|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
3rd August 2020, 12:09 AM | #2001 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
I was told that it was impossible to get 50 questions right in 15 minutes. Now, that does not mean an impossibly high IQ. It means that the test designers thought it impossible. ie an open ended test. I have no idea how they rated that to IQ. What number question did you get wrong. Was it number 25? Why did you not use your extra 5 minutes to check your answers on the difficult ones? I agree that none of the questions required a high IQ to get right. I already told you that. The word ones were particularly easy. But I notice they rephrased and changed formatting of similar questions. It was a "speed" versus "accuracy" test. When I had my first IQ test I had a series of complicated tests that took a number of hours. One part was fitting blocks together to get patterns. I aced that part with the guy expressing amazement at my speed. Pattern recognition was always a strong point of mine. |
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
3rd August 2020, 12:12 AM | #2002 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
|
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
3rd August 2020, 12:25 AM | #2003 |
Schrödinger's cat
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Malmesbury, UK
Posts: 16,140
|
If you're still using the same equipment in the same way then, as I said, it is highly unlikely that it has suddenly started behaving differently. I suppose there's a small possibility that the equipment was originally malfunctioning and the fault has somehow since corrected itself, but it is more likely that your original readings were incorrect or misread.
In any case, please clarify: are you still maintaining that ordinary wifi equipment can cause symptoms in EHS sufferers? Or are you now withdrawing that claim? |
__________________
"If you trust in yourself ... and believe in your dreams ... and follow your star ... you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things" - Terry Pratchett |
|
3rd August 2020, 12:33 AM | #2004 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
Hacking a Gmail account that stays logged in most of the time should not be to difficult to someone who knows how to. The hack was covered up. I use strong passwords that are easy for me but make no sense to others, being full of symbols and number. No plain words. I do not let my computer remember any passwords, except really simple stuff where I use the same simple password. If you read about the blatant corruption in the police, the judiciary, the government and Corporates in SA you will get an idea of how bad things here are. No-one cares and they all know that they can do what they like without consequence. It is one reason I say that God created a pandemic in order to "reform" society. The Telcos had no problem with blatant perjury and falsification of documents. Do you think that big corporate would not have departments that "war game" their opponents? The fact is that I do not know who hacked my email. I know it was hacked and nothing really done. It appears they were looking for information. One bit of information may have been who my legal counsel were and how it was going. The next bit of info they needed was when I was going to file for an interdict so they could mount the tower. I changed the email a week before filing and I beat them by one day. Did anyone think that NASA was gathering data on the scale they were until it was leaked? When I emigrated to the USA I found that the FBI kept files on ANY suspicious behavior. A guy told me he applied for a low level security clearance and he was asked about why he went to the local small harbor where a Russian sub had docked. I see so much corruption and immoral behavior, even in ordinary people. Luckily, not in family and friends, so there is hope. |
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
3rd August 2020, 12:38 AM | #2005 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
|
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
3rd August 2020, 12:46 AM | #2006 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
I take it that you saying you got 50/50 in 11 minutes. Just confirming. If so, well done. Thanks for the feedback. It would appear that I was misinformed about the difficulty. When I looked at the test again I did think it was not too difficult. Only about three made me pause and think. The rest needed focus and concentration. It does not mean that I am dumb - just misinformed. I would not have brought up the test had I looked at it first. It is good to know that a 19 year old has the smart and concentration to do well on such a test. You do know that avoiding misreading of questions is part of the test. |
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
3rd August 2020, 12:49 AM | #2007 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
|
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
3rd August 2020, 01:10 AM | #2008 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
Yes, I was expecting people to take the test. But I assessed people like this: a) people confident enough to take the test b) people who would read the test and disparage it because they were not confident. I expected only answers from people who took the test and got high results.
One mark of intelligence is reading something accurately and not distorting what was said. If the distortion is deliberate then having a high IQ does not mean having high moral standards - and I think we all agree on that. Here is what I posted. And I have been honest. I prefer to have an accurate assessment of myself rather than a delusion, so I will not be using this test as a reference. Post 184 I will post one intelligence test that I took when I was about 50 years of age and less than my peak at 38 years of age. I was told it was an open-ended test in that it was impossible for anyone to get the maximum number correct. Yet I did. You can try it yourself, or get experts to assess it. I must just find it and put it on Google drive with a link. Post 1733 So can I post the IQ test I took in year 2000 and got an "impossible" score? We can all take it and compare. Or you can all just tell me that despite being professionally administered, it was actually easy. I would be interested to see if it was as difficult as I was told. Post 1879 I found the IQ test with 50 questions in 15 minutes. Each one only took me a few seconds. At an average of 18 seconds a question, I reckon I could do it again in possibly half the time. I only found a few that I needed a bit more time to think if I had the right answer. To be sure I understood the question. I wonder why they said it was impossible to get 50 out of 50? |
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
3rd August 2020, 01:13 AM | #2009 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
Part of IQ is general knowledge. What English speaker is not aware of American coinage? Schooled in Zimbabwe, lived in SA, USA, NZ and back in SA. I did live in the USA for 15 years. NYC. But in general you are correct. It is very difficult to remove culture and language from tests. |
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
3rd August 2020, 01:51 AM | #2010 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
Same article, next paragraph "But deaths in the sprawling slum have not exploded..." It is quite clear that this virus is highly infectious and transmissible. That means everyone will get it if there is no vaccine. What I have been looking at, has been the pattern of the spread. First to countries with hi-hech and hi-tech hospitals and hi-tech old care. Next the mortality rate. When it comes to mortality rate there are a number of factors so it becomes difficult to spot patterns. Rather look at Johns Hopkins. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality There is a graph of mortality rate and one can hover to see the country. Yemen clearly has confounding factors such as war and disease. But we have UK, Italy, Spain, France, Belgium and Netherlands. If the quality of hospitals REDUCED the mortality rate, then they should have LOW rates. West Bank and Gaza. Low rate 0.7%. No doubt low EMFs in offices and hospitals. Israel is also low. Israel 0.7% but they have anti-EMF campaigns. Rwanda, Iceland, Namibia, Mozambique are all low. US, Brazil, India, Russia, South Africa all have high numbers and median rates. They have mixtures of populations that are both poor and elite and have areas that have high EMFs and areas with low EMFs. If what God told me is correct then this pandemic has features that I predicted but not many others did. The pandemic will hit the elite as well as the poor. Unlike the Spanish flu they will not escape. This is due to the "stealth" effect I predicted. Long incubation and being asymptomatically infectious The virus is creating maximum panic and destroying societies as we know it. The inequality and the corruption is being exposed. People want change. It will not directly reduce the population. This means that either the knock-on effects get so bad billions will die soon, or there is another pandemic with much higher mortality on the way. Show me which group has considered these to be a high probability. Do you get the feeling you are living in a "sci-fi" movie yet? |
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
3rd August 2020, 02:04 AM | #2011 |
Schrödinger's cat
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Malmesbury, UK
Posts: 16,140
|
The average age in India is 29. I imagine it's even lower in the slums.
Quote:
Quote:
Countries which have high levels of international travel were hit earliest, when little was known about the virus, how it spreads and how to treat it. Countries which were hit later have the advantage of learning from the ones that were hit earliest. Simple things like lying patients on their stomachs instead of their backs had been discovered to make a significant difference to mortality.
Quote:
Quote:
|
__________________
"If you trust in yourself ... and believe in your dreams ... and follow your star ... you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things" - Terry Pratchett |
|
3rd August 2020, 02:04 AM | #2012 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 3,377
|
48/50...
Could have easily made 50 if I was not being cheeky. What's the fuss about? |
__________________
I've got to get to a library...fast Robert Langdon |
|
3rd August 2020, 02:12 AM | #2013 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
I am using the same equipment I have been using for a long time and am well experienced with. A self-correcting calibration fault is almost impossible (it is German precision after all ). There is one way the meter can read low when the emf is high and that is when the antenna is not properly screwed in. I know this and check it. It would not account for high readings that were actually low.
There is no way to misread the meter. It has an audio that screams when the reading is high. It can be turned off or low, but I use it to check quality. The readings I took originally went over-scale. The low readings are in the 10 to 20 percent and less range of full scale. No, my abilities are not the problem. When it comes to readings we are talking about ranges such as 0-1 or 3-10 or 50-200 or 400-700 or 1200-2000 and 2500-3500. Precise readings are not required. I guess I should post a video on Google Drive. Let me clarify then for you. Some EHS sufferers claim to be harmed by ordinary WiFi from surrounding devices. If I am affected, which may be the case, I cannot detect it, except to go to a place with no emfs, and then most of my body pain disappears. I claim to be affected by a high (readings ten times normal) transmissions from a device to a tower, or by towers that radiate downwards. Rather box myself and test the latter I thought I had found a device that consistently gave high emfs (1200 to 3500). Then I started to find that was not the case. I did not expect that I would see consistently high readings, and then find that when I want to test, the device does not emit the high readings but quite low readings (3 to 300). This should be science and not some ghost interfering. If there is interference with the test, I would first suspect the Telcos, but there may be other explanations (possibly coincidental) that I have not found. I said that I have some ideas to explore but will first do it before posting. |
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
3rd August 2020, 02:15 AM | #2014 |
Protected by Samurai Hedgehogs!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,267
|
|
__________________
"You're a sick SOB. You know that, Wollery?" - Roadtoad "Just think how stupid the average person is, and then realize that half of them are even stupider!" --George Carlin |
|
3rd August 2020, 02:20 AM | #2015 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
Thank for trying the test and posting your result. It confirms my suspicions just before uploading the test. Which numbers did you get wrong? Why did "cheeky" affect the score? Anyhow, it gave some interest to the thread. I think people should have to post a summary of themselves. Age, profession, and achievements. |
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
3rd August 2020, 02:20 AM | #2016 |
Schrödinger's cat
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Malmesbury, UK
Posts: 16,140
|
|
__________________
"If you trust in yourself ... and believe in your dreams ... and follow your star ... you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things" - Terry Pratchett |
|
3rd August 2020, 02:26 AM | #2017 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
|
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
3rd August 2020, 02:28 AM | #2018 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
|
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
3rd August 2020, 02:38 AM | #2019 |
Protected by Samurai Hedgehogs!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,267
|
|
__________________
"You're a sick SOB. You know that, Wollery?" - Roadtoad "Just think how stupid the average person is, and then realize that half of them are even stupider!" --George Carlin |
|
3rd August 2020, 02:44 AM | #2020 |
Winking at the Moon
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 16,711
|
You missed me, Darat and wollery’s son.
I got 50/50 in 9.5 minutes (while not concentrating as I was watching a motor race). Darat got 49/50 in seven minutes. Wollery’s son got 42/50 but was disadvantaged by being a child and by the test not fitting with his cultural knowledge. |
__________________
Why can't you be more like Agatha? - Loss Leader |
|
3rd August 2020, 02:45 AM | #2021 |
Lackey
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 113,982
|
|
__________________
“If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?” Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago |
|
3rd August 2020, 02:46 AM | #2022 |
Protected by Samurai Hedgehogs!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,267
|
And me, 50/50 in 5 minutes.
(Although it's probably a slightly unfair comparison in that I teach this sort of stuff.) |
__________________
"You're a sick SOB. You know that, Wollery?" - Roadtoad "Just think how stupid the average person is, and then realize that half of them are even stupider!" --George Carlin |
|
3rd August 2020, 02:54 AM | #2023 |
Schrödinger's cat
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Malmesbury, UK
Posts: 16,140
|
|
__________________
"If you trust in yourself ... and believe in your dreams ... and follow your star ... you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things" - Terry Pratchett |
|
3rd August 2020, 03:03 AM | #2024 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 3,377
|
|
__________________
I've got to get to a library...fast Robert Langdon |
|
3rd August 2020, 04:17 AM | #2025 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,594
|
|
__________________
Vote like you’re poor. A closed mouth gathers no feet" "Ignorance is a renewable resource" P.J.O'Rourke "It's all god's handiwork, there's little quality control applied", Fox26 reporter on Texas granite |
|
3rd August 2020, 04:24 AM | #2026 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Where there's never a road broader than the back of your hand.
Posts: 7,171
|
|
__________________
'Of course it can be OK to mistreat people.'- shuttlt Bring Back the Yak! P.J. Denyer |
|
3rd August 2020, 05:00 AM | #2027 |
Protected by Samurai Hedgehogs!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,267
|
|
__________________
"You're a sick SOB. You know that, Wollery?" - Roadtoad "Just think how stupid the average person is, and then realize that half of them are even stupider!" --George Carlin |
|
3rd August 2020, 05:21 AM | #2028 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
I believe I have solved the problem of the power output.
I did a "proof concept" test where I monitored the output under various conditions to find out what parameters were needed. Once I got the high (actually medium 600-1200) readings, I waited to see what symptoms occurred to make a note of them. There is no "maybe" about them. In about 4 minutes I had pain. The pain increased and spread until the test stopped at 15 minutes. The symptoms disappeared rather quickly (about 3-5 minutes) after the test, so I believe I can do a run about 4 tests a day without compromising my health. I have video recordings and narrative. My question is: Why, with all the expertise and brain power here, did no-one suggest the fix I came up with? There is enough information in my posts to be able to come with the solution that I did. Give it another shot. |
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
3rd August 2020, 05:28 AM | #2029 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
|
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
3rd August 2020, 05:31 AM | #2030 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,083
|
No, it's not. Absolutely not.
I've had four (properly given) IQ tests at different points in my life and all of them purported to test only cognitive ability, NOT acquired knowledge. In fact a flaw in one of them I recall was a question which described two cars driving away from each other and the various turns they took. At the end you were supposed to figure out (multiple choice) how far they were away from each other point to point. The flaw being it was based on having to know A^2+B^2=C^2. If the most powerful brain on the planet had never been taught the pythagorean theorem they'd miss that question. Edit to add : the underlying point of that question was to test ability to relate two objects in space and visualize that relationship outside of the directions of who turned left or right where. The problem being even if you did so, measuring their distance required having been taught geometry. That's why so many of the questions involve things like pattern matching, spatial relations (which of the below represents the sample shape rotated 180 degrees horizontally, etc.), memory, and the like. The goal is to test brainpower absent cultural experience or acquired knowledge. The list of things you're deliciously wrong about grows every day. Amazing how long it is. One might even say it's 'impossible'. |
3rd August 2020, 05:45 AM | #2031 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1,903
|
PartSkeptic, you've been busted, and no amount of backpedalling is going to change that. We can all see it.
You told us that you sat an IQ test as part of a job application. You told us that you aced the test and scored an impossible score of 50/50. Now that you've shown us the test, it turns out that scoring 50/50 is absolutely nothing out of the ordinary. The fact that you sat this easy test, which you said was an IQ test, scored 50/50, which an intelligent person would recognise is nothing impressive, yet believed the test giver when they told you you'd just scored an impossible score on the test, speaks volumes as to the difference between your actual intelligence and what you perceive your intelligence to be. You genuinely believed that getting 50/50 on this test meant you had an impossibly high intelligence. You've told us that you've have achieved a number of supposedly impossible things. If this is the kind of thing you're including in those impossible achievements, can you see why people are getting even more skeptical when you boast about how intelligent and amazing a person you are? |
3rd August 2020, 05:57 AM | #2032 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
Many thanks for that. I apologize for my haste and lack of focus. On Saturday and Sunday I was mostly in bed with a bad flu. I was hardly in a state to get on this thread. It seems that making silly mistakes by being too hasty is not something one can afford to do here. But here again its a lesson. A single scratch means do not swim with the sharks. Errata 14. Write the last letter of the one of these three words which contains only one letter that is in neither of the other two. Bridge Rig Binder Binder - "n" is in neither I misspelled it and did not see it. I have put a strike-out on the s. Hard to see but it is there. Regrettably I have said that I am having a lot of difficulty with words and spellings. My spell check did not pick that up. I will eat humble pie. I was mistaken about the level of this test. Despite being mislead, I should have looked at it again and questioned the person giving it. I never claimed perfection. I have learned late in life that one can learn a lot from one's mistakes. I accept the lessons and move on. |
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
3rd August 2020, 06:09 AM | #2033 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 4,801
|
I posted my previous post without reading this one of yours. I admit I was mistaken to characterize the test in the way I was told. And I admit I could have and should have reviewed the test and being skeptical. It was a memory of a 20 year old test where I remember the part about "open-ended" and not possible to get 50/50. I had the test because I scanned every document before leaving New Zealand which is why it took at while to find. It dents my credibility, but does it negate it? Can you point out any well-known intelligent person who has not been mistaken about evaluating what was told to them? Does it dent my honesty? Are my other achievements also nothing to be proud of? So are you going to tag along for the results of the emf harm test? |
__________________
**Agnostic theist. God/Satan/Angels/Demons may not exist - but I choose to think the probability is that they do. By personal experience.** |
|
3rd August 2020, 06:41 AM | #2034 |
Schrödinger's cat
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Malmesbury, UK
Posts: 16,140
|
If you have finally found a way to induce your wifi modem to consistently produce the output level you now consider to be the minimum necessary to provoke your symptoms, PartSkeptic, may I politely suggest you post your full test protocol before you continue with your trials?
For the level of clarity and detail that can reasonably be expected for a test of this kind, see the one I posted here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com...2#post13154392 |
__________________
"If you trust in yourself ... and believe in your dreams ... and follow your star ... you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things" - Terry Pratchett |
|
3rd August 2020, 06:45 AM | #2035 |
Winking at the Moon
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 16,711
|
You'd made an error with the quote function in that particular post to which Cosmic Yak linked, making it appear that EvilBiker's words were yours.
I don't think anyone is clear what you are trying to test any more. The original hypothesis was that you got a headache when the wifi was on, so Pixel42 among others developed a protocol to help you test that hypothesis. Part of the protocol is that you should not know whether the wifi was actually on or not until after the test is over, because many things can cause headaches (including but not limited to the expectation of a headache). Now you are testing for a power level first and then monitoring yourself for symptoms. What is the hypothesis that you are testing? |
__________________
Why can't you be more like Agatha? - Loss Leader |
|
3rd August 2020, 07:01 AM | #2036 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
|
The test you posted was not in any way an IQ test. There is no way a meaningful IQ could have been measured by that test. As others have noted, it's more likely designed to detect the onset of cognitive impairment. Any person of normal cognitive function would have been expected to get all the questions right within the time limit. You were entirely wrong about the test, and your critics were right about it even before you posted it. They knew from your description of the test that it could not have been as you claimed. Now perhaps you'll give your critics some credit for being more knowledgeable than you about some things.
|
3rd August 2020, 07:03 AM | #2037 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
|
|
3rd August 2020, 07:08 AM | #2038 |
Protected by Samurai Hedgehogs!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,267
|
I don't think it's a lie, I think it's a combination of poor memory and strong cognitive bias.
|
__________________
"You're a sick SOB. You know that, Wollery?" - Roadtoad "Just think how stupid the average person is, and then realize that half of them are even stupider!" --George Carlin |
|
3rd August 2020, 07:23 AM | #2039 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
|
Because it's an obviously wrong protocol. If you know that the wifi is on and emitting at high power, as measured by your equipment, that doesn't rule out a psychosomatic cause for your headaches. The purpose of our protocol was to eliminate such possibilities as causes.
Now perhaps you can explain why, once again, you've gone out of your way to insinuate that your critics are stupid compared to you. This is not something you need to do in order to have a meaningful debate regarding what's causing your headaches. It's something you need only if your real purpose here is to massage your ego. |
3rd August 2020, 09:25 AM | #2040 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The great American West
Posts: 24,911
|
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|