[Merged] Icebear's thread to post things that he finds interesting - Page 2

jaydeehess · 24th October 2016, 11:46 AM

Originally Posted by marplots

The cause and effect works both ways.

"I've got a job, tidied up, gone around looking for a suitable mate, made the appropriate advances - and still no one wants to have sex with me! It's almost like some nefarious force is working behind the scenes to thwart my goals.

"I think I'll go on the Internet to ease my frustration..."

Lack of sex would explain why they typically have so much energy and time. The idea appeals to me on a Karma/Darwinian basis.

Science nerds are the new sexy.
Nerds with attitude, not so much!

IOW the guy who can show a girl how to set up her wi-fi name and password - sexy.

The guy who rants about iluminatii and thinks Weird Al's "Tin Foil" is an anthem for today's society - not sexy.

tinribmancer · 24th October 2016, 12:27 PM

Originally Posted by marplots

The cause and effect works both ways.

"I've got a job, tidied up, gone around looking for a suitable mate, made the appropriate advances - and still no one wants to have sex with me! It's almost like some nefarious force is working behind the scenes to thwart my goals.

"I think I'll go on the Internet to ease my frustration..."

Lack of sex would explain why they typically have so much energy and time. The idea appeals to me on a Karma/Darwinian basis.

Or having no life...

What about people like Bubba, "kyoon" and ---Malbec--- ?

jaydeehess · 24th October 2016, 12:28 PM

Originally Posted by SezMe

What is a demmunist?

Short form for diminutive scientist?

Quote:

Why do you want to rehash the 2000 debacle 16 years later?

Oh, pick me. pick me.

It's because Mr. Trump's followers want to demonstrate that the Democrats have been attempting to 'fix' elections for years.

marplots · 24th October 2016, 12:49 PM

Originally Posted by jaydeehess

Science nerds are the new sexy.
Nerds with attitude, not so much!

IOW the guy who can show a girl how to set up her wi-fi name and password - sexy.

The guy who rants about iluminatii and thinks Weird Al's "Tin Foil" is an anthem for today's society - not sexy.

Thankfully, I aged out of sexy. My options now are the ISF or letch. ISF seems like the economically responsible choice. (Although I admit creepy does have a certain appeal.)

dudalb · 24th October 2016, 02:45 PM

Well, Alex has convinced me to vote for Donald:

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/a...ds-population/

MikeG · 24th October 2016, 03:43 PM

Originally Posted by icebear

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpLAzAZXi2A

Another content-free opening post from this poster.

What are your views on whatever is contained in the thing you linked to? What should we be looking out for? How credible is the person making the clip? Why should I go and look at some random youtube clip?

Trebuchet · 24th October 2016, 05:32 PM

Originally Posted by MikeG

Another content-free opening post from this poster.

Who, like Charlie on the MTA, has never returned. I don't know if Seagull Posting is against the rules, but it should be.

cmikes · 24th October 2016, 09:17 PM

Originally Posted by ddt

If I remember correctly, the problem was that Gore didn't actually ask for a statewide recount, but only in specific counties.

Of course, the far more important factor was Katherine Harris' very enthusiastic purging of the voter rolls of anyone whose name slightly resembled that of a felon.

Yes, that's correct. If the recount had gone forward under Gore's request, Bush still would have won. And this was according to a study done by the New York Times. If the Times couldn't figure out a way to count the votes so that the Democrat would win, there was no way that Gore could have won.

As far as Katherine Harris, one of the functions of the Secretary of State in many states is to the purge the voter rolls of felons, dead people, and other people who are ineligible to vote. I mean, come on, it's not Chicago.

ETA: The biggest reason that Florida was close enough for Gore to demand a recount in the first place was the media's decision to call the state for Gore before the polls closed in the Florida panhandle, which tended to vote Republican. Even if the early call only cost Bush a couple of thousand of votes, that was still enough to put the issue in doubt.

cmikes · 24th October 2016, 09:37 PM

Originally Posted by jaydeehess

It's because Mr. Trump's followers want to demonstrate that the Democrats have been attempting to 'fix' elections for years.

That's one of the worst things about Trump's candidacy. There are valid and good arguments to be made about issues like voter fraud, immigration, money in politics and a whole host of other issues, but Trump is such a buffoon that no one making those arguments can be heard over that **** shouting and being a clown.

Although the whole voter fraud thing reminds me of a very old joke:

During the 1960 Kennedy/Nixon election, two union guys in Chicago are going through a cemetery writing down names to register and vote for Kennedy. Toward the back of the cemetery where the graves are oldest, one gravestone has worn away to almost nothing over the years and one of the union guys spends five minutes squinting at the gravestone and shining his light at it trying to decipher the name. Finally the other union guy says "C'mon, let's go, we got plenty of names" and the other guy replies, "Hey, give me a minute, this dead guy's got the same right to vote as any other dead guy!"

CORed · 25th October 2016, 02:55 PM

Originally Posted by grunion

No, based upon a number of independent statewide recounts, Gore received about 100 more votes in Florida than Bush using either party's standard for counting chads to determine voters' intent. Had Gore been able to get a statewide recount, and had the Supreme Court not intervened, Gore would have won.

IIRC, Gore did not actually request a statewide recount. He requested recounts of some precincts that he thought should have had more votes for him. My recollection is that somebody's independent recount determined that had just the precincts he requested been recounted, he would have lost, but a statewide recount would have made him the winner.

In other words, Gore's attempt to game the recount would have backfired, had he succeeded in getting the recall he wanted.

I kind of like Bill Maher's take on the 2000 election: "Bush didn't steal the election, but it did fall off the back of the truck.

WilliamSeger · 26th October 2016, 07:10 AM

Originally Posted by icebear

Don't get me wrong, I pretty much despise George W. Bush and view him a sort of an idiot. The one service he ever really provided for the United States was to prevent a very much bigger idiot (Algor) from occupying the white house.

If that had happened, then we really would be rubbing sticks together to make fire.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sz6IpmmYSXA

FReepers live in a world of hate- and fear-driven distortion and delusion, an alternate reality fed by the vast propaganda industry founded by Rush Limbaugh and an army of clones who discovered that right-wing demagoguery and character assassination are very profitable. Reality check: The Bush administration was the most quantifiably disastrous misadministration in our history, just as intelligent people like Al Gore predicted it would be.

fuelair · 26th October 2016, 08:04 PM

Originally Posted by WilliamSeger

FReepers live in a world of hate- and fear-driven distortion and delusion, an alternate reality fed by the vast propaganda industry founded by Rush Limbaugh and an army of clones who discovered that right-wing demagoguery and character assassination are very profitable. Reality check: The Bush administration was the most quantifiably disastrous misadministration in our history, just as intelligent people like Al Gore predicted it would be.

Some people, not you, but some people take a long hard time to see the truth that republickers hate people who are smarter than them*. It hurts their widdle feewings and makes them lash out at their betters.* (also)

*Democrats, Libertarians (well, not Gary, but) and the like!!! That's how the Drumpfster came to rule the lost republickers for a little while - and destroy their hearts and souls in the process. (Their minds had been kind of mushlike since the early 80s).

Donal · 28th October 2016, 11:22 AM

Originally Posted by cmikes

As far as Katherine Harris, one of the functions of the Secretary of State in many states is to the purge the voter rolls of felons, dead people, and other people who are ineligible to vote. I mean, come on, it's not Chicago.

The problem is, she was also eagerly purging people who were eligible, but "fit the description".

And every credible investigation into the "in the booth" type of election fraud turns up with the same answer: "its not an issue". Voter ID laws and such do far more to damage the integrity of an election. That's when thousands of eligible voters are barred from exercising their right.

BStrong · 3rd November 2016, 08:39 AM

Originally Posted by Trebuchet

Who, like Charlie on the MTA, has never returned. I don't know if Seagull Posting is against the rules, but it should be.

Old fart posters of a certain age might remember it more like this:

We were sittin' round talkin' 'bout the one man ambush
And the fool piped up and said he's go
So we scrounged up some frags and a .357
And bowed, and showed him the door...
But did he ever return, etc.

NoahFence · 3rd November 2016, 08:49 AM

Originally Posted by Macgyver1968

Yeah..me too. I thought it was going to be from the Sea Shepard guy. He's been pretty much off the radar since he jumped bail in Germany, and has been on the lam ever since.

That was cancelled.

Paul Watson - Sea Shepherd Paul Watson... is a hero.

The guy in the video that was seagulled upon us is a douche.

jaydeehess · 3rd November 2016, 10:44 AM

Originally Posted by marplots

Thankfully, I aged out of sexy. My options now are the ISF or letch. ISF seems like the economically responsible choice. (Although I admit creepy does have a certain appeal.)

Oh, I too aged out quite a while back. Also am one of thoe people who takes marriage vows to heart as does my wife. ( unlike my exwife

)

I do however work with mostly young (all younger, but one woman is only 5 years back from me) people. All of whom are tech geeks.

icebear · 7th November 2016, 09:51 PM

An idea has occurred to me here....

Elect Donald Trump, and we can actually have a woman for a first lady.....

as opposed to what we've had for the past eight years.....

Tony Stark · 7th November 2016, 09:53 PM

Pathetic.

You people are lucky that Michelle Obama has no political aspirations because she could become President herself if she wanted.

Nova Land · 7th November 2016, 10:20 PM

Originally Posted by icebear

Elect Donald Trump, and we can actually have a woman for a first lady..... as opposed to what we've had for the past eight years.....

This looks like a reference to the theory that Barack Obama is gay and Michelle Obama is actually a man. Is that what you are saying? If so, this thread belongs in CT rather than politics.

If that's not what you're saying, please explain more clearly what the intended topic of this thread is.

(If it is what you're saying, then there's no need to reply; your lack of a statement that you mean something else, and explanation of what that something else is, will be sufficient for clarifying which section of the forum this thread belongs in.)

Jrrarglblarg · 7th November 2016, 10:21 PM

Potato

Stacko · 7th November 2016, 10:25 PM

Originally Posted by Jrrarglblarg

Potato

Missing an e.

Jrrarglblarg · 7th November 2016, 10:26 PM

Tomato

bruto · 7th November 2016, 10:31 PM

Originally Posted by icebear

An idea has occurred to me here....

Elect Donald Trump, and we can actually have a woman for a first lady.....

as opposed to what we've had for the past eight years.....

What an interesting dilemma this post poses, as it is hard to imagine an appropriate response to this that would not be forbidden, containing as it would references to the very worst qualities a person might be conceived to possess.

Hokulele · 7th November 2016, 10:49 PM

Knowing Donald Trump, I sincerely doubt it would be the same woman for all four years.

fuelair · 7th November 2016, 11:03 PM

Originally Posted by icebear

An idea has occurred to me here....

Elect Donald Trump, and we can actually have a woman for a first lady.....

as opposed to what we've had for the past eight years.....

I prefer Teflon coated heavy caliber bullets. They go just fine through ceilings. And racists, misogynists, ******** and related - which helps greatly with breaking glass ceilings.

fuelair · 7th November 2016, 11:08 PM

Originally Posted by Tony Stark

Pathetic.

You people are lucky that Michelle Obama has no political aspirations because she could become President herself if she wanted.

The first is well worn old news. The second I suspect is his/her worst nightmare - and if she was also gay or bi- I am pretty certain it would be heart attack city - not that there is anything wrong with that!!!!!

fuelair · 7th November 2016, 11:09 PM

Originally Posted by Hokulele

Knowing Donald Trump, I sincerely doubt it would be the same woman for all four years.

Yep - he would give her up for his daughter - as he has indirectly noted more than once!!!!!

icebear · 7th November 2016, 11:29 PM

Funny how with all of our advanced technology, nobody can make a dress which can hide a linebacker's shoulders...

Tony Stark · 7th November 2016, 11:31 PM

It is a very good sign that the Donald followers are so desperate. Deep down even they know he is going to lose.

icebear · 7th November 2016, 11:33 PM

Originally Posted by Tony Stark

Pathetic.

You people are lucky that Michelle Obama has no political aspirations because she could become President herself if she wanted.

I assume you meant to say "if he wanted"....

Tony Stark · 7th November 2016, 11:33 PM

Originally Posted by icebear

I assume you meant to say "if he wanted"....

Stay mad.

Nova Land · 8th November 2016, 12:10 AM

Originally Posted by icebear

Funny how with all of our advanced technology, nobody can make a dress which can hide a linebacker's shoulders...

Thank you for confirming that this is indeed intended to be a thread for discussing the conspiracy theory that Michelle Obama is secretly a man and that Barack Obama and others close to Michelle have been trying to keep that a secret.

I can understand your reticence to say that more clearly in the OP. As conspiracy theories go, this is one of the more embarrassing ones.

But since you want to discuss it, let's pretend it's a serious claim. So:

Theory: Michelle Obama is actually a man disguised as a woman.

Extent of the evidence presented so far in support of this theory: Michelle Obama's shoulders appear masculine to some viewers.

Problem: both men and women come in various shapes and sizes. There is nothing uniquely masculine about the shoulders in the picture posted.

Conclusion: there is as yet no good reason to believe Michelle Obama is a man.

marplots · 8th November 2016, 01:06 AM

Are we finding the strong black woman intimidating? Good.

mikado · 8th November 2016, 01:54 AM

got it in one

fagin · 8th November 2016, 02:53 AM

I would, she is cute.

My girlfriend used to swim a lot and has well developed shoulders. I cycle and have lovely legs. Unified we'd make one really hot bod.

sts60 · 8th November 2016, 03:22 AM

Sad little troll.

The one about how NASA technicians are walking around on Mars fixing rovers was stupid, but good for a laugh. This one is merely stupid and hateful.

Goodbye, sad little troll.

*!plonk*

Slowvehicle · 8th November 2016, 04:40 AM

Originally Posted by Stacko

Missing an e.

POE-tato?

LarianLeQuella · 8th November 2016, 05:52 AM

Originally Posted by Slowvehicle

POE-tato?

One could only hope, but sadly post history indicates otherwise...

NoahFence · 8th November 2016, 06:10 AM

You made me kitteh the thread:

Aepervius · 8th November 2016, 06:24 AM

This is not a quarterback shoulder arm.

This one is. Look at the muscle. She has nothing of that.

I can't even believe I am arguiyng with a CTer about this.

This is so stupid.

KITTTTEEEEEH !

24th October 2016, 12:27 PM	#42
tinribmancer Hasbarian NWO Templar Cattle Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: Belgium Posts: 1,666	Originally Posted by marplots The cause and effect works both ways. "I've got a job, tidied up, gone around looking for a suitable mate, made the appropriate advances - and still no one wants to have sex with me! It's almost like some nefarious force is working behind the scenes to thwart my goals. "I think I'll go on the Internet to ease my frustration..." Lack of sex would explain why they typically have so much energy and time. The idea appeals to me on a Karma/Darwinian basis. Or having no life... What about people like Bubba, "kyoon" and ---Malbec--- ?
	__________________ "Bravery Is Not A Function Of Firepower." - JC Denton "And belief in conspiracy theories is not the function of a higher intellect." - BStrong

24th October 2016, 02:45 PM	#45
dudalb Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Sacramento Posts: 50,334	Well, Alex has convinced me to vote for Donald: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/a...ds-population/
	__________________ Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay - and claims a halo for his dishonesty. Robert Heinlein.

24th October 2016, 03:43 PM	#46
MikeG Now. Do it now. Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: UK Posts: 24,804	Originally Posted by icebear https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpLAzAZXi2A Another content-free opening post from this poster. What are your views on whatever is contained in the thing you linked to? What should we be looking out for? How credible is the person making the clip? Why should I go and look at some random youtube clip?
	__________________ "The Conservatives want to keep wogs out and march boldly back to the 1950s when Britain still had an Empire and blacks, women, poofs and Irish knew their place." The Don That's what we've sunk to here.

24th October 2016, 05:32 PM	#47
Trebuchet Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Port Townsend, Washington Posts: 31,064	Originally Posted by MikeG Another content-free opening post from this poster. Who, like Charlie on the MTA, has never returned. I don't know if Seagull Posting is against the rules, but it should be.
	__________________ Cum catapultae proscribeantur tum soli proscripti catapultas habeant.

24th October 2016, 09:17 PM	#48
cmikes Critical Thinker Join Date: Dec 2014 Posts: 495	Originally Posted by ddt If I remember correctly, the problem was that Gore didn't actually ask for a statewide recount, but only in specific counties. Of course, the far more important factor was Katherine Harris' very enthusiastic purging of the voter rolls of anyone whose name slightly resembled that of a felon. Yes, that's correct. If the recount had gone forward under Gore's request, Bush still would have won. And this was according to a study done by the New York Times. If the Times couldn't figure out a way to count the votes so that the Democrat would win, there was no way that Gore could have won. As far as Katherine Harris, one of the functions of the Secretary of State in many states is to the purge the voter rolls of felons, dead people, and other people who are ineligible to vote. I mean, come on, it's not Chicago. ETA: The biggest reason that Florida was close enough for Gore to demand a recount in the first place was the media's decision to call the state for Gore before the polls closed in the Florida panhandle, which tended to vote Republican. Even if the early call only cost Bush a couple of thousand of votes, that was still enough to put the issue in doubt.
cmikes Critical Thinker Join Date: Dec 2014 Posts: 495	Last edited by cmikes; 24th October 2016 at 09:25 PM.

24th October 2016, 11:46 AM	#41
jaydeehess Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: 40 miles north of the border Posts: 20,843	Originally Posted by marplots The cause and effect works both ways. "I've got a job, tidied up, gone around looking for a suitable mate, made the appropriate advances - and still no one wants to have sex with me! It's almost like some nefarious force is working behind the scenes to thwart my goals. "I think I'll go on the Internet to ease my frustration..." Lack of sex would explain why they typically have so much energy and time. The idea appeals to me on a Karma/Darwinian basis. Science nerds are the new sexy. Nerds with attitude, not so much! IOW the guy who can show a girl how to set up her wi-fi name and password - sexy. The guy who rants about iluminatii and thinks Weird Al's "Tin Foil" is an anthem for today's society - not sexy.

24th October 2016, 12:28 PM	#43
jaydeehess Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: 40 miles north of the border Posts: 20,843	Originally Posted by SezMe What is a demmunist? Short form for diminutive scientist? Quote: Why do you want to rehash the 2000 debacle 16 years later? Oh, pick me. pick me. It's because Mr. Trump's followers want to demonstrate that the Democrats have been attempting to 'fix' elections for years.

24th October 2016, 12:49 PM	#44
marplots Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 29,167	Originally Posted by jaydeehess Science nerds are the new sexy. Nerds with attitude, not so much! IOW the guy who can show a girl how to set up her wi-fi name and password - sexy. The guy who rants about iluminatii and thinks Weird Al's "Tin Foil" is an anthem for today's society - not sexy. Thankfully, I aged out of sexy. My options now are the ISF or letch. ISF seems like the economically responsible choice. (Although I admit creepy does have a certain appeal.)

24th October 2016, 09:37 PM	#49
cmikes Critical Thinker Join Date: Dec 2014 Posts: 495	Originally Posted by jaydeehess It's because Mr. Trump's followers want to demonstrate that the Democrats have been attempting to 'fix' elections for years. That's one of the worst things about Trump's candidacy. There are valid and good arguments to be made about issues like voter fraud, immigration, money in politics and a whole host of other issues, but Trump is such a buffoon that no one making those arguments can be heard over that **** shouting and being a clown. Although the whole voter fraud thing reminds me of a very old joke: During the 1960 Kennedy/Nixon election, two union guys in Chicago are going through a cemetery writing down names to register and vote for Kennedy. Toward the back of the cemetery where the graves are oldest, one gravestone has worn away to almost nothing over the years and one of the union guys spends five minutes squinting at the gravestone and shining his light at it trying to decipher the name. Finally the other union guy says "C'mon, let's go, we got plenty of names" and the other guy replies, "Hey, give me a minute, this dead guy's got the same right to vote as any other dead guy!"
cmikes Critical Thinker Join Date: Dec 2014 Posts: 495

25th October 2016, 02:55 PM	#50
CORed Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Central City, Colorado, USA Posts: 10,099	Originally Posted by grunion No, based upon a number of independent statewide recounts, Gore received about 100 more votes in Florida than Bush using either party's standard for counting chads to determine voters' intent. Had Gore been able to get a statewide recount, and had the Supreme Court not intervened, Gore would have won. IIRC, Gore did not actually request a statewide recount. He requested recounts of some precincts that he thought should have had more votes for him. My recollection is that somebody's independent recount determined that had just the precincts he requested been recounted, he would have lost, but a statewide recount would have made him the winner. In other words, Gore's attempt to game the recount would have backfired, had he succeeded in getting the recall he wanted. I kind of like Bill Maher's take on the 2000 election: "Bush didn't steal the election, but it did fall off the back of the truck.
	Last edited by CORed; 25th October 2016 at 02:57 PM.

26th October 2016, 07:10 AM	#51
WilliamSeger Philosopher Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 5,092	Originally Posted by icebear Don't get me wrong, I pretty much despise George W. Bush and view him a sort of an idiot. The one service he ever really provided for the United States was to prevent a very much bigger idiot (Algor) from occupying the white house. If that had happened, then we really would be rubbing sticks together to make fire. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sz6IpmmYSXA FReepers live in a world of hate- and fear-driven distortion and delusion, an alternate reality fed by the vast propaganda industry founded by Rush Limbaugh and an army of clones who discovered that right-wing demagoguery and character assassination are very profitable. Reality check: The Bush administration was the most quantifiably disastrous misadministration in our history, just as intelligent people like Al Gore predicted it would be.
	Last edited by WilliamSeger; 26th October 2016 at 07:27 AM.

26th October 2016, 08:04 PM	#52
fuelair Banned Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 58,581	Originally Posted by WilliamSeger FReepers live in a world of hate- and fear-driven distortion and delusion, an alternate reality fed by the vast propaganda industry founded by Rush Limbaugh and an army of clones who discovered that right-wing demagoguery and character assassination are very profitable. Reality check: The Bush administration was the most quantifiably disastrous misadministration in our history, just as intelligent people like Al Gore predicted it would be. Some people, not you, but some people take a long hard time to see the truth that republickers hate people who are smarter than them. It hurts their widdle feewings and makes them lash out at their betters. (also) *Democrats, Libertarians (well, not Gary, but) and the like!!! That's how the Drumpfster came to rule the lost republickers for a little while - and destroy their hearts and souls in the process. (Their minds had been kind of mushlike since the early 80s).
fuelair Banned Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 58,581	Last edited by fuelair; 26th October 2016 at 08:05 PM.

28th October 2016, 11:22 AM	#53
Donal Illuminator Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 4,333	Originally Posted by cmikes As far as Katherine Harris, one of the functions of the Secretary of State in many states is to the purge the voter rolls of felons, dead people, and other people who are ineligible to vote. I mean, come on, it's not Chicago. The problem is, she was also eagerly purging people who were eligible, but "fit the description". And every credible investigation into the "in the booth" type of election fraud turns up with the same answer: "its not an issue". Voter ID laws and such do far more to damage the integrity of an election. That's when thousands of eligible voters are barred from exercising their right.
Donal Illuminator Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 4,333

3rd November 2016, 08:39 AM	#54
BStrong Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: San Francisco Posts: 13,081	Originally Posted by Trebuchet Who, like Charlie on the MTA, has never returned. I don't know if Seagull Posting is against the rules, but it should be. Old fart posters of a certain age might remember it more like this: We were sittin' round talkin' 'bout the one man ambush And the fool piped up and said he's go So we scrounged up some frags and a .357 And bowed, and showed him the door... But did he ever return, etc.
	__________________ Music is what feelings sound like "Dulce bellum inexpertīs." - Erasmus

3rd November 2016, 08:49 AM	#55
NoahFence Banned Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Patriot Nation Posts: 22,131	Originally Posted by Macgyver1968 Yeah..me too. I thought it was going to be from the Sea Shepard guy. He's been pretty much off the radar since he jumped bail in Germany, and has been on the lam ever since. That was cancelled. Paul Watson - Sea Shepherd Paul Watson... is a hero. The guy in the video that was seagulled upon us is a douche.

3rd November 2016, 10:44 AM	#56
jaydeehess Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: 40 miles north of the border Posts: 20,843	Originally Posted by marplots Thankfully, I aged out of sexy. My options now are the ISF or letch. ISF seems like the economically responsible choice. (Although I admit creepy does have a certain appeal.) Oh, I too aged out quite a while back. Also am one of thoe people who takes marriage vows to heart as does my wife. ( unlike my exwife) I do however work with mostly young (all younger, but one woman is only 5 years back from me) people. All of whom are tech geeks.

7th November 2016, 09:51 PM	#57
icebear Muse Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 524	Key to breaking the glass ceiling An idea has occurred to me here.... Elect Donald Trump, and we can actually have a woman for a first lady..... as opposed to what we've had for the past eight years.....
icebear Muse Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 524

7th November 2016, 09:53 PM	#58
Tony Stark Philosopher Join Date: Nov 2014 Posts: 9,626	Pathetic. You people are lucky that Michelle Obama has no political aspirations because she could become President herself if she wanted.
Tony Stark Philosopher Join Date: Nov 2014 Posts: 9,626

7th November 2016, 10:20 PM	#59
Nova Land / Tagger Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Whitleyville, TN, surrounded by cats Posts: 5,968	Originally Posted by icebear Elect Donald Trump, and we can actually have a woman for a first lady..... as opposed to what we've had for the past eight years..... This looks like a reference to the theory that Barack Obama is gay and Michelle Obama is actually a man. Is that what you are saying? If so, this thread belongs in CT rather than politics. If that's not what you're saying, please explain more clearly what the intended topic of this thread is. (If it is what you're saying, then there's no need to reply; your lack of a statement that you mean something else, and explanation of what that something else is, will be sufficient for clarifying which section of the forum this thread belongs in.)

7th November 2016, 10:21 PM	#60
Jrrarglblarg Guest Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 12,673	Potato
Jrrarglblarg Guest Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 12,673

7th November 2016, 10:25 PM	#61
Stacko Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 10,837	Originally Posted by Jrrarglblarg Potato Missing an e.

7th November 2016, 10:26 PM	#62
Jrrarglblarg Guest Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 12,673	Tomato
Jrrarglblarg Guest Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 12,673

7th November 2016, 10:31 PM	#63
bruto Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Way way north of Diddy Wah Diddy Posts: 27,774	Originally Posted by icebear An idea has occurred to me here.... Elect Donald Trump, and we can actually have a woman for a first lady..... as opposed to what we've had for the past eight years..... What an interesting dilemma this post poses, as it is hard to imagine an appropriate response to this that would not be forbidden, containing as it would references to the very worst qualities a person might be conceived to possess.
	__________________ I love this world, but not for its answers. (Mary Oliver) Quand il dit "cuic" le moineau croit tout dire. (When he's tweeted the sparrow thinks he's said it all. (Jules Renard)

7th November 2016, 10:49 PM	#64
Hokulele Deleterious Slab of Damnation Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: The Biggest Little City in the World Posts: 29,577	Knowing Donald Trump, I sincerely doubt it would be the same woman for all four years.
	__________________ "Oh god...What have you done, zooterkin? WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?!?!?!" - Cleon

7th November 2016, 11:03 PM	#65
fuelair Banned Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 58,581	Originally Posted by icebear An idea has occurred to me here.... Elect Donald Trump, and we can actually have a woman for a first lady..... as opposed to what we've had for the past eight years..... I prefer Teflon coated heavy caliber bullets. They go just fine through ceilings. And racists, misogynists, ******** and related - which helps greatly with breaking glass ceilings.
fuelair Banned Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 58,581

7th November 2016, 11:08 PM	#66
fuelair Banned Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 58,581	Originally Posted by Tony Stark Pathetic. You people are lucky that Michelle Obama has no political aspirations because she could become President herself if she wanted. The first is well worn old news. The second I suspect is his/her worst nightmare - and if she was also gay or bi- I am pretty certain it would be heart attack city - not that there is anything wrong with that!!!!!
fuelair Banned Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 58,581

7th November 2016, 11:09 PM	#67
fuelair Banned Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 58,581	Originally Posted by Hokulele Knowing Donald Trump, I sincerely doubt it would be the same woman for all four years. Yep - he would give her up for his daughter - as he has indirectly noted more than once!!!!!
fuelair Banned Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 58,581

7th November 2016, 11:29 PM	#68
icebear Muse Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 524	Funny how with all of our advanced technology, nobody can make a dress which can hide a linebacker's shoulders...
icebear Muse Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 524	Last edited by icebear; 7th November 2016 at 11:31 PM.

7th November 2016, 11:31 PM	#69
Tony Stark Philosopher Join Date: Nov 2014 Posts: 9,626	It is a very good sign that the Donald followers are so desperate. Deep down even they know he is going to lose.
Tony Stark Philosopher Join Date: Nov 2014 Posts: 9,626

7th November 2016, 11:33 PM	#70
icebear Muse Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 524	Originally Posted by Tony Stark Pathetic. You people are lucky that Michelle Obama has no political aspirations because she could become President herself if she wanted. I assume you meant to say "if he wanted"....
icebear Muse Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 524

7th November 2016, 11:33 PM	#71
Tony Stark Philosopher Join Date: Nov 2014 Posts: 9,626	Originally Posted by icebear I assume you meant to say "if he wanted".... Stay mad.
Tony Stark Philosopher Join Date: Nov 2014 Posts: 9,626

8th November 2016, 12:10 AM	#72
Nova Land / Tagger Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Whitleyville, TN, surrounded by cats Posts: 5,968	Originally Posted by icebear Funny how with all of our advanced technology, nobody can make a dress which can hide a linebacker's shoulders... Thank you for confirming that this is indeed intended to be a thread for discussing the conspiracy theory that Michelle Obama is secretly a man and that Barack Obama and others close to Michelle have been trying to keep that a secret. I can understand your reticence to say that more clearly in the OP. As conspiracy theories go, this is one of the more embarrassing ones. But since you want to discuss it, let's pretend it's a serious claim. So: Theory: Michelle Obama is actually a man disguised as a woman. Extent of the evidence presented so far in support of this theory: Michelle Obama's shoulders appear masculine to some viewers. Problem: both men and women come in various shapes and sizes. There is nothing uniquely masculine about the shoulders in the picture posted. Conclusion: there is as yet no good reason to believe Michelle Obama is a man.

8th November 2016, 01:06 AM	#73
marplots Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 29,167	Are we finding the strong black woman intimidating? Good.

8th November 2016, 01:54 AM	#74
mikado Graduate Poster Join Date: Feb 2013 Posts: 1,932	got it in one
mikado Graduate Poster Join Date: Feb 2013 Posts: 1,932	__________________ member formally known as Renmarkable.

8th November 2016, 02:53 AM	#75
fagin Philosopher Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: As far away from casebro as possible. Posts: 7,070	I would, she is cute. My girlfriend used to swim a lot and has well developed shoulders. I cycle and have lovely legs. Unified we'd make one really hot bod.
	__________________ There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda