|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
![]() |
#161 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
An insane question. Supernovae are produced by the stars by themselves, e.g. running out of fuel for fusion, not his ignorant delusions about stars maybe thousands of light years away. |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#162 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
An abysmally ignorant delusion. |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#163 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
Stupid random arithmetic. |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#164 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
His insane delusion that only pushing forces exist. Children know that they pull toys with strings! Usual delusions from insane ignorance - the position of all of these stars can be found by anyone with enough few brain cells to Google ![]() What makes this ignorance really insane is he has many years spewing abysmal stupidity about astronomy and he still knows nothing about astronomy, e.g. that databases of star positions exist. |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#165 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
A deluded "prediction" because he is too abysmally ignorant to actually test it. |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#166 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
A display of massive ignorance and delusion. There will be stars close to that star because it is in a galaxy! Supernovae do not magically make other stars produce flares because of simple physics and facts such as the facts about supernovae and the inverse square law. The same for stellar flares doing whatever his delusions want.. |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#167 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
It is not worth considering many years of gibberish, ignorance and lies about science |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#168 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
There fore we have the same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science. |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#169 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
|
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#170 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,636
|
|
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning." by Maartenn100 |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#171 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Directly above the center of the Earth
Posts: 2,685
|
So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?
If not, why not? If so, why haven't you reported what you found? It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces. How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces. |
__________________
I'm an "intellectual giant, with access to wilkipedia [sic]" "I believe in some ways; communicating with afterlife is easier than communicating with me." -Tim4848 who said he would no longer post here, twice in fact, but he did. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#172 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,636
|
Research on disk galaxies sheds light on movement of stars
https://m.phys.org/news/2019-04-disk...ent-stars.html "Although the research provides evidence for why the spiral arms maintain their shape, questions remain. It's easy to understand why a traffic jam occurs when you get to a car accident that reduced three lanes to one, but determining what creates the denser waves is still an open question." It is not open anymore!!! Here's the answer to the types. Pushing force Nothing else. As the expanding star protrudes towards an area with more stars, it is subjected to a pushing force that slows its pace and thus spiral absorbs itself into a new expanding star. This star continues through the spiral branch extending with the other expanding stars, and on the other side it is subjected to the force of the spiraling branch of the renewed spiral branch that pushes it away from the spiral branch. This is how the spiral branch is still the same spiral branch as before, even though all the stars have changed in it. The same spiral branch consisting of different stars. The same lake, different water. Same man, different cells. The same quark, different expanding pushing force. Same spiral branch, different stars. Eternal recycling is always in the infinite 3 D space that itself is nothing. 🤔 |
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning." by Maartenn100 |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#173 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,636
|
Mystery of the Universe's Expansion Rate Widens with New Hubble Data
http://hubblesite.org/news_release/n...OKbWUGxdZYaSY8 "New physics may be needed to rectify the universe's past and present behavior. There is something wrong with our universe. Or, more specifically, it is outpacing all expectations for its present rate of expansion. Something is amiss in astronomers' efforts to measure the past and predict the present, according to a discrepancy between the two main techniques for measuring the universe's expansion rate – a key to understanding its history and physical parameters." Space dont expanding at all. Nucleus of atoms expanding and recycling expanding pushing force which have nature of expanding electrons and expanding light. All expanding lights interactive with eachother and get others expanding faster. Thats why expanding light moving faster and faster same way what matter and light expanding. Expanding lightwaves is dark for us and that dark waves / dark pushing force have lot of more mass what expanding photons have. |
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning." by Maartenn100 |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#174 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,636
|
Space dont expanding!
Expanding space is the Emperor's naked. The nuclei of the atoms expand and recycle the expanding pushing force with e.g. the nature of expanding light to us the dark waves. These expanding waves of dark pushing force carrying expanding photons contain most of the mass of expanding light. These waves of expanding light interact with each other, accelerating each other's expansion, and the pace of such expanding light accelerates in the same proportion as the substance and light expand. And there is an explanation for these findings, which are contradictory to current theories. . "It was considered as a possible explanation for the contradictory speed of expansion of the growth of the influence of dark energy as the universe evolved." 🤣🤣🤣 Doesn't these types really realize WHAT ??? Wake Up Cardboard !!! What's more in space, more and more from every direction in every direction?!? Well what about LIGHT !!! Expanding light so that expanding lights interact with each other and accelerate each other's expansion 🤔 |
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning." by Maartenn100 |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#175 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Directly above the center of the Earth
Posts: 2,685
|
![]() So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet? If not, why not? If so, why haven't you reported what you found? It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces. How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces. |
__________________
I'm an "intellectual giant, with access to wilkipedia [sic]" "I believe in some ways; communicating with afterlife is easier than communicating with me." -Tim4848 who said he would no longer post here, twice in fact, but he did. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#176 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
|
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#177 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
Starts with "expanding star" insanity. Utter stupidity that that a spiral arm is a star. Then it gets worse! |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#178 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
An insane lie that the universe is not expanding when he cites a measurement of the universe expanding (the Hubble constant) ![]() Deluded atom/electrons/light expanding gibberish. Deluded dark wave gibberish. For others: Mystery of the Universe's Expansion Rate Widens with New Hubble Data
Quote:
|
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#179 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,636
|
Solar storm of 1859 September 1–2,
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm_of_1859 "The solar storm of 1859 (also known as the Carrington Event)[1] was a powerful geomagnetic storm during solar cycle 10 (1855–1867). A solar coronal mass ejection (CME) hit Earth's magnetosphere and induced one of the largest geomagnetic storms on record, September 1–2, 1859." So, also some dark expanding pushing force deep inside expanding Earth and later there pushing out energy and thats what happening? Royal Charter Storm 25 and 26 October 1859 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Charter_Storm "The Royal Charter Storm (also known as the Great storm of 1859)[1] of 25 and 26 October 1859 was considered to be the most severe storm to hit the Irish Sea in the 19th century," |
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning." by Maartenn100 |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#180 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
The Solar storm of 1859 (Carrington Event) and Royal Charter Storm (almost 2 months later ![]() |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#181 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 7,122
|
Pixie of key, what, if anything, would you accept as evidence that could contradict your ideas?
|
__________________
Steen -- Jack of all trades - master of none! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#182 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,636
|
|
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning." by Maartenn100 |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#183 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 7,122
|
|
__________________
Steen -- Jack of all trades - master of none! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#184 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
The usual insanely deluded crank video. His ignorant delusions do not explain sunspots. "Reason why there was Sunspots 1940 - 2000, even should not be" He is the only one deluded enough to think that there should be no sunspots from 1940 to 2000. Intelligent people learn about the real Sun. These are the real, known grand solar minimum Homeric Minimum [8] 950BC 800BCIt is a blatant lie that grand solar minimum are separated by 330 years. It is a complete delusion that we should be in a grand solar minimum. Sunspots.are caused by the Sun, not his insanity about our supermassive black hole, gas giants, pushing forces, dark matter, matter bubbles, etc. An insane delusion that Uranus and Neptune line up on one side of the Sun every 330 years. The insanity is their orbital periods (64 and 165 years) make this obviously impossible and asking viewers to do the research or calculations he has not done. An insane delusion about supernova in 1572 and 1604 preventing his delusion that there should have been no sunspots 1940-2000. Usual insanity about Jupiter's Red Spot. Weather on our gas giants are powered by the Sun and internal heat. Usual insanity about the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami (he cannot even get the order correct!). That insanity is applied to the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season. That insanity is applied to a new storm on Jupiter in 2006. That insanity is applied to all storms on all gas giants. Repeats his insane delusion about Uranus and Neptune then vague muttering about changing the value of 330 years. Maybe this. Maybe that. Maybe keep with the 330 lie! Maybe a different value ![]() Repeats his insane bubbles and supernova delusions. |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#185 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,636
|
Too cheap prize now 😃😃😃 No niin pösilöt😃😃😃 Tästä se löhtöö työntymään 😃 "In principle, it is not unusual for the magnetic activity of a star like the sun to undergo cyclic oscillation. And yet past models have been unable to adequately explain the very regular cycle of the sun. The HZDR research team has now succeeded in demonstrating that the planetary tidal forces on the sun act like an outer clock, and are the decisive factor behind its steady rhythm. To accomplish this result, the scientists systematically compared historical observations of solar activity from the last thousand years with planetary constellations, statistically proving that the two phenomena are linked. "There is an astonishingly high level of concordance: what we see is complete parallelism with the planets over the course of 90 cycles," said Frank Stefani, lead author of the study. "Everything points to a clocked process."" https://phys.org/news/2019-05-corrob...dal-solar.html Tästähän minä jo juttua olen jonnii aikoo esillä pitänyt 😃 Tyypeiltä ilmeisesti puuttuu vielä syvällisempi ymmärrys, mutta pittää minun ensin lukea tuo juttu loppuun. Ei paha tämä!!! Ei paha yhtään 😃😃😃 🤔 |
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning." by Maartenn100 |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#186 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,636
|
"In the long term, a more precise model of the solar dynamo would help scientists to quantify climate-relevant processes such as space weather more effectively, and perhaps even to improve climate predictions one day. The new model calculations also mean that, besides tidal forces, potentially other, hitherto neglected mechanisms would have to be integrated into the solar dynamo theory, mechanisms with weak forces that can nevertheless—as researchers now know—have a major impact. To be able to investigate this fundamental question in the laboratory, too, the researchers are currently setting up a new liquid metal experiment at HZDR."
Hyvä meininki. Mutta onko tyypeillä munaa luopua nykyisestä atomimallista? 🤔 |
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning." by Maartenn100 |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#187 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,636
|
Does the Sun get a new perceptible substance from the dark matter that would push through it all the time, so that a small part of it would expand within the Sun as a new observable substance and penetrate the Sun's surface with a delay of about 330 to 495 years?
What would be essential would be the expanding pushing force of the gas planets and also only if the Sun were in the area between the supermassive object of the gas planet and the center of the galaxy, where the dark matter from the supermassive object would come deep into the densities of the pushing force from the gas planet inside the Sun? Long choppy episodes in the Sun. Wolf's minimum 1280 - 1350 Spörer is mentioned in 1460-1540 Maunderin Minimum 1645 - 1715 Dalton was mentioned in 1790-1830 Alright. Just look at this and wonder! Wolf's minimum 1320 +165 = 1485 aka Spörer Spörer minimum 1485 + 165 = 1650 or Maunder Maunder's minimum 1650 + 165 = 1815 or Dalton Dalton's minimum 1815 + 165 = 1980, ie global warming. About 165 years is Neptune's lap time around the sun. But Neptune is not the only gas planet. One must also consider Uranus and Saturn who mix the pack. Of course, Jupiter plays the most important role when thinking about the way sunspots are born, but other gas planets are involved in influencing when a new substance is pushed to the surface of the Sun and when not. When Neptune was in the area between the supermassive object of the Sun and the center of the galaxy, there was also Uranus. I saw it in the last 1000 years, though Uranus's lap time is only about 84 years, not in sync with Neptune. But apparently so close that Uranus has been on the same side of the Sun with Neptune whenever Neptune has been in the area between the supermassive object of the Sun and the center of the galaxy. Of course, Uranus has always been in that area once, while Neptune has been on the other side of the Sun. But anyway, Jupiter's accomplishments did not help Neptune and Uranus for a long time whenever they were in the area between the supermassive object of the Sun and the center of the galaxy. And with a delay of about 165 years, I saw long choppy episodes. Such would have been the supernovae discovered in the 1900s without the 1572 and 1604 whose energy pushed deep into the Sun and accelerated the speed of Jupiter's efforts towards the surface of the Sun and thus the planet's warming energy towards the planets? So the Sun is in the area between the supermassive object of the center of Jupiter and the galaxy every 12 years. When Neptune and Uranus were at the same time in the influence area, they received a dark substance from the supermassive object to expand extensively deep inside the Sun, and thus, with the Jupiter achievements, more new, heavily expanded matter was pushed to reach the rate of escape up to the Sun. At a certain depth, the effect was more intense, and so the upward movement of those in this area accelerated more than those of Jupiter that had already passed that area. I saw a new heavily expanded substance on the surface of the Sun every 11 years, even though Jupirer's lap time is about 12 years. 🤔 Saako Aurinko itselleen uutta havaittavaa ainetta siitä pimeästä aineesta jota työntyisi sen läpi koko ajan, niin että pieni osa laajenisi Auringon sisällä uudeksi havaittavaksi aineeksi ja työntyisi Auringon pinnalle noin 330 - 495 vuoden viiveellä? Oleellista olisi kaasuplaneetoista peräisin oleva laajeneva työntävä voima ja sekin vain silloin kun Aurinko olisi kyseisen kaasuplaneetan ja galaksin keskustan supermassiivisen kohteen välisellä alueella, jolloin supermassiivisesta kohteesta peräisin oleva pimeä aine törmäisi syvällä Auringon sisällä kaasuplaneetasta peräisin oleviin työntävän voiman tihentymiin? Pitkät pilkuttomat jaksot Auringossa Wolfin minimi 1280 - 1350 Spörerin minimi 1460 - 1540 Maunderin minimi 1645 - 1715 Daltonin minimi 1790 - 1830 Ok. Katsokaapa tämä ja ihmetelkää!!! Wolfin minimi 1320 +165 = 1485 eli Spörer Spörerin minimi 1485 + 165 = 1650 eli Maunder Maunderin minimi 1650 + 165 = 1815 eli Dalton Daltonin minimi 1815 + 165 = 1980 eli ilmaston lämpeneminen. About 165 vuotta on Neptunuksen kierrosaika Auringon ympäri. Mutta Neptunus ei ole ainut kaasuplaneetta. Pitää ottaa huomioon myös Uranus ja Saturnus jotka sekoittavat pakkaa. Jupiter on tietysti tärkeimmässä roolissa kun Auringonpilkkujen syntytapaa ylipäätään mietitään, mutta muut kaasuplaneetat ovat omalta osaltaan mukana vaikuttamassa milloin uutta ainetta työntyy Auringon pinnalle asti ja milloin ei. Silloin kun Neptunus oli Auringon ja galaksin keskustan supermassiivisen kohteen välisellä alueella, siellä oli myös Uranus. Näin viimeisen 1000 vuoden aikana, vaikka Uranuksen kierrosaika onkin vain about 84 vuotta eli ei ihan synkronissa Neptunuksen kanssa. Mutta ilmeisesti kuitenkin niin lähellä että Uranus on ollut samalla puolella Aurinkoa Neptunuksen kanssa aina silloin kun Neptunus on ollut Auringon ja galaksin keskustan supermassiivisen kohteen välisellä alueella. Toki Uranus on aina käynyt uudestaan tuolla alueella kertaalleen sillä aikaa kun Neptunus on ollut toisella puolella Aurinkoa. Mutta anyway, Jupiterin aikaansaannokset eivät saaneet apuja Neptunukselta ja Uranukselta pitkään aikaan aina silloin kun ne molemmat olivat Auringon ja galaksin keskustan supermassiivisen kohteen välisellä alueella. Ja näin about 165 vuoden viiveellä pitkät pilkuttomat jaksot. Sellainen olisi ollut myös 1900 luvulla ilman 1572 ja 1604 havaittuja supernovia joiden energia työntyi syvälle Auringon sisälle ja kiihdytti Jupiterin aikaansaannosten vauhtia kohti Auringon pintaa ja näin planeettojen ilmastoa lämmittävää energiaa kohti planeettoja? Ja Aurinko siis Jupiterin ja galaksin keskustan supermassiivisen kohteen välisellä alueella vajaan 12 vuoden välein. Kun Neptunus ja Uranus olivat vaikutusalueella yhtä aikaa, ne saivat supermassiivisesta kohteesta peräisin olevaa pimeää ainetta laajenemaan voimakkaasti syvällä Auringon sisällä ja näin Jupiterin aikaansaannoksien mukana työntyi enemmän uutta voimakkaasti laajentunutta ainetta, jolloin ne yhdessä saavuttivat pakonopeuden Auringon pinnalle asti. Tietyssä syvyydessä vaikutus oli voimakkaampaa ja näin tällä alueella ylös päin työntyneiden vauhti kiihtyi enemmän kuin tuon alueen jo ohittaneiden Jupiterin aikaansaannosten. Näin Auringon pinnalle uutta voimakkaasti laajentunutta ainetta noin 11 vuoden välein vaikka Jupirerin kierrosaika onkin about 12 vuotta 🤔 |
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning." by Maartenn100 |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#188 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,636
|
"When I first read about ideas linking the solar dynamo to planets, I was very skeptical," Stefani recalled. "But when we discovered the current-driven Tayler instability undergoing helicity oscillations in our computer simulations, I asked myself: What would happen if the plasma was impacted on by a small, tidal-like perturbation? The result was phenomenal. The oscillation was really excited and became synchronized with the timing of the external perturbation.""
https://phys.org/news/2019-05-corrob...dal-solar.html I just wonder 🤔 "When I first read about ideas linking the solar dynamo to planets" 🤔 |
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning." by Maartenn100 |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#189 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
|
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#190 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
The same gibberish, ignorance and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
|
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#191 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
This is an insane delusion that dark matter does magic when dark matter does not interacted with matter except gravitationally ![]() |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#192 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
|
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#193 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
Study corroborates the influence of planetary tidal forces on solar activity is a slightly dubious result for the well known reason that correlation does not mean causation. The classic example comes from economics where the length of dresses relates to economic indicators. That does not mean that economic systems are controlled by woman's fashions!
A Model of a Tidally Synchronized Solar Dynamo |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#194 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Directly above the center of the Earth
Posts: 2,685
|
Pixie of key:
So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet? If not, why not? If so, why haven't you reported what you found? It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces. How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces? |
__________________
I'm an "intellectual giant, with access to wilkipedia [sic]" "I believe in some ways; communicating with afterlife is easier than communicating with me." -Tim4848 who said he would no longer post here, twice in fact, but he did. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#195 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Directly above the center of the Earth
Posts: 2,685
|
|
__________________
I'm an "intellectual giant, with access to wilkipedia [sic]" "I believe in some ways; communicating with afterlife is easier than communicating with me." -Tim4848 who said he would no longer post here, twice in fact, but he did. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#196 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,636
|
Neptune & Uranus Control Grand Minima & Solar Modulation?
https://landscheidt.wordpress.com/20...-grand-minima/ "I am looking forward to contributing to this alternative view on how we interact with the cosmos. I will be reporting on news and scientific papers concerning planetary involvement connected with influencing the Sun and the global climate. Carl’s work has inspired me, and this first article is a work in progress report that was born by his SSB graph which showed to me the importance of Neptune and Uranus. We are living in exciting times and may witness a brand new area of science, especially if we DO experience a Grand Minimum beginning with Solar Cycle 24." . When you read that thing, it is inevitable that you are in the right footsteps, but some essential factor is missing. According to my own model, that missing factor is the supermassive target of the center of the galaxy and the dark matter that originates from it, which is expanding into a perceptible substance within the Sun and the planets. And, in addition, the dark energy from the supernovae discovered in 1572 and 1604 would have a role to play with a delay of several hundred years. So first, deep inside the Sun, there's an interaction with a new observable substance that had expanded into a perceptible substance within the Sun, and so its pace accelerated toward the surface of the Sun and the Sunspots at a time when the rate of the new detectable substance would not have been enough to be pushed onto the Sun . 🤔 🤔 |
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning." by Maartenn100 |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#197 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,636
|
Giant Stellar eruption detected for the first time https://phys.org/news/2019-06-giant-...-eruption.html "The team analyzed a particularly favorable flare, which took place on the active star HR 9024, about 450 light-years away from us. The High-Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer, or HETGS, aboard Chandra is the only instrument that allows measurements of the motions of coronal plasmas with speeds of just a few tens of thousands of miles per hour." . It would mean that that star would be in the position of the supernova that had caused that eruption, so that the supernova of 1572 would have been discovered by that time at about the same time as we did. And the 1604 supernova would have been discovered for that reason about 30 years later than we did. 🤔 Giant stellar eruption detected for the first time https://phys.org/news/2019-06-giant-...-eruption.html "The team analyzed a particularly favorable flare, which took place on the active star HR 9024, about 450 light-years away from us. The High-Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer, or HETGS, aboard Chandra is the only instrument that allows measurements of the motions of coronal plasmas with speeds of just a few tens of thousands of miles per hour." No niin, havaittiinko tuon tähden luona 1572 tai 1604 vuosien supernovista tuon about 450 vuotta sitten? Tarkoittaisi sitä että tuo tähti olisi tuon purkauksen aikaan saaneeseen supernovaan nähden sellaisessa asemassa että vuoden 1572 supernova olisi havaittu tuon tähden luona about samaan aikaan kuin meillä. Ja vuoden 1604 supernova olisi havaittu tuon tähden luona about 30 vuotta myöhemmin kuin meillä. 🤔 |
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning." by Maartenn100 |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#198 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
This is a crank web page about the dead astrologer Theodor Landscheidt and his delusions abut solar activity and climate. The delusion is not that solar activity may be influenced by the planets (but a delusion may be that Neptune caused grand minima), the delusion is that the Sun currently controls global temperatures. Solar radiation intensity has decreased slightly since the 1970's while global temperatures have gone up! Climatic effects of a new Maunder Minimum will be minimal so no delusion of a new Little Ice age soon. A recent paper that suggests that the 11 year cycle can be matched by plugging in the tidal forces of Venus, Earth and Jupiter into a model of the solar magnetic field: Study corroborates the influence of planetary tidal forces on solar activity But what about Mercury? What about Saturn? A little thing called the inverse square law suggests neglecting Mercury is dubious. It may explain neglecting Saturn. It definitely explains ignoring Neptune and Uranus. |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#199 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28,521
|
![]()
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.
OU Andromedae (also designated as HR 9024) is a still existing variable star. A total delusion that some supernova somewhere caused that flare. A total delusion that HR 9024 was at the position of "the supernova of 1572"? |
__________________
NASA Finds Direct Proof of Dark Matter (another observation) (and Abell 520) Electric comets still do not exist! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#200 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,636
|
Jupiter and Saturn cycle Suns magnetic field twisted and broken.
Also explanation why south and north pole change. https://youtu.be/hbV1bNMGDzo 🤔 |
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4 "Math without words is meaningless. Words without math can have meaning." by Maartenn100 |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|