|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
![]() |
#41 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 4,423
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 57,860
|
|
__________________
Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay - and claims a halo for his dishonesty. Robert Heinlein. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 57,860
|
Frank Luke could have done it..,,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Luke Luke became known as "The Balloon Buster" because of his skill in shotting down German Observation Balloons. |
__________________
Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay - and claims a halo for his dishonesty. Robert Heinlein. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 57,860
|
|
__________________
Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay - and claims a halo for his dishonesty. Robert Heinlein. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 57,860
|
Pentagon denies it's a weather balloon.
I will take their word on this one. I suspect it's one of those stupid ideas that Intelligence agencies get that somehow got greenlit. I supsect that the guy in China who thought this up is now cleaning toilets. |
__________________
Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay - and claims a halo for his dishonesty. Robert Heinlein. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Quester of Doglets
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sunny South Australia
Posts: 4,452
|
|
__________________
We would be better, and braver, to engage in enquiry, rather than indulge in the idle fancy, that we already know -- Plato. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Skepticifimisticalationist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Gulf Coast
Posts: 28,103
|
I think the reason the military isn't doing anything about this problem is that it isn't really a problem. It's a balloon. It's a threat to no one and nothing, and it's not as if its flight path is taking it over any sensitive locations.
Militarily engaging this thing is not worth the time, cost, or risks, not to mention that doing so creates a precedent that other countries can use against American assets. If we can shoot down their spy balloon, then they can decide to take an active measure against our spy satellite, and unlike a balloon those things are damn expensive. |
__________________
"¿WHAT KIND OF BIRD? ¿A PARANORMAL BIRD?" --- Carlos S., 2002 |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,323
|
And we can't rule it that the military might be jamming its signals.
My newest pet theory for which I have absolutely no evidence is that it is a surveillance satellite, but not one that was intended to go over the whole U.S. Maybe they were playing around with using one to track shipping in the northern Pacific, intending for it to self destruct and fall before it got too close to the U.S. Then it failed to do so. I suppose it could be out of communications range, if it has travelled much further than intended. Depending of course on how it communicates. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
OD’ing on Damitol
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Walk in an ever expanding Archimedean spiral and you'll find me eventually
Posts: 2,105
|
They finally got a close up...
|
__________________
I collect people like you in little formaldehyde bottles in my basement. (Not a threat. A hobby.) |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Antimemetics Division
Posts: 63,607
|
|
__________________
There is no Antimemetics Division. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
Skepticifimisticalationist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Gulf Coast
Posts: 28,103
|
|
__________________
"¿WHAT KIND OF BIRD? ¿A PARANORMAL BIRD?" --- Carlos S., 2002 |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
OD’ing on Damitol
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Walk in an ever expanding Archimedean spiral and you'll find me eventually
Posts: 2,105
|
Apparently the surveillance equipment is as big as 3 school buses, there are solar panels and a rudder. Not an insignificant payload.
|
__________________
I collect people like you in little formaldehyde bottles in my basement. (Not a threat. A hobby.) |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,792
|
Jamming would likely not be easy. First, you likely cannot stop it from transmitting with a jammer. Jamming works on the receiving end. To make it work, you need to overpower the signal from the transmitter. Signal strength follows the root mean square law.
So where is the receiver you need to jam? If it is bouncing signals all the way back to China, you need to worry about the route, which is likely always changing with atmospheric conditions. For the transmitter to be reliable in the first place, this is likely not being done. If the receiver is a satellite, then a ground based jammer starts with two problems. One is that the balloon is several miles up. Decay in the jamming signal has to be accounted for. And since the balloon is moving the ground based jammer has to move to or transfer duty to another location. If a plane is used to jam the signal it will still have power issues unless it flies higher than the balloon. Not easy to pull off and the jamming plane would be easy to find by the same people that track satellites. A satellite jammer might work if the receiving Chinese satellite location is known. But that means giving away the jammer location that might be more of more use to China than whatever the balloon is seeing. Then there is the radio technology of the balloon. China can do frequency hopping. We can be sure of that since they did a lot of the work to develop 5G cell technology which does do frequency hopping. Trying to jam all the frequencies they might be using requires more power. And they can change the frequencies used in the hop set and make jamming that much harder. And even if all that works, the transmitter on the balloon might be holding the information to transmit whenever the jammers stop for a short while. And lastly, we don't know what the balloon mission really is. That thing might not even have a camera on it and be used for signal intel. In that case, the US jamming it is just more intel for China. If this thing is being jammed, there would likely be reports coming in from the same people that track satellite signals for a hobby. |
__________________
45 es un titere |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Official Ponylandistanian National Treasure. Respect it!
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ponylandistan! Where the bacon grows on trees! Can it get any better than that? I submit it can not!
Posts: 49,454
|
The thing passed over St. Louis a couple hours ago. Went outside and looked, but didn't see it.
|
__________________
"Never judge a man until you’ve walked a mile in his shoes... Because then it won't really matter, you’ll be a mile away and have his shoes." ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Evil Fokker
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,388
|
|
__________________
www.spectrum-scientifics.com <- |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Olomouc, Czech Republic
Posts: 4,041
|
Srsly how did US air defense miss it ?
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,967
|
|
__________________
"Facts are stupid things." Ronald Reagan |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Antimemetics Division
Posts: 63,607
|
|
__________________
There is no Antimemetics Division. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Olomouc, Czech Republic
Posts: 4,041
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 65,365
|
|
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#61 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 65,365
|
|
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sorth Dakonsin
Posts: 27,607
|
I changed my mind. It looks much more like Glinda the Good Witch's bubble. No wonder the military is hesitant to shoot it down. That, or it might be carrying anthrax. (The bacteria, not the band.)
|
__________________
Science is self-correcting. Woo is self-contradicting. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Antimemetics Division
Posts: 63,607
|
I'm not following your logic. Spy satellites pass over the US all the time and nobody loses their minds.
On the other hand, it's generally agreed that spy planes are best kept out of one's airspace, if one can manage it. So. Is the US supposed to be treating this kind of high-altitude balloon more like a spy plane, and therefore they must have missed it? Or is the US supposed to be treating it more like a spy satellite, and therefore they may not have missed it, but rather are content to let it do its thing before moving on? |
__________________
There is no Antimemetics Division. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#64 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 6,617
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8qjxT1iIAM&t=2s
Yep. I know I'm supposed to tell what the youtube link is to. I'll just lie and say, It is potato. |
__________________
"At the Supreme Court level where we work, 90 percent of any decision is emotional. The rational part of us supplies the reasons for supporting our predilections." Justice William O. Douglas "Humans aren't rational creatures but rationalizing creatures." Author Unknown |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Near Harmonica Virgins, AZ
Posts: 3,447
|
|
__________________
"You have done nothing to demonstrate an understanding of scientific methodology or modern skepticism, both of which are, by necessity, driven by the facts and evidence, not by preconceptions, and both of which are strengthened by, and rely upon, change." - Arkan Wolfshade |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 23,530
|
How would they know unless they have actually analyzed it? It may, I suppose, be an experimental atmospheric research balloon . . . disguised as a standard weather balloon. But as any sort of spy it is almost completely worthless.
To misquote Scrooge. “Are there no spy satellites?” |
__________________
"Reality is what's left when you cease to believe." Philip K. Dick |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#67 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 65,365
|
|
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#68 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 6,617
|
It's the Balloon Boy again!
|
__________________
"At the Supreme Court level where we work, 90 percent of any decision is emotional. The rational part of us supplies the reasons for supporting our predilections." Justice William O. Douglas "Humans aren't rational creatures but rationalizing creatures." Author Unknown |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#69 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sorth Dakonsin
Posts: 27,607
|
|
__________________
Science is self-correcting. Woo is self-contradicting. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#70 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 23,530
|
Nice picture here:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/china-...loon-1.6735770 But it's really hard to know the exact shape. I don't see any dangly bits. |
__________________
"Reality is what's left when you cease to believe." Philip K. Dick |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#71 |
Muse
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 567
|
Chinese official response has been typical.
1. Its absolutely nothing to do with us. Its anti-China US propaganda to say its Chinese. 2. Where is the evidence its from China? Its anti-China US propaganda to say its Chinese. 3. It might be Chinese. But it was still anti-China US propaganda to assume it was Chinese. 4. Ok, it is actually Chinese, but its a civilian balloon. Its anti-China US propaganda to say otherwise. 5. Its not a spy balloon. Its anti-China US propaganda to say anything else. 6. Why dont you believe us? Its anti-China US propaganda not to believe us. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#72 |
Gentleman of leisure
Tagger
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Flying around in the sky
Posts: 27,648
|
The balloon will probably slowly decend as the gas leaks out of the balloon. Then land and the USA could recover the payload and see what it contains. Though by that stage it may be in the Alantic Ocean.
|
__________________
This signature is for rent. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#73 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Antimemetics Division
Posts: 63,607
|
Hopefully the US Navy will think to put a ship out there or something.
|
__________________
There is no Antimemetics Division. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#74 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,020
|
|
__________________
__________ Hiding from the ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#75 |
Muse
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 567
|
Over 80% of Chinese airspace is controlled by the Chinese military, many parts of it are completely forbidden to civilian air traffic. No fly zones, no exceptions.
Hence the Chinese military are absolutely guaranteed to be aware of its flight path through restricted military airspace. So it cannot have been civilian in the first place. They knew exactly where it was going. Through China, over Japan, over Canada and then into the US. And yet they didn't mention it to the US. "Oh sorry, please be aware our civilian weather research balloon has inadvertently drifted off course, and is now entering your airspace. Its going over Montana, which we can appreciate is sensitive, what with all the missile silos. How can we work with you to resolve this, and avoid a diplomatic incident?" But instead they flat out denied it was even Chinese. Its not a conclusive argument, but its not a good look for China. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#76 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Olomouc, Czech Republic
Posts: 4,041
|
It's certainly not a satellite. Satellite can't fall down. This for sure will. Satellites fly above national airspace, balloons do not. Definitions vary between nations, but the idea about the limits is mostly the same .. satellites fly above, balloons don't.
It's clearly violation of US territory. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#77 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sorth Dakonsin
Posts: 27,607
|
|
__________________
Science is self-correcting. Woo is self-contradicting. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#78 |
Muse
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 567
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#79 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Olomouc, Czech Republic
Posts: 4,041
|
Nice picture is near the middle of the page here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/nat...aths-rcna69052 |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#80 |
Penultimate Amazing
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 10,284
|
No, it isn’t. Or at least it wasn’t. Our airspace has a vertical limit that this ballon was above.
It obviously isn’t a ‘spy ballon’. It obviously isn’t a threat. It seemingly arrived here accidentally. It is more dangerous shot down than floating about. What should be done about it? |
__________________
My previous signature risked (unknowingly) violating the Hatch Act! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|