|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
8th December 2009, 05:42 AM | #401 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 458
|
For those looking in, there were 3 critical aspects to this case which resulted in the conviction of Megrahi. The other threads on this forum cover these aspects, but to summarize:
1. An unaccompanied bomb bag came from Malta as illustrated by Frankfurt airport worker Mrs Erac's printout. [http://www.internationalskeptics.com...d.php?t=155657] 2. The fragment of timer discovered around the Scottish border pointed the finger towards Libya and thus Megrahi. [http://www.internationalskeptics.com...d.php?t=153971] 3. The shop owner's recollection of the sale of clothes used in concealing the bomb and the purchaser 'resembled' Megrahi. [http://www.internationalskeptics.com...d.php?t=158909] And, as the saying goes, that's all folks. No evidence that Megrahi ever bought this timer. No evidence of Megrahi with the semtex used in making the bomb, and despite over 10 years of investigating, no evidence whatsoever of how Megrahi actually placed the suitcase on the Air Malta flight which then wound it's way around 3 airport security systems and onto 103 at Heathrow. This accusation and evidence presented was so weak that his accomplice in Malta, and co-accused at Zeist, was immediately acquitted of all charges. 1. As the other thread on this forum demonstrates, the were some odd circumstances surrounding the production of Mrs Erac's printout from Frankfurt Airport, when consideration is given to the aspect that no other records from Frankfurt were recovered - or at least disclosed. Mrs Erac's story of how this came to be the only document purporting to show an unaccompanied bag from a baggage station collecting Air Malta luggage - and according to prosecutors, the bomb bag - and then finding it's way onto the PanAm feeder flight have been challenged in some respects. We know initial reports in Germany wrongly stated it was a flight from Frankfurt that had crashed over Lockerbie, which you would therefore expect, naturally, law and security officials to spring into action. Aside from the inaccurate first reports of the crash originating in Germany, Frankfurt was also on high alert for an attempt of sabotage on a aircraft from other investigations in the weeks proceeding 21st Dec 1988. So why was Mrs Erac's record the only document recovered from an airport prepared for a possible airline attack, and why wasn't the bag noticed by airport baggage examiners warned beforehand to look out for bombs contained in Toshiba radios? 2. The timer fragment, it's discovery, it's identification and the chain of records pertaining to it, are also subject to some dispute. As a result, the integrity of the timer fragment itself is questioned, together with the knowledge that the three main 'expert' and 'scientific' protagonists in discovering and identifying the 'fragment' have all been, subsequent to the Lockerbie investigation, discredited in other unrelated work associated with forensic evidence brought to court. Despite repeated denials over the years, and claims that this vital piece of evidence did not leave the UK mainland due to it's critical importance, it has recently been confirmed that this fragment had indeed been examined by various people in various countries outside the UK. 3. The clothes that were contained around the bomb that brought down 103, were recovered and identified as being from a small shop in Sliema, Malta. The shop owner provided many statements to the investigators, including many differing descriptions of the buyer, and some additional information including Christmas lights in the town and weather on the day the purchase was made. However, the shop owner Tony Gauci was recollecting a purchase nine months earlier, so perhaps vague and inconsistent recollections are inevitable. However, despite all these discrepancies, his testimony was accepted by the court and indeed became the main foundation for the bomb originating in Malta and constructed by Megrahi. In 2007 the SCCRC concluded that in it's finding that Megrahi case should be sent to appeal, it had also uncovered evidence that the Maltese shopkeeper had received substantial 'compensation' for his testimony at Zeist further undermining this aspect to the case and investigation. There are a plethora of other areas which could be decreed as having some significance to the Lockerbie bombing including : CIA, drugs, arms dealers, double-agents, triple agents, Lebanon hostages, South African Apartheid, UN officials, MI6, undisclosed evidence, warnings, tampering of evidence, Bollier and the Swiss timer, duped drugs mule, Iran revenge, paid witnesses and freed terrorists. However, the main critical areas as detailed above, should be of primary concern to everyone, as that was the basis for forming the indictment, and ultimately, the conviction of Megrahi who was incarcerated for 9 years before being released on compassionate grounds. |
12th December 2009, 07:22 PM | #402 |
Scholar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 59
|
Removed
|
15th December 2009, 02:43 PM | #403 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,494
|
Slow times on these threads. I did a new post on my blog about the Vincennes/IA655 incident, trying to understand if the Iranians really had reason to get angry and seek revenge of the 103 type. It gets clearer the more I look.
http://12-7-9-11.blogspot.com/2009/1...-iran-war.html |
16th December 2009, 02:36 AM | #404 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,494
|
On the above, everyone gets the significance, right? It's widely believed by those not overly-enchanted by the bread crumb trail leading to Libya, that PA103 was Iranian revenge, exacted pretty exactly, for this highly troubling U.S. shoot-down. This is the event "inextricably linked' with Lockerbie, according to the petition circulated in the Scottish Parliament by MSP Grahame. Looking closer, it's little wonder Washington didn't want the two connected in any way. Something had to come between them, because time, original evidence, motive, means, and opportunity all were pushing them together.
The more you know: The Vincennes was designed, tested, and usually used for surface-to-air missions. In July 1988 it was sent for surface-to-surface missions, and only worked its forte in its mistaken actions. Huh. The function the accident wound up serving was contributing to Iran's growing sense that it could no longer afford the war now that Americans were shooting at them and might just continue. The incident packed a lot of pain into one bad decision, and would two really be that unlikely? Interestignly, I'd suspect the event had an effect on the public unlike much of what they'd already been going through for years. A new (rather more direct) and vastly more powerful enemy, and Fear of heights... Just think again what you're so mad at Megrahi for, recall these people didn't die until hitting the surface. This is almost the definition of terrorism to show that your government's policies might get YOU killed in horrifying ways. X and X has to stop, or the planes might keep falling. That's the message of terrorism. It's also the message of this accidental outcome of a reckless and otherwise unjustifiable deployment. I know it's harsh to even suggest, but the Iranians are harsh people and they probably saw it just this way. It worked, they cancelled the war rather than risk whatever was in store from outside and/or from below (revolution, etc.). And then some mirror-image atrocity against Americans happened right after that. And we wind up blaming Libya, with the Iranians apparently just giving up after the Autumn Leaves thing. Who can explain this curious cluster of coinkydinks? Does it warrant its own thread? Maybe later. |
16th December 2009, 01:42 PM | #405 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
Sorry I've been a bit quiet - I've got about a gadzillion Christmas cards and presents still to send.
I don't see any real evidence that the downing of the Airbus was anything more than a negligent accident. And I work beside someone who was right there, serving on the HMS York, at the time. He says that originally the Vincennes tried to blame the York for the loss of the airbus, but the York didn't even have the necessary missiles. They were convinced that they'd shot down a fighter plane, and the airbus was nothing to do with them. However, after about 15 minutes, the penny dropped. Then the Vincennes and another US warship that was in the area steamed away and left the crew of the York to fish the bodies and the bits of bodies out of the Persian Gulf. The rest of the tale would probably be Too Much Information. They were matching up legs by pairing the shoes at one point. I am led to believe, however, that revenge for the loss of the Airbus would be seen as a holy duty by the Iranian government, accident or not. There is a complicated theory (Tam Dalyell?) that suggests the revenge should have involved the downing of a number of US passenger jets, and some clandestine deal was done to limit the revenge to just the one, with PA103 being the sacrificial lamb. Not sure I believe that, but it has been alleged. I was thinking, if I get the cards posted and so on by the weekend, and it doesn't snow, I might drive down to Lockerbie after work on Monday and put a bunch of flowers on the memorial or something. If I can't make it on Monday, I'll go in the springtime. 12th May might be appropriate.... Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
16th December 2009, 03:15 PM | #406 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,494
|
Hey, thanks for taking a minute. I know evryone's gor seasonal stuff going on, even me, just not as much ATM. Actually, wait... oh, this has to be quick.
Quote:
Abdulhasan Bani Sadr President of Iran 1979-1981 30:10 On the shoot-down of IA655 “It was a crime. To the Iranians it was a crime. … The people of Iran have never forgotten. Had it involved any other country, there would have been legal proceedings. A lot of fuss would have been made around the world. But here they destroyed the aircraft and then congratulated themselves." 34:00 On the bombing of Pan Am 103 “Dalhomani spent most of the time in Tehran. He is also an officer in the Syrian Secret Service. Iran ordered the attack and Ahmed Jibril carried it out. With collaboration from the diplomatic missions." So to the IA655 CT, I won't go further. On the PA103 CT, we needn't go further than acknowledge Iran's perception of the accident was enough to warrant ambitions of in-kind revenge. Just wanted to linger on the issue a moment, to feel why maybe others have NOT wanted to linger on it, as tying it to PA103 would cause.
Quote:
|
20th December 2009, 07:09 AM | #407 |
Chief Punkah Wallah
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 9,811
|
Incidentally, I see that Megrahi's condition continues to deteriorate.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/8423117.stm |
__________________
When the men elected to make laws are but a small part of a foreign parliament, that is when all healthy national feeling dies. James Keir Hardie (1856 - 1915): Politician, Founder of Scottish Labour Party |
|
20th December 2009, 01:43 PM | #408 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
I saw that on the TV news tonight. It's inevitable, I fear.
I'm not going to get anywhere near Lockerbie tomorrow. I couldn't even get the car as far as the main road yesterday evening because of the snow. The snowploughs and gritters have been out and everything is passable again, but more snow is forecast and it's not weather for 60-mile trips that aren't necessary. I'll take some spring flowers instead. Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
21st December 2009, 04:52 AM | #409 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
This latest twist in the news makes no sense.
Lockerbie: Megrahi's cancer is spreading No I don't mean that the deterioration of his medical condition makes no sense, it's the later part of the article.
Quote:
First, where did this assertion that Megrahi was "a low-ranking airline worker" come from? His airline job was Head of Airline Security for Libyan Arab Airlines, hardly low-ranking in anybody's book. This is a simple fact, and was never disputed. What is often forgotten is that he had left that job before the Lockerbie bombing to take up a new job as Director of the Centre for Strategic Studies in Tripoli. He wasn't working in the airline industry at all at the crucial time. But again, it's not disputed. That was his job at the time of the bombing. So, not low-ranking, and not even an airline worker. So far as I am aware, the Libyan government has never made any "assertion that Megrahi was simply a low-ranking airline worker". It would be a pretty silly thing to assert. I suspect a particularly egregious example of the straw man fallacy here. (Invent a silly claim, then point out that it's patent nonsense. Nice.) He was also probably an intelligence officer. In that respect the Defence strategy (as for most of the case) was to make the Crown prove its assertions rather than either admitting anything or providing explanations. I don't think the Crown ever proved he was a JSO officer after he changed jobs, but I suspect he probably was. So it's highly probable that he was an international co-ordinator of something for Libya. However, the presence of money in a bank account is not by itself a "financial web that linked Libya and Megrahi to international terrorism". There is still a total absence of evidence to show that Megrahi in person was ever involved in any terrorism, ever handled explosives, ever constructed a bomb. Or that he coupld possibly have got an unaccompanied suitcase on board KM180. So what about the money? Well, this part of the Herald report seems to be little more than a re-posting of the Sunday Times article that Robert Black criticised in his blog yesterday. The money was known about at the time of the court case, and the Defence was prepared to argue "innocent" (or rather, non-Lockerbie-connected) explanations for its being there. The question of that money (if it's still there) wasn't raised by the Crown during the bail hearing. And so on. Since about 1990 the Sunday Times has been pushing the line that Libya was behind the Lockerbie disaster (a volte-face from their earlier series of articles tracing the atrocity to the PFLP-GC and Ahmed Jibril, apparently led by David Leppard's inexplicable conversion to the Libya theory). Look what the Journalists blog has to say about the writer responsible for the present allegations. Whatever the motivation, it's clear that article is riddled with factual inaccuracies and is as biassed as hell. It's sad to see the Herald repeat it so mindlessly. But given the Herald's readership base, I suspect tomorrow's letters page (recently expanded) will prove an interesting read. Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
21st December 2009, 06:46 AM | #410 |
Nitpicking dilettante
Administrator Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Berkshire, mostly
Posts: 57,668
|
Quote:
|
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.Bertrand Russell Zooterkin is correct Darat Nerd! Hokulele Join the JREF Folders ! Team 13232 Ezekiel 23:20 |
|
21st December 2009, 07:36 AM | #411 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
You'd think so, wouldn't you.
However, this is part and parcel of the defence at the trial, which was to make the prosecution prove their case and not to provide their own narrative. It seems fairly likely that Megrahi was engaged on something not entirely above-board in December 1988, probably sanctions-busting for the Gadaffi regime. It was fairly clear that the Libyan authorities had no intention of revealing what he was actually doing in Luqa airport that morning. And the Libyan authorities had control of the defence, just as the CIA had control of the prosecition. Preparing a set of obfuscatory smoke-screens would be about par for the course. Revealing what Megrahi was actually up to, not so much. Note also the "sources close to the Libyan's defence team" citation. Nice piece of deniability, or even complete rubbish. Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
21st December 2009, 01:53 PM | #412 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,494
|
Mr. MacAskill cited those sources when others could also have told him there are actually different reasons to have a million or more in a bank account. I've heard Megrahi's job for Libya described as "sanctions buster." But this was after the bombing. It seems to be from here, a 2002 article I'll have to sign up for later:
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P2-9989557.html
Quote:
Did we catch Megrahi's personal response to this issue? It may be his last response to anything. He didn't even bother responding to the "Megrahi's gone missing!" stores a couple days ago. Twenty-one Years ago today. I'll go have me a moment of silence now. Another will be due July 3. |
21st December 2009, 02:43 PM | #413 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
I'm afraid I was digging my car into my driveway at 7.03pm this evening, aided by a couple of neighbours. So the actual moment passed. (I can't see the logic in taking a small snowplough along the pavement, leaving two lines of piled snow across everybody's driveway, but that's what some genius did.)
But today's the day Scotland remembers. I was woken to Pamela Dix speaking on the radio, bemoaning the limbo of not knowing what or who happened to her brother. We won't forget. I'm just astounded by the ignorance, and frankly the disinfo of the "low-ranking airline worker" assertion. It's good that Megrahi is still well enough to make a response regarding the rest of the allegations at least. Did you see that Father Keegans was blocked from addressing the 21st anniversary service in Arlington earlier, because they don't want anyone to point out that Megrahi was probably innocent. The Herald published part of the speech he was going to give. Oh, and Caustic Logic, I've finally figured out what you were on about regarding Frank Duggan. Very very weird. This makes me even more suspicious that the US relatives were essentially bought off. If you got a lot of money from Pan Am because they were allegedly negligent in letting baggage tray 8849 on board PA103A with a bomb on it, and Ł10 million (no less) from Gadaffi because Megrahi allegedly put the bomb in that case, are you really going to want to hear that it almost certainly didn't happen like that? So what better than an "official spokesman" with no personal interest, whose job is simply to fob off all challenges. I find "Charles" on the Robert Black blog strangely interesting, although he's looking at the rabbit hole I'm reluctant to venture down. Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
21st December 2009, 05:45 PM | #414 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 458
|
It's so sad and such a shame that amid the sorrow and frustration that must be shared by so many family and friends with each passing anniversary, this time for reflection is soured by spurious media reports and the vitriolic words from the likes of Duggan.
He certainly does not represent all the US families, and quite why his arrogant nonsensical caterwauling is a permanent feature in the media, far less why he is allowed to determine who speaks and who does not at the Arlington memorial, is deeply saddening. I take CL's point, but as I say, AFAIK he certainly does not represent all (perhaps not even a majority) of the US families, although he certainly has the boot spurs and the bombastic characteristics to appear credible and reasoned to some. |
21st December 2009, 06:12 PM | #415 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 458
|
The Vincennes incident has always left me somewhat uneasy with it's background, the actual incident itself and the conclusions. This whole period of the 1980's was a quagmire for US foreign policy. Supporting Saddam while arming the Iranians against the Russians, could only be one very precarious hot potato to juggle with. I do believe that the moment the missile struck IA655 over the Persian Gulf and the US govt were seen to ignore the transgressions of it's naval officers involved while exhibiting a crushing apathy towards those non-americans killed, the fate of 270 further innocent people's lives were sealed. The dead though are dead, and the murdered remain murdered whether it is by a home-made IED or a multi-million pound production of the corporate arms industry. The dead of one act cannot be called collateral damage while the victims of another are the victims of cowardly murderers.
In this great era of Thatcher-Blairite/Reagan-Bush brutal modernisation the past must be swept aside and we all must whistle a happy tune and move on. A path is dictated, a future is mapped, and without recourse to genuine cerebral activity the happy band must waltz along the directed route with cheery grins and apple cheeks. Those who fail to find their dance shoes, or dare question our methods, are nothing less than Fedayeen deadenders waving a blunt sword over the outstretched neck of your government and fellow countrymen. Sorry, I'm rambling away here, thinking aloud. As you say, this could be another time, another thread. |
22nd December 2009, 03:19 AM | #416 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,494
|
Zooterkin, Architect, thanks for commenting. It's always heartening to see someone else decide this issue is worth talking about, at least a little. To the lurkers, ditto but replace talking with reading.
The roads have to be cleared. Most of its length the (side-berms?) are a no-brainer deal for passability. At driveways or even side-street entrances plowed over, those just have to be managed locally by the people passing them. This stuff just seems elemental to me after the winter we had last year (94 inches total, a record). Count yourself lucky you got your car in, says I.
Quote:
Quote:
On the American side especially though there is that confirmation bias, as you explained. I sense that for sure. "It just has to be so." Political appointment and/or money seem to be sufficient to amplify the original encoded false signal. I wouldn't be surprised at all if a few genuine victims were also subsidized to speak a little too surely of the justness of the official case. If pressed though, I hope they'd behave differently than Mr. Duggan.
Quote:
Buncrana: excellent posts, thanks for helping shake off the slumber momentarily. I appreciate fully your queasiness re: The Vincennes and IA655. Now that I've learned a bit it's too fascinatingly horrible to put down. We do all know the attacked ships Capt. Rogers was going to help were fake signals in a US sting operation to lure out iranians to shoot at right? I said I'd go no further though. But to summarize, Rolfe says it was probably a "negligent accident," and I guess I'll agree, with the note that "negligent" is a big word. And there is a point where the negligence gets too much to accept as real rather than a cover. I can't say at this point is this case is over that line, or just too darn near it for comfort. Everyone agrees the Iranians paid out $10 million for revenge. Just some feel they never collected on that, in the over two decades since. But Megrahi had 1.8 million in an account, which proves... something. |
23rd December 2009, 01:54 AM | #417 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,494
|
Aaah! I always wind up with the last word before another lull. Ah well.
On keeping politics out of the memorial service. recall Mr. Duggan de-listed Friar Keegans' speech because his comments (supporting al Megrahi's innocence) had no place in "a day to remember 270 innocent souls murdered in an act of state sponsored terrorism. It is not a day for politics, a discussion of the bomber's trial and conviction or of his health." I noted above that I agree the solemn remembrance part should be politics free, but it would go beyond that into tacit or more direct embrace of the OFFICIAL politics. So let's check - President Obama sent John O Brennan, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism. And he said:
Quote:
You know, I really want to ask these "hero's welcome" bemoaners two questions 1) How should Libyans have responded to the return of a convicted murderer of 270 they generally feel is innocent and wrongly convicted? Boos and hisses and a mob dismemberment? Hang their heads in solemn recognition of America's official delusions? 2) Do you really feel, as you people imply so often, the cheers were FOR the murder of the Lockerbie victims? Why so vague, just complaining about the "spectacle" rather than what you think it actually means? Anyone here who feels they can field that question, I'm all ears. |
23rd December 2009, 06:06 AM | #418 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 458
|
Huh...according to the bold Frank '103 inc' Duggan, it is only the "deniers" and "cranks", as are Robert Black and Jim Swire, who will not and cannot accept the "overwhelming evidence" of guilt on the part of Megrahi. Evidence of which Mr Duggan "doesn't know how to explain it".
Well, quite. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWWg5xivFkI |
23rd December 2009, 10:56 AM | #419 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
He's a paid shill.
Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
23rd December 2009, 04:06 PM | #420 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 458
|
Jim Swire, with some of the other 103's victims relatives, have apparently secured the help and advice of renowned and formidable solicitor Gareth Pierce.
This could be the last and yet the most significant and promising step taken by Dr Swire in his quest to discover, at least some, of the truth behind his daughters awful death. Ms Pierce is someone whom any State, legal system, it's judges and lawyers, will be extremely concerned at her involvement. Ms Pierce's lengthy experience (esp. within the British judicial system) and tenacious persistence will be an invaluable addition to Dr Swire's search. Not to mention, she also has intimate knowledge of some of those involved at the Camp Zeist. The names Feraday and Hayes, not to mention the involvement of RARDE itself, have been center stage in some of the other miscarriages of justice she has exposed. http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/h...uiry-1.993737? |
23rd December 2009, 04:47 PM | #421 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
She's not up to speed yet. She's declaring that the evidence the MST-13 was planted is strong, but as we've seen it's not as easy to knock over as all that. She even seems to be giving some credence to Bollier's substitution claims, but again I think the evidence says that's bunk.
A lot of what she's alleging is just hearsay, or standard "pet theories" regurgitated. She doesn't even seem to have decided which pet theory she espouses. I hope she'll come to a clearer undertanding when she's had a chance to look at the evidence in detail. The annoying thing is, it's really quite easy to come to the conclusion that Megrahi didn't buy the clothes from Gauci and didn't put the bomb on the plane. If that's the sum total of what is required to be proved then it's not exactly challenging. It's figuring out any sort of coherent narrative about what did happen that's the tricky bit. I'm afraid she may join so many others in throwing around obfuscating doubt rather than illuminating the issue. I hope I'm wrong though. Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
29th December 2009, 05:29 PM | #422 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,494
|
'm ashamed to say I had gotten Pierce and Grahame confused a little. I agree Pierce needs to not flail around so much, but Grahame for her part is A-okay. Her sideline with the movements of PT/35(b) didn't pan out so great (as we predicted), but I re-read here article "Megrahi is home. And he is innocent" and I decided she's in the right space all told and will do about as well as anyone up against the same behemoth.
Quote:
Thought I'd share two other interesting quoteable conservative politicians: Margaret Thatcher: “December 21 - Lockerbie bombing.” (not 21 December? Hmmm) - The entire reference to the event in Thatcher’s 914-page memoir The Downing Street Years (1995). "We wish to add nothing to the text" - Her response when asked, by a British PA103 relatives' group, about the book’s silence. http://lockerbiecase.blogspot.com/20...lockerbie.html One I didn't expect - David Frum, American political commnentor, neoconservative, speechwriter for Bush II. IIRC, it was Frum who was (at least half) responsible for the phrase "Axis of Evil."
Quote:
|
29th December 2009, 06:12 PM | #423 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
As I said, Christine Grahame is my local MSP, and I know her slightly. I've had personal email correspondence with her researcher about this issue, and I'm fairly sure she and her team are pretty solid on the research front.
Gareth Pierce, for all her stellar reputation, is very much a Johnny-come-lately to the Lockerbie debate. She is an English lawyer for a start, so it's not really her jurisdiction. I think she's just been reading Paul Foot and similar commentary (possibly even de Braeckeleer), without going too deeply into it as yet. However, she is a smart cookie who has passionate sympathy for victims of the "system", so I hope she reads a bit more, that's all. Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
31st December 2009, 03:03 PM | #424 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,494
|
Hey cool, my first full re-post by Prof Black.
http://lockerbiecase.blogspot.com/20...nsibility.html |
4th January 2010, 05:53 PM | #425 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,494
|
Sorry, not quite a full re-post, but it got some attention after Black posted it, and kicked up a bit of info the skeptics might like. An admission of guilt, partial guilt, says a respected guy - Arnaud de Borchgrave, via Frank Duggan and Prof. Black. I wrote about the response here:
http://12-7-9-11.blogspot.com/2010/0...-of-guilt.html e-mail, in part, de Borchgrave to Duggan (solicited)
Quote:
2009:
Quote:
Quote:
|
4th January 2010, 06:13 PM | #426 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
Well, I've heard a number of alleged private confessions from various suspects in this affair. Jibril is alleged to have confessed. There are any number of people proffering individual pieces of evidence they happen to have, which point this way and that.
What makes this one different? Not a lot, it seems, judging from the discussion on Prof. Black's blog. Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
6th January 2010, 05:16 AM | #427 |
Chief Punkah Wallah
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 9,811
|
|
__________________
When the men elected to make laws are but a small part of a foreign parliament, that is when all healthy national feeling dies. James Keir Hardie (1856 - 1915): Politician, Founder of Scottish Labour Party |
|
6th January 2010, 05:59 AM | #428 |
Butterbeans and Breadcrumbs
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Emily's shop
Posts: 17,709
|
Brief summary is that the UN European consultant on explosives has done lots of tests blowing up combinations of radio, suitcase etc and in every case (20 explosions), none of the circuit board/timer etc survived the blast, it was just dust. More on newsnight tonight.
|
__________________
Sponsor me please! http://www.justgiving.com/Catherine-Kiernan http://www.justgiving.com/Catherine-Kiernan1 My blog |
|
6th January 2010, 04:19 PM | #429 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
This is actually a lot more relevant in the thread specifically about the timer fragment (which I will bump).
Newsnight piece has been postponed because the Labour Party tried to depose Gordon Brown today. Possibly Friday, now. Rolfe. ETA: I see I'm well behind, it's already up there. Sorry, I heard about this on the morning radio news, but I've been shovelling snow all bloody day. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
7th January 2010, 03:35 PM | #430 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
Gordon Brewer has just announced that one of the Newsnicht ("Newsnight Scotland") items at 11pm will be "Should Megrahi ever have been convicted?"
I wish we were allowed to discuss some aspects of this in Politics, but it's apparently verboten. Rolfe. ETA: Just watched it, and it seems to have been a repeat of the item already under discussion from yesterday - I think it was shown in England yesterday, hence the slight confusion. I return this discussion to the thread about the timer fragment, because that's what it was about, it didn't question the identification evidence or the Erac printout. ETA again: The version on the BBC web site is slightly longer than what I just watched on TV - it has more criticism of Thurman. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
7th January 2010, 04:58 PM | #431 |
Good of the Fods
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,675
|
So Newsnight have investigated evidence that the MST-13 fragment was planted. The results strongly suggest that it was, and certainly warrant further testing.
Neither the report from Dr Wyatt nor the results of tests carried out pretrial seem to be available. |
7th January 2010, 05:13 PM | #432 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
The BBC weren't saying the F-word. Just implying either that the fragment was some random thing that happened to resemble an MST-13 timer and just happened to be there (what??), or maybe that it was indeed a bit of an MST-13 timer, but again it just happened to be there and had nothing to do with the actual bomb. (What????!!)
Did they really come up the Clyde on a banana boat? Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
7th January 2010, 06:08 PM | #433 |
Anti-homeopathy illuminati member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 28,209
|
Explosions are seriously unpredictable. While glass fiber is something you would generaly expect to be reduced to dust there are plently of reports of oddities surviving explosions.
|
10th January 2010, 01:44 PM | #434 |
Butterbeans and Breadcrumbs
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Emily's shop
Posts: 17,709
|
Just noticed this in the Grauniad's listings:
Quote:
|
__________________
Sponsor me please! http://www.justgiving.com/Catherine-Kiernan http://www.justgiving.com/Catherine-Kiernan1 My blog |
|
10th January 2010, 04:02 PM | #435 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
Mmmmm. Could be worth a visit.
Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
11th January 2010, 04:00 PM | #436 |
Chief Punkah Wallah
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 9,811
|
Actually, that looks rather worthwhile. I'm not sure if I'm in the Glasgow office that day or not, and will have a look at my diary.
|
__________________
When the men elected to make laws are but a small part of a foreign parliament, that is when all healthy national feeling dies. James Keir Hardie (1856 - 1915): Politician, Founder of Scottish Labour Party |
|
11th January 2010, 04:03 PM | #437 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
I wish it wasn't right in the middle of the working day though. I don't think I can get away, looking at our rota.
Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
11th January 2010, 04:20 PM | #438 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mazes of Menace
Posts: 9,432
|
Too much to hope someone will televise it...
|
13th January 2010, 09:49 AM | #439 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 458
|
I decided to read "The Book of Honor, The Secret Lives and Deaths of CIA Operatives", by Ted Gup while I was away of the last few weeks.
It's an interesting read, although being honest his chapter on Matthew Gannon who was killed on 103 was my primary motive for reading it. This itself was instigated by a comment made by someone on Prof, Black blog a number of weeks ago called 'Baz'. I'm pretty sure in another comment from about a year ago, Baz asserted he was an ex-policeman. There was no indication whether this may have been US, UK, German or indeed another other nations LE agency. I'm assuming he was either Scottish or English, but that's merely a hunch, and I've no idea if he was originally involved in the original investigation or has simply become an interested party. He also has a blog, "The Masonic Verses - Lockerbie and other Related Scams" available to read here : http://e-zeecon.blogspot.com/ Some of which is interesting and certainly provides another viewpoint for many of the issues discussed here about the 103 disaster. However, he is fiercely adament about the 'drug theory' postulated by some as having a bearing on the way the crime was carried out as a 'hoax' and deliberate misdirection. Primarily that is, Allan Francovitch, Lester Coleman and John Ashton. Of course others claim it may have played a part, but he vehemently specifically focuses, unfairly imo, on those individuals. Some might suggest that even if the drugs theory played no part in the actual bombing, it may have been instrumental in how the investigation, and the evidence recovered, would be steered. However, I digress. He suggested, somewhat alarmingly for me anyway, a few weeks ago, that he did not belive that Matthew Gannon, part of a CIA team on the flight, had not been killed on 103. ....I've been interuppted here, and will come back to this later! |
13th January 2010, 06:04 PM | #440 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,494
|
I also do not believe he was not killed there. I just got in e-mail contact with Baz like yesterday. Why does weird timing haunt me here? Nevermind... His name is Barry Walker, former police on Hong Kong, no connection to the case. It's a later interest, mostly spurred by the Ian Spiro story which I only barely know about. He is British, or at least lives in the UK, unless the stuff in the e-mail was untrue.
Also he's been invited to discuss here, but has been using a public library to access the net, and this site comes up as blocked, occult. Funny. And since we're bumping the thread, I should hope the presentation with Dr. Swire et al gets posted online, but if not - well, mostly it's stuff we already know, probably. I would like to see it though. And I've started a long working essay on my blog - what's up is close to done and shows how proven liar Giaka largely built the case, first mentioning both accused. http://12-7-9-11.blogspot.com/2010/0...est-drive.html Also, annoying quotes from belligerent Americans http://12-7-9-11.blogspot.com/2010/0...cans-sigh.html |
Thread Tools | |
|
|