Silence is Complicity - The methodical shooting of boys at work in Gaza

bikerdruid · 23rd January 2011, 11:08 AM

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=22879

from the article:

The deliberate injury of the limbs of 23 boys by high velocity weapons has been logged and described by Defence for Children International – Palestine Branch (DCI-P) since March 2010. (1) Some of the facts have been published in national newspapers. These barbarous acts contravene international and national law but there are no judicial responses. The caring professions see the physical and mental pain of those who suffer and they should be in the vanguard in calling for this great cruelty to cease forthwith. Political leaders have failed to act.

The Geneva Conventions Act 1957, which is of central importance in holding war criminals to account in the jurisdiction of the UK, is being emasculated.

......................

the 23 boys who have been shot between 26/03/10 (Said H) and 23/12/10 (Hatem S) are listed in the table below with skeletal facts. These points are made:-

· In 18 there were single shots and not automatic fire

· The reported range in most cases confirms that the weapon was a sniper's rifle in the hands of a sniper

· Almost always there were many dozens of other men and boys at work; these victims were picked off

· A leg was the target in most cases. Where the leg was not the target it is likely the sniper was 'aiming up' so the flank, elbow etc was hit instead.

· No weapons were being borne by the gravel workers so they posed no threat to the Israeli Occupation Force personnel. Instead they were bending their backs to their menial work within their internment camp

· The histories refer often to the recovery of the injured boy by friends and relatives under fire. This was a feature during 'Cast Lead' or instead the paramedics were barred from getting to the victims so they died without care.

The history of the injury and sequel for each boy are linked to in (1). It has been done meticulously and the translation into English is perfect. The pain, and often the terror, felt by the boy as the bullet struck home are vividly recorded. No bullets have been recovered yet so the calibre/type is unknown.

WildCat · 23rd January 2011, 11:29 AM

globalresearch?

Really?

Really?

bikerdruid · 23rd January 2011, 11:34 AM

Originally Posted by WildCat

globalresearch?

Really?

Really?

so it must not be true?
really?

....really?

mortimer · 23rd January 2011, 11:40 AM

Bikerdruid,

Who fired those shots?

Beerina · 23rd January 2011, 11:41 AM

It's refreshing to see a side shooting to injure rather than blowing up hundreds at a crack.

bikerdruid · 23rd January 2011, 11:43 AM

Originally Posted by mortimer

Bikerdruid,

Who fired those shots?

read the article.

WildCat · 23rd January 2011, 11:52 AM

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

so it must not be true?
really?

....really?

Is anything on that site true?

Sword_Of_Truth · 23rd January 2011, 11:53 AM

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

so it must not be true?
really?

....really?

It's an anti-semitic hate site that contains completely made up crap that has no supporting evidence.

And now you're posting articles from that same site about Jews murdering children.

What next, mein herr? "Boncentration Bamps" perhaps?

bikerdruid · 23rd January 2011, 12:20 PM

Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth

It's an anti-semitic hate site that contains completely made up crap that has no supporting evidence.

And now you're posting articles from that same site about Jews murdering children.

What next, mein herr? "Boncentration Bamps" perhaps?

again with the rhetoric.
anytime someone criticizes israel they are 'anti-semitic'.

...prove the article is not true.....
if it is all lies, that should be easy.

btw....since you have not bothered to read the article, it has nothing to do with 911.
also i can't watch your video response.

mortimer · 23rd January 2011, 01:57 PM

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

read the article.

Nowhere in that article are any claims made as to who shot these boys. Did you read the article?

Is it safe to say that you assume the shots were fired by Israelis?

Ziggurat · 23rd January 2011, 02:17 PM

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

...prove the article is not true.....

You seem to believe that the burden of proof doesn't lie with the person making the claim. But it does. You're making the claim, you back it up.

Now, in actual practice, many times we give an assumption of truth to statements made by sources we consider reliable. Is global research such a source? Not unless you're a troofer.

Oh....

Ziggurat · 23rd January 2011, 02:22 PM

Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth

What next, mein herr? "Boncentration Bamps" perhaps?

I'm reminded of this:
http://www.southparkstudios.com/clip...60/learn-focus

lionking · 23rd January 2011, 02:33 PM

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

so it must not be true?
really?

....really?

Quoting a large slab of an article to start a thread without stating your position or making any comment on it is very bad form. How about you make your point in the OP rather than leave people guessing.

Virus · 24th January 2011, 12:32 AM

Remember that girl who supposedly died from tear gas and it turned out to be a lie propagated by the Palestinian lie machine? This story is worth less than that.

nvidiot · 24th January 2011, 12:54 AM

War is hell. Propaganda is another weapon.

But Biker, you really have to vet your sources more carefully.

Sword_Of_Truth · 24th January 2011, 01:08 AM

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

anytime someone criticizes israel they are 'anti-semitic'.

Go back and read again the link I provided.

Globalresearch posted an article by a group that has been identified as a terrorist support group by the Simon Wiesenthal Center.

Promoting conspiracy theories that paint the jewish people as being behind everything is anti-semitism.Global Research ~IS~ an anti-semitic hate site. As such, every article on that site is automatically suspect.

Sword_Of_Truth · 24th January 2011, 02:52 AM

Originally Posted by nvidiot

But Biker, you really have to vet your sources more carefully.

He's a 9/11 truther.

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

you are missing my point.
i made no claim as to what happened on 911.
i claimed that,"i do not believe the 'official story'."

is is undeniably a fact. the fact being that [i]i do not believe the official story.

He couldn't properly vet "White Power Weekly".

Virus · 24th January 2011, 03:14 AM

What do you think of this globalresearch article which says the Freemasons and Illuminati created Wahabbism?

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...xt=va&aid=2757

Bikderdruid, what do you think of websites that publish that sort of stuff? You claim you taught critical thinking to high school kids.

Holy crap it all makes sense now. Bikerdruid's kids that he ear-holed into "questioning everything" now write truther, Illuminati, moonbat lefto-neonazi articles on globalresearch.ca

bikerdruid · 24th January 2011, 07:51 AM

wow....just wow...no one is willing to address the topic of the thread, but sure are quick to make personal attacks.
is the article a lie?
prove it or stfu.

mortimer · 24th January 2011, 08:06 AM

Originally Posted by mortimer

Nowhere in that article are any claims made as to who shot these boys. Did you read the article?

Is it safe to say that you assume the shots were fired by Israelis?

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

wow....just wow...no one is willing to address the topic of the thread, but sure are quick to make personal attacks.
is the article a lie?
prove it or stfu.

I addressed the topic. You are refusing to respond.

WildCat · 24th January 2011, 08:24 AM

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

wow....just wow...no one is willing to address the topic of the thread,

Including you. You cut and pasted from the article, and have yet to offer an opinion on it.

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

but sure are quick to make personal attacks.
is the article a lie?
prove it or stfu.

Ther article is garbage from a garbage paranoid conspiracy site.

dudalb · 24th January 2011, 08:44 AM

For someone who claims to be a retired teacher, bikerdruid sure seems terrible when it comes to choosing his source material.
Nice how he keeps dodging the little fact that the article is from a crackpot site.
BUt then he is a 9/11 Truther so what should we expect.........

Thunder · 24th January 2011, 08:45 AM

Originally Posted by dudalb

For someone who claims to be a retired teacher, bikerdruid sure seems terrible when it comes to choosing his source material.
Nice how he keeps dodging the little fact that the article is from a crackpot site.
BUt then he is a 9/11 Truther so what should we expect.........

perfect example of an ad hom attack.

WildCat · 24th January 2011, 08:58 AM

Originally Posted by Thunder

perfect example of an ad hom attack.

NWO Sentryman · 24th January 2011, 09:41 AM

I invoke Sentryman's corollary to Scopie's law WRT sites such as globalresearch.

Ziggurat · 24th January 2011, 12:16 PM

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

wow....just wow...no one is willing to address the topic of the thread, but sure are quick to make personal attacks.
is the article a lie?
prove it or stfu.

Is the article correct?
Prove it or stfu.

You made the claim, troofer. The burden of proof is on you.

tyr_13 · 24th January 2011, 12:24 PM

More than just aiming always for the leg, it seems they were specifically targeting the boy's testicles. The attacker must be trying to stop the boys from reproducing. Indeed in almost half the cases, the targets were described as 'fine pieces of ass' by Gaza women, and thus were more likely to reproduce than their uglier counterparts who were not targeted for attack. Also, all the rounds were found with just the tip cut off, indicating that the attacker is Jewish.

That sounds true. They should add that to the article.

Pardalis · 24th January 2011, 01:39 PM

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

No bullets have been recovered yet so the calibre/type is unknown.

Strange that.

bikerdruid · 24th January 2011, 01:43 PM

Originally Posted by Ziggurat

Is the article correct?
Prove it or stfu.

You made the claim, troofer. The burden of proof is on you.

1. http://www.dci-pal.org/english/doc/p...%202010(b).pdf

2. http://www.haaretz.com/news/barak-ha...south-1.240417

3. http://www.amnesty.org.uk/uploads/do.../doc_21083.pdf

the references are in the article.
amnesty international is one source for the details.

fuelair · 24th January 2011, 02:20 PM

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

again with the rhetoric.
anytime someone criticizes israel they are 'anti-semitic'.

...prove the article is not true.....
if it is all lies, that should be easy.

btw....since you have not bothered to read the article, it has nothing to do with 911.
also i can't watch your video response.

BD - you pointed us to the article. You quoted from it. With no offense, you certainly know the order of evidence/proof here: you pulled it up, you are responsible for proving it - at a minimum you should be able to quote from a better/more trustworthy source with verifiable detail or have no assumption that we have any reason to believe it.

BTW, Israeli snipers tend (exclusively I am pretty sure) to use .50 cal. for sniping. That would be pretty evident even if spent bullets could not be located.

Ziggurat · 24th January 2011, 02:42 PM

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

2. http://www.haaretz.com/news/barak-ha...south-1.240417

I picked this article at random from your links. I read it. I don't see anything in the article about shooting boys in Gaza. The only mention of any Palestinian boys in that story is as part of a death toll from an air strike, not from shootings. The deaths may be regrettable, but they sure don't fit the description in your original post.

So... fail.

I won't bother with your other links. Feel free to provide quotes, though, if you really think they back up your claim.

mortimer · 24th January 2011, 03:19 PM

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

1. http://www.dci-pal.org/english/doc/p...%202010(b).pdf

2. http://www.haaretz.com/news/barak-ha...south-1.240417

3. http://www.amnesty.org.uk/uploads/do.../doc_21083.pdf

the references are in the article.
amnesty international is one source for the details.

Have you actually looked at these sources? The latter two mention *nothing* about "methodical shooting of boys at work in Gaza". The first one does, but produces no evidence or sources for their material.

Puppycow · 24th January 2011, 08:30 PM

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

...prove the article is not true.....

No. You prove that it is true.

mortimer · 24th January 2011, 08:32 PM

Originally Posted by mortimer

Bikerdruid,

Who fired those shots?

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

read the article.

Originally Posted by mortimer

Nowhere in that article are any claims made as to who shot these boys. Did you read the article?

Is it safe to say that you assume the shots were fired by Israelis?

Bikerdruid, are you going to respond to this?

Virus · 24th January 2011, 08:33 PM

Bikerdruid; What's your opinion on the article about the Illuminati creating Wahabbism? What's your opinion on sites that publish such articles?

Sword_Of_Truth · 24th January 2011, 11:16 PM

Originally Posted by fuelair

BTW, Israeli snipers tend (exclusively I am pretty sure) to use .50 cal. for sniping. That would be pretty evident even if spent bullets could not be located.

I think most military/law enforcement snipers use .308 or 7.62 mm. use of the .50 for the majority of military and law enforcement sharpshooting is overkill.

I don't think Israel is any different.

Puppycow · 24th January 2011, 11:42 PM

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

1. http://www.dci-pal.org/english/doc/p...%202010(b).pdf

Most of those look like minor scratches or bruises. None is obviously a bullet wound.

Puppycow · 25th January 2011, 03:34 AM

Originally Posted by bikerdruid

1. http://www.dci-pal.org/english/doc/p...%202010(b).pdf

The more I think about the document in that link, the more I realize that:

Not only are the pictures in that document not compelling evidence supporting the claim in the OP, they are actually strong evidence against the claim in the OP. If 29 children had really been shot by snipers, you would think at least one of them would have a bullet wound that resembles a real bullet wound. Some of them don't have any apparant wound at all. Others are covered by bandages or casts, and others are garden-variety scratches, scrapes, bruises and the like.

fuelair · 25th January 2011, 02:37 PM

Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth

I think most military/law enforcement snipers use .308 or 7.62 mm. use of the .50 for the majority of military and law enforcement sharpshooting is overkill.

I don't think Israel is any different.

Normally I would agree, however the only articles I have seen (important note) have specified .50 though not manufacturer and have indicated trajectory, range and hitting power were of large importance in that choice.

Pardalis · 25th January 2011, 05:31 PM

Originally Posted by Puppycow

The more I think about the document in that link, the more I realize that:

Not only are the pictures in that document not compelling evidence supporting the claim in the OP, they are actually strong evidence against the claim in the OP. If 29 children had really been shot by snipers, you would think at least one of them would have a bullet wound that resembles a real bullet wound. Some of them don't have any apparant wound at all. Others are covered by bandages or casts, and others are garden-variety scratches, scrapes, bruises and the like.

And in all these cases, no bullet was found inside the victims' bodies.

This means all 29 bullets have entered and exited the wounds without a trace. What are the odds of that?

23rd January 2011, 11:08 AM	#1
bikerdruid Philosopher Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: North Peace Bioregion of theGreat Boreal Forest Posts: 7,361	Silence is Complicity - The methodical shooting of boys at work in Gaza http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=22879 from the article: The deliberate injury of the limbs of 23 boys by high velocity weapons has been logged and described by Defence for Children International – Palestine Branch (DCI-P) since March 2010. (1) Some of the facts have been published in national newspapers. These barbarous acts contravene international and national law but there are no judicial responses. The caring professions see the physical and mental pain of those who suffer and they should be in the vanguard in calling for this great cruelty to cease forthwith. Political leaders have failed to act. The Geneva Conventions Act 1957, which is of central importance in holding war criminals to account in the jurisdiction of the UK, is being emasculated. ...................... the 23 boys who have been shot between 26/03/10 (Said H) and 23/12/10 (Hatem S) are listed in the table below with skeletal facts. These points are made:- · In 18 there were single shots and not automatic fire · The reported range in most cases confirms that the weapon was a sniper's rifle in the hands of a sniper · Almost always there were many dozens of other men and boys at work; these victims were picked off · A leg was the target in most cases. Where the leg was not the target it is likely the sniper was 'aiming up' so the flank, elbow etc was hit instead. · No weapons were being borne by the gravel workers so they posed no threat to the Israeli Occupation Force personnel. Instead they were bending their backs to their menial work within their internment camp · The histories refer often to the recovery of the injured boy by friends and relatives under fire. This was a feature during 'Cast Lead' or instead the paramedics were barred from getting to the victims so they died without care. The history of the injury and sequel for each boy are linked to in (1). It has been done meticulously and the translation into English is perfect. The pain, and often the terror, felt by the boy as the bullet struck home are vividly recorded. No bullets have been recovered yet so the calibre/type is unknown.

23rd January 2011, 11:29 AM	#2
WildCat NWO Master Conspirator Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 59,856	globalresearch? Really? Really?
	__________________ Vive la liberté! Last edited by WildCat; 23rd January 2011 at 11:31 AM.

23rd January 2011, 11:40 AM	#4
mortimer NWO Janitor Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,518	Bikerdruid, Who fired those shots?
mortimer NWO Janitor Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,518

23rd January 2011, 11:41 AM	#5
Beerina Sarcastic Conqueror of Notions Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 30,340	It's refreshing to see a side shooting to injure rather than blowing up hundreds at a crack.
	__________________ "Great innovations should not be forced [by way of] slender majorities." - Thomas Jefferson The government should nationalize it! Socialized, single-payer video game development and sales *now!* More, cheaper, better games, right? Right?

23rd January 2011, 11:52 AM	#7
WildCat NWO Master Conspirator Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 59,856	Originally Posted by bikerdruid so it must not be true? really? ....really? Is anything on that site true?
	__________________ Vive la liberté!

23rd January 2011, 11:34 AM	#3
bikerdruid Philosopher Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: North Peace Bioregion of theGreat Boreal Forest Posts: 7,361	Originally Posted by WildCat globalresearch? Really? Really? so it must not be true? really? ....really?

23rd January 2011, 11:43 AM	#6
bikerdruid Philosopher Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: North Peace Bioregion of theGreat Boreal Forest Posts: 7,361	Originally Posted by mortimer Bikerdruid, Who fired those shots? read the article.

23rd January 2011, 11:53 AM	#8
Sword_Of_Truth Penultimate Amazing Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 11,494	Originally Posted by bikerdruid so it must not be true? really? ....really? It's an anti-semitic hate site that contains completely made up crap that has no supporting evidence. And now you're posting articles from that same site about Jews murdering children. What next, mein herr? "Boncentration Bamps" perhaps?

23rd January 2011, 12:20 PM	#9
bikerdruid Philosopher Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: North Peace Bioregion of theGreat Boreal Forest Posts: 7,361	Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth It's an anti-semitic hate site that contains completely made up crap that has no supporting evidence. And now you're posting articles from that same site about Jews murdering children. What next, mein herr? "Boncentration Bamps" perhaps? again with the rhetoric. anytime someone criticizes israel they are 'anti-semitic'. ...prove the article is not true..... if it is all lies, that should be easy. btw....since you have not bothered to read the article, it has nothing to do with 911. also i can't watch your video response.
	Last edited by bikerdruid; 23rd January 2011 at 12:22 PM.

23rd January 2011, 01:57 PM	#10
mortimer NWO Janitor Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,518	Originally Posted by bikerdruid read the article. Nowhere in that article are any claims made as to who shot these boys. Did you read the article? Is it safe to say that you assume the shots were fired by Israelis?
mortimer NWO Janitor Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,518

23rd January 2011, 02:17 PM	#11
Ziggurat Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 48,290	Originally Posted by bikerdruid ...prove the article is not true..... You seem to believe that the burden of proof doesn't lie with the person making the claim. But it does. You're making the claim, you back it up. Now, in actual practice, many times we give an assumption of truth to statements made by sources we consider reliable. Is global research such a source? Not unless you're a troofer. Oh....
	__________________ "As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose -- that it may violate property instead of protecting it -- then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder. Political questions will always be prejudicial, dominant, and all-absorbing. There will be fighting at the door of the Legislative Palace, and the struggle within will be no less furious." - Bastiat, The Law

23rd January 2011, 02:22 PM	#12
Ziggurat Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 48,290	Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth What next, mein herr? "Boncentration Bamps" perhaps? I'm reminded of this: http://www.southparkstudios.com/clip...60/learn-focus
	__________________ "As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose -- that it may violate property instead of protecting it -- then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder. Political questions will always be prejudicial, dominant, and all-absorbing. There will be fighting at the door of the Legislative Palace, and the struggle within will be no less furious." - Bastiat, The Law

23rd January 2011, 02:33 PM	#13
lionking In the Peanut Gallery Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Melbourne Posts: 46,976	Originally Posted by bikerdruid so it must not be true? really? ....really? Quoting a large slab of an article to start a thread without stating your position or making any comment on it is very bad form. How about you make your point in the OP rather than leave people guessing.

24th January 2011, 12:32 AM	#14
Virus Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 6,875	Remember that girl who supposedly died from tear gas and it turned out to be a lie propagated by the Palestinian lie machine? This story is worth less than that.
Virus Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 6,875	Last edited by Virus; 24th January 2011 at 12:52 AM.

24th January 2011, 12:54 AM	#15
nvidiot Botanical Jedi Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 2,121	War is hell. Propaganda is another weapon. But Biker, you really have to vet your sources more carefully.
nvidiot Botanical Jedi Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 2,121

24th January 2011, 01:08 AM	#16
Sword_Of_Truth Penultimate Amazing Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 11,494	Originally Posted by bikerdruid anytime someone criticizes israel they are 'anti-semitic'. Go back and read again the link I provided. Globalresearch posted an article by a group that has been identified as a terrorist support group by the Simon Wiesenthal Center. Promoting conspiracy theories that paint the jewish people as being behind everything is anti-semitism.Global Research ~IS~ an anti-semitic hate site. As such, every article on that site is automatically suspect.

24th January 2011, 02:52 AM	#17
Sword_Of_Truth Penultimate Amazing Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 11,494	Originally Posted by nvidiot But Biker, you really have to vet your sources more carefully. He's a 9/11 truther. Originally Posted by bikerdruid you are missing my point. i made no claim as to what happened on 911. i claimed that,"i do not believe the 'official story'." is is undeniably a fact. the fact being that [i]i do not believe the official story. He couldn't properly vet "White Power Weekly".

24th January 2011, 03:14 AM	#18
Virus Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 6,875	What do you think of this globalresearch article which says the Freemasons and Illuminati created Wahabbism? http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...xt=va&aid=2757 Bikderdruid, what do you think of websites that publish that sort of stuff? You claim you taught critical thinking to high school kids. Holy crap it all makes sense now. Bikerdruid's kids that he ear-holed into "questioning everything" now write truther, Illuminati, moonbat lefto-neonazi articles on globalresearch.ca
Virus Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 6,875	Last edited by Virus; 24th January 2011 at 03:18 AM.

24th January 2011, 07:51 AM	#19
bikerdruid Philosopher Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: North Peace Bioregion of theGreat Boreal Forest Posts: 7,361	wow....just wow...no one is willing to address the topic of the thread, but sure are quick to make personal attacks. is the article a lie? prove it or stfu.

24th January 2011, 08:06 AM	#20
mortimer NWO Janitor Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,518	Originally Posted by mortimer Nowhere in that article are any claims made as to who shot these boys. Did you read the article? Is it safe to say that you assume the shots were fired by Israelis? Originally Posted by bikerdruid wow....just wow...no one is willing to address the topic of the thread, but sure are quick to make personal attacks. is the article a lie? prove it or stfu. I addressed the topic. You are refusing to respond.
mortimer NWO Janitor Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,518

24th January 2011, 08:24 AM	#21
WildCat NWO Master Conspirator Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 59,856	Originally Posted by bikerdruid wow....just wow...no one is willing to address the topic of the thread, Including you. You cut and pasted from the article, and have yet to offer an opinion on it. Originally Posted by bikerdruid but sure are quick to make personal attacks. is the article a lie? prove it or stfu. Ther article is garbage from a garbage paranoid conspiracy site.
	__________________ Vive la liberté!

24th January 2011, 08:44 AM	#22
dudalb Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Sacramento Posts: 50,311	For someone who claims to be a retired teacher, bikerdruid sure seems terrible when it comes to choosing his source material. Nice how he keeps dodging the little fact that the article is from a crackpot site. BUt then he is a 9/11 Truther so what should we expect.........

24th January 2011, 08:45 AM	#23
Thunder Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 34,918	Originally Posted by dudalb For someone who claims to be a retired teacher, bikerdruid sure seems terrible when it comes to choosing his source material. Nice how he keeps dodging the little fact that the article is from a crackpot site. BUt then he is a 9/11 Truther so what should we expect......... perfect example of an ad hom attack.
Thunder Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 34,918

24th January 2011, 08:58 AM	#24
WildCat NWO Master Conspirator Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 59,856	Originally Posted by Thunder perfect example of an ad hom attack.
	__________________ Vive la liberté!

24th January 2011, 09:41 AM	#25
NWO Sentryman Proud NWO Gatekeeper Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 6,994	I invoke Sentryman's corollary to Scopie's law WRT sites such as globalresearch.
	__________________ If I now say "dominoes", you won't think "pizza". Will you? - FireGarden on the Middle East Last edited by NWO Sentryman; 24th January 2011 at 09:43 AM.

24th January 2011, 12:16 PM	#26
Ziggurat Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 48,290	Originally Posted by bikerdruid wow....just wow...no one is willing to address the topic of the thread, but sure are quick to make personal attacks. is the article a lie? prove it or stfu. Is the article correct? Prove it or stfu. You made the claim, troofer. The burden of proof is on you.
	__________________ "As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose -- that it may violate property instead of protecting it -- then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder. Political questions will always be prejudicial, dominant, and all-absorbing. There will be fighting at the door of the Legislative Palace, and the struggle within will be no less furious." - Bastiat, The Law

24th January 2011, 12:24 PM	#27
tyr_13 Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 16,411	More than just aiming always for the leg, it seems they were specifically targeting the boy's testicles. The attacker must be trying to stop the boys from reproducing. Indeed in almost half the cases, the targets were described as 'fine pieces of ass' by Gaza women, and thus were more likely to reproduce than their uglier counterparts who were not targeted for attack. Also, all the rounds were found with just the tip cut off, indicating that the attacker is Jewish. That sounds true. They should add that to the article.
	__________________ Circled nothing is still nothing. "Nothing will stop the U.S. from being a world leader, not even a handful of adults who want their kids to take science lessons from a book that mentions unicorns six times." -UNLoVedRebel Mumpsimus: a stubborn person who insists on making an error in spite of being shown that it is wrong

24th January 2011, 01:39 PM	#28
Pardalis Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 25,817	Originally Posted by bikerdruid No bullets have been recovered yet so the calibre/type is unknown. Strange that.
Pardalis Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 25,817

24th January 2011, 01:43 PM	#29
bikerdruid Philosopher Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: North Peace Bioregion of theGreat Boreal Forest Posts: 7,361	Originally Posted by Ziggurat Is the article correct? Prove it or stfu. You made the claim, troofer. The burden of proof is on you. 1. http://www.dci-pal.org/english/doc/p...%202010(b).pdf 2. http://www.haaretz.com/news/barak-ha...south-1.240417 3. http://www.amnesty.org.uk/uploads/do.../doc_21083.pdf the references are in the article. amnesty international is one source for the details.
	Last edited by bikerdruid; 24th January 2011 at 01:44 PM.

24th January 2011, 02:20 PM	#30
fuelair Banned Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 58,581	Originally Posted by bikerdruid again with the rhetoric. anytime someone criticizes israel they are 'anti-semitic'. ...prove the article is not true..... if it is all lies, that should be easy. btw....since you have not bothered to read the article, it has nothing to do with 911. also i can't watch your video response. BD - you pointed us to the article. You quoted from it. With no offense, you certainly know the order of evidence/proof here: you pulled it up, you are responsible for proving it - at a minimum you should be able to quote from a better/more trustworthy source with verifiable detail or have no assumption that we have any reason to believe it. BTW, Israeli snipers tend (exclusively I am pretty sure) to use .50 cal. for sniping. That would be pretty evident even if spent bullets could not be located.
fuelair Banned Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 58,581

24th January 2011, 02:42 PM	#31
Ziggurat Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 48,290	Originally Posted by bikerdruid 2. http://www.haaretz.com/news/barak-ha...south-1.240417 I picked this article at random from your links. I read it. I don't see anything in the article about shooting boys in Gaza. The only mention of any Palestinian boys in that story is as part of a death toll from an air strike, not from shootings. The deaths may be regrettable, but they sure don't fit the description in your original post. So... fail. I won't bother with your other links. Feel free to provide quotes, though, if you really think they back up your claim.
	__________________ "As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose -- that it may violate property instead of protecting it -- then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder. Political questions will always be prejudicial, dominant, and all-absorbing. There will be fighting at the door of the Legislative Palace, and the struggle within will be no less furious." - Bastiat, The Law

24th January 2011, 03:19 PM	#32
mortimer NWO Janitor Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,518	Originally Posted by bikerdruid 1. http://www.dci-pal.org/english/doc/p...%202010(b).pdf 2. http://www.haaretz.com/news/barak-ha...south-1.240417 3. http://www.amnesty.org.uk/uploads/do.../doc_21083.pdf the references are in the article. amnesty international is one source for the details. Have you actually looked at these sources? The latter two mention nothing about "methodical shooting of boys at work in Gaza". The first one does, but produces no evidence or sources for their material.
mortimer NWO Janitor Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,518

24th January 2011, 08:30 PM	#33
Puppycow Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Yokohama, Japan Posts: 25,727	Originally Posted by bikerdruid ...prove the article is not true..... No. You prove that it is true.
	__________________ A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool. William Shakespeare

24th January 2011, 08:32 PM	#34
mortimer NWO Janitor Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,518	Originally Posted by mortimer Bikerdruid, Who fired those shots? Originally Posted by bikerdruid read the article. Originally Posted by mortimer Nowhere in that article are any claims made as to who shot these boys. Did you read the article? Is it safe to say that you assume the shots were fired by Israelis? Bikerdruid, are you going to respond to this?
mortimer NWO Janitor Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,518

24th January 2011, 08:33 PM	#35
Virus Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 6,875	Bikerdruid; What's your opinion on the article about the Illuminati creating Wahabbism? What's your opinion on sites that publish such articles?
Virus Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 6,875