Merged: Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? Pt 2

[The Man]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Ask how "big" one quark can grow.

No.

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Well, one quark will “cover” space later as large an area as the expanding visible universe now.

Ask if it can still expand after that.

Again, nope.

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Of course, it will continue to expand, and later it will "cover" space of the same size as what the expanding visible universe "covered" at the beginning of the second phase.

Space is infinity 3 D place, the expansion of quarks in space outward into an already existing space is not a problem for infinity space.

Too much for you?!?

��

Thrice nay, apparently you just can't say "How much further has the Earth been pushed away from the Sun today as compared to yesterday" and a such your purported "model" can't even support your claim of what "Expanding planets which pushing away from expanding Sun have.". Do please get back to us when you can at least just support your own claims with your supposed "model" .

ETA:

So, have you actually tried that rope experiment as described yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces?

[steenkh]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

No problem with spiral orbits.

Really? Which spiral orbits do have in mind? Please show us how you calculate these spiral orbits.

Quote:

Maybe too much for you.

The idiocy is too much for me.

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

When the expanding planet is in the region between the expanding Sun and the expanding supermassive object, its expanding atomic nuclei are subjected to more expanding pushing force from the center of the galaxy than when it is on the other side of the expanding Sun.

You were asked to explain planetary orbits using your “model”. What does the centre of the galaxy have to do with planetary orbits? If a planet is squeezed out from between the Sun and the galactic centre, it is not going to return to that position on the next revolution, so there you are: no orbit!

Planetary orbits have been calculated since Newton. You can’t even do this most simple calculation.

Quote:

Can you tell me what it is based on according to my model?

I most certainly cannot! Your “model” does not exist: it is not modeling anything, least of all the real world.

Quote:

Apparently you know how to claim that my model does not explain the orbits of the planets?

Yes I do, because you have no model.

Quote:

Prove that you are familiar with my model and answer my question.

So, I know you can’t answer my question because you’re not familiar with the Onesimpleprinciple model.

I do not have to be familiar with your “model” to ask you to show that it can model planetary orbits.

[Pixie of key]

The supermassive object in the center of the galaxy expands and radiates discrete expanding densities of expanding dark matter that transmit an expanding pushing force away from the center of the expanding galaxy.

When the expanding planet is in the region between the expanding Sun and the expanding supermassive object, the expanding pushing force densities from the expanding Sun collide in the center of the expanding planet with massive and dense separate expanding pushing force densities of the expanding dark matter from the expanding supermassive object.

As they collide with the counterball, the expanding atomic nuclei of the expanding planet are subjected to a more pushing force that pushes away from the center of the expanding galaxy.

Thus, the momentum of the expanding planet accelerates away from the center of the galaxy relative to the expanding Sun.

The expanding planet passes along the curved orbit of the expanding Sun because of the expanding pushing force from the Sun.

As the expanding planet protrudes to the other side of the expanding Sun relative to the center of the galaxy, there are no collisions with the counterpart in the center of the expanding planet.

The protrusion away from the center of the expanding galaxy slows relative to the expanding Sun, and thus the expanding planet descends again in the area between the Sun and the supermassive object in the center of the galaxy.

Is this too much for you?

Too much for you

��

Consider expanding Jupiter into the area between the Sun and the supermassive object in the center of the galaxy.

Expanding densities of pushing force collide with the counterball in the center of the expanding Jupiter.

The expanding Jupiter acquires a new expanding substance as the densities of expanding dark matter from a supermassive target in the center of the galaxy expand in the center of Jupiter into a new observable expanding substance that protrudes in a continuous stream toward the surface of the expanding Jupiter.

Explanation of Jupiter's red dot.

When the Sun is in the area between Jupiter and the supermassive object in the center of the galaxy, there are also collisions with the counter-sphere inside the Sun and the Sun also gets itself a new expanding substance that starts to push towards the surface of the expanding Sun.

This explains Sunspots.

The expanding Earth also receives a new expanding gas from its center, which is delayed out of the expanding Earth, causing hurricanes, tornadoes, and other storms.

Too much for you?!?

��

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

..

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
The same "expanding planet/Sun/supermassive object/atomic nucleus/quark" gibberish.

[Pixie of key]

TennisBall from Sky Challenge

https://vm.tiktok.com/7PywSj/

Not Bad 🤔

Same in youtube, if you dont have TikTok.

https://youtu.be/VKMaiqicads

boomerang better.

🤔

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

...

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Irrelevant spam.

[steenkh]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

The expanding planet passes along the curved orbit of the expanding Sun because of the expanding pushing force from the Sun.

As the expanding planet protrudes to the other side of the expanding Sun relative to the center of the galaxy, there are no collisions with the counterpart in the center of the expanding planet.

Why does the Sun or the planets have orbits at all? Once they are pushed away from whatever expanding nonsense you are inventing, they will not return to make another round in the orbit, because then they would move against the pushing force.

Your laughable concept would eventually bring everything to rest at the place where all the pushing forces cancel out.

[bruto]

Thought Lost in the Stars was a documentary?

[Pixie of key]

Is Venus’ Rotation Slowing Down?

https://www.universetoday.com/93494/...-slowing-down/

Originally Posted by steenkh

Why does the Sun or the planets have orbits at all? Once they are pushed away from whatever expanding nonsense you are inventing, they will not return to make another round in the orbit, because then they would move against the pushing force.

Your laughable concept would eventually bring everything to rest at the place where all the pushing forces cancel out.

"Over its four-year mission, Magellan determined the length of the day on Venus as being equal to 243.0185 Earth days. But the data from Venus Express indicate the length of the Venus day is on average 6.5 minutes longer.

What could cause the planet to slow down? One possibility may be the raging weather on Venus. Recent atmospheric models have shown that the planet could have weather cycles stretching over decades, which could lead to equally long-term changes in the rotation period. The most important of those forces is due to the dense atmosphere – more than 90 times the pressure of Earth’s and high-speed weather systems, which are believed to change the planet’s rotation rate through friction with the surface."

Reason is same why expanding planets puhing all a time away from expanding Sun curved orbit which spiral orbit.

Can you figure out explanation?

Can you use your own brain?

🤔

[Pixie of key]

Read this first

The supermassive object in the center of the galaxy expands and radiates discrete expanding densities of expanding dark matter that transmit an expanding pushing force away from the center of the expanding galaxy.

When the expanding planet is in the region between the expanding Sun and the expanding supermassive object, the expanding pushing force densities from the expanding Sun collide in the center of the expanding planet with massive and dense separate expanding pushing force densities of the expanding dark matter from the expanding supermassive object.

As they collide with the counterball, the expanding atomic nuclei of the expanding planet are subjected to a more pushing force that pushes away from the center of the expanding galaxy.

Thus, the momentum of the expanding planet accelerates away from the center of the galaxy relative to the expanding Sun.

The expanding planet passes along the curved orbit of the expanding Sun because of the expanding pushing force from the Sun.

As the expanding planet protrudes to the other side of the expanding Sun relative to the center of the galaxy, there are no collisions with the counterpart in the center of the expanding planet.

The protrusion away from the center of the expanding galaxy slows relative to the expanding Sun, and thus the expanding planet descends again in the area between the Sun and the supermassive object in the center of the galaxy.

Is this too much for you?

Too much for you

🤔

Consider expanding Jupiter into the area between the Sun and the supermassive object in the center of the galaxy.

Expanding densities of pushing force collide with the counterball in the center of the expanding Jupiter.

The expanding Jupiter acquires a new expanding substance as the densities of expanding dark matter from a supermassive target in the center of the galaxy expand in the center of Jupiter into a new observable expanding substance that protrudes in a continuous stream toward the surface of the expanding Jupiter.

Explanation of Jupiter's red dot.

When the Sun is in the area between Jupiter and the supermassive object in the center of the galaxy, there are also collisions with the counter-sphere inside the Sun and the Sun also gets itself a new expanding substance that starts to push towards the surface of the expanding Sun.

This explains Sunspots.

The expanding Earth also receives a new expanding gas from its center, which delays out of the expanding Earth with a delay, causing hurricanes, tornadoes and other storms.

🤔

Ok, then this.

The expanding pushing force within the expanding planet, which is circulated by the expanding atomic nuclei of the expanding planet, interacts with the expanding pushing force from the expanding Sun's expanding atomic nuclei, and thus the expanding planet is subjected to pushing from the expanding planet away.

Reflect on the spiral orbit and realize where the expanding pushing force is directed out of the expanding planets.

From the expanding Earth to the expanding Earth where there is evening.

From the expanding Venus on the side where the morning of Venus is.

The reason why the rotation around the axis of the expanding Venus slows down in a clearly noticeable way.

You can't explain this with pulling forces either, nor with curved space !!!

The expanding pushing force with recyclable expanding densities is explained in a logically beautiful way.

🤔

[steenkh]

Repeating nonsense does not turn it into sense.

True to form you did not even try to show how orbits can be a result of your fantasy. You probably have realized that they can’t. Just like you decided not to do the rope experiment, but instead made a ridiculous video where you use tiny pieces of string in order to avoid losing face.

[Pixie of key]

Originally Posted by steenkh

Repeating nonsense does not turn it into sense.

True to form you did not even try to show how orbits can be a result of your fantasy. You probably have realized that they can’t. Just like you decided not to do the rope experiment, but instead made a ridiculous video where you use tiny pieces of string in order to avoid losing face.

Why Venus rotate slow down?

Because of expanding pushing force.

Lets wait James Webb Telescope.

Then we can see how expanding galaxys was born inside to outside.

🤔

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Is Venus’ Rotation Slowing Down?

https://www.universetoday.com/93494/...-slowing-down/



"Over its four-year mission, Magellan determined the length of the day on Venus as being equal to 243.0185 Earth days. But the data from Venus Express indicate the length of the Venus day is on average 6.5 minutes longer.

What could cause the planet to slow down? One possibility may be the raging weather on Venus. Recent atmospheric models have shown that the planet could have weather cycles stretching over decades, which could lead to equally long-term changes in the rotation period. The most important of those forces is due to the dense atmosphere – more than 90 times the pressure of Earth’s and high-speed weather systems, which are believed to change the planet’s rotation rate through friction with the surface."
...

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
His "expanding planet/Sun/supermassive object/atomic nucleus/quark" gibberish + lies about what he cites (Venus's rotation is not its orbit!).

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

...

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Spams the thread with his "expanding planet/Sun/supermassive object/atomic nucleus/quark" gibberish.

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

...

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
His "expanding planet/Sun/supermassive object/atomic nucleus/quark/force " gibberish.

[Pixie of key]

.

Expanding space is naked empire!!!

🤔

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

...

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Deluded lie when he has been told the physical evidence for an expanding universe many times and his gibberish has nothing to do with the real universe.

[Pixie of key]

.

Expanding space has nothing to do with the real universe.

Space is infinity 3 D place which is nothing!

🤔

Scientist Finds ‘Evidence’ of Another Universe Before This One

https://physics-astronomyblog.blogsp...f-another.html

🤔

[Pixie of key]

.

This is it!

https://youtu.be/A-45AqYtkFw

🤔

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

...

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Deluded lie when he has been told the theory and physical evidence for an expanding universe many times and his gibberish has nothing to do with the real universe.

Deluded lie about science.
Scientist Finds ‘Evidence’ of Another Universe Before This One is that this universe is expanding as part of a cycle of universes.

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

...

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Spams us with his lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video from Mar 21, 2017 yet again.

The Man asked for a rope experiment and got this lying video in return.

[The Man]

Originally Posted by Reality Check

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Spams us with his lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video from Mar 21, 2017 yet again.

The Man asked for a rope experiment and got this lying video in return.

Wait, he's still trotting out that video that shows he knows exactly why the rope experiment wouldn't work?

Pixie of key, anytime you link that video you just demonstrate that you do understand how and why the rope would respond differently to pulling forces than it does to pushing forces. Since that level of understanding is clearly evident in your attempt to forgo the conditions of the experiment, that were explicitly stated specifically to invalidate what you try to do in the video (pushing the object with just a bit of rope between it and your finger, among other tricks you might have tried). Why is it that you evidently just can't relate that actual understanding of what would happen here?

[Little 10 Toes]

http://www.internationalskeptics.com...&postcount=750

Pixie of key. Failing to follow simple experiments since 2014.

So, have you actually tried that rope experiment as described yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces?

[Pixie of key]

The occurrence of consecutive commas overlaps slightly

New spots appear far from the equator and old spots near the equator.

http://solarcyclescience.com/bin/bfly.jpg


That is, it is about how Jupiter’s timings deep inside the Sun get help from other gas planets.

The construction site on the planets, as seen from the center of the galaxy, is on the other side of the Sun.

The dots of the new episode that reach the surface of the Sun protrude far from the equator, and the achievements of Jupiter, which has reached and accelerated toward the surface of the Sun and have been helped by other planets

Logically beautiful simple.

https://youtu.be/4wgD9qHDdxE

🤔

[The Man]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

The occurrence of consecutive commas overlaps slightly

New spots appear far from the equator and old spots near the equator.

http://solarcyclescience.com/bin/bfly.jpg


That is, it is about how Jupiter’s timings deep inside the Sun get help from other gas planets.

The construction site on the planets, as seen from the center of the galaxy, is on the other side of the Sun.

The dots of the new episode that reach the surface of the Sun protrude far from the equator, and the achievements of Jupiter, which has reached and accelerated toward the surface of the Sun and have been helped by other planets

Logically beautiful simple.

https://youtu.be/4wgD9qHDdxE

🤔

Illogical, ugly, convoluted and tortuously contrived nonsense. Not only unsupported by direct observational evidence but generally claimed, by you, as unsupportable by direct observational evidence.

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

...

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Total gibberish about commas, planets, etc. !

Usual idiotic lies about science.
The image is "Daily Sunspot Area Averaged over Individual Solar Rotations". It has 2 graphs plotting data from 1870 to 2020. The first graph shows how the area (not a lie of age) varies with latitude.

Usual insane video: "Maybe Earth warmup 1900-1940 and 1980-2010 because 1572 and 1604 supernovas dark pushing force?!?!".
Our climate has nothing to do with the tiny, tiny amount of energy that reached us from these 2 supernovae over a period of a few weeks or any deluded "dark pushing force".

Originally Posted by Reality Check

Insane gibberish of 2 supernova emitting "dark pushing force" and doing deluded stuff to the Sun.

Insane because SN1572 and SN1604 were just 2 of the observed supernovae. The Milky Way has a supernova on average every 50 years !

Insane because supernova emit light and neutrinos and gas not his gibberish of "dark".

Insane because the emissions from most supernova cannot have any effect on the Sun. The emissions are totally insignificant compared to the Sun (parts per billion?). The emissions are absorbed by the photosphere and reemitted in all direction as light. An exception would be a supernova a few light years away.

[Pixie of key]

ALMA sees most distant Milky Way look-alike

https://phys.org/news/2020-08-alma-d...ook-alike.html

"Astronomers using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), in which the European Southern Observatory (ESO) is a partner, have revealed an extremely distant and therefore very young galaxy that looks surprisingly like our Milky Way. The galaxy is so far away its light has taken more than 12 billion years to reach us: we see it as it was when the Universe was just 1.4 billion years old. It is also surprisingly unchaotic, contradicting theories that all galaxies in the early Universe were turbulent and unstable. This unexpected discovery challenges our understanding of how galaxies form, giving new insights into the past of our Universe.

"The big surprise was to find that this galaxy is actually quite similar to nearby galaxies, contrary to all expectations from the models and previous, less detailed, observations," says co-author Filippo Fraternali, from the Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen in the Netherlands. In the early Universe, young galaxies were still in the process of forming, so researchers expected them to be chaotic and lacking the distinct structures typical of more mature galaxies like the Milky Way"


Expanding galaxys was born inside to outside

Expanding space is naked empire.

🤔

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

ALMA sees most distant Milky Way look-alike

https://phys.org/news/2020-08-alma-d...ook-alike.html

"Astronomers using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), in which the European Southern Observatory (ESO) is a partner, have revealed an extremely distant and therefore very young galaxy that looks surprisingly like our Milky Way. The galaxy is so far away its light has taken more than 12 billion years to reach us: we see it as it was when the Universe was just 1.4 billion years old. It is also surprisingly unchaotic, contradicting theories that all galaxies in the early Universe were turbulent and unstable. This unexpected discovery challenges our understanding of how galaxies form, giving new insights into the past of our Universe.

"The big surprise was to find that this galaxy is actually quite similar to nearby galaxies, contrary to all expectations from the models and previous, less detailed, observations," says co-author Filippo Fraternali, from the Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen in the Netherlands. In the early Universe, young galaxies were still in the process of forming, so researchers expected them to be chaotic and lacking the distinct structures typical of more mature galaxies like the Milky Way"

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
His ignorant gibberish does not say how long it took for this single galaxy to form its shape. He lies that this has anything to do with the enormous body of physical evidence that the universe is expanding.

[Little 10 Toes]

http://www.internationalskeptics.com...&postcount=750

Pixie of key. Failing to follow simple experiments since 2014.

So, have you actually tried that rope experiment as described yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces?

[Pixie of key]

Originally Posted by Little 10 Toes

http://www.internationalskeptics.com...&postcount=750

Pixie of key. Failing to follow simple experiments since 2014.

So, have you actually tried that rope experiment as described yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces?

Video from 22.9.2014

https://youtu.be/Nw53G5buuyI

🤔

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Video from 22.9.2014

Pixie of key repeats the 6 year old lie that that this video is a experiment where he pushes something with a rope.

Once again: This is him fiddling around with a compass attached to a string and gibberish about coins, a tape measure, etc. Then comes the lie - he pushes a book with his finger (having the string squashed between them is not the rope experiment).

Even the title is a lie. James Randi, Stephen Hawking and even a child would see this is not the rope experiment. A child knows that pulling a toy using a rope is having one end of the rope attached to the toy and pulling on the other end of the rope. For pushing that toy, it is one end of the rope attached to the toy and pushing on the other end of the rope.

[Pixie of key]

Originally Posted by Reality Check

Pixie of key repeats the 6 year old lie that that this video is a experiment where he pushes something with a rope.

Once again: This is him fiddling around with a compass attached to a string and gibberish about coins, a tape measure, etc. Then comes the lie - he pushes a book with his finger (having the string squashed between them is not the rope experiment).

Even the title is a lie. James Randi, Stephen Hawking and even a child would see this is not the rope experiment. A child knows that pulling a toy using a rope is having one end of the rope attached to the toy and pulling on the other end of the rope. For pushing that toy, it is one end of the rope attached to the toy and pushing on the other end of the rope.

Höpö höpö

🙂

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Höpö höpö

Pixie of key still lies that a "Rope experiment / Randi / Stephen Hawking dont understund!" has the rope experiment (push an object with a stretched out rope as done with pulling an object) and lies about James Randi and Stephen Hawking not understanding what a child understands.

[Pixie of key]

Mystery gas discovered near center of Milky Way

https://phys.org/news/2020-08-myster...ter-milky.html

"An international team of researchers have discovered a dense, cold gas that's been shot out from the center of the Milky Way "like bullets"."

Thus.

Galaxies emerge from the center out.

The supermassive object expands and emits from time to time an expanding dark substance which, under suitable conditions, can expand into a detectable expanding substance.


Näin.

Galaksit syntyvät keskeltä ulos päin.

Supermassiivinen kohde laajenee ja siitä purkautuu aika ajoin laajenevaa pimeää ainetta joka voi sopivissa olosuhteissa laajentua havaittavaksi laajenevaksi aineeksi.

🤔

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Mystery gas discovered near center of Milky Way

https://phys.org/news/2020-08-myster...ter-milky.html

"An international team of researchers have discovered a dense, cold gas that's been shot out from the center of the Milky Way "like bullets"."

Pixie of key lies about science again.

1. Gas traveling in the existing Milky Way is not a galaxy being born or emerging !
   This is gas being moved around in the Milky Way.
2. A lie that supermassive black holes expand and emit an imaginary "expanding dark substance".
   Supermassive black holes expand when they collect mas and emit nothing. The Milky Way's supermassive black hole is not collecting measurable mass.
3. This article is not about his "dark substance" fantasies.
   This is gas that was detected because it is emitting light.
   {*}As the article says, this is a normal process that we have seen in other galaxies.

Cold gas in the Milky Way’s nuclear wind

Quote:

The centre of the Milky Way hosts several high-energy processes that have strongly affected the inner regions of our Galaxy. Activity from the super-massive black hole at the Galactic Centre, which is coincident with the radio source Sagittarius A*, and stellar feedback from the inner molecular ring1 expel matter and energy from the disk in the form of a galactic wind2. Multiphase gas has been observed within this outflow, including hot highly ionized3,4 (temperatures of about 10⁶ kelvin), warm ionized5,6 (104 to 105 kelvin) and cool atomic7,8 (10³ to 10⁴ kelvin) gas. However, so far there has been no evidence of the cold dense molecular phase (10 to 100 kelvin). Here we report observations of molecular gas outflowing from the centre of our Galaxy. This cold material is associated with atomic hydrogen clouds travelling in the nuclear wind8. The morphology and the kinematics of the molecular gas, resolved on a scale of about one parsec, indicate that these clouds are mixing with the warmer medium and are possibly being disrupted. The data also suggest that the mass of the molecular gas outflow is not negligible and could affect the rate of star formation in the central regions of the Galaxy. The presence of this cold, dense and high-velocity gas is puzzling, because neither Sagittarius A* at its current level of activity nor star formation in the inner Galaxy seems to be a viable source for this material.

[Pixie of key]

"In quasar 3C279—also a black hole—the EHT team found another phenomenon: At a distance of more than a thousand times the shadow of the black hole, the core of a plasma jet suddenly lit up. How the energy for this jet could get there as if through an invisible chimney was not yet known."

https://phys.org/news/2020-08-black-...-magnetic.html

🤔

Hoh hoh houu.

Galaxies are born from the inside out.

Supermassive objects expand and radiate expanding dark matter, some of which expands into a registrable expandable substance.
*



Hoh hoh houu.

Galaksit syntyvät sisältä ulos päin.

Supermassiiviset kohteet laajenevat ja säteilevät laajenevaa pimeää ainetta josta osa laajenee rekisteröitävissä olevaksi laajenevaksi aineeksi.

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

"In quasar 3C279—also a black hole—the EHT team found another phenomenon: At a distance of more than a thousand times the shadow of the black hole, the core of a plasma jet suddenly lit up. How the energy for this jet could get there as if through an invisible chimney was not yet known."

https://phys.org/news/2020-08-black-...-magnetic.html

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread
Pixie of key lies about science again. This article is a jet of gas suddenly lighting up in an existing galaxy.
His gibberish is about galaxies being born and "expanding dark matter" idiocy (dark matter is not plasma gas, dark matter does not expand).

[Pixie of key]

Ok, let me tell you 😀

The more massive and denser the expanding densification, the slower the acceleration.

Still, the acceleration is slow and sure.

This is because as the expanding densities circulate with each other the expanding pushing force, they automatically push each other away from each other and at the same time away from the object from which they originate.

And such an object is thus constantly pushed away by an expanding pushing force having the nature of expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies.

And at the same time, of course, the nature of the expanding galaxies that emerge from the inside out. That is, as these expanding supermassive objects collide with each other as they push forward, they release an expanding dark matter that creates new expanding stars without binding forces and without any pulling forces. And from the beginning, their trajectories still meet at a very steep angle. Today, the trajectories of space-expanding galaxies meet at a very gentle angle.

That is, expanding supermassive objects, expanding stars, expanding electrons, and expanding photons are created on the same principle about this.

Rough example.

https://youtu.be/QboDTgped1E

Ok, but that's not all.

Towards these really large-scale pushing forces, extremely fast pushing forces are pushed in from all directions in zillions as separate densities where the pushing force is no longer scattered in space.

The pushing force in them has pushed forward at an accelerating pace for billions of billions of years.

And when they now collide with these very massive and dense expanding densities, they cause their expansion to accelerate, inevitably pushing each other away from each other faster the faster the pushing force in them expands.

After all, they are circulating with each other the ever-expanding pushing force, and thus the expanding pushing force in them changes completely with time.

That is, our expanding visible universe consists solely of an expanding pushing force that accelerates from a certain direction to a certain direction, and in billions of billions of years, the pushing force we now have will collide with very, very massive and dense expanding densities, causing their expansion to accelerate. from such a really really large-scale recycler where the extremely dense pushing force explodes / expands all the time into a less dense pushing force

And as a result, an extremely dense and constantly denser dispersing / expanding pushing force is pushed in such a direction from such an object.

Ok, why does the very dense pushing force in these really large-scale recyclers never run out?

Well, they are pushed from every direction by that pushing force dispersed in space at an extremely rapid rate, and thus rushed into these very dense and massive densities, causing their expansion to accelerate.

And at the same time the pace of the pushing force in them slows down and slows down and when the pace finally fades away in relation to the environment, then they are inside such a really large scale object, perhaps very close to its center is there once again compressed into an extremely dense pushing force, because there the pushing force is subjected to enormous pressure / pushing force. And that compression into an extremely dense pushing force just so that it once again sets off with the very very dense pushing force around it to protrude away from the center of that very large size object.

It is a very large-scale recycling in which the expanding pushing force in space has the character of expanding galaxies emerging from the inside out.

😀

[Pixie of key]

Same with my mother language 😀

Ok, minäpä kerron.

Mitä massiivisempi ja tiheämpi laajeneva tihentymä, sitä hitaampi kiihtyvyys.

Silti kiihtyyttä on hitaasti ja varmasti.

Tämä johtuu siitä että sitä mukaa kuin laajenevat tihentymät kierrättävät toistensa kanssa laajenevaa työntävää voimaa, ne automaattisesti työntävät toisiansa pois päin toisistansa ja samalla pois päin siitä kohteesta josta ovat peräisin.

Ja tuollaisesta kohteesta siis työntyy koko ajan pois päin laajenevaa työntävää voimaa jolla on galaksien keskusten laajenevien supermassiivisten kohteiden luonne.

Ja samalla tietysti sisältä ulos päin syntyvien laajenevien galaksien luonne. Siis sen takia että sitä mukaa kuin nämä laajenevat supermassiiviset kohteet törmäilevät toistensa kanssa eteenpäin työntymisen aikana, niistä purkautuu laajenevaa pimeää ainetta josta syntyy uusia laajenevia tähtiä ilman sidosvoimia ja ilman minkäänlaisia vetäviä voimia. Ja alkumatkastahan niiden liikeradat vielä kohtaavat hyvinkin jyrkässä kulmassa. Nykyisin avaruudessa laajenevien galaksien liikeradat kohtaavat hyvin loivassa kulmassa.

Eli laajenevat supermassiiviset kohteet, laajenevat tähdet, laajenevat elektronit ja laajenevat fotonit syntyvät samalla periaatteella about näin.

Karkea esimerkki.

https://youtu.be/QboDTgped1E

Ok, mutta ei tässä kaikki.

Näitä todella ison mittakaavan työntävää voimaa kierrättäviä kohteita kohti työntyy joka suunnasta äärimmäisen nopeaa työntävää voimaa ziljoonina erillisinä tihentyminä joissa oleva työntävä voima ei enää juurikaan hajaannu avaruuteen.

Niissä oleva työntävä voima on työntynyt kiihtyvällä vauhdilla eteenpäin miljardeja miljardeja vuosia.

Ja kun ne nyt törmäävät näihin erittäin massiivisiin ja tiheisiin laajeneviin tihentymiin, ne saavat niiden laajenemisen kiihtymään, jolloin ne väistämättä työntävät toinen toisiansa pois päin toisistansa sitä mukaa nopeammin, mitä nopeammin niissä oleva työntävä voima laajenee.

Nehän siis kierrättävät keskenään sitä koko ajan nopeammin laajenevaa työntävää voimaa ja näin niissä oleva laajeneva työntävä voima vaihtuu ajan kanssa kokonaan.

Eli meidän laajeneva näkyvä maailmankaikkeua koostuu pelkästään laajenevasta työntävästä voimasta jonka vauhti kiihtyy tietystä suunnasta tiettyyn suuntaan ja miljardien miljardien vuosien päästä meissä nyt oleva työntävä voima tulee törmäämään uusiin erittäin erittäin massiivisiin ja tiheisiin laajeneviin tihentymiin, saaden niiden laajenemisen kiihtymään ja samalla niiden oma vauhti kiihtyy pois päin tuollaisesta todella todella ison mittakaavan kierrättäjästä jossa oleva äärimmäisen tiheä työntävä voima räjähtää / laajenee koko ajan vähemmän tiheämmäksi työntäväksi voimaksi

Ja sen seurauksena tuollaisesta kohteesta siis työntyy joka suuntaan äärimmäisen tiheää ja koko ajan vähemmän tiheämmäksi hajaantuvaa / laajenevaa työntävää voimaa.

Ok, minkä takia näissä todella ison mittakaavan kierrättäjissä oleva erittäin tiheä työntävä voima ei koskaan lopu?

No, niitä kohtihan työntyy joka suunnasta sitä avaruuteen hajaantunutta työntävää voimaa äärimmäisen nopealla vauhdilla ja sitä siis tormää näihin erittäin tiheisiin ja massiivisiin tihentymiin, saaden niiden laajenemisen kiihtymään.

Ja samalla niissä olevan työntävän voiman vauhti hidastuu ja hidastuu ja kun vauhti lopulta hiipuu pois suhteessa ympäristöön, niin silloinhan ne ovat tuollaisen todella ison mittakaavan kohteen sisällä, kenties hyvinkin lähellä sen keskustaa ja näin nämä todella ison mittakaavan kierrättäjät saavat keskustaansa koko ajan lisää työntävää voimaa joka puristuu siellä taas kerran äärimmäisen tiheäksi työntäväksi voimaksi, koska siellä työntävään voimaan kohdistuu valtava paine / työntävä voima. Ja tuo äärimmäisen tiheäksi työntäväksi voimaksi puristuminen vain jotta se taas kerran lähtee ympärillä olevan erittäin erittäin tiheän työntävän voiman mukana työntymään pois päin tuon erittäin ison kokoluokan kohteen keskustasta.

Sitä on erittäin ison mittakaavan kierrätys jossa avaruudessa laajenevalla työntävällä voimalla on sisältä ulos päin syntyvien laajenevien galaksien luonne.

😀

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Ok, let me tell you ...

As usual, Pixy of key writes ignorant gibberish unrelated to the real world.
The same total gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 11 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread