ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Social Issues & Current Events
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags police incidents , police issues , police misconduct charges

Reply
Old 16th September 2020, 11:24 PM   #2281
Mumbles
Philosopher
 
Mumbles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,940
Originally Posted by Hlafordlaes View Post
It is a well-known phenomenon that victims of childhood abuse/neglect, like victims of racism, will often internalize the memes directed at them. Thus the rather otherwise inexplicable undercurrent present in US Black culture of preference for lighter tone skin, for example. Finding one of these in one's own thoughts is often cause for great pain and consternation, leading potentially to even more self-hate.

Whereas "Black conservative" is no example of drawing on and acquiescing to the above, "Black Trump supporter" most definitely is (or of personal stupidity).
As I keep saying, black conservatives are a dime a dozen - there's actually a rich variety of church leaders, small business owners, teachers, and the like that push so-called "traditional" values, low taxes, hard work, blah blah blah. You can find them historically in people like Booker T. Washington, and in exclusionary conservatives like Louis Farrakhan.

The overwhelming majority of black conservative voters, go for democrats. And this is due to the overt hostility that republicans have shown towards black people, and their love of obvious grifters like Burlap and Quartz who ride painful, "crows from Dumbo" stereotypes for profit (and exploitation of the clearly mentally ill, like one Kanye West, but considering who the president is, this appears to be equal-opportunity on this front).

Similarly, whether out of a need to prove themselves to their cop "brothers", a feeling of embarrassment towards other black people, or whatever, I can assure you that many black people, when dealing with a white cop, will immediately think "Well, at least he/she isn't black.", because they're known to be more violent and on-edge than white officers are.
Mumbles is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 03:52 AM   #2282
Darat
Lackey
Administrator
 
Darat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 93,621
Originally Posted by Distracted1 View Post
nope.
You did - go back and you will see I swapped police with non-police in what Shutit said and then it was no longer reasonable. Because you hold non-police to a higher standard than you hold the police.
__________________
I wish I knew how to quit you
Darat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 03:52 AM   #2283
Darat
Lackey
Administrator
 
Darat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 93,621
Originally Posted by shuttlt View Post
Agreed.
It was your own words, your own comments.
__________________
I wish I knew how to quit you
Darat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 04:06 AM   #2284
bluesjnr
Professional Nemesis for Hire
 
bluesjnr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Home.
Posts: 8,046
Originally Posted by Mumbles View Post
As I keep saying, black conservatives are a dime a dozen - there's actually a rich variety of church leaders, small business owners, teachers, and the like that push so-called "traditional" values, low taxes, hard work, blah blah blah. You can find them historically in people like Booker T. Washington, and in exclusionary conservatives like Louis Farrakhan.

The overwhelming majority of black conservative voters, go for democrats. And this is due to the overt hostility that republicans have shown towards black people, and their love of obvious grifters like Burlap and Quartz who ride painful, "crows from Dumbo" stereotypes for profit (and exploitation of the clearly mentally ill, like one Kanye West, but considering who the president is, this appears to be equal-opportunity on this front).

Similarly, whether out of a need to prove themselves to their cop "brothers", a feeling of embarrassment towards other black people, or whatever, I can assure you that many black people, when dealing with a white cop, will immediately think "Well, at least he/she isn't black.", because they're known to be more violent and on-edge than white officers are.
Seriously? Aren't you opening the door on the "blacks are inherently more violent debate"? You can't write that and claim it only applies when they wear the blue.
__________________
bluesjnr is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 04:12 AM   #2285
Steve
Philosopher
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,796
Originally Posted by bluesjnr View Post
Seriously? Aren't you opening the door on the "blacks are inherently more violent debate"? You can't write that and claim it only applies when they wear the blue.
Why not?
__________________
Caption from and old New Yorker cartoon - Why am I shouting? Because I'm wrong!"
Steve is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 04:35 AM   #2286
shuttlt
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,748
Originally Posted by Darat View Post
You did - go back and you will see I swapped police with non-police in what Shutit said and then it was no longer reasonable. Because you hold non-police to a higher standard than you hold the police.
Self defence law in Wisconsin (I pick that one only because I read it recently) states the following:

Quote:
A person is privileged to threaten or intentionally use force against another for the purpose of preventing or terminating what the person reasonably believes to be an unlawful interference with his or her person by such other person. The actor may intentionally use only such force or threat thereof as the actor reasonably believes is necessary to prevent or terminate the interference. The actor may not intentionally use force which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm unless the actor reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself.
Would that not be the same defence that both the police and civilians would rely upon?
shuttlt is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 04:38 AM   #2287
shuttlt
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,748
Originally Posted by bluesjnr View Post
Seriously? Aren't you opening the door on the "blacks are inherently more violent debate"? You can't write that and claim it only applies when they wear the blue.
I don't see that the word "inherently" is warranted here. Either black officer are or aren't on average more likely to mistreat a black suspect. "Inherently" read to me to be adding a requirement that this be due to some kind of genetic predisposition.
shuttlt is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 04:39 AM   #2288
shuttlt
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,748
Originally Posted by Darat View Post
It was your own words, your own comments.
Could you unpack that a bit? I just posted the self defence law in Wisconsin. What am I missing in terms of there being a different standard?
shuttlt is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 04:43 AM   #2289
Darat
Lackey
Administrator
 
Darat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 93,621
Here is the run of posts:

Originally Posted by shuttlt View Post
If the cop has a reasonably belief that they are about to be seriously injured/killed and lethal force is needed to eliminate the threat, then sure. What do you expect police to do, wait to find out what you intend to do when you get up close to them? There are certainly cases where people got shot despite obeying police, but at that point you are talking about a very small number of cases indeed.
Originally Posted by Darat View Post
It gets even better, I'm walking down the street and I know that I've not committed any crime, a police officer shouts at me to stop, that would make me very scared, I would be thinking they might decide to shoot me even though I am committing no crime and even if I obey their non-legal order, I pull out my legally owned and carried pistol and shoot the police officer dead.

I was scared so it must be fine I killed the officer.
Originally Posted by shuttlt View Post
Somehow most people manage not to get shot by the police when they are ordered to stop. Similarly the vast majority of non-criminals don't start shooting under these circumstances. You would therefore be acting well outside the norm in terms of your threat assessment and reaction. I think you would have an uphill struggle in defending your actions.
Originally Posted by Darat View Post
What do you expect me to do, wait to find out what the police officer intended to do when they get up close to me?
__________________
I wish I knew how to quit you
Darat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 04:53 AM   #2290
shuttlt
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,748
Darat. It depends whether they have a reasonable belief. If I am minding my own business and pass a cop in the street, they can't shoot me just because I approached them. If you meet a crazy person who tells you that he can see demons inside you and who keeps coming towards you despite your warnings and now he starts to run at you, then you might well be entitled to shoot him. It comes down to whether there is a reasonable belief. I don't know how many times I can restate the same thing. You don't have to wait to find out if in fact he just wants to show you a cool Pokemon he has caught.

Last edited by shuttlt; 17th September 2020 at 04:55 AM.
shuttlt is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 04:55 AM   #2291
Distracted1
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 4,855
Originally Posted by Darat View Post
Here is the run of posts:
My response was to go ahead and give it a try.

If the DA finds no reason to charge you after examining the facts, in most cases I would be fine with that.
If the DA decides to charge you- then a jury finds that your fear was reasonable after considering the event in its' entirety, I would accept their judgment as well.

You use the word "reasonable" in your imaginary scenario- then describe a situation that makes it appear that you were not reasonable it is your hypothetical that implies a different standard of reasonableness- not anything I have posted..
__________________
The man with one watch knows what time it is, the man with two watches is never sure.
Distracted1 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 04:57 AM   #2292
SuburbanTurkey
Philosopher
 
SuburbanTurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 6,029
The real question becomes, will you be prosecuted, will you risk jury trial or plead out, and will a jury convict?

For cops, they tend to have a special advantage that most citizens dont. Prosecutors are extremely reluctant to pursue cases against cops because it is politically dangerous, and juries are extremely generous to cops because we are a nation of bootlickers. Even in cases where the cops actions are plainly criminal, it's an open question whether they will be prosecuted vigorously or convicted by a jury.

Cops don't have any de jure special privilege to misuse force with impunity, but de facto they absolutely do.
__________________
Gobble gobble
SuburbanTurkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 05:17 AM   #2293
Distracted1
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 4,855
Originally Posted by Giordano View Post
I know you think it is working amazingly well. I don’t think so. I don’t believe you would think so if these “unavoidable errors” were your son, or brother, or friend instead of a cold statistic.
You suggest that ones intimacy with a given situation affects how they view it.
I agree with that.
Might I suggest that had you been the victim of a crime, or if you resided in a high-crime area, your own assessment of the importance of the police, and the way they perform their job might also be altered.

In fact, I find it a source of frustration that so many posters in these threads blithely pass judgment on the police as an "enemy of the community" while living their lives safely removed from most of the violence and aggravation that the police protect us from.
Your neighborhood might remain livable if the police were defunded- mine most likely would not- and is in fact already seeing a spike in crime as the police back off on their more agressive policing.

If it is necessary for me to have had a loved one be killed by a police error in order to have a "proper" perspective on how dreadful the police are, It is equally valid that you must sink the entirety of your savings into a home in a high crime area and live there in order to gain the "proper" perspective on what the police actually encounter on a day-to-day basis.
__________________
The man with one watch knows what time it is, the man with two watches is never sure.
Distracted1 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 05:24 AM   #2294
SuburbanTurkey
Philosopher
 
SuburbanTurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 6,029
Prison kills prisoner through medical neglect.

In April, She Was Jailed on a Probation Violation. By June, She Was Dead
Holly Barlow-Austin suffered horrifying medical neglect at a Texarkana detention facility, according to video evidence in a new lawsuit.


Quote:
Three days later, her husband went to the jail personally to hand over her medications, which were correctly labeled and showed up-to-date prescriptions. They included pills to manage HIV, depression, and bipolar disorder, as well as an antifungal. But jail staff initially withheld some medications and only gave her others sporadically, in a way that undermined their efficacy, according to a lawsuit filed Wednesday.

...


In response, according to the lawsuit, a nurse on staff said that Barlow-Austin "pretends to be weak" and "knows how to play the sickly role."
https://reason.com/2020/09/16/in-apr...-she-was-dead/

This woman was arrested on a probation violation and jailed. She entered the prison with a well managed HIV infection and healthy white blood cell counts. The prison refused to administer her prescribed drugs and labeled her a malingerer while her health spiraled until she died.

Same private prison company that is accused of mass sterilization of immigrant detainees.

Quote:
Previously LaSalle Corrections had been in the news after 20-year-old Morgan Angerbauer died of ketoacidosis, a condition which results from high blood sugar, while in custody at the Bi-State jail in 2016. She was denied medication to adequately manage her diabetes. Her pleas for help were ignored by staff despite the fact that she was unable to stand and was vomiting for hours, according to a lawsuit reported by the Texarkana Gazette. Lawyers for Angerbauer's family eventually reached a settlement in a wrongful death suit with LaSalle.
Routine medical abuse and neglect, the American way!
__________________
Gobble gobble

Last edited by SuburbanTurkey; 17th September 2020 at 05:28 AM.
SuburbanTurkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 05:29 AM   #2295
shuttlt
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,748
Originally Posted by SuburbanTurkey View Post
Cops don't have any de jure special privilege to misuse force with impunity, but de facto they absolutely do.
A few reasons for that off the top of my head:
1. There are many things that cops are expected to do, that a civilian typically can't reasonably do. I mentioned earlier pulling over a car. Walking up to a car and ordering the occupant to keep their hands on the wheel. A cop can do those things without acting outside the bounds of what we expect cops to do, if civilians do those kind of things I think they are going to have a higher bar in terms of evidencing that they were acting reasonably.
2. The situation is not what it should be, but typically the cops will have better evidence of the circumstances that led up to a shooting, and maybe including the shooting, than you will. It could be communications with a dispatcher, dashcam, bodycam etc... You and I are much more likely to be relying on our word.
3. If the cop doesn't have a bad history, and there isn't other evidence that they were acting unreasonably, then quite a bit of weight will be put on their account of events. There are certainly civilians who that would also apply to, but the typical unarmed person who the cops shoot dead is a schizophrenic, or someone with a history of violence and crime.... so even if they live, they may not be an ideal witness.

Short of some kind of equity system where we insist that the proportion of cops going to prison for shooting people is matched in some way with civilians who successfully claim self defence, or civilians who shoot cops successfully claiming self defence, I don't know what could be done to remove the cops advantages at trial.

Last edited by shuttlt; 17th September 2020 at 05:32 AM.
shuttlt is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 08:24 AM   #2296
bluesjnr
Professional Nemesis for Hire
 
bluesjnr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Home.
Posts: 8,046
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Why not?
I kinda get your point but still struggle with assertion (if such an assertion exists from Mumbles) that a blue uniform is the difference.
__________________
bluesjnr is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 09:10 AM   #2297
Suddenly
No Punting
 
Suddenly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not In Follansbee
Posts: 3,901
Originally Posted by SuburbanTurkey View Post

Cops don't have any de jure special privilege to misuse force with impunity, but de facto they absolutely do.
This is at the core of it.

It should be a central principle that every right to meaningfully exist requires there to be an effective remedy. Otherwise it is a nullity.

However, especially with police misconduct, we've allowed the law to reach a place where this principle is totally ignored in favor of formalism based in legal fictions.
Suddenly is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 09:20 AM   #2298
Suddenly
No Punting
 
Suddenly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not In Follansbee
Posts: 3,901
Originally Posted by bluesjnr View Post
I kinda get your point but still struggle with assertion (if such an assertion exists from Mumbles) that a blue uniform is the difference.
It isn't unique that people who fear that assumptions based on their identity will be seen as evidence that they don't fit in will take pains to contradict those assumptions as much as possible.

The ones most worried about their place in the pack are going to be the loudest and most zealous supporters of the pack.
Suddenly is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 02:26 PM   #2299
Mumbles
Philosopher
 
Mumbles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,940
Originally Posted by bluesjnr View Post
Seriously? Aren't you opening the door on the "blacks are inherently more violent debate"? You can't write that and claim it only applies when they wear the blue.
Can and do. In every other profession I've seen, the most hysterical, scream and throw things over nothing, crowd have invariably been conservative white men. True of doctors, lawyers, engineers, technicians, janitors, teachers, and so forth. Black men will hunch over, take extra care to smile, raise their (our) vocal pitch, dress better than colleagues, show up earlier, do everything possible to ensure that nobody will suddenly decide that they're "violent" by, say, briefly frowning.

The only two groups of seriously violence prone black guys I've known are cops, and gang members. Imagine that.
Mumbles is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2020, 02:43 PM   #2300
quadraginta
Becoming Beth
 
quadraginta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Central Vale of Humility (USA, sort of)
Posts: 25,632
Originally Posted by Mumbles View Post
Can and do. In every other profession I've seen, the most hysterical, scream and throw things over nothing, crowd have invariably been conservative white men. True of doctors, lawyers, engineers, technicians, janitors, teachers, and so forth. Black men will hunch over, take extra care to smile, raise their (our) vocal pitch, dress better than colleagues, show up earlier, do everything possible to ensure that nobody will suddenly decide that they're "violent" by, say, briefly frowning.

The only two groups of seriously violence prone black guys I've known are cops, and gang members. Imagine that.

It isn't difficult. There is little to choose between the two.

I would not be surprised if the gang members were the ones who scored too high on an intelligence test to be accepted as cops.
__________________
"A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."

"Ninety percent of the politicians give the other ten percent a bad reputation."
quadraginta is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th September 2020, 02:55 AM   #2301
Darat
Lackey
Administrator
 
Darat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 93,621
Originally Posted by quadraginta View Post
It isn't difficult. There is little to choose between the two.

I would not be surprised if the gang members were the ones who scored too high on an intelligence test to be accepted as cops.
Remind me again - the gangs are the ones that you have to kill someone to become part of the inner gang and get a tattoo......?
__________________
I wish I knew how to quit you
Darat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th September 2020, 09:19 AM   #2302
Mumbles
Philosopher
 
Mumbles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,940
Originally Posted by Darat View Post
Remind me again - the gangs are the ones that you have to kill someone to become part of the inner gang and get a tattoo......?
No, they're usually small, and the only real initiation is to let the other members beat the crap out of you for a while (a woman that wants to join can usually let the guys gangbang her, but she'll be considered a lesser member). And while they don't let people that are "too smart" into the gang, it's usually because they want the kid to succeed, and know that joining will only drag him or her down.
Mumbles is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 11:46 PM   #2303
quadraginta
Becoming Beth
 
quadraginta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Central Vale of Humility (USA, sort of)
Posts: 25,632
Originally Posted by Mumbles View Post
No, they're usually small, and the only real initiation is to let the other members beat the crap out of you for a while (a woman that wants to join can usually let the guys gangbang her, but she'll be considered a lesser member). And while they don't let people that are "too smart" into the gang, it's usually because they want the kid to succeed, and know that joining will only drag him or her down.

Cops, on the other hand, don't want anyone too smart because they might blow the sweet deal the rest of the cops have.
__________________
"A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."

"Ninety percent of the politicians give the other ten percent a bad reputation."
quadraginta is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Social Issues & Current Events

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:48 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.