|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
Tags | artificial intelligence , consciousness |
View Poll Results: Is consciousness physical or metaphysical? |
Consciousness is a kind of data processing and the brain is a machine that can be replicated in other substrates, such as general purpose computers. | 81 | 86.17% | |
Consciousness requires a second substance outside the physical material world, currently undetectable by scientific instruments | 3 | 3.19% | |
On Planet X, unconscious biological beings have perfected conscious machines | 10 | 10.64% | |
Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll |
8th June 2012, 06:35 AM | #561 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,874
|
|
__________________
"Anyway, why is a finely-engineered machine of wire and silicon less likely to be conscious than two pounds of warm meat?" Pixy Misa "We live in a world of more and more information and less and less meaning" Jean Baudrillard http://bokashiworld.wordpress.com/ |
|
8th June 2012, 08:23 AM | #563 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,800
|
|
8th June 2012, 09:00 AM | #564 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,946
|
lol
Ok, lets be specific about this. There are two aspects to what people normally call "creativity." First, there is the ability of a person to take the experiences they have had, and reorganize them, and generate something new or unique from those prior experiences. Second, there is the set of experiences a person has access to. I don't claim that the internet has advanced the first aspect. However it is plainly obvious that the internet has exponentially advanced the second. Case in point: while those masks you linked to may seem "creative" given the things the tribesmen had to work with, it is clear from even a cursory examination that the creative "diversity" among just the avatars of this forum alone far exceeds that of the entire set of all African masks ever made. Are we more creative than the tribal artists? It depends. We certainly have a far greater number of experiences to draw from, and that should count for something. |
8th June 2012, 01:42 PM | #565 |
Muse
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 693
|
Blah, blah, blah. Put up or shut up. Inform us oh wise one of your views on consciousness, biology, whatever. Making excuses for using a known type of fallacious argument does not add to your credibility.
Who knows, maybe if you give me your arguments on the topic at hand I might be swayed. That is if you are willing to give it a try. On the other hand, if you do not want to give it a go, that is your business and I will completely understand. This weak sauce of just saying I am soooo wrong without even trying to show why bores me. All the best to you all! |
__________________
I learned much from the Order of the Jesuits. Until now, there has never been anything more grandiose, on the earth, than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic church. I transferred much of this organization into my own party. — Hitler, 1933 |
|
8th June 2012, 02:06 PM | #566 |
Under the Amazing One's Wing
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,546
|
Creativity and Consciousness
We've been through this before. It's been implied that no machine could have the fine arts magic bean, therefore no machine could be conscious, but the unfortunate implication is that someone who can't create like a Dali or a Mozart is not conscious.
When someone says that the music I write comes "from God" it pisses me off, because I'm quite conscious of how hard I work to create music. Here's how I do it: 1) Pick an emotion to express. 2) Recall existing pieces of music that evoke that feeling and solve for their underlying patterns responsible for that evocation. 3) Pick a series of notes and chords. Parts that sound good, keep and embellish. Parts that don't, forget. 4) If a part reminds me of existing music, change it. 5) Package it in familiar musical sequences of repeats and beginning, middle, and end. 6) Perform for friends, record, write down, or enter into a sequencer. Notice that step #3 is exactly the process of the evolution of life: keep and embellish on what works, discard what doesn't. No god or magic bean required. Because I can be quite conscious of my process, I can break it down into steps on a path towards demystifying and replicating it in machines that some say only use meaningless numbers, though my brain does it with meaningless action potentials. FWIW the process is quite similar to computer programming, and both result in concocting of a sequence of events that play out in time. |
8th June 2012, 02:08 PM | #567 |
Muse
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 693
|
I want to make a point here about the exposition above. Leaving completely aside for the moment whether neurons can effect each other through an em field, which is what the first paragraph above is about, the second paragraph has a definite bias in it.
EM fields are real things. They are real just like neurons, axons and dendrites are. The EM field concept is one of the cornerstones of scientific exploration. There is no cop out involved in analyzing the possible consequences of the EM field inside a brain (beyond just the connectionist paradigm). This is a legitimate scientific question. It seems pretty evident as well that if there is a place for the EM field to affect neurons and be affected by neurons, then the computational complexity just went up a notch. There seems to be some controversy about the spelling of this, neuron versus neurone, neural versus neuronal, for me, neuron just sounds better so that is what I will use. If you do not like that then just add it in mentally when you see it (add an 'e' or 'on' here or there as appropriate). |
__________________
I learned much from the Order of the Jesuits. Until now, there has never been anything more grandiose, on the earth, than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic church. I transferred much of this organization into my own party. — Hitler, 1933 |
|
8th June 2012, 02:12 PM | #568 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,800
|
I am sorry that "no" is difficult to understand. If you're having trouble finding information on a particular topic, I'd be happy to point you in the right direction, but engaging directly - no.
If you'd like a hint for where to go first, several people have recently pointed out that we are routinely exposed to EM frequencies which, if neurons actually did act as antennas, should leave us all in grand mal seizures. Yet we aren't. Why do you suppose that is? So what you're saying is, you never bothered to investigate the term I gave you, believing it to be just an alternate spelling. If you can't be arsed to read a wikipedia link, you can hardly demand others care about your ideas in return. |
8th June 2012, 03:48 PM | #569 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: central Illinois
Posts: 39,700
|
That is silly as you would know if you read my prior post, the means of neuron activation is chemical on a very very very low voltage. The transmission is chemical through neurotransmitters.
That is the science, it is not electron flowing through a wire. there is nothing like an antenna in the neuron, so while it is great speculation, it is just that speculation. Just because your car's spark wire make an appreciable EM filed does not mean they have anything to do with synchronizing the pulses through antenna. If you want to know the actual science say so, there are a trillion neurons and they have on average 2,000 contacts with other neurons. So why does an MRI or a strong electrical field not give someone seizures? |
__________________
I suspect you are a sandwich, metaphorically speaking. -Donn And a shot rang out. Now Space is doing time... -Ben Burch You built the toilet - don't complain when people crap in it. _Kid Eager Never underestimate the power of the Random Number God. More of evolutionary history is His doing than people think. - Dinwar |
|
8th June 2012, 05:30 PM | #570 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 16,041
|
|
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together." Isaac Asimov |
|
8th June 2012, 05:51 PM | #571 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 20,121
|
The age of experience may be a thing of the past.
Imagine our ancestors killing a giant ground sloth, as they did where I live... We don't even have a decent video game of that experience. |
8th June 2012, 09:32 PM | #572 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,946
|
Well just look at the images -- all the masks are pretty much similar.
Contrast that with our avatars. I have a flaming nazi zombie monster ( I don't care for nazis, this is just my favorite AI I have worked on ). Beelzebuddy has a dancing chicken. Mr. Scott has a kid with blue hair holding some magical light, I presume a still from some studio Ghibli movie. I can't even tell what your's is, and !Kaggen has a freaking winged albino eating a heart. If that isn't creative diversity, I don't know what is. I don't mean experience in the commonly used sense, I mean "any remembered information that one can draw from". If you told me to come up with 10 masks, I would be able to get quite a bit of inspiration from the images and movies I can find on the internet. I know this because I have spent days scouring the internet for inspiration every time I design a level, a character, or any system really, for any of the games I work on. So does any savvy creative professional these days. I don't just sit in front of a blank piece of paper and wait for something to come to me. However tribal artists don't really have a choice -- their inspiration can come only from the things they have seen with their own eyes. They don't even have photographs to help them. |
8th June 2012, 09:39 PM | #573 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,946
|
|
9th June 2012, 02:27 AM | #574 |
Muse
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 693
|
Sorry I am not addressing all of your post. I am not sure why an MRI does not give one a seizure, but I have read that strong EM fields will cause hallucinations. There is a professor who has a helmet (think it is called the god helmet or something) that when you put it on it makes you experience spooky feelings or even the sense of a presence as reported by some.
Now, to be completely fair, various em fields should probably have an effect in the current consensus model (as I take it you are advancing), in my pet theory and in McFadden's CEMI. I say this question should be looked more into if this is a point of contention. As for how em fields can effect things on a macroscale, read McFadden's paper. See if you find his reasoning persuasive or not. If you can not find it let me know. |
__________________
I learned much from the Order of the Jesuits. Until now, there has never been anything more grandiose, on the earth, than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic church. I transferred much of this organization into my own party. — Hitler, 1933 |
|
9th June 2012, 02:37 AM | #575 |
Muse
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 693
|
In answer to the last question, I do not find the logic given thus far persuasive about the grand mal seizure idea. As far as the first paragraph goes, it is not really worthy of response.
Nope, I did do a Google search of "neuronal network" as soon as I read about this but it just kept coming up with "neural network". After the third page I gave up looking. Try for yourself or let me know where I should be looking that I have not been. Everyone, try it for yourself if you do not believe me. But, who knows, maybe I am missing something here??? Either way, on McFadden's page he used the word neurone where I would have just used neuron. Is this a 'color' versus 'colour' thing? Or by neuronal network are your specifically trying to refer to biological networks of neuron(e)s? |
__________________
I learned much from the Order of the Jesuits. Until now, there has never been anything more grandiose, on the earth, than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic church. I transferred much of this organization into my own party. — Hitler, 1933 |
|
9th June 2012, 05:41 AM | #576 |
Under the Amazing One's Wing
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,546
|
Are the EM fieldies arguing for just more information processing within the brain, or for brain-to-brain or brain-to-universe communication?
As far as I know, there's no evidence that neurons communicate with each other via EM fields -- only chemicals (neurotransmitters), nor that brains communicate with other brains directly, nor the universe at large. The electrical currents are extremely feeble, and the fields leaving the brain reach only a few millimeters past the edge of the scalp (carrying only murky thought information) before they vanish into the extra-cranial ocean of EM noise. *rocketdodger is correct, my avatar is the title character from Howl's Moving Castle, by Miyazaki / Ghibli, in a flashback to when the fire demon stole the boy Howl's heart. |
9th June 2012, 05:45 AM | #577 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,874
|
|
__________________
"Anyway, why is a finely-engineered machine of wire and silicon less likely to be conscious than two pounds of warm meat?" Pixy Misa "We live in a world of more and more information and less and less meaning" Jean Baudrillard http://bokashiworld.wordpress.com/ |
|
9th June 2012, 05:49 AM | #578 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,874
|
|
__________________
"Anyway, why is a finely-engineered machine of wire and silicon less likely to be conscious than two pounds of warm meat?" Pixy Misa "We live in a world of more and more information and less and less meaning" Jean Baudrillard http://bokashiworld.wordpress.com/ |
|
9th June 2012, 05:56 AM | #579 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: central Illinois
Posts: 39,700
|
I looked at McFadden's web page, they are wrong right off the bat neurons are not electric circuits.
So they are wrong. And the induced hallucination effect is at what magnetic strength? Do you understand the difference in the 1 tesla of TCM and what order of magnitude taht is different from the very small em field of the neuron? For example the earth's magnetic field "The intensity of the field is greatest near the poles and weaker near the Equator. It is generally reported in nanotesla (nT) or gauss (G), with 1 G = 100,000 nT. It ranges between approximately 25,000 and 65,000 nT (0.25–0.65 G).[10][11] By comparison, a strong refrigerator magnet has a field of about 100 G." Now what is the magnetic moment of neuron? This is silly tensordyne, you are woolgathering, there is absolutely no evidence that human neurons respond to the field strength of adjacent neurons. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders_...magnetic_field) "10−12 picotesla 0.1 - 1.0 pT 1 - 10 nG human brain magnetic field" So if TCM produces a response at one tesla, the brain field is 10^-12 times smaller. that is one trillion times smaller, 1/1,000,000,000,000 Now a conventional radio that uses transistor amplification can pick up very faint radio signals, however it is a lot larger than a neuron. |
__________________
I suspect you are a sandwich, metaphorically speaking. -Donn And a shot rang out. Now Space is doing time... -Ben Burch You built the toilet - don't complain when people crap in it. _Kid Eager Never underestimate the power of the Random Number God. More of evolutionary history is His doing than people think. - Dinwar |
|
9th June 2012, 06:40 AM | #580 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 16,041
|
A similar argument suggests that the old world monkeys are a more diverse group than, say, all the life that can be found in two clumps of soil, one from madagascar and another from the amazon.
But the soil's life is more diverse than the old world monkeys. Are our avatars more creative and diverse than african masks? I don't know, but I'm not an art critic, nor an artist. The differences in details of those masks, even though they look superficially alike from my perspective, may be huge. My avatar is my Brazilian Jiu Jitsu purple belt, by the way. |
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together." Isaac Asimov |
|
9th June 2012, 06:42 AM | #581 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 16,041
|
|
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together." Isaac Asimov |
|
9th June 2012, 07:50 AM | #582 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,874
|
|
__________________
"Anyway, why is a finely-engineered machine of wire and silicon less likely to be conscious than two pounds of warm meat?" Pixy Misa "We live in a world of more and more information and less and less meaning" Jean Baudrillard http://bokashiworld.wordpress.com/ |
|
9th June 2012, 08:17 AM | #583 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 16,041
|
|
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together." Isaac Asimov |
|
9th June 2012, 08:23 AM | #584 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,874
|
|
__________________
"Anyway, why is a finely-engineered machine of wire and silicon less likely to be conscious than two pounds of warm meat?" Pixy Misa "We live in a world of more and more information and less and less meaning" Jean Baudrillard http://bokashiworld.wordpress.com/ |
|
9th June 2012, 08:34 AM | #585 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 16,041
|
I'm actually talking about the predictions that we are able to make with physics. The fact, for instance, that Newtonian mechanics can be used to predict the next sighting of Halley's comet. Or that we can, with thermodynamics, rule out the possibility of perpetual motion machines, or that general relativity has withstood decades of experimental testing, or that QM has done the same.
These are not just descriptions of prior phenomena, they are descriptions of the world that make predictions about what we'll see in places that we haven't looked yet, and those predictions have turned out, time and again, to be incredibly accurate. You are saying that's a coincidence? If not, why do you think those predictions have turned out to be accurate? |
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together." Isaac Asimov |
|
9th June 2012, 08:43 AM | #586 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,211
|
|
9th June 2012, 09:01 AM | #587 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,874
|
|
__________________
"Anyway, why is a finely-engineered machine of wire and silicon less likely to be conscious than two pounds of warm meat?" Pixy Misa "We live in a world of more and more information and less and less meaning" Jean Baudrillard http://bokashiworld.wordpress.com/ |
|
9th June 2012, 09:38 AM | #588 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,946
|
The difference is irrelevant if the subject can't perceive it.
Of course there will always be a small group of hardcore ... um, whatever you claim to be ... that refuses to partake. But the other 99% of the population ( that can afford it ) will be more than happy to have amazing experiences inside a virtual world. |
9th June 2012, 09:42 AM | #589 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,800
|
|
9th June 2012, 01:28 PM | #590 |
Under the Amazing One's Wing
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,546
|
Calcifer is conscious. I'm buying into Dennett's argument that the concept of a Philosopher's Zombie is incoherent and if a being acts conscious it is conscious.
Is anyone arguing that it is impossible for humans to create a conscious machine with any type of material or technology? |
9th June 2012, 01:50 PM | #591 |
Under the Amazing One's Wing
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,546
|
I "felt the future" that a magic beaner would try to get some mileage from that.
You are in a delusional dream if you think I don't see a difference between Pixar and Ghibli. Reminds me of a lecture I attended about computer typesetting, by Donald Knuth. He turned the alphabet into numeric formula so a computer could typeset with adjustable features, like serif size, stroke width, etc. It was found that when a font developed with computer aid was perfectly consistent, it was cold and lifeless. However, if the parameters were varied slightly and automatically from letter to letter, the text came to life and was warm and organic like old inky lead text. This randomness was done by the computer with no human intervention. It's easy to program randomness and not that difficult to program aspects of human taste into computers. Pixar films are full of heart, and have made billions of dollars more than Ghibli's films, but the issue has little bearing on the nature of consciousness. Machines have aided animation since its earliest days. |
9th June 2012, 05:13 PM | #593 |
Muse
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 693
|
|
__________________
I learned much from the Order of the Jesuits. Until now, there has never been anything more grandiose, on the earth, than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic church. I transferred much of this organization into my own party. — Hitler, 1933 |
|
9th June 2012, 05:20 PM | #594 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 16,041
|
|
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together." Isaac Asimov |
|
9th June 2012, 05:37 PM | #595 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,864
|
That was pretty much how I felt, reading it. Hard to know where to start. I felt the same way about the analysis of the 'three main materialistic forms of basis for consciousness' (attributed broadly, and barely recognisably, to Dennet, Searle, & Chalmers).
Originally Posted by tensordyne
Also, the idea that neurons are antennae can significantly influence each other via their EMF just doesn't stack up for reasons already mentioned; if the membrane that depolarizes to cause the weak EMF was sensitive enough to be significantly affected by it, neither neurons nor brains could function - and as far as I know there's no evidence to suggest it may be, nor any requirement for it to be. It's a moribund equine, let it lie. |
__________________
Simple probability tells us that we should expect coincidences, and simple psychology tells us that we'll remember the ones we notice... |
|
9th June 2012, 08:32 PM | #596 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 20,121
|
Well,
You've got your techno, and you've got Motown. Its pointless evoking 'soul' here. Such an ephemeral quality. Today, I can decipher a human from a recorded human on the phone, and I can tell a drum machine from a drummer. This gap could close, yet, I suspect, humans will rise to that challenge, and be able to know an artificial consciousness from the flesh and blood variety. I would think it would become something of an obsession, this motivation to decipher the real from the less-real. Bruce Willis knows. Yet, Ahnold was actually a compassionate machine in the Terminator flicks. Nice guy, even. Buff. Governor of California, in a different movie. Its quite confusing, but I, frankly, don't welcome our 'indistinguishable from human' machine consciousness. I'm vaguely aware of the curmudgeoness of liking the soul of the carbon-based life forms. Luddite, and all. (Get off my lawn, and take your robot with you, etc.) I have a different vision of the future; perhaps hopelessly out-dated and irrelevant. We are biological. And funky. I dig the funk. I hate the beeping noises. |
10th June 2012, 01:48 AM | #597 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,211
|
|
10th June 2012, 04:57 AM | #598 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,211
|
Can you not see how calcifur, the fire demon I used as my example, is in no way any more conscious than the traits we consciously give him (program him). He follows his audio script (consciously created from the scriptwriters consciousness) He follows programming for his visible form and movements (consciously created by the programmers input) He's not conscious himself. He is constructed out of only attributes conscious people choose, to give him those attributes. Everything he does is linked to our conscious input, and, as any computer will, they will manifest this in a form that *may seem* conscious, but is still bound to do nothing more than the consciousness based programmer. |
10th June 2012, 05:29 AM | #599 | |||
Under the Amazing One's Wing
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,546
|
Don't be silly.
My first response was to be that Calcifer was pretend, so no, but I made the leap to what I thought was being asked, "If Calcifer were real, would he be conscious?" The answer is yes, as would the other main characters in the movie. Sure, if we made a conscious machine, one could argue that it was made by conscious humans (e.g the Chinese Room), so I sense one may imply that only consciousness can beget consciousness. All available evidence indicates consciousness formed on an unconscious planet via unconscious processes in an unconscious universe. Get used to it. Dennett sez:
|
|||
10th June 2012, 05:37 AM | #600 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,211
|
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|