|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
1st May 2019, 08:06 PM | #121 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: US of A
Posts: 16,613
|
Some pistols, particularly the Glocks often preferred by police, don't have safeties to disengage. But in others it's just a thumb lever; people train to disengage the safety as they draw from the holster. I'm willing to grant that she drew her weapon on instinct; the issue is that she deliberately shot somebody -- twice -- when she had no conceivable grounds to do so, and, in particular, when she could have safely backed out of the unit and demanded an explanation/called for backup/etc.
|
1st May 2019, 08:11 PM | #122 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: US of A
Posts: 16,613
|
|
1st May 2019, 08:13 PM | #123 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: US of A
Posts: 16,613
|
If that 911 tape gains her any sympathy for being surprised, she loses it when she keeps saying things like "I'm gonna lose my job!" as the guy she shot is dying in front of her eyes.
|
2nd May 2019, 04:31 AM | #124 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 35,043
|
Neither was Noor's decision to unholster his gun and shoot an unarmed woman outside his car window, but the jury still only found him liable for 3rd degree murder, which is differentiated from more severe murder charges by a lack of intent.
We can split hairs about whether shooting at a person is ever an act without intent to kill in the general sense, but a jury won't necessarily see it that way. If you think that Guyger committed murder with a clear intent, be prepared to be disappointed by the trial. My complete amateur opinion is that she'll get a similar outcome as Noor, a lesser degree murder charge that is more akin to manslaughter. |
__________________
Previously known as SuburbanTurkey Last edited by TurkeysGhost; 2nd May 2019 at 05:20 AM. Reason: I need to start proof reading these posts |
|
2nd May 2019, 05:16 AM | #125 |
Self Employed
Remittance Man Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 46,649
|
|
__________________
"If everyone in the room says water is wet and I say it's dry that makes me smart because at least I'm thinking for myself!" - The Proudly Wrong. |
|
2nd May 2019, 06:10 AM | #126 |
Mad Mod Poet God
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 3,316
|
This. Many many times this. This is known as the double standard for burden of proof: where one demands much more burden of proof for conviction of one set of people (police), while holding another group of people (civilians who are surprised by a no-knock warrant, police screaming at them, or police shouting conflicting confusing things at them) to a much lower burden of proof for conviction.
One of these is supposedly trained for high-intensity situations, and the other just might be bleeding out on the floor. |
__________________
"You can find that book everywhere and the risk is that many people who read it believe that those fairy tales are real. I think I have the responsibility to clear things up to unmask the cheap lies contained in books like that." - Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone |
|
16th May 2019, 06:39 AM | #127 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,712
|
Defense trying to get a change of venue
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/crim...ng-botham-jean |
__________________
"I dont call that evolution, I call that the survival of the fittest." - Bulletmaker "I thought skeptics would usually point towards a hoax rather than a group being duped." - makaya325 Kit is not a skeptic. He is a former Bigfoot believer that changed his position to that of non believer.- Crowlogic |
|
16th May 2019, 07:49 AM | #129 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Where the Arrantly Roam
Posts: 26,169
|
And shoot the prosecutor?
|
__________________
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect" -Mark Twain "Half of what he said meant something else, and the other half didn't mean anything at all" -Rosencrantz, on Hamlet |
|
9th June 2019, 08:23 AM | #130 |
Show me the monkey!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 26,646
|
Fired Dallas officer Amber Guyger appears in court for murder case in fatal shooting of Botham Jean
Originally Posted by Dallas News
|
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot. |
|
20th August 2019, 06:14 AM | #131 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,712
|
An article outlining the defense's strategy with regard to Amber Guyger.
https://www.dallasobserver.com/news/...ctics-11735279 It is what we predicted here. Mistake of Fact
Quote:
Quote:
|
__________________
"I dont call that evolution, I call that the survival of the fittest." - Bulletmaker "I thought skeptics would usually point towards a hoax rather than a group being duped." - makaya325 Kit is not a skeptic. He is a former Bigfoot believer that changed his position to that of non believer.- Crowlogic |
|
20th August 2019, 06:17 AM | #132 |
Fiend God
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In a post-fact world
Posts: 96,875
|
"Accident"? It would've been an accident if she just came into the appartment and left. She shot a man. That's not an accident.
|
20th August 2019, 06:57 AM | #133 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,083
|
I'm far from being a lawyer, but I hope the prosecution really hammers home questions like "So with you being as tired as you were and in possession of a lethal weapon it's safe to conclude that, had you gone to your actual apartment and found a maintenance worker inside trying to fix a gas leak you'd have shot him, too?". Only in more lawyerly language.
|
20th August 2019, 06:58 AM | #134 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,083
|
|
20th August 2019, 09:10 AM | #135 |
Great minds think...
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 13,903
|
Mind you, this happened in Texas.
My guess is she'll get acquitted and the family will get money in civil court. |
__________________
“There are times when the mind is dealt such a blow it hides itself in insanity. While this may not seem beneficial, it is. There are times when reality is nothing but pain, and to escape that pain the mind must leave reality behind.” - Patrick Rothfuss |
|
20th August 2019, 10:03 AM | #136 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Antimemetics Division
Posts: 69,914
|
|
__________________
There is no Antimemetics Division. |
|
20th August 2019, 10:12 AM | #137 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,083
|
Saying 'ask questions like' was my lazy way of expressing that's the angle I hope they pursue, by whatever lawyerly way appropriate. Again, not a lawyer by any stretch myself, but to me the point of failure in this case was never going to the wrong apartment, it was the decision to shoot, period. Meaning if she in fact had been at her apartment as she claims to have thought, there were reasons why someone might be in there which didn't involve anything nefarious. In either the hypothetical 'correct apartment, guy fixing gas leak' situation or the one that played out in reality, it's my layman's opinion (want to emphasize that part since I can't claim any expertise here) that she should have done a far better job assessing the situation before deciding to shoot. Doing so would have allowed her to see (hypothetical) 'dude is fixing a gas leak, so don't shoot', or (reality) '****, I'm in the wrong apartment - don't shoot'. |
20th August 2019, 10:20 AM | #138 |
Show me the monkey!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 26,646
|
|
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot. |
|
20th August 2019, 10:28 AM | #139 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,083
|
|
20th August 2019, 10:43 AM | #140 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Port Townsend, Washington
Posts: 39,057
|
|
__________________
Cum catapultae proscribeantur tum soli proscripti catapultas habeant. |
|
20th August 2019, 11:26 AM | #141 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Antimemetics Division
Posts: 69,914
|
I don't see how finding someone unexpected in (what she believes to be) her apartment changes the calculus much whether it's really her apartment or not.
Probably a better line for the prosecution would be to challenge her decision to go armed, if she really was as fatigued as she claims. If she was so tired that her judgement was impaired, why was she even wearing her gun at that point? |
20th August 2019, 11:33 AM | #142 |
Fiend God
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In a post-fact world
Posts: 96,875
|
|
20th August 2019, 11:39 AM | #143 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,083
|
I'm probably not explaining myself properly as I'm in full agreement with your first sentence. There's been much to-do in this thread about how she should have known it wasn't her apartment because of <list of reasons>. IMO those arguments aren't right or wrong, they're simply not relevant. Even if she had been in her apartment and found someone there, or if we allow that it was a totally understandable and forgivable mistake to have gone to the wrong apartment thinking it was hers, the decision to shoot was clearly in the wrong and she didn't do enough to assess the situation before deciding to shoot.
As to the 'too impaired to carry' line, I don't feel qualified to weigh in. I don't know what overall LE policy is regarding situations like that (maybe it's SOP that you do something with the weapon if you're impaired or whatever, I honestly don't know). I'm looking at it strictly from the standpoint of someone whose grown up with firearms and has taken safety courses (never carried or owned for defensive reasons though). I simply don't see how she could have done close to a reasonable assessment of the situation and come to the conclusion that it was safe (let alone justified) to shoot, regardless of what apartment she was in or thought she was in. |
20th August 2019, 12:49 PM | #144 |
Great minds think...
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 13,903
|
|
__________________
“There are times when the mind is dealt such a blow it hides itself in insanity. While this may not seem beneficial, it is. There are times when reality is nothing but pain, and to escape that pain the mind must leave reality behind.” - Patrick Rothfuss |
|
21st August 2019, 01:14 PM | #145 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,712
|
I agree that much of the criminal defense will be to put the blame on the city for ignoring policy for overtime. Thus, they created the situation where the good man, Botham Jean ended up dead.
The civil lawsuit will name City of Dallas and Amber Guyger. Amber Guyger, if found not guilty, might even sue the City. |
__________________
"I dont call that evolution, I call that the survival of the fittest." - Bulletmaker "I thought skeptics would usually point towards a hoax rather than a group being duped." - makaya325 Kit is not a skeptic. He is a former Bigfoot believer that changed his position to that of non believer.- Crowlogic |
|
22nd August 2019, 06:22 AM | #146 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,474
|
|
22nd August 2019, 09:57 AM | #147 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,083
|
Again, in my non-lawyerly opinion, that isn't the central question in the matter. Both sides will doubtless hammer on that point from their respective directions, but the key thing to me is that there simply is no answer to the 'should she have known' question which would then make the decision to shoot okay. If she should have known then it might make things worse for her, but if determined that it was a perfectly reasonable mistake of fact to have made it doesn't then put a big 'OK' stamp on her subsequent actions. To use an exaggerated analogy, if a person is on trial for a drive by shooting we might also look at the question of 'was the car used stolen' to see if that exacerbates things. But the answer to 'stolen or not' can never be one which justifies the drive by, which is the central issue in the case. Not being a lawyer I could find myself totally wrong in this, of course. When/if that happens I won't be utterly shocked, just disappointed. So I guess I'm approaching this more from a moralistic 'how it ought to be', and not an 'according to statute <x> what she did qualifies as ...'. |
22nd August 2019, 10:01 AM | #148 |
Self Employed
Remittance Man Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 46,649
|
|
__________________
"If everyone in the room says water is wet and I say it's dry that makes me smart because at least I'm thinking for myself!" - The Proudly Wrong. |
|
22nd August 2019, 12:21 PM | #149 |
Lackey
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 113,984
|
|
__________________
“If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?” Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago |
|
22nd August 2019, 12:30 PM | #150 |
Great minds think...
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 13,903
|
So does this come down to basically the question of: Is this murder or negligent homicide?
I don't think there are any circumstances where it's ok for her to have been at the wrong apartment. At the fundamental level you should know where the hell your living quarters are and how to get there. I don't want to dig through the thread, but at any point did it say how long she had lived there? I'm sure that it's been said before, but her being a cop makes this a bit worse. I've been tired at the end of a work day as well, but I can't recall a time that I've walked into a completely different apartment...and I have self inflicted short term memory issues . |
__________________
“There are times when the mind is dealt such a blow it hides itself in insanity. While this may not seem beneficial, it is. There are times when reality is nothing but pain, and to escape that pain the mind must leave reality behind.” - Patrick Rothfuss |
|
22nd August 2019, 12:49 PM | #151 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,083
|
|
22nd August 2019, 03:53 PM | #152 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: No longer Philadelphia :(
Posts: 5,770
|
"Acceptable", "unacceptable", those terms are less important here than "legal" and "criminal".
I think we all grok (at least a little bit) that Texas (among other States) seems to grant a person a great deal of latitude when deciding to shoot someone, especially if that someone is in their home uninvited. Ask yourself the question: "is it likely in Texas that Guyger walks if the exact same events had played out in her apartment" ? If you think it likely that she does, you must acknowledge that primary determining factor in the likely outcome is the reasonableness of her error. It seems to me like an error that a reasonable person could certainly make. Another splendid example of why people shouldn't be walking around armed. |
__________________
The man with one watch knows what time it is, the man with two watches is never sure. |
|
22nd August 2019, 03:56 PM | #153 |
Resident Skeptical Hobbit
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waging war on woo-woo in Winnipeg
Posts: 7,599
|
I'm going to disagree, from personal experience.
I live in a multi-floor apartment block. The floors are not like a suburban neighbourhood where houses generally have distinct shapes and paint jobs, different lawns and ornaments, different fences, etc. Every floor is decorated exactly the same: the carpet and colour scheme are identical to other floors. Every door is in the same location and has the same general look to it. I have on more than one occasion left the elevator at the wrong floor, walked all the way to where my apartment is on my floor—ignoring obvious clues like a door having or not having a wreath or hanger of some sort on it ("Oh, it looks like the owner changed it")—only to stop at what I thought was my door and pause because something "seemed wrong" about it. Perhaps it had a different lock, or scratches and small gouges on the door frame looked wrong. Only then did I actually look at the apartment number, prominently visible on all the doors, and determine I was on the wrong floor. (Why didn't I look before? Because I thought I was on the correct floor!) The real kicker? The elevator announces the floor number as the doors open. I missed even that obvious clue. And I wasn't stupid out of my mind tired; I was either thinking about something or listening to a podcast on my phone. |
__________________
The social illusion reigns to-day upon all the heaped-up ruins of the past, and to it belongs the future. The masses have never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to deify error, if error seduce them. Gustav Le Bon, The Crowd, 1895 (from the French) |
|
22nd August 2019, 04:23 PM | #154 |
Self Employed
Remittance Man Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 46,649
|
People get too hung up on the "I can see myself doing it..." thing.
Just because you can see yourself doing it doesn't mean it's not a crime (or a lesser crime or a crime with an apologetic modifier or whatever.) |
__________________
"If everyone in the room says water is wet and I say it's dry that makes me smart because at least I'm thinking for myself!" - The Proudly Wrong. |
|
22nd August 2019, 04:35 PM | #155 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,083
|
I can't claim to understand what the law says and so can't guess how it will rule. I've been arguing this more along what I feel would be the moral/just way to handle things. Hopefully the law would align with that but I won't pretend it does. I actually don't know. From that angle I feel very strongly that if the events played out in her apartment exactly as they did here then she shouldn't walk. I've already brought up the maintenance worker example for cases where the person in your apartment might have a valid reason for being there. I'd take that further - if the person inside was in fact a burglar and they took no offensive/threatening actions once she walked through the door, shooting would not be proper.
Of course if that were the case she could easily play the 'he lunged toward me' card. Taking that sort of action would be a clear threat and put shooting on the table as an option for me. I think it'd be easy to claim that he lunged at her when he did no such thing. At that point it'd be up to all those Quincy types to reconstruct the scene to try and establish if that was possible based on body position, etc. So at the end of the day she might walk for a number of reasons. I hope not, but won't be bowled over with surprise if so. But in my opinion that would be a flawed result from a moral standpoint, because even if she had been in her apartment as she claims to have thought that doesn't automatically justify bypassing all basic target/environment assessments and dropping into Quickdraw McGraw mode. |
22nd August 2019, 04:42 PM | #156 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: No longer Philadelphia :(
Posts: 5,770
|
|
__________________
The man with one watch knows what time it is, the man with two watches is never sure. |
|
22nd August 2019, 04:58 PM | #157 |
Self Employed
Remittance Man Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 46,649
|
1. Well I can't actually imagine myself walking into the wrong apartment, not noticing I was in the wrong apartment and staying in a perfect balance of "light enough to tell there is a person in my apartment but dark enough so I can't notice IT'S NOT MY GODDAMN BLOODY APARTMENT AND THE PERSON IN IT ISN'T ARMED" to draw my gun and shoot them and I've been awake a LOT longer then "All day OMG the inhumanity of it all" and handled a weapon.
2. I don't really believe anyone else does either. 3. Even IF I accept 1 and/or 2 are true you can't just legally assign the title of "reasonable" person to yourself. Everyone thinks they are reasonable. Meaningless. I think it's "reasonable" to sit in your home and not get shot by some dumb broad wandering in and opening fire because a full duty day apparently turns her into a rage zombie, crazy that. 4. Yet again I wonder where this conversation of excuses and "yeah buts" and fan fiction are in other cases. |
__________________
"If everyone in the room says water is wet and I say it's dry that makes me smart because at least I'm thinking for myself!" - The Proudly Wrong. |
|
22nd August 2019, 05:08 PM | #158 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Port Townsend, Washington
Posts: 39,057
|
|
__________________
Cum catapultae proscribeantur tum soli proscripti catapultas habeant. |
|
22nd August 2019, 05:12 PM | #159 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NZ
Posts: 21,318
|
|
22nd August 2019, 05:26 PM | #160 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: No longer Philadelphia :(
Posts: 5,770
|
|
__________________
The man with one watch knows what time it is, the man with two watches is never sure. |
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|