|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
10th March 2010, 08:18 AM | #1 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,584
|
Khan Academy
Preface: I don't work for the Khan Academy. I just had to say that, because I post about it so often.
Here's an idea: Can the JREF emulate the style of the Khan academy videos to teach people specifically about critical thinking, debunking of conspiracy theories, homeopathic "medicine," intelligent design, etc, etc... The videos could be created by any JREF member, as long as they are perhaps prescreened and voted for approval (by forum members and mods?) to the youtube site. I realize JREF has a youtube account, but I feel it's underutilized. I think it would be cool if there were a playlist or set of playlists designed specifically to educate people of any age, and had a standard format, perhaps similar to the blackboard and pen style of the Khan Academy. Either way, the most important concept is that we could crowdsource the knowledge and resources of the JREF community to educate people. And honestly, what better way than YouTube? What do you think? |
10th March 2010, 08:19 AM | #2 | |||
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,584
|
Khan Academy example:
|
|||
10th March 2010, 08:25 AM | #3 | |||
Illuminator
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,785
|
Here is another example:
I'm sorry. I had to. OT: This is dam amazing. I wonder what software he uses. |
|||
__________________
It's amazing how many of these "paranormal" icons seem to merge together. There always seem to be theories about how they link together in some way. I'm sure someone has a very good explanation as to how Bigfoot killed JFK to help cover Roswell.-Mark Mekes This isn't rocket surgery.-Bill Nye |
||||
10th March 2010, 08:28 AM | #4 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,584
|
|
10th March 2010, 01:47 PM | #5 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,951
|
|
11th March 2010, 01:47 AM | #6 |
Girl
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London EC1
Posts: 19,046
|
|
11th March 2010, 12:28 PM | #7 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,785
|
|
__________________
It's amazing how many of these "paranormal" icons seem to merge together. There always seem to be theories about how they link together in some way. I'm sure someone has a very good explanation as to how Bigfoot killed JFK to help cover Roswell.-Mark Mekes This isn't rocket surgery.-Bill Nye |
|
13th March 2010, 01:47 AM | #8 |
Girl
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London EC1
Posts: 19,046
|
It's excessively amateur, kills the subject matter beyond recognition and strikes me as a dire way to learn anything much.
|
13th March 2010, 01:58 AM | #9 |
Nasty Woman
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 96,383
|
I saw a piece on the Khan Academy on CNN just a day or so ago. Looked like a great resource the way it was presented on the news.
As for not being everyone's cup of tea, (Francesca's post), I imagine that is an individual preference or learning style. I don't quite see how the web model is conducive to the JREF though. It's not like people who believe in woo are out there looking for someone to explain to them why they are wrong. |
13th March 2010, 02:12 AM | #10 |
Girl
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London EC1
Posts: 19,046
|
Here's another set of you tube teaching videos, courtesy of Harvard economics postgrad Jodi Beggs. I find it similarly uninspiring and dull (even though the subject is one of my interests) and I suspect it would only rate higher than the Khan stuff due to the "eye candy" angle of her appearing in them herself and attempting a few (poor IMO) jokes.
Personally the only video lectures that I find engaging are recordings of actual lectures given by people trained to do this, in front of rooms full of people. |
16th March 2010, 09:08 AM | #11 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,785
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
__________________
It's amazing how many of these "paranormal" icons seem to merge together. There always seem to be theories about how they link together in some way. I'm sure someone has a very good explanation as to how Bigfoot killed JFK to help cover Roswell.-Mark Mekes This isn't rocket surgery.-Bill Nye |
|
18th March 2010, 09:38 AM | #12 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,746
|
OT: - Am I the only one who sees the words "Khan Academy" and pictures Ricardo Montalbam in that ridiculous Star Trek movie reciting Milton?
|
__________________
No laws of physics were broken in the writing of this post |
|
18th March 2010, 11:22 AM | #13 | |||
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,918
|
Perhaps using games?
|
|||
18th March 2010, 11:28 AM | #14 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,701
|
|
__________________
The weakness of all Utopias is this, ... They first assume that no man will want more than his share, and then are very ingenious in explaining whether his share will be delivered by motorcar or balloon. -G.K. CHESTERTON |
|
22nd March 2010, 10:49 AM | #15 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 60,375
|
|
25th March 2010, 10:35 AM | #16 |
Scholar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 106
|
|
26th November 2010, 08:08 PM | #17 |
Metasyntactic Variable
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,623
|
Khaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaann!!!
<* BUMP *>
I just saw a report on the Khan Academy on the American Broadcasting Network, and checked out the website. I must say that this is the most fantastic idea since the graphics calculator! Following quote from the website:
Quote:
Disclaimer: I am not affiliated in any way with the Khan Academy or the ABC network. I just like what I see, and hope that others can take advantage of the website. |
__________________
Belief is the subjective acceptance of a (valid or invalid) concept, opinion, or theory; Faith is the unreasoned belief in improvable things; and Knowledge is the reasoned belief in provable things. Belief itself proves nothing.
|
|
28th November 2010, 03:24 AM | #18 |
New Blood
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 12
|
Just to quickly chime in...
I recently returned to school after a long absence and the Khan Academy chemistry and math videos quickly got me back up to speed so that when I came back to those subjects I was ready. I've recommended them to some of my fellow students and they've helped them understand some things that they didn't get in class. They worked for me cause he's a good teacher and he's informal. I don't know how well that would jive with a committee approving them. |
24th March 2012, 03:51 AM | #19 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 13,833
|
I watched a CBS 60 Minutes program where they talked about Khan Academy. Here is a short trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHUI095xUFw
"Our vision for Khan Academy in the classroom includes
I think education can be improved a lot. Perhaps this model is one possible way of making such improvement. |
1st November 2012, 09:24 AM | #20 |
Thinker
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 227
|
I think some of the ideas are admirable, but the video aspect is highly overrated--at least his videos are.
There's no communication between the teacher and the student. If I'm teaching a lesson a student can immediately ask a question. I can clarify, re-explain, or try another example or approach. I can look at my students and see the quizzical looks, or the understanding nods, or even the looks of the totally stupefied! I can question students--elicit responses that help me gauge whether they are understanding or not. That immediate communication is important. Fordama |
__________________
There's a million fine looking women in the world, dude. But, they don't all bring you lasagna at work. |
|
1st November 2012, 10:33 AM | #21 |
Sarcastic Conqueror of Notions
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,812
|
|
__________________
"Great innovations should not be forced [by way of] slender majorities." - Thomas Jefferson The government should nationalize it! Socialized, single-payer video game development and sales now! More, cheaper, better games, right? Right? |
|
1st November 2012, 01:01 PM | #22 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 40 miles north of the border
Posts: 20,849
|
I had a need/desire to know more about how the kidney functions and watched two videos on that subject. I found them easy to follow and of course you can rewatch , or pause which helps. IMHO the usefullness would be as a supplement to common classroom teaching. Watch a video prior to or after a classroom session to reinforce the learning process
|
1st November 2012, 01:48 PM | #23 |
Intellectual Gladiator
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,948
|
In my professional opinion as a classroom educator, I have to say that yes, Khan Academy would be a good supplement, but it is in no way a good substitute for classroom education. And it is only a good supplement for some subjects, whereas it doesn't even attempt to touch others.
Specifically, for scientific subjects, I would love to see someone do serious lab work on Khan Academy. Let me know when that happens... |
__________________
Visit my blog: The Skeptical Teacher "We ****** up the air, the water, we ****** up each other. Why don't we just finish the job by flushing our brains down the toilet?" -- John Trent, In the Mouth of Madness |
|
2nd November 2012, 07:17 AM | #24 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,034
|
Yeesh, don't watch the computer programming ones
|
__________________
Don't fear the REAPER, embrace it |
|
2nd November 2012, 07:32 AM | #25 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 3,377
|
I hav been using Khan Academy to brush up on my Math for almost a year now, and I must say it rocks
|
__________________
I've got to get to a library...fast Robert Langdon |
|
3rd November 2012, 01:32 PM | #26 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 40 miles north of the border
Posts: 20,849
|
|
3rd November 2012, 02:02 PM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 58,581
|
|
10th November 2012, 07:56 PM | #28 | |||
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,466
|
So something like this?
|
|||
__________________
Don't feed the trolls. Just ignore them. |
||||
10th November 2012, 08:45 PM | #29 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 259
|
Khan Academy has helped me revise for tomorrow's Human Biology exam. Great stuff!
|
__________________
You will find easily More than sufficient doubt That these colours you see Were picked in advance By some careful hand With an absolute concept of beauty |
|
11th November 2012, 01:13 PM | #30 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,034
|
|
__________________
Don't fear the REAPER, embrace it |
|
11th November 2012, 04:55 PM | #31 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,741
|
I find it one of the most amazing things I've encountered on the web (outside pornhub). It really does amaze me. I'm sure it helped alot of people.
|
11th November 2012, 06:35 PM | #32 |
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 698
|
Has it occurred to you that this is actually a good thing? One of the problems I see with math education, is that it is basically taught as an argument from authority. Teachers have worked out problems they perform flawlessly for the students. The student gets absolutely no idea of what sort of thought process they will have to go through the problem, where they might struggle, where they might have to backtrack. Mathematics is provided to the students as a finely polished product, making the student feel stupid when they struggle with an actual problem.
Not relevant to Khan Academy, but relevant to Math education, this is especially true in mid-level University mathematics, when students finally have to write proofs. Good classes and books on mathematical thinking will first teach the student that developing proofs is a messy and informal thing. The terse proofs you see in the math textbooks are the result of much revision. A good teacher will demonstrate this by developing a proof from scratch, not writing out the proof from a textbook, which teaches the student nothing. |
29th November 2012, 01:58 PM | #33 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,311
|
|
__________________
Fourscore and seven years ago I tapped yo mama in a log cabin! Abe Lincoln |
|
29th November 2012, 04:30 PM | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 58,581
|
|
22nd December 2012, 04:47 AM | #35 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 494
|
I'm with MattusMaximus, I teach science in the higher classes of highschool. (I'm Dutch, so we have a somewhat different schoolsystem than you might be used to) I find Khan Academy an excellent supplement to classroom teaching. I also have to agree with some of the later posters that it's really good when you're revising something or brushing up knowledge that you've previously understood.
Khan's method however can not be a substitute to actual teaching as it's currently implemented. Just looking at the very first video example, the one I'm sure most people reading this thread, have clicked on and at least watched the first few minutes. I would never start by straight away telling my students which two possible ways you could resolve this problem and than tell them which one is right. This method has several problems: 1. It's not actually activating students, they passively sit there and absorb the knowledge. 2. I'm showing the wrong method to students who may allready be calculating it correctly.. which is never a good thing. 3. I'm not creating a cognitive conflict in students that are currently using the wrong method. What I would do in this case is also put up 7 + 2 x 3 on the board and have the students calculate the answer. Once all students have an answer, I would tell them the right answer. This should make students that got the right answer happy, and make the others wonder what they did wrong. Depending on how many students get things right/wrong I might than follow up by either a bit of peer instruction, or by asking them how they think I got the answer 13. After a short period there should be several students that have now worked out the right order to do this calculation themselves. Only then I would move onto explaining the general rule, since I'm now left with students that 'get it' and students that need this kind of direct instruction to 'get it'. I would give them the general rule of multiplication taking preference over addition, and than write the correct way of doing it on the board. It should be obvious how this method would yield better results than the Khan instruction. |
__________________
"If Elvis was still alive, he would be dead by now". - source unknown (more accurately: forgotten). Proud Asmurfist. |
|
22nd December 2012, 05:17 AM | #36 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,290
|
First of all I'm learning linear algebra from the Khan Academy,a topic I've never experienced. The lectures are generally clear although sometimes I feel parts are glossed over and other parts are over-emphasised. There are good aspects to this type of learning, being able to pause the lecture and examine a detail with all the other resources on the 'net and choosing when I want to learn are invaluable to me.
Second, there is no form of education that is suitable for everyone. If Khan doesn't do it for you, there are plenty of alternatives. Traditional education was more often designed for the convenience of the teacher, now the choice allows the student to pick the most suitable. |
22nd December 2012, 08:32 AM | #37 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 494
|
You obviously have a strong internal drive to actually learn and understand linear algebra, which sets you far apart from the average student in my classroom. When there is a strong internal motivation to understand something, almost any way of being introduced to a topic will suffice.
I quickly browsed some of your other posts and you seem to be fairly skeptical about most things in general, so you must surely agree with me that your personal experience is is not really a very strong argument. We've got numerous people on here that have, or claim to have, experienced God, the ill effects of vaccination, alien abductions etc etc.. The points I brought up in respect to Khan Academy's methods are not so much points I have personally with mr Khan, they are in direct conflict with currently prevailing social, and educational, psychology's viewpoints. The first and third point I brought up in particular fly in the face of everything research into behaviourism and constructivism show. I'm not trying to be negative, there are some good points about the instruction of Khan Academy. The points you bring up; being able to pause it, being able to access it whenever you will, and the fact that's he's very rarely factually wrong with what he says are all valuable. But if you would study linear algebra according to more modern insights, you would probably find it to be faster, you would get a higher order of understanding of it and you would find the information will be easier to retain. As I said I teach science in the higher classes of highschool, in the Netherlands that means that on top of my master's degree in Physics, I have done a full year of post master university level in education and social psychology. Simply claiming that because you find Khan Academy sufficient to learn linear algebra and therefore it's a good way to educate people, to me is woo. You make two points here, you are absolutely right in claiming that different people have different styles of learning. Most people would refer to Kolb who differentiate between people that prefer concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualisation or active experimentation. That's why in these times all good teacher vary their lessons so each of these preferences get some time to shine. While this can be used as an argument in favour of Khan when it comes to a single topic, it's actually a problem if one would get all their topics given to them this way. In order to later be succesful in further studies or a proffessional career students actually have to learn to also use those learning strategies that they would not normally favour because of their own learning style. You argument that traditional education favours the convenience of the teacher has not been true of good teachers at least since the 1970 when the eductional psychology research took flight. Of course there are still to this days teachers would are lazy and teach in a way that conveniences them rather than challenge their students. But to claim that that's currently traditional education is borderline insulting to teacher like me who take their job seriously and use evidence based practices to constantly improve their lessons. |
__________________
"If Elvis was still alive, he would be dead by now". - source unknown (more accurately: forgotten). Proud Asmurfist. |
|
22nd December 2012, 04:09 PM | #38 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,290
|
I would suggest that on-line learning selects driven students.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Well I've met and discussed such attitudes with teachers since then and employed in a laboratory the results of education since then. My experience doesn't agree with you. If you feel insulted that somebody is critical, even though I was clearly talking in the past, I would expect some evidence in the rebuttal, not arguments from authority and grandiose statements. |
22nd December 2012, 05:09 PM | #39 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,519
|
We need more Khan academy. The subjects are pretty sparse. Its helped me with my math though.
|
22nd December 2012, 05:12 PM | #40 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,466
|
|
__________________
“Ego is subversive and devolutionary, truly destructive and terrible; ego is the generator of privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. Ego is the fire that burns within the pit of hell, devouring and consuming everything that enters and leaving utterly nothing behind. Ego is horrible, cruel, and restraining, the darkness of the world, and the doom and bane of man.” – my reaction to that famous Bertrand Russell quote. |
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|