|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
9th January 2009, 05:04 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,206
|
Bigfoot: The Patterson Gimlin Film - Part 3
I find it interesting... Esteban Sarmiento talks of how dermal ridges
and scars etc can be faked. Just skip Chilcutt and go to 2:03 in the video. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=M15H9WGzWbw And if you're really bored watch this. Seven parts,,, if you can take the torture. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=GHK2O6...eature=related |
Last edited by Darat; 3rd November 2009 at 01:36 AM. Reason: Added info box to wrong post - sorry for any confusion! |
|
9th January 2009, 05:05 PM | #2 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 391
|
Logic,
Great image! m |
9th January 2009, 05:35 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,325
|
JCR, the ngc program is heavily biased. It is a travesty to the serious researchers. Why didnt it present the freeman and klamath footage? Why not the hair morphology? The gaussian curve?
|
9th January 2009, 05:43 PM | #4 |
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sapporo ichiban!
Posts: 9,272
|
Whenever Chilcutt talks he reminds me of a certain someone (skip Doug, go to 00:40):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnZDm...eature=related
Quote:
|
__________________
Until better evidence is provided, the best solution to the PGF is that it is a man in a suit. -Astrophotographer. 2 prints, 1 trackway, same 'dermals'? 'Unfortunately no' says Meldrum. I want to see bigfoot throw a pig... Is that wrong? -LTC8K6 |
|
9th January 2009, 05:50 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,206
|
LMAO... I suffered through all 7
|
9th January 2009, 06:14 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,206
|
|
9th January 2009, 06:25 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,325
|
Jc, a man trying to imitate something is a travesty? Come on, ask anyone to do that, and all of them sound like complete morons, yet that doesnt mean there wrong.
|
9th January 2009, 06:45 PM | #8 |
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sapporo ichiban!
Posts: 9,272
|
|
__________________
Until better evidence is provided, the best solution to the PGF is that it is a man in a suit. -Astrophotographer. 2 prints, 1 trackway, same 'dermals'? 'Unfortunately no' says Meldrum. I want to see bigfoot throw a pig... Is that wrong? -LTC8K6 |
|
9th January 2009, 06:57 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,325
|
Kitz, thats not the point. The point is that people are no more credible or less credible when they imitate a sound
|
9th January 2009, 06:57 PM | #10 |
Master Poster
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,342
|
|
9th January 2009, 07:01 PM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,206
|
|
9th January 2009, 07:10 PM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,325
|
Rockin, the hairs are similiar to human, except that all 11 lack medullas, are thicker, cut, tapered ends.
|
9th January 2009, 07:20 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,206
|
Imitating sounds is just that...
And credibility is another creature altogether. |
9th January 2009, 07:48 PM | #14 |
Master Poster
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,342
|
Human hair can lack medullas.
In other words - the lack of a medulla does not rule out the hairs being human. What to heck does "thicker" mean? Are you referring to the Maximum Shaft Diameter? Is that measurement outside of known human hair? If so - by how much? (Please cite reference) Ummm..."cut". Please explain what you meant by that. Tapered ends...do you mean the distal hair tip is tapered? Human hair can have naturally occurring taper. Is it a Natural Taper or a Rounded Taper? |
9th January 2009, 08:08 PM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,325
|
Rockin, 11 different hairs have features that are different from human hair
http://bfro.net/images/whatis/figure...%20caption.jpg |
9th January 2009, 08:22 PM | #16 |
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sapporo ichiban!
Posts: 9,272
|
|
__________________
Until better evidence is provided, the best solution to the PGF is that it is a man in a suit. -Astrophotographer. 2 prints, 1 trackway, same 'dermals'? 'Unfortunately no' says Meldrum. I want to see bigfoot throw a pig... Is that wrong? -LTC8K6 |
|
9th January 2009, 09:27 PM | #17 |
Master Poster
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,342
|
|
9th January 2009, 09:35 PM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,325
|
Sasquatch hair is cut and has different cortex color
|
9th January 2009, 09:44 PM | #19 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Inland NW
Posts: 4,942
|
|
__________________
Normal in a weird way. |
|
9th January 2009, 10:06 PM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,325
|
GT, i mean that the hairs are cut, which isnt found in human hair
Professor Stephen I Rosen of the University of Maryland has identified its hair as that of a previously unknown primate–and he has hair on file for most of the living primates of the world. |
9th January 2009, 10:07 PM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,325
|
|
9th January 2009, 10:17 PM | #22 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail
Posts: 21,423
|
Quote:
|
__________________
What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break? |
|
9th January 2009, 10:20 PM | #23 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail
Posts: 21,423
|
Let's have the full quote, makaya. Why did you write it as if it were your own words?
Quote:
|
__________________
What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break? |
|
9th January 2009, 10:22 PM | #24 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail
Posts: 21,423
|
Also here:
http://www.bigfootencounters.com/articles/coon.htm
Quote:
|
__________________
What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break? |
|
10th January 2009, 08:02 AM | #25 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,528
|
Well, Jack is still holding at 5' 10" +/- on Patty's height.
|
10th January 2009, 10:16 AM | #26 |
Non credunt, semper verificare
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sigil, the city of doors
Posts: 14,571
|
Apparently even rare elusive animal are getting caught on Camera. Not bigfoot....
venomous mamal studied (I know the argument on the quantum bigfoot (both elusive and easily found at the same time) have been beaten to death, but I thought of the finding might interrest some people here on its own value). |
10th January 2009, 10:51 AM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,325
|
Aep, tell me, how many videos do we have of a blue bear? Yes, im bringing it up again.
|
10th January 2009, 10:58 AM | #28 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,528
|
|
10th January 2009, 10:59 AM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,325
|
Long, even wolverines are video taped tons of times. However, the blue bear has never been video taped, and if it were, it would be online
|
10th January 2009, 11:08 AM | #30 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,528
|
That cant be stated with any degree of reliability. Theres no cosmic prime directive that anything filmed must be put on the internet. ( I myself have hundreds of hours of stuff thats not on the net and I'm sure millions of others do as well)
So, you cant say it was never filmed anymore than you can say you know it has ( unless you have seen a film of one) The point is moot however because the BB is known to exist for over a century so the ABILITY to find and film one ( if desired) is readily available for anyone with the resources to do so. Thats what really matters. I dont follow your reasoning. Are you saying that because a known animal has not been filmed ( which is really a choice to NOT film it since it can be filmed) that in some way shores up the argument thats theres ZERO reliable "film" of BF especially since BF gets seen hundreds of times a year with a good bit of camera traps and people physically looking for him? ) and everyone else in the woods doing other things?) |
10th January 2009, 11:10 AM | #31 |
Show me the monkey!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 26,646
|
|
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot. |
|
10th January 2009, 11:19 AM | #32 |
Muse
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 834
|
|
10th January 2009, 11:31 AM | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,325
|
No hitch. Bad case by me. Im still hellbent on the lack of continous bodies of the blue bear. This goes more than an analogy, its sad we have trouble finding them
|
10th January 2009, 11:33 AM | #34 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 391
|
First you need to define which species of Blue Bear. These bears are not quite as elusive as bigfoot, which is everywhere yet nowhere. Who needs video/film when you have one in a zoo?
m Ursus arctos pruinosus aka Blue Bear Got this one in a zoo. Ursus americanus emmonsii aka Blue Bear/Glacier Bear/Spirit Bear This species is not quite as rare |
10th January 2009, 11:52 AM | #35 |
Show me the monkey!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 26,646
|
|
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot. |
|
10th January 2009, 11:57 AM | #36 |
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sapporo ichiban!
Posts: 9,272
|
Continuous bodies? What does that even mean, man? You need to quite it with the blue bears. It flies at BFF, not here. They are in zoos, we have there bodies living and dead to study, the Chinese chop them up into little bitty bits and put them in jars in apothecaries. There is a reason why they are rare.
Enough with the blue bears! It's raining blue bears: |
__________________
Until better evidence is provided, the best solution to the PGF is that it is a man in a suit. -Astrophotographer. 2 prints, 1 trackway, same 'dermals'? 'Unfortunately no' says Meldrum. I want to see bigfoot throw a pig... Is that wrong? -LTC8K6 |
|
10th January 2009, 12:05 PM | #37 |
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sapporo ichiban!
Posts: 9,272
|
|
__________________
Until better evidence is provided, the best solution to the PGF is that it is a man in a suit. -Astrophotographer. 2 prints, 1 trackway, same 'dermals'? 'Unfortunately no' says Meldrum. I want to see bigfoot throw a pig... Is that wrong? -LTC8K6 |
|
10th January 2009, 12:12 PM | #38 |
Non credunt, semper verificare
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sigil, the city of doors
Posts: 14,571
|
If I remember correctly there is a blue bear in a zoo in Japan, as somebody already psoted you. I dunno why you are so hung on video as opposed to photo.
But, hey, pay me the travel to the japan zoo where there is one, and I deliver you tons over tons of blue bear video. Or ask kitakaze to film it. |
10th January 2009, 12:15 PM | #39 |
Non credunt, semper verificare
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sigil, the city of doors
Posts: 14,571
|
|
10th January 2009, 12:23 PM | #40 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Inland NW
Posts: 4,942
|
|
__________________
Normal in a weird way. |
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|