at that point you are talking about a very small number of cases indeed.
Why do the police only have the right to absolute metaphysical absence of any threat?

I don't know if what the cop is going to do anymore then the cop knows what I'm going to do. What does he "first draw" benefit of the doubt and I don't?

All your arguments work just as well for the general populace to be shooting the police as it does for the police to be shooting the general populace.
__________________
- I don't know how to convince you that facts exist
- I don't know how to convince you that you should care about other people
JoeMorgue is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 06:51 AM   #2210
jimbob
Uncritical "thinker"
 
jimbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 22,160
Originally Posted by JoeMorgue View Post
Why do the police only have the right to absolute metaphysical absence of any threat?

I don't know if what the cop is going to do anymore then the cop knows what I'm going to do. What does he "first draw" benefit of the doubt and I don't?

All your arguments work just as well for the general populace to be shooting the police as it does for the police to be shooting the general populace.
Exactly. And merely being certain demographics and exercising one's second amendment rights would be enough to give one reasonable fear of some cops.
__________________
OECD healthcare spending
Expenditure on healthcare
http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-data.htm
link is 2015 data (2013 Data below):
UK 8.5% of GDP of which 83.3% is public expenditure - 7.1% of GDP is public spending
US 16.4% of GDP of which 48.2% is public expenditure - 7.9% of GDP is public spending
jimbob is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 07:40 AM   #2211
pgwenthold
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,404
Originally Posted by JoeMorgue View Post
I'm not constantly bringing up Breonna Taylor just because she's black or just because of this or this because of that.

I constantly bring her up to counter the biggest narrative that deny's the reality of what is happening; the whole "Oh just do whatever you're told and the cop won't kill you..." nonsense.

1. As many other people have pointed out that's a functionally insane, psychopathic defense of a living in a police state.
2. As noted by myself and other people that doesn't help you when police scream contradicting instructions at you and shot you for not doing both at the same time.
3. But most importantly, as I said, it counters the "Well if they had just have done this they would have still been alive" because I can offer a scenario where they did do the thing and question are are still dead.
It's acceptable collateral damage, that's all.

It is kind of interesting. In a country based on "innocent until proven guilty" and "better a dozen guilty go free than an innocent in jail" we have people who have no problem with the execution of innocents as collateral damage.
__________________
"As your friend, I have to be honest with you: I don't care about you or your problems" - Chloe, Secret Life of Pets
pgwenthold is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 07:42 AM   #2212
SuburbanTurkey
Philosopher
 
SuburbanTurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 6,069
Originally Posted by pgwenthold View Post
It's acceptable collateral damage, that's all.

It is kind of interesting. In a country based on "innocent until proven guilty" and "better a dozen guilty go free than an innocent in jail" we have people who have no problem with the execution of innocents as collateral damage.
It's ok, leadership from the top is that getting gun downed in the street is "retribution". Expect more ambushes of cops. Some might call that retribution too.
__________________
Gobble gobble
SuburbanTurkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 07:44 AM   #2213
johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
 
johnny karate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,407
Originally Posted by shuttlt View Post
What do you expect police to do, wait to find out what you intend to do when you get up close to them?
What do you expect firefighters to do, run into burning buildings?
johnny karate is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 07:47 AM   #2214
pgwenthold
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,404
Originally Posted by SuburbanTurkey View Post
It's ok, leadership from the top is that getting gun downed in the street is "retribution". Expect more ambushes of cops. Some might call that retribution too.
The importance of the 2nd amendment is that it protects the rights of citizens to protect itself against the tyranny of the oppressive government.

But you don't actually to exercise that right to fight an oppressive government, you only get to use it to uphold government's version of Law and Order.
__________________
"As your friend, I have to be honest with you: I don't care about you or your problems" - Chloe, Secret Life of Pets
pgwenthold is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 08:06 AM   #2215
Distracted1
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 4,909
Originally Posted by johnny karate View Post
What do you expect firefighters to do, run into burning buildings?
Not if they can get the fire out some safer way, no.
__________________
The man with one watch knows what time it is, the man with two watches is never sure.
Distracted1 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 08:22 AM   #2216
Distracted1
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 4,909
Originally Posted by pgwenthold View Post
It's acceptable collateral damage, that's all.

It is kind of interesting. In a country based on "innocent until proven guilty" and "better a dozen guilty go free than an innocent in jail" we have people who have no problem with the execution of innocents as collateral damage.
Indeed. Here in Philadelphia, we have had 322 executions so far this year!
__________________
The man with one watch knows what time it is, the man with two watches is never sure.
Distracted1 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 08:25 AM   #2217
JoeMorgue
Self Employed
Remittance Man
 
JoeMorgue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 27,151
Originally Posted by Distracted1 View Post
Not if they can get the fire out some safer way, no.
Yeah the "Fire" in the metaphor is the lives of innocent people.
__________________
- I don't know how to convince you that facts exist
- I don't know how to convince you that you should care about other people
JoeMorgue is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 08:42 AM   #2218
Suddenly
No Punting
 
Suddenly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not In Follansbee
Posts: 3,933
Originally Posted by Distracted1 View Post
Not if they can get the fire out some safer way, no.
Safer for whom? The firefighters or the people trapped in the fire?
Suddenly is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 08:44 AM   #2219
JoeMorgue
Self Employed
Remittance Man
 
JoeMorgue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 27,151
Also firefights aren't allowed to stand outside my house and spray high pressure hoses through my windows because "well we can't prove there's NOT a fire in there."
__________________
- I don't know how to convince you that facts exist
- I don't know how to convince you that you should care about other people
JoeMorgue is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 08:46 AM   #2220
Distracted1
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 4,909
Originally Posted by Suddenly View Post
Safer for whom? The firefighters or the people trapped in the fire?
Wow, we are going to keep going with this analogy. Okay

Safer for the firefighters, of course.
It is the fire that is the enemy of both the firefighters- and the trapped people.
Concern for the safety of the fire is last on the list.
__________________
The man with one watch knows what time it is, the man with two watches is never sure.
Distracted1 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 08:54 AM   #2221
SuburbanTurkey
Philosopher
 
SuburbanTurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 6,069
Originally Posted by Distracted1 View Post
Wow, we are going to keep going with this analogy. Okay

Safer for the firefighters, of course.
It is the fire that is the enemy of both the firefighters- and the trapped people.
Concern for the safety of the fire is last on the list.
Firefighters are often characterized as heroes because they knowingly take actions that place their lives at risk in order to save people and to serve the community.

Meanwhile cops perforate crying men because they tried to pull up their pants in the name of "officer safety". The way cops justify the massive body count they rack up in the guise of "officer safety" is a direct repudiation of the heroic public servant model.

Everyone loves firefighters, and more and more people are growing to detest the cops.
__________________
Gobble gobble
SuburbanTurkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 09:17 AM   #2222
rockysmith76
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 1,854
Originally Posted by JoeMorgue View Post
Also firefights aren't allowed to stand outside my house and spray high pressure hoses through my windows because "well we can't prove there's NOT a fire in there."
But they should be
rockysmith76 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 09:18 AM   #2223
Distracted1
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 4,909
Originally Posted by SuburbanTurkey View Post
Firefighters are often characterized as heroes because they knowingly take actions that place their lives at risk in order to save people and to serve the community.

Meanwhile cops perforate crying men because they tried to pull up their pants in the name of "officer safety". The way cops justify the massive body count they rack up in the guise of "officer safety" is a direct repudiation of the heroic public servant model.

Everyone loves firefighters, and more and more people are growing to detest the cops.
Indeed, firefighters have been known to act heroically, as has the occasional LEO.

Those actions (the heroic ones) are "above and beyond" what they are being paid to do, however.
On a day to day basis, we do not expect the people charged with protecting our lives and property to be running suicide missions.
__________________
The man with one watch knows what time it is, the man with two watches is never sure.
Distracted1 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 09:27 AM   #2224
Bob001
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: US of A
Posts: 11,438
Originally Posted by shuttlt View Post
If the cop has a reasonably belief that they are about to be seriously injured/killed and lethal force is needed to eliminate the threat, then sure. What do you expect police to do, wait to find out what you intend to do when you get up close to them? There are certainly cases where people got shot despite obeying police, but at that point you are talking about a very small number of cases indeed.
What constitutes "a reasonabl[e] belief?" Should a guess be grounds for killing somebody? And what should the consequences be when the cop is wrong? Suppose a guy reaches into his pocket for his wallet, and gets killed because a cop "reasonably believes" that he might be pulling a gun? Or cops break into a home and kill the lawful, law-abiding resident because they "reasonably believe" that a drug dealer might be inside?

How 'bout this: If a cop acts on his "reasonable belief" and he turns out to be wrong, he gets a mandatory life sentence at hard labor? I bet they'd adopt a little narrower definition of what's "reasonable."
Bob001 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 09:27 AM   #2225
shuttlt
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,798
Originally Posted by Distracted1 View Post
Indeed, firefighters have been known to act heroically, as has the occasional LEO.

Those actions (the heroic ones) are "above and beyond" what they are being paid to do, however.
On a day to day basis, we do not expect the people charged with protecting our lives and property to be running suicide missions.
Firefighters are sometimes disciplined for doing exactly this. The first case I found was this:
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/02/12/u...rnd/index.html

Part of that I think is that one individual going on a suicide mission potentially adds to the risk of everybody else.

There are plenty of other cases.
shuttlt is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 09:31 AM   #2226
SuburbanTurkey
Philosopher
 
SuburbanTurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 6,069
Originally Posted by Bob001 View Post
What constitutes "a reasonabl[e] belief?" Should a guess be grounds for killing somebody? And what should the consequences be when the cop is wrong? Suppose a guy reaches into his pocket for his wallet, and gets killed because a cop "reasonably believes" that he might be pulling a gun? Or cops break into a home and kill the lawful, law-abiding resident because they "reasonably believe" that a drug dealer might be inside?

How 'bout this: If a cop acts on his "reasonable belief" and he turns out to be wrong, he gets a mandatory life sentence at hard labor? I bet they'd adopt a little narrower definition of what's "reasonable."
I think a better system is to randomly ambush cops while they are sitting in patrol cars.
__________________
Gobble gobble
SuburbanTurkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 09:33 AM   #2227
Darat
Lackey
Administrator
 
Darat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 93,750
Originally Posted by JoeMorgue View Post
Why do the police only have the right to absolute metaphysical absence of any threat?

I don't know if what the cop is going to do anymore then the cop knows what I'm going to do. What does he "first draw" benefit of the doubt and I don't?

All your arguments work just as well for the general populace to be shooting the police as it does for the police to be shooting the general populace.
It gets even better, I'm walking down the street and I know that I've not committed any crime, a police officer shouts at me to stop, that would make me very scared, I would be thinking they might decide to shoot me even though I am committing no crime and even if I obey their non-legal order, I pull out my legally owned and carried pistol and shoot the police officer dead.

I was scared so it must be fine I killed the officer.
__________________
I wish I knew how to quit you
Darat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 09:36 AM   #2228
Bob001
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: US of A
Posts: 11,438
Originally Posted by Darat View Post
It gets even better, I'm walking down the street and I know that I've not committed any crime, a police officer shouts at me to stop, that would make me very scared, I would be thinking they might decide to shoot me even though I am committing no crime and even if I obey their non-legal order, I pull out my legally owned and carried pistol and shoot the police officer dead.

I was scared so it must be fine I killed the officer.
Sounds like "stand your ground" to me. Probably legal in Florida.
Bob001 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 09:41 AM   #2229
shuttlt
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,798
Originally Posted by Bob001 View Post
What constitutes "a reasonabl[e] belief?" Should a guess be grounds for killing somebody?
Not as a rule, that is pretty well established.

Originally Posted by Bob001 View Post
And what should the consequences be when the cop is wrong? Suppose a guy reaches into his pocket for his wallet, and gets killed because a cop "reasonably believes" that he might be pulling a gun?
Why would the cop be punished for acting in a way that any other given cop might well have acted? If that is all that went wrong, then the issue isn't with the individual cop. One would have to know more about the encounter to know whether it was reasonable or not.

Originally Posted by Bob001 View Post
Or cops break into a home and kill the lawful, law-abiding resident because they "reasonably believe" that a drug dealer might be inside?
Believing a drug dealer is in a house isn't a reason to kill anybody. If the person in the house starts shooting, then that might well change things. Who if anybody needs to get punished depends on the details of the event, what errors were made, and whether anybody acted unreasonably.

Originally Posted by Bob001 View Post
How 'bout this: If a cop acts on his "reasonable belief" and he turns out to be wrong, he gets a mandatory life sentence at hard labor? I bet they'd adopt a little narrower definition of what's "reasonable."
That would be ridiculous. Lets imagine the final scene in falling down where it turns out Michael Douglas only has a water pistol. Are you saying that the cop there should be off to prison?
YouTube Video This video is not hosted by the ISF. The ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.
I AGREE
shuttlt is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 09:46 AM   #2230
Wudang
BOFH
 
Wudang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire
Posts: 12,914
Originally Posted by shuttlt View Post
Why would the cop be punished for acting in a way that any other given cop might well have acted? If that is all that went wrong, then the issue isn't with the individual cop.
Hmm.
__________________
"Your deepest pools, like your deepest politicians and philosophers, often turn out more shallow than expected." Walter Scott.
Wudang is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 09:47 AM   #2231
shuttlt
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,798
Originally Posted by Darat View Post
It gets even better, I'm walking down the street and I know that I've not committed any crime, a police officer shouts at me to stop, that would make me very scared, I would be thinking they might decide to shoot me even though I am committing no crime and even if I obey their non-legal order, I pull out my legally owned and carried pistol and shoot the police officer dead.

I was scared so it must be fine I killed the officer.
Somehow most people manage not to get shot by the police when they are ordered to stop. Similarly the vast majority of non-criminals don't start shooting under these circumstances. You would therefore be acting well outside the norm in terms of your threat assessment and reaction. I think you would have an uphill struggle in defending your actions.

Last edited by shuttlt; 16th September 2020 at 09:53 AM.
shuttlt is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 09:49 AM   #2232
Dave Rogers
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through a scribbled morning waving necessary ankles
 
Dave Rogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cair Paravel, according to XKCD
Posts: 31,167
Originally Posted by shuttlt View Post
Somehow most people manage not to get shot by the police when they are ordered to stop.
Somehow most people manage not to get killed by serial killers. The likelihood of any specific individual being killed by a serial killer is infinitesimal. There is therefore no need to do anything about serial killers.

Dave
__________________
Inspiring discussion of Sharknado is not a good sign for the audience expectations of your new high-concept SF movie sequel.

- Myriad
Dave Rogers is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 09:51 AM   #2233
Darat
Lackey
Administrator
 
Darat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 93,750
Originally Posted by shuttlt View Post
Somehow most people manage not to get shot by the police when they are ordered to stop. Similarly the vast majority of non-criminals don't start shooting under these circumstances. You are therefore acting well outside the norm in terms of your threat assessment and reaction. I think you would have an uphill struggle in defending your actions.
What do you expect me to do, wait to find out what the police officer intended to do when they get up close to me?
__________________
I wish I knew how to quit you
Darat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 09:59 AM   #2234
shuttlt
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,798
Originally Posted by Dave Rogers View Post
Somehow most people manage not to get killed by serial killers. The likelihood of any specific individual being killed by a serial killer is infinitesimal. There is therefore no need to do anything about serial killers.

Dave
False analogy. If we want to compare the situations it would be if you shot your neighbour when he rang on your door because you were concerned based on the 1/30,000,000 chance of him being a serial killer that he was about to murder you. That is the reasoning of a lunatic.
shuttlt is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 10:01 AM   #2235
Wudang
BOFH
 
Wudang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire
Posts: 12,914
Originally Posted by shuttlt View Post
False analogy. If we want to compare the situations it would be if you shot your neighbour when he rang on your door because you were concerned based on the 1/30,000,000 chance of him being a serial killer that he was about to murder you. That is the reasoning of a lunatic.
I wonder what the ratio is of cases of someone pulling a gun versus pulling out a wallet.
__________________
"Your deepest pools, like your deepest politicians and philosophers, often turn out more shallow than expected." Walter Scott.
Wudang is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 10:06 AM   #2236
shuttlt
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,798
Originally Posted by Darat View Post
What do you expect me to do, wait to find out what the police officer intended to do when they get up close to me?
You can obviously shoot when ever you think it is necessary, but if the rest of the world decides that your fears were not reasonable you will be off to prison. I do not see that a cop acting in a manner consistent with normal cop behaviour is ever going to be grounds for successfully claiming self defence.
shuttlt is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 10:06 AM   #2237
chrispy
Muse
 
chrispy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Solola, Guatemala
Posts: 974
Originally Posted by shuttlt View Post

Why would the cop be punished for acting in a way that any other given cop might well have acted? If that is all that went wrong, then the issue isn't with the individual cop.


Getting closer..
__________________
Just a spec in the Spectrum...
chrispy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 10:10 AM   #2238
Distracted1
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 4,909
Originally Posted by Darat View Post
It gets even better, I'm walking down the street and I know that I've not committed any crime, a police officer shouts at me to stop, that would make me very scared, I would be thinking they might decide to shoot me even though I am committing no crime and even if I obey their non-legal order, I pull out my legally owned and carried pistol and shoot the police officer dead.

I was scared so it must be fine I killed the officer.
Give it a try.
You will get your day in court, perhaps you could convince the jury of the reasonableness of your fear.
__________________
The man with one watch knows what time it is, the man with two watches is never sure.
Distracted1 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 10:10 AM   #2239
Darat
Lackey
Administrator
 
Darat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 93,750
Originally Posted by shuttlt View Post
You can obviously shoot when ever you think it is necessary, but if the rest of the world decides that your fears were not reasonable you will be off to prison. I do not see that a cop acting in a manner consistent with normal cop behaviour is ever going to be grounds for successfully claiming self defence.
I find your asymmetrical assessment of "reasonable" fear quite strange.

In my country we (try to) hold our police officers to higher standards than we do the non-police whereas it appears in the USA it is the other way around.
__________________
I wish I knew how to quit you
Darat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2020, 10:12 AM   #2240
Darat
Lackey
Administrator
 
Darat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 93,750
Originally Posted by Distracted1 View Post
Give it a try.
You will get your day in court, perhaps you could convince the jury of the reasonableness of your fear.
See my post above. I really can't understand why you don't want your police officers to be held to higher standards than non-police. It seems rather arse about tit to me.
__________________
I wish I knew how to quit you
Darat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Social Issues & Current Events

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:35 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.