Merged: Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? Pt 2

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Jupiter and Saturn cycle Suns magnetic field twisted and broken.

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Also explanation why south and north pole change. ...

10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread.

Yet another deluded YouTube video does not explain any science. 2 minutes and 56 seconds of

1. Delusion about Jupiter and Saturn "twisting" the Sun's magnetic field.
2. Usual insanity of "pushing force".
3. Points to what looks like a solar activity chart, graphics of the solar system in 1990/2000/2010 and we get his delusions about Jupiter and Saturn 'lines" and the Sun.
4. Insanity that a measured average 22 year cycle for solar magnetic field reversal is 20 years.
5. More gibberish.

[Little 10 Toes]

Pixie of key:

So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces?

[Pixie of key]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Jupiter and Saturn cycle Suns magnetic field twisted and broken.

Also explanation why south and north pole change.

https://youtu.be/hbV1bNMGDzo

🤔

Is this a coincidence?

https://youtu.be/hbV1bNMGDzo

🤔

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Is this a coincidence?

No. It is ignorance, delusions and/or lies.
The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

[The Man]

Originally Posted by Little 10 Toes

Pixie of key:

So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces?

Thanks for picking up my slack Little 10 Toes.

[Pixie of key]

Earth warmup 1900-1940 because of dark pushing force from Tyko Brahe supernova 1572 deep inside Sun and later strong SunSpot or more regular energy up.

1980 - 2010 because of dark pushing force from Kepler Supernova 1604...

https://youtu.be/4wgD9qHDdxE

🤔

[Pixie of key]

Whats going on with weather?!?

Month ago Earth was between Sun and Jupiter.

Now Between Sun and Saturnus.

And also Earth been over month between Sun and galaxy centre supermassive concentration.

Lot of small area collide deep inside expanding Earth.

��

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

...

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

[steenkh]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Whats going on with weather?!?

Month ago Earth was between Sun and Jupiter.

Now Between Sun and Saturnus.

And also Earth been over month between Sun and galaxy centre supermassive concentration.

Lot of small area collide deep inside expanding Earth.

You are funny - in a sad way

[MetalPig]

A supernova deep inside the sun

[WhatRoughBeast]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Earth warmup 1900-1940 because of dark pushing force from Tyko Brahe supernova 1572 deep inside Sun and later strong SunSpot or more regular energy up.

1980 - 2010 because of dark pushing force from Kepler Supernova 1604...

🤔

Umm.

So, the effects of SN1572 (8000 to 9800 light years away) took about 330 years to arrive and affect the sun, but SN1604 (20,0000 light years) only took about 410? Have I got that right? The SN1604 pushing force was much faster than that of SN1572?

Why? Why would something so fundamental as the pushing force show so much variation?

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Whats going on with weather?!?...

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

[Pixie of key]

Originally Posted by WhatRoughBeast

Umm.

So, the effects of SN1572 (8000 to 9800 light years away) took about 330 years to arrive and affect the sun, but SN1604 (20,0000 light years) only took about 410? Have I got that right? The SN1604 pushing force was much faster than that of SN1572?

Why? Why would something so fundamental as the pushing force show so much variation?

Are you kidding with me?

Expanding dark pushing force from Tyko Brahe supernova was here 1572 and it pushing deep inside expanding Sun.

It get Sun magnetic material expanding faster and that start pushing up that way where is Sun "skin". So Earth and other planets get some extraenergy from Sun 1900 - 1940.

Expanding dark pushing force from Kepler supernova was here 1604 and it pushing deep inside expanding Sun. Deeper that dark pushing force fromTyko Brahe supernova


It get Sun magnetic material expanding faster and that start pushing up that way where is Sun "skin". So Earth and other planets get some extraenergy from Sun 1980 - 2010.

Also thats why Sun had a Sun Spots 1900 century, With out that dark pushing force from this supernovas there be long time with out Sun Spots, like 1280-1350, 1460-1550, 1645-1715 and 1790-1830.

��

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

...

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

Insane gibberish of 2 supernova emitting "dark pushing force" and doing deluded stuff to the Sun.

Insane because SN1572 and SN1604 were just 2 of the observed supernovae. The Milky Way has a supernova on average every 50 years !

Insane because supernova emit light and neutrinos and gas not his gibberish of "dark".

Insane because the emissions from most supernova cannot have any effect on the Sun. The emissions are totally insignificant compared to the Sun (parts per billion?). The emissions are absorbed by the photosphere and reemitted in all direction as light. An exception would be a supernova a few light years away.

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

1980 - 2010 because of ...

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

Insane gibberish of 2 supernova emitting "dark pushing force" and doing deluded stuff to the Sun.

Lies about the Sun which has been decreasing in "warmth" since the 1970's . That physical fact is why climate scientists ruled out the Sun as a cause of the current global warming.

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Earth warmup 1900-1940 ...

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

Insane gibberish of 2 supernova emitting "dark pushing force" and doing deluded stuff to the Sun.

Lies about the Sun which has been decreasing in "warmth" since the 1970's .

Delusion about global warming 1900-1940 which was partially due to the Sun's normal changes in irradiance but also because of increasing CO2.

[Pixie of key]

Lot of Volcano actitivites.

Lot of Earth Quake activities

Strange weather like Australian and China rare tornadoes.

Because expanding pushing force from

Jupiter and Sun

Saturn and Sun

Galaxy center supermassive concentration and Sun

We was month ago between Sun and Jupiter

Now between Sun and Saturnus.

And all that time between Sun and galaxy centre supermassive concentration.

When was last time when Juputer and Saturn was between Sun and galaxy centre supermassive concentration?

How activate was Volcanoes then?

How much Earth Quake was then?!?

��

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Lot of Volcano actitivites....

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?

[Pixie of key]

Originally Posted by Roboramma

Damn. If you were willing to sell for 28 million I might willing but 38 is too steep for me.

Too bad.

Now it is 111 million euros ��

��

[Pixie of key]

Study captures six galaxies undergoing sudden, dramatic transitions

https://phys.org/news/2019-09-captur...ansitions.html

""We started out trying to understand changing look transformations in Seyfert galaxies. But instead, we found a whole new class of active galactic nucleus capable of transforming a wimpy galaxy to a luminous quasar," said Suvi Gezari, an associate professor of astronomy at UMD, a co-director of JSI and a co-author of the research paper. "Theory suggests that a quasar should take thousands of years to turn on, but these observations suggest that it can happen very quickly. It tells us that the theory is all wrong. We thought that Seyfert transformation was the major puzzle. But now we have a bigger issue to solve.""

So, galaxys born inside to outside.

🤔

"Our findings confirm that LINERs can, in fact, host active supermassive black holes at their centers," Frederick said. "But these six transitions were so sudden and dramatic, it tells us that there is something altogether different going on in these galaxies. We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start falling into a black hole. Because we caught these transitions in the act, it opens up a lot of opportunities to compare what the nuclei looked like before and after the transformation.""

"We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start falling into a black hole."

Such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start pushing out from a black hole.

First it is expanding dark matter, but when is expanding very fast, then it is visible expanding matter from expanding supermassive concentration.

🤔

[Little 10 Toes]

Pixie of key:

So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces?

[Pixie of key]

Rope experiement

https://youtu.be/Nw53G5buuyI

🤔

[Mojo]

yt;dw

[Steve001]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Rope experiement

https://youtu.be/Nw53G5buuyI

🤔

That's not an experiment. What it is is a visual presentation of same gibberish you have spewed forth for years.

[Pixie of key]

Originally Posted by Steve001

That's not an experiment. What it is is a visual presentation of same gibberish you have spewed forth for years.

It was science experiement with rope.

I push book with rope 😃

Yes, whaf?!?

🤔

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Study captures six galaxies undergoing sudden, dramatic transitions

https://phys.org/news/2019-09-captur...ansitions.html

""We started out trying to understand changing look transformations in Seyfert galaxies. But instead, we found a whole new class of active galactic nucleus capable of transforming a wimpy galaxy to a luminous quasar," said Suvi Gezari, an associate professor of astronomy at UMD, a co-director of JSI and a co-author of the research paper. "Theory suggests that a quasar should take thousands of years to turn on, but these observations suggest that it can happen very quickly. It tells us that the theory is all wrong. We thought that Seyfert transformation was the major puzzle. But now we have a bigger issue to solve.""
...

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?

This is an deluded "galaxys born inside to outside" lie when the article is about already born galaxies and their evolution. An existing AGN turns on and turns a galaxy into a quasar (the same galaxy but with a very active AGN).

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Rope experiement

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?

A repeated, deluded lie that an insane "Rope experiment / Randi / Stephen Hawking dont understund!" video is the rope experiment or any experiment. A demented few seconds describing a couple of strings on a compass. The rest is gibberish using coins and cartoons. Insanity of pushing a book by putting a string between his finger and the book and pushing with his finger

Pixie of key's main delusion is that there are no pulling forces such as every force that we know. Galaxies, etc. cannot exist in his world. Ropes cannot exist in his world. Atoms cannot exist in his world. !
But the real world exists and ropes can pull objects. He needs an experiment (not gibberish in a video with no experiment) showing that only pushing forces are involved. That is an experiment of pushing on one end (not a side as in that deluded video) of a rope and the other end pushing on say a book!

[Pixie of key]

"Our findings confirm that LINERs can, in fact, host active supermassive black holes at their centers," Frederick said. "But these six transitions were so sudden and dramatic, it tells us that there is something altogether different going on in these galaxies. We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start falling into a black hole. Because we caught these transitions in the act, it opens up a lot of opportunities to compare what the nuclei looked like before and after the transformation.""

"We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start falling into a black hole."

It is not gas and dust which falling into a black hole.

This supermassive concentrations expanding and sometimes also this the supermassive objects are discharged, and then for us, the expanding substance of the dark exponentially expands, and then it becomes a perceptible expanding substance.

🤔

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

It was science experiement with rope.

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?

A repeated, deluded lie that an insane "Rope experiment / Randi / Stephen Hawking dont understund!" video is the rope experiment or any experiment. A demented few seconds describing a couple of strings on a compass. The rest is gibberish using coins and cartoons. Insanity of pushing a book by putting a string between his finger and the book and pushing with his finger.

An insane lie of pushing a book with a rope. He pushes it with his finger with a string squeezed in between.

Pixie of key's main delusion is that there are no pulling forces such as every force that we know. Galaxies, etc. cannot exist in his world. Ropes cannot exist in his world. Atoms cannot exist in his world. !
But the real world exists and ropes can pull objects. He needs an experiment (not gibberish in a video with no experiment) showing that only pushing forces are involved. That is an experiment of pushing on one end (not a side as in that deluded video) of a rope and the other end pushing on say a book!

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

"Our findings confirm that LINERs can, in fact, host active supermassive black holes at their centers," Frederick said. "But these six transitions were so sudden and dramatic, it tells us that there is something altogether different going on in these galaxies. We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start falling into a black hole. Because we caught these transitions in the act, it opens up a lot of opportunities to compare what the nuclei looked like before and after the transformation.""

"We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start"...

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?

An insane "It is not gas and dust which falling into a black hole." delusion when the article is about gas and dust falling into a black hole and he quotes this !
Black holes have gas and dust discs around then and some "eat" the gas and dust from these discs. Supermassive black holes even have stars falling into them.

Actually insane "supermassive objects are discharged", etc. gibberish. Black holes do not emit anything - they are black! This is also massively stupid gibberish - his delusion is no falling gas and dust and he writes "discharging"/"expanding" gibberish.

For others: This is fascinating astronomy.
Study captures six galaxies undergoing sudden, dramatic transitions
There are low-ionization nuclear emission-line region (LINER) galaxies which are about a third of our nearby galaxies. They are in the spectrum between ordinal galaxies whose supermassive back holes are not consuming surrounding gas and dust and active galaxy nuclei galaxies whose supermassive back holes are consuming surrounding gas and dust. The debate is whether most of the light from LINER galaxies comes from weakly active nuclei or from star forming regions outside of the nuclei.
These astronomers saw 6 LINER galaxies transform into quasars (the brightest AGN galaxies). They found that these are consistent with known astronomy - "changing look transitions" as seen in Seyfert galaxies. The new astronomy is that these transformations were much faster than expected.

[Pixie of key]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Study captures six galaxies undergoing sudden, dramatic transitions

https://phys.org/news/2019-09-captur...ansitions.html

""We started out trying to understand changing look transformations in Seyfert galaxies. But instead, we found a whole new class of active galactic nucleus capable of transforming a wimpy galaxy to a luminous quasar," said Suvi Gezari, an associate professor of astronomy at UMD, a co-director of JSI and a co-author of the research paper. "Theory suggests that a quasar should take thousands of years to turn on, but these observations suggest that it can happen very quickly. It tells us that the theory is all wrong. We thought that Seyfert transformation was the major puzzle. But now we have a bigger issue to solve.""

So, galaxys born inside to outside.

🤔

"Our findings confirm that LINERs can, in fact, host active supermassive black holes at their centers," Frederick said. "But these six transitions were so sudden and dramatic, it tells us that there is something altogether different going on in these galaxies. We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start falling into a black hole. Because we caught these transitions in the act, it opens up a lot of opportunities to compare what the nuclei looked like before and after the transformation.""

"We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start falling into a black hole."

Such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start pushing out from a black hole.

First it is expanding dark matter, but when is expanding very fast, then it is visible expanding matter from expanding supermassive concentration.

🤔

"It tells us that the theory is all wrong."

BINGO!!!

😃

[The Man]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Rope experiement

https://youtu.be/Nw53G5buuyI

🤔

Nope, as well you know that doesn't comply with the experimental condition of pushing the object by the fully extended rope. Again it simply shows that you are well aware of what would happen if you did try the experiment as it was stated.

Why continue to try to obscure the fact that you evidently know, as demonstrated by your actions in the video, why the rope experiment would fail? Specifically because of the differences between pulling and pushing forces and their effects on materials.

[The Man]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

So, galaxys born inside to outside.

The article you linked doesn't say or even suggest that.

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

🤔


Such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start pushing out from a black hole.

First it is expanding dark matter, but when is expanding very fast, then it is visible expanding matter from expanding supermassive concentration.

🤔

Not only doesn't the article you linked say or even suggest that, you even quote it as saying the opposite.

Quote:

"We want to know how such massive amounts of gas and dust can suddenly start falling into a black hole."

Why do you feel the need to misrepresent articles that in some cases simply don't support your assertions and in other cases directly refutes them?

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

"It tells us that the theory is all wrong."

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

The lie of quote mining a single sentence.
Study captures six galaxies undergoing sudden, dramatic transitions

Quote:

"We started out trying to understand changing look transformations in Seyfert galaxies. But instead, we found a whole new class of active galactic nucleus capable of transforming a wimpy galaxy to a luminous quasar," said Suvi Gezari, an associate professor of astronomy at UMD, a co-director of JSI and a co-author of the research paper. "Theory suggests that a quasar should take thousands of years to turn on, but these observations suggest that it can happen very quickly. It tells us that the theory is all wrong. We thought that Seyfert transformation was the major puzzle. But now we have a bigger issue to solve."

What is wrong is the timescale of quasars turning on. Obviously the theory producing that timescale is wrong. That suggests either a broader theory that includes the observed shorter timescales or a different mechanism for these observations.

Inane gibberish about galaxies is not about how quasars turn on.

[Pixie of key]

Beyond Einstein: Physicists solve mystery surrounding photon momentum

https://phys.org/news/2019-10-einste...-momentum.html

"However, the answer that Hartung discovered through his experiment is—as is typical for quantum mechanics—more surprising. The electron not only receives the expected momentum, but additionally one third of the photon momentum that actually should have gone to the atom nucleus. The sail of the boat therefore "knows" of the impending accident before the cords tear and steals a bit of the boat's momentum. To explain the result more precisely, Hartung uses the concept of light as an electro-magnetic wave: "We know that the electrons tunnel through a small energy barrier. In doing so, they are pulled away from the nucleus by the strong electric field of the laser, while the magnetic field transfers this additional momentum to the electrons.""

Yes yes yes.

I was ahead of my time 😃😃😃

You dont understund that Nucleus of atoms expanding and recycling dark expanding pushing force which have example nature of expanding light.

Expanding light waves is dark for us, but we know, there is waves because we can register photons.

But almost all expanding light mass is in dark expanding waves.

Expanding lights interactive with eachother and get eachother expanding faster and faster. So expanding light moving faster and faster same way what matter and light expanding.

🤔

So, Dark Expanding light waves interactive with eachother and get eachother expanding faster. Thats why expanding light moving faster and faster same way what matter and light expanding.

Explanation for

1. Bending light near star and galaxy

2. Cosmologys way redshifted light

3. Gravity redshifted light

So, there is no expanding space!

No curving space!

Space is infinity 3 D place which is nothing.

🤔

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Beyond Einstein: Physicists solve mystery surrounding photon momentum

https://phys.org/news/2019-10-einste...-momentum.html

"However, the answer that Hartung discovered through his experiment is—as is typical for quantum mechanics—more surprising. The electron not only receives the expected momentum, but additionally one third of the photon momentum that actually should have gone to the atom nucleus. The sail of the boat therefore "knows" of the impending accident before the cords tear and steals a bit of the boat's momentum. To explain the result more precisely, Hartung uses the concept of light as an electro-magnetic wave: "We know that the electrons tunnel through a small energy barrier. In doing so, they are pulled away from the nucleus by the strong electric field of the laser, while the magnetic field transfers this additional momentum to the electrons.""
...

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

Usual insane gibberish lying about the science article.

[Pixie of key]

Not long ago, the center of the Milky Way exploded

"A massive blast of energy and radiation came right out of the galactic centre and into the surrounding material. This shows that the centre of the Milky Way is a much more dynamic place than we had previously thought. It is lucky we're not residing there!""

https://phys.org/news/2019-10-center-milky.html

""These results dramatically change our understanding of the Milky Way," says co-author Magda Guglielmo from the University of Sydney.

"We always thought about our Galaxy as an inactive galaxy, with a not so bright centre. These new results instead open the possibility of a complete reinterpretation of its evolution and nature.

"The flare event that occurred three million years ago was so powerful that it had consequences on the surrounding of our Galaxy. We are the witness to the awakening of the sleeping beauty."

The latest work firms up SgrA* as prime suspect, but, the researchers concede, there is still a lot more work to be done. How black holes evolve, influence and interact with galaxies, they conclude, "is an outstanding problem in astrophysics"."

Galaxys born inside to outside.

��

[The Man]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Galaxys born inside to outside.

��

The article you cite makes no such claims.

Again, why do you feel the need to misrepresent articles that in some cases simply don't support your assertions and in other cases directly refutes them?

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Pixie of key

Not long ago, the center of the Milky Way exploded

"A massive blast of energy and radiation came right out of the galactic centre and into the surrounding material. This shows that the centre of the Milky Way is a much more dynamic place than we had previously thought. It is lucky we're not residing there!""

https://phys.org/news/2019-10-center-milky.html

""These results dramatically change our understanding of the Milky Way," says co-author Magda Guglielmo from the University of Sydney.

"We always thought about our Galaxy as an inactive galaxy, with a not so bright centre. These new results instead open the possibility of a complete reinterpretation of its evolution and nature.

"The flare event that occurred three million years ago was so powerful that it had consequences on the surrounding of our Galaxy. We are the witness to the awakening of the sleeping beauty."

The latest work firms up SgrA* as prime suspect, but, the researchers concede, there is still a lot more work to be done. How black holes evolve, influence and interact with galaxies, they conclude, "is an outstanding problem in astrophysics".

The same gibberish, ignorance, delusions and lies about science in this 10 year old Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? thread

Usual insanely blatant lying about a science article. This is a flare three million years ago. The Solar System alone is 4.6 billion years old ! The Milky Way was born maybe 13 billion years ago !