Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

 International Skeptics Forum New telepathy test, the sequel.

 Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
 Tags telepathy , telepathy test

 20th February 2017, 08:56 AM #601 abaddon Penultimate Amazing     Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 17,579 Originally Posted by Loss Leader This thread has somehow gotten even weirder. When Michel explained how he watches camgirls and kisses his computer screen, did you expect him to be reading Simone de Beauvoir on the side? Yeah, I kind of avoided that bit of the thread as much as possible. Too creepy for me. __________________ Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive? ...love and buttercakes...
 20th February 2017, 09:58 AM #602 The Sparrow Graduate Poster     Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Central Canada Posts: 1,388 Originally Posted by Michel H This is an impressive CV, Hokulele. Interesting also is the fact that the highlighted number you quoted (27) is equal to 27 = 33. Now, the correct answer of this test: is "real", the third (3rd) one in the list of options. No, whe wrote -27 That is, NEGATIVE 27. She also wrote 25 Both numbers have 2 in it, so therefore she must be subconciously receiving "2", which is incorrect. So, you lose.
 20th February 2017, 10:29 AM #603 Dave Rogers Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through a scribbled morning waving necessary ankles     Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Cair Paravel, according to XKCD Posts: 26,573 Originally Posted by The Sparrow No, whe wrote -27 That is, NEGATIVE 27. The cube root of which, of course, is -3, which means her choice would have to be "the" (the word three before the first choice in the test). Unless we're including zero, in which case it's "of". I don't think either of those is a hit. Then again, given Michel's repeated re-interpretation of negatives as positives, I can understand the mistake. Dave __________________ Me: So what you're saying is that, if the load carrying ability of the lower structure is reduced to the point where it can no longer support the load above it, it will collapse without a jolt, right? Tony Szamboti: That is right
 20th February 2017, 10:39 AM #604 abaddon Penultimate Amazing     Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 17,579 Originally Posted by The Sparrow No, whe wrote -27 That is, NEGATIVE 27. Which is NEGATIVE 3 cubed. Originally Posted by The Sparrow She also wrote 25 Nope. She didn't. I am not in any way endorsing the lunatic idea that everyone hears anyone else's...brain. The fact remains that -3x -3x -3 = -27. To that extent Michel H is correct. The attempt to purloin that into telepathy is at best dishonest. Michel H is reduced from his claim that all of us hear his thoughts clearly to the claim that somebody somewhere vaguely gets an impression of his thoughts, maybe, perhaps on planet X, to perhaps any numerical answer can be bodged into agreement is, IMHO, a tactical error. It matters not one whit what one might reply. If said reply contains in any way any form of numerical reference, then clearly, Michel H will warp it by any means possible into support for his obvious crankery about the very concept of telepathy. Do not forget that the claim at hand is that all of us hear his thoughts clear as a bell, yet somehow conspire to lie about it. All 7 billion of us. Somehow, in a vague test of no meaning, we reveal our true intent by answering in any way that contains a number of any sort. It is no different to Drosnin and his crackpot bible codes. At base, it is outright numerology nonsense. Originally Posted by The Sparrow Both numbers have 2 in it, so therefore she must be subconciously receiving "2", which is incorrect. So, you lose. Ah, this is how Michel bends any response as support for his useless contention. This is also why I am careful to put nothing in my replies anymore that can possibly be misconstrued as support in any way for Michel H's contentions. __________________ Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive? ...love and buttercakes...
 20th February 2017, 11:23 AM #606 abaddon Penultimate Amazing     Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 17,579 Originally Posted by fromdownunder I could post 42 as a response and Michel would not even understand the reference. (ETA Actually I think that I and several others have already done this in past tests) Norm Yup. And 42 is divisible by 3 and is therefore a hit in Michel H world. Can I explain that? Nope. Can Michel H explain that? Nope. Where does that leave us? __________________ Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive? ...love and buttercakes...
 20th February 2017, 12:27 PM #607 P.J. Denyer Illuminator   Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 3,718 Originally Posted by abaddon Ah, this is how Michel bends any response as support for his useless contention. This is also why I am careful to put nothing in my replies anymore that can possibly be misconstrued as support in any way for Michel H's contentions. Having had one of my own posts twisted in this way (which incidentally annoyed the hell out of me), I don't think there is a post that can be written that Michel H can't twist to support whichever answer he wants it to support. When you're not constrained by anything remotely approaching reality, no mental leap is too far.
 25th February 2017, 01:13 AM #608 Hokulele Deleterious Slab of Damnation     Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: The Biggest Little City in the World Posts: 29,558 Originally Posted by abaddon Nope. She didn't. Well, yeah. I did write 25 in the post Michel H twisted, while avoiding the issue of his sexism. I first stated I had 25+ years of experience, but of course, he ignored this miss and glommed on to the -27. The innumeracy must be a guy thing. __________________ "Oh god...What have you done, zooterkin? WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?!?!?!" - Cleon
 10th April 2017, 02:11 PM #609 Michel H Graduate Poster   Join Date: May 2012 Location: Belgium Posts: 1,274 A new telepathy test: which word did I write? I recently wrote and circled one of the seven words: "gas", "illegal", "bombs", "two", "sides", "same", and "coin" on my paper. I ask you to write it here (if you think you might know it). Thank you for participating.
 10th April 2017, 02:13 PM #610 Hokulele Deleterious Slab of Damnation     Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: The Biggest Little City in the World Posts: 29,558 No. __________________ "Oh god...What have you done, zooterkin? WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?!?!?!" - Cleon
 10th April 2017, 03:13 PM #611 fagin Philosopher     Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: As far away from casebro as possible. Posts: 5,805 No. __________________ There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda
 10th April 2017, 05:10 PM #612 Squeegee Beckenheim Penultimate Amazing     Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 19,403 Originally Posted by Michel H I recently wrote and circled one of the seven words: "gas", "illegal", "bombs", "two", "sides", "same", and "coin" on my paper. I ask you to write it here (if you think you might know it). Thank you for participating. Instead of this, why don't you try doing one of the better tests that have been suggested to you many times? __________________ I don't trust atoms. They make up everything.
 10th April 2017, 05:32 PM #613 Michel H Graduate Poster   Join Date: May 2012 Location: Belgium Posts: 1,274 Originally Posted by Squeegee Beckenheim Instead of this, why don't you try doing one of the better tests that have been suggested to you many times? Squeegee Beckenheim, I don't want to offend any one, but I really don't think that most of the criticism that was made about my tests on this forum was of great value. Psychological aspects are important here, and it is important to realize that most people who take part in these telepathy tests are not necessarily fully cooperative.
 10th April 2017, 06:09 PM #614 John Jones Penultimate Amazing     Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Iowa USA Posts: 12,131 Not no, but hell no. Not This Again! __________________ "Sufficiently advanced malice is indistinguishable from incompetence. = godless Dave
 10th April 2017, 06:23 PM #615 fromdownunder Philosopher   Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 5,785 Originally Posted by Michel H Psychological aspects are important here, and it is important to realize that most people who take part in these telepathy tests are not necessarily fully cooperative. We already know from many of your earlier tests that you think that people who give correct answers are "hearing" you, and that people who give incorrect answers are lying (according to you). Oh, third category - people who give ambiguous answers are either telling the truth or lying, depending on the answer they give based solely on your subjective interpretation of the answer. So, do you actually have a point? Norm __________________ Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in Vain
 10th April 2017, 07:43 PM #617 Matthew Ellard Graduate Poster   Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,768 Originally Posted by Michel H I really don't think that most of the criticism that was made about my tests on this forum was of great value. . Your "experiment" is worthless. A scientist would eliminate all variables. You have not sought psychiatric consultation to remove mental illness as a variable. Until you do this you are wasting everyone's time. Additionally you have made a conflicting hypothesis. Sometimes you claim you can make animals do things, other times you say you hear voices in your head telling you to kill people. That's not a testable hypothesis is it? Either do this scientifically or go waste people's time on the David Icke forum where science is not a concern.
 10th April 2017, 08:12 PM #618 Nay_Sayer I say nay!     Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Long Island Posts: 3,446 Originally Posted by Michel H I recently wrote and circled one of the seven words: "gas", "illegal", "bombs", "two", "sides", "same", and "coin" on my paper. I ask you to write it here (if you think you might know it). Thank you for participating. no __________________ I am 100% confident all psychics and mediums are frauds. ---------------------------------------------- Proud woo denier ---------------------------------------------- “That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” -Christopher Hitchens-
 11th April 2017, 01:47 AM #619 Squeegee Beckenheim Penultimate Amazing     Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 19,403 Originally Posted by Michel H Squeegee Beckenheim, I don't want to offend any one, but I really don't think that most of the criticism that was made about my tests on this forum was of great value. Perhaps, but you've been at this for years with no satisfying results. Why not give a different methodology a try? Quote: Psychological aspects are important here, and it is important to realize that most people who take part in these telepathy tests are not necessarily fully cooperative. Then you should definitely give one of the methods that ensures all participants are necessarily fully cooperative a go, rather than repeating the same flawed test over and over again. __________________ I don't trust atoms. They make up everything.
 11th April 2017, 02:30 AM #620 abaddon Penultimate Amazing     Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 17,579 Originally Posted by Michel H I recently wrote and circled one of the seven words: "gas", "illegal", "bombs", "two", "sides", "same", and "coin" on my paper. I ask you to write it here (if you think you might know it). Thank you for participating. No. __________________ Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive? ...love and buttercakes...
 11th April 2017, 02:46 AM #621 Kid Eager Philosopher     Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 6,410 Originally Posted by Squeegee Beckenheim Perhaps, but you've been at this for years with no satisfying results. Why not give a different methodology a try? Then you should definitely give one of the methods that ensures all participants are necessarily fully cooperative a go, rather than repeating the same flawed test over and over again. I think the answer would be obvious to all but one of the posters in this thread: any reasonable test would remove bias and show that Michel has no telepathy. He ran shrieking from the room the last time such a test was proposed. __________________ What do Narwhals, Magnets and Apollo 13 have in common? Think about it....
 11th April 2017, 03:08 AM #622 wea Critical Thinker     Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: EU Posts: 370 Originally Posted by Michel H nobody is forced to believe me
 11th April 2017, 04:08 AM #623 Donn Philosopher     Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: In my head. Posts: 7,758 No. __________________ "If I hadn't believed it with my own mind, I would never have seen it." - thanks sackett "If you stand on a piece of paper, you are indeed closer to the moon." - MRC_Hans "I was a believer. Until I saw it." - Magrat
 11th April 2017, 05:16 AM #624 Dave Rogers Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through a scribbled morning waving necessary ankles     Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Cair Paravel, according to XKCD Posts: 26,573 No. __________________ Me: So what you're saying is that, if the load carrying ability of the lower structure is reduced to the point where it can no longer support the load above it, it will collapse without a jolt, right? Tony Szamboti: That is right
 11th April 2017, 05:44 AM #625 Beelzebuddy Philosopher     Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 6,045 He should include "no" as one of the options next time, and claim all of the nopes here as evidence of future telepathy.
 11th April 2017, 06:28 AM #626 Donn Philosopher     Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: In my head. Posts: 7,758 Originally Posted by Beelzebuddy He should include "no" as one of the options next time, and claim all of the nopes here as evidence of future telepathy. Don't give the para parrot ideas. __________________ "If I hadn't believed it with my own mind, I would never have seen it." - thanks sackett "If you stand on a piece of paper, you are indeed closer to the moon." - MRC_Hans "I was a believer. Until I saw it." - Magrat
 11th April 2017, 08:30 AM #627 Michel H Graduate Poster   Join Date: May 2012 Location: Belgium Posts: 1,274 Originally Posted by Squeegee Beckenheim ... Then you should definitely give one of the methods that ensures all participants are necessarily fully cooperative a go, rather than repeating the same flawed test over and over again. This is why I introduced my simple credibility method: when people seem to be serious and reliable, then their answers seem to be more closely related to the correct one. I remind you that you should in principle reply one of the following seven words: Originally Posted by Michel H ... "gas", "illegal", "bombs", "two", "sides", "same", and "coin" ... in this test. Don't be afraid of trying, even if you are incorrect, your fellow skeptics won't be able to eat you, if you do . Those who are too scared of failing will never encounter success, because they've not at least tried.
 11th April 2017, 08:33 AM #628 abaddon Penultimate Amazing     Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 17,579 Originally Posted by Michel H This is why I introduced my simple credibility method: when people seem to be serious and reliable, then their answers seem to be more closely related to the correct one. I remind you that you should in principle reply one of the following seven words: in this test. Don't be afraid of trying, even if you are incorrect, your fellow skeptics won't be able to eat you, if you do . Those who are too scared of failing will never encounter success, because they've not at least tried. And everyone is telling you "No" because we all know what you will do with any answer. You will simply make things up. Sent from my SM-A300FU using Tapatalk __________________ Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive? ...love and buttercakes...
 11th April 2017, 08:35 AM #629 The Sparrow Graduate Poster     Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Central Canada Posts: 1,388 No
 11th April 2017, 09:01 AM #630 Beelzebuddy Philosopher     Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 6,045 Originally Posted by Donn Don't give the para parrot ideas. I doubt anything we say here is capable of dislodging whatever's currently in his head. Writing and circling "telepathy is hogwash" should also receive an above-chance hit rate.
 11th April 2017, 09:37 AM #631 John Jones Penultimate Amazing     Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Iowa USA Posts: 12,131 Originally Posted by Michel H This is why I introduced my simple credibility method: when people seem to be serious and reliable, then their answers seem to be more closely related to the correct one. I remind you that you should in principle reply one of the following seven words: in this test. Don't be afraid of trying, even if you are incorrect, your fellow skeptics won't be able to eat you, if you do . Those who are too scared of failing will never encounter success, because they've not at least tried. Again I say no to you! No! __________________ "Sufficiently advanced malice is indistinguishable from incompetence. = godless Dave
 11th April 2017, 09:55 AM #632 Donn Philosopher     Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: In my head. Posts: 7,758 We are the Knights of Nay. On this One Subject we agray. Nivver to feed facts to folly, Or follow Michel's fallacious way. __________________ "If I hadn't believed it with my own mind, I would never have seen it." - thanks sackett "If you stand on a piece of paper, you are indeed closer to the moon." - MRC_Hans "I was a believer. Until I saw it." - Magrat Last edited by Donn; 11th April 2017 at 11:00 AM.
 11th April 2017, 10:56 AM #633 Nay_Sayer I say nay!     Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Long Island Posts: 3,446 Originally Posted by Beelzebuddy I doubt anything we say here is capable of dislodging whatever's currently in his head. Writing and circling "telepathy is hogwash" should also receive an above-chance hit rate. Worse yet any and I do mean any reply has, can, and will be twisted into an answer. A simple no can be read as the numbers: 2, 29, 11, 1, 7 Character or not he will reply quoting several or more of you and show why your responses were answers. Short and sweet. Do Not Reply. Period. __________________ I am 100% confident all psychics and mediums are frauds. ---------------------------------------------- Proud woo denier ---------------------------------------------- “That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” -Christopher Hitchens- Last edited by Nay_Sayer; 11th April 2017 at 10:57 AM.
 12th April 2017, 01:49 AM #634 Squeegee Beckenheim Penultimate Amazing     Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 19,403 Originally Posted by Michel H This is why I introduced my simple credibility method: when people seem to be serious and reliable, then their answers seem to be more closely related to the correct one. This is nonsense, as you know. You should use one of the suggested methods which ensures that the only people who can participate are necessarily fully cooperative. Quote: Don't be afraid of trying, even if you are incorrect, your fellow skeptics won't be able to eat you, if you do . Those who are too scared of failing will never encounter success, because they've not at least tried. I'm not going to help feed your delusion, only suggest that you try a real test of your abilities, rather than repeating the same unreliable, easily gamed "test" you've been running sporadically for the last 4 years. If you truly believe in your abilities then you have no reason not to. Even if just to shut other people up doing a proper test once in 4 years isn't going to hurt, is it? If you don't truly believe in your abilities, then what are you doing? __________________ I don't trust atoms. They make up everything.
 13th April 2017, 01:08 PM #635 P.J. Denyer Illuminator   Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 3,718 No
 13th April 2017, 02:24 PM #636 Agatha Winking at the MoonModerator     Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: UK Posts: 12,393 No. __________________ Why can't you be more like Agatha? - Loss Leader
 13th April 2017, 03:20 PM #637 Marcus Master Poster     Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 2,829 Originally Posted by Michel H I recently wrote and circled one of the seven words: "gas", "illegal", "bombs", "two", "sides", "same", and "coin" on my paper. I ask you to write it here (if you think you might know it). Thank you for participating. At least you said "if". It seems unlikely anyone would think they might know it.
 21st April 2017, 11:23 AM #638 Michel H Graduate Poster   Join Date: May 2012 Location: Belgium Posts: 1,274 I would like to give now some results of my latest telepathy test, which I started about eleven days ago: Originally Posted by Michel H I recently wrote and circled one of the seven words: "gas", "illegal", "bombs", "two", "sides", "same", and "coin" on my paper. I ask you to write it here (if you think you might know it). Thank you for participating. The answer to the test was "two" (i.e. the fourth word; I chose it simply because the random number generator I used told me "4", so I wrote and circled the fourth word of the list of choices on my paper, this is my usual method). Note that, because of the relatively large number of possible choices, and because of a possible confusion between "four" and "two", this was a difficult test. Superficially, no one participated in this test on this forum. However, many people replied (somewhat oddly - I have already done about 20 telepathy tests on this forum in the past 5 years, and I have never seen anything like this) "No", which is obviously a two-letter word: Originally Posted by Hokulele No. Originally Posted by fagin No. Originally Posted by John Jones Not no, but hell no. Not This Again! Originally Posted by Nay_Sayer no Originally Posted by abaddon No. Originally Posted by Donn No. Originally Posted by Dave Rogers No. Originally Posted by The Sparrow No Originally Posted by John Jones Again I say no to you! No! Originally Posted by P.J. Denyer No Originally Posted by Agatha No. Interestingly, Nay_Sayer commented: Originally Posted by Nay_Sayer A simple no can be read as the numbers: 2, ... Even Bashar al-Assad, the President of Syria, seems to have loosely participated in this test: This picture seems to have been taken on April 12 (Damascus time): http://pulse.ng/world/in-syria-assad...id6526803.html. I started my test on April 10 (Belgium time).
 21st April 2017, 07:37 PM #639 Kid Eager Philosopher     Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 6,410 Originally Posted by Michel H I would like to give now some results of my latest telepathy test, which I started about eleven days ago: The answer to the test was "two" (i.e. the fourth word; I chose it simply because the random number generator I used told me "4", so I wrote and circled the fourth word of the list of choices on my paper, this is my usual method). Note that, because of the relatively large number of possible choices, and because of a possible confusion between "four" and "two", this was a difficult test. Superficially, no one participated in this test on this forum. However, many people replied (somewhat oddly - I have already done about 20 telepathy tests on this forum in the past 5 years, and I have never seen anything like this) "No", which is obviously a two-letter word: Interestingly, Nay_Sayer commented: Even Bashar al-Assad, the President of Syria, seems to have loosely participated in this test: http://i.imgur.com/9t3YUG7.jpg?1 This picture seems to have been taken on April 12 (Damascus time): http://pulse.ng/world/in-syria-assad...id6526803.html. I started my test on April 10 (Belgium time). And this is why you run shrieking from any semblance of a valid test, and why we refuse to be enablers for your delusions. __________________ What do Narwhals, Magnets and Apollo 13 have in common? Think about it....
 21st April 2017, 07:51 PM #640 Nay_Sayer I say nay!     Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Long Island Posts: 3,446 I called this, Actually I call it correctly every time. my hit percentage is 100% I cannot stress enough; DO NOT REPLY! __________________ I am 100% confident all psychics and mediums are frauds. ---------------------------------------------- Proud woo denier ---------------------------------------------- “That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” -Christopher Hitchens-

International Skeptics Forum

 Bookmarks Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google Reddit

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Welcome to ISF     Welcome!     International Skeptics     Other Skeptical Organizations         JREF     Skeptical Events         TAM Scholarship Auction Reference     The Repository         Forum Newsletters     Book Reviews     Forum Spotlight General Topics     General Skepticism and The Paranormal     Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology     Education     Economics, Business and Finance     History, Literature, and the Arts     Religion and Philosophy     Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories         9/11 Conspiracy Theories     USA Politics     Non-USA & General Politics     Social Issues & Current Events     Trials and Errors     Computers and the Internet     Conjuror's Corner Members Only     Forum Community         In memoriam...     Humor     Hobbies, DIY and Interests     Movies, TV, Music, Computer Gaming, and other Entertainment     Puzzles     Sports     Archive         Old TAM Auction Threads

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:56 AM.
This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.
 -- ISF Blue ---- Aqua ---- Drab Olive ---- Dull Day ---- Eco ---- Purple Haze ---- Nobby's classy style ---- The Red One ---- The Blues ---- Vimto ---- Mobile -- Default vBulletin Contact Us - International Skeptics - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top