|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
24th October 2012, 10:59 AM | #1 |
Thinker
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 241
|
Rebecca Watson's article in Slate
http://www.slate.com/articles/double...e_threats.html
I have never met Rebecca Watson, nor have I ever attended a TAM. However, friends and fans of Randi may want to read this. I do not have a dog in whatever disagreement occurred. |
24th October 2012, 11:28 AM | #2 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 12,984
|
I was going to write about this in some of the older threads when this new thread opened. (In fact, I was doing a keyword search to find those threads that mentioned "muslima.")
Leaving aside the question of whether the elevator incident warranted criticism, the conduct of others that followed is stunningly rude. To think that some of these ... people ... describe themselves as "skeptics" actually makes me feel as though my family--which strives for the highest and best qualities of civilization--has been infiltrated by a bunch of low-brow barbarians. This conduct is not merely "sexism," nor is it merely "bullying." It ventures into the realm of "being a grade-A-*******." And the things that some have done to provoke intimidation and intense fear and a change in the behavior of the targeted individual ... well, I think there's a name for THAT sort of uncivilized conduct as well. |
__________________
Klaatu: I'm impatient with stupidity. My people have learned to live without it. Mr. Harley: I'm afraid my people haven't. I am very sorry. I wish it were otherwise. -- The Day The Earth Stood Still, screenplay by Edmund H. North "Don't you get me wrong. I only want to know." -- Judas in Jesus Christ Superstar, lyrics by Tim Rice |
|
24th October 2012, 11:49 AM | #3 |
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 11,831
|
I'm sorry, there are still people who listen to or believe anything Rebecca Watson has to say?
She's a self-absorbed attention-grabbing radfem drama llama bully who hasn't said anything remotely skeptical in more than a year. Elevatorgate blew up when she decided to start labelling anyone who disagreed with her on anything as "misogynists" and "parrots," dictating that her word was law for all women, everywhere. The idea of applying skepticism, or even just open discussion, to any one of her feminist claims sends her into a flaming tirade. Her and her ever-shrinking clique have started their own movement, and unless you uncritically accept everything they say, you're not welcome as a member. And if you're not a member, then you should be shunned from the community. |
24th October 2012, 12:03 PM | #4 |
The Jester
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,763
|
|
__________________
As the size of an explosion increases, the number of social situations it is incapable of resolving approaches zero. -Vaarsuvius It's a rum state of affairs when you feel like punching a jar of mayonnaise in the face. -Charlie Brooker |
|
24th October 2012, 12:05 PM | #5 |
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 11,831
|
|
24th October 2012, 12:14 PM | #6 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 12,984
|
I liked Rebecca when I met her, but I have been unimpressed with her work as skeptic and as a spokesperson for skeptical issues. That doesn't mean I dislike her; it just means that I have not been impressed with her talent as a spokesperson. But that is rather beside the point.
I have no trouble taking more-or-less at face value the incidents that she describes, since they are similar to incidents I have seen myself. Further, I have also seen with my own eyes that people who would think twice before picking on me (because I am a man) mysteriously feel at liberty to pick on women. Where this sense of liberty comes from is an utter mystery to me. Skeptics need to have the highest ethical standards, and cruel or immature harrassment is unethical and ought to be unacceptable, regardless of the personal merits of the victim. |
__________________
Klaatu: I'm impatient with stupidity. My people have learned to live without it. Mr. Harley: I'm afraid my people haven't. I am very sorry. I wish it were otherwise. -- The Day The Earth Stood Still, screenplay by Edmund H. North "Don't you get me wrong. I only want to know." -- Judas in Jesus Christ Superstar, lyrics by Tim Rice |
|
24th October 2012, 12:20 PM | #7 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 5,147
|
Agreed. The whole point of JREF should be a continuation of The Enlightenment, i.e., the concerted effort to acknowledge and expunge patterns of thinking that are ignorant, irrational, demeaning, etc.
Regardless of one's take on the "elevator incident," it's clear that misogyny is a problem among some people in the skeptical community. Those people need a figurative dope-slap to help them realize the harm they're doing not just to women alienated by their behavior, but to the entire skeptical movement when it is robbed of the insights of brilliant women who choose not to participate in that movement because of their fears (whether real or merely perceived) of being harassed. |
24th October 2012, 12:22 PM | #8 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,280
|
I stopped listening to SGU because I can't stand her.
|
24th October 2012, 12:24 PM | #9 |
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 11,831
|
Again, Elevatorgate blew up after Watson became a bully. After she doubled down, then doubled down again on her initial description until it was a matter of harrassment and potential rape instead of the minor annoyance she first described. After she called out anyone who disagreed with the severity of the incident as "ignorant" and "parroting misogynist thought." After she started attacking anyone who disagreed with her as gender traitors.
Quote:
|
24th October 2012, 12:27 PM | #10 |
Thinker
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 228
|
|
24th October 2012, 12:29 PM | #11 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,985
|
|
__________________
Take the risk of thinking for yourself. Much more happiness, truth, beauty, and wisdom will come to you that way. -Christopher Hitchens Believe what you're told. There would be chaos if everyone thought for themselves. -Top Dog slogan |
|
24th October 2012, 12:35 PM | #12 |
The Jester
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,763
|
Really? From people who are supposedly part of the skeptical community?
I know people like Dawkins and PZ Myers often get threats of death, dismemberment and damnation from religious folk, but how many times have they been threatened with death or rape from their fellow atheists? |
__________________
As the size of an explosion increases, the number of social situations it is incapable of resolving approaches zero. -Vaarsuvius It's a rum state of affairs when you feel like punching a jar of mayonnaise in the face. -Charlie Brooker |
|
24th October 2012, 12:44 PM | #13 |
Dental Floss Tycoon
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,371
|
Quote:
|
__________________
Counterbalance in the little town of Ridgeview, Ohio. Two people permanently enslaved by the tyranny of fear and superstitution, facing the future with a kind of helpless dread. Two others facing the future with confidence - having escaped one of the darker places of the Twilight Zone. |
|
24th October 2012, 12:52 PM | #14 |
Nasty Woman
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 96,386
|
So where's the evidence the 'rape' threats were from scientists? From atheists? From skeptics? More/worse than the usual crap most of the more frequently read bloggers get?
Here's the lesson: get in a public row with someone famous and your 15 minutes of fame gets an extended time block. It doesn't need to be a real issue, straw appears to do nicely. |
24th October 2012, 12:55 PM | #15 |
a carbon based life-form
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 39,049
|
|
24th October 2012, 12:56 PM | #16 |
Eats shoots and leaves.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 8,217
|
Who?
|
__________________
"Truth does not contradict truth." - St. Augustine "Faith often contradicts faith. Therefore faith is not an indication of truth." - RenaissanceBiker |
|
24th October 2012, 12:58 PM | #17 |
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 11,831
|
|
24th October 2012, 01:01 PM | #18 |
Nasty Woman
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 96,386
|
If you get enough people in a group, you'll likely start to get a representation of a typical population when it comes to personalities and behavior.
Some Catholic priests and Boy Scoutmasters rape young boys. Some of the least critical thinkers believe they are skeptics. Some self identified atheists believe in the paranormal. Some otherwise critically thinking skeptics believe in god myths. The absurdity of Watson's little cause is she's apparently a skeptic who doesn't recognize skeptics are not a monolithic group. From the tunnel I view this whole kerfuffle through, she can't seem to comprehend her version of feminism is not the only legitimate version. |
24th October 2012, 01:05 PM | #19 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,140
|
I think all the hyperbole surrounding Ms. Watson's elevator story is a little outrageous. In the moment, she might have honestly felt intimidated or "creeped out" by the guy or whatever, and that's understandable. But for her to extrapolate that singular experience to an admonishment of all men's interactions with all women everywhere just comes off as ridiculously melodramatic. For her to state unequivocally that every man should always refrain from offering a friendly invitation to any woman in any situation where they happen to be alone together is kind of insulting.
But however much you might scoff at "Elevatorgate" and dislike Rebecca Watson's attention-grabbing personality, she does have a point about the rampant sexism. While some of the examples she cites might be written off as people who personally dislike Rebecca Watson saying things calculated specifically to antagonize her, there actually is a surprising amount of misogyny within the "skeptic" and "atheist" communities. |
__________________
“In religion and politics, people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second-hand, and without examination, from authorities who have not themselves examined the questions at issue but have taken them at second-hand from other non-examiners, whose opinions about them were not worth a brass farthing.” —Mark Twain |
|
24th October 2012, 01:22 PM | #20 |
Non credunt, semper verificare
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sigil, the city of doors
Posts: 14,571
|
We all have our opinion on watson.
Mysoginy is a problem in nearly ALL community. I have not seen evidence it is more predominent in our community than in other community. I have perceived a few evidence it less predominent (I perceive it to be less compared to other forums, viist gamer forum and CON theym are much worst IMO but i could be biased). Sue there is work to go to zero but is even zero, as the rate to strive for, even reachable ? I contend it is irrealist. There will always be rotten apple in all HUMAN communities. Amd I am not sure what mysoginy has to do with skepticism. They seem to be orthogonal issues. YOu can be a mysogin and a skeptic, and you can be not-mysogin and utter irrational woo. |
24th October 2012, 01:37 PM | #21 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,827
|
|
__________________
I'm an Anglican Christian, so I declare my prejudice here. Please take it in to account when reading my posts. "Most people would rather die than think: many do." - Betrand Russell My dull life blogged http://jerome23.wordpress.com |
|
24th October 2012, 01:40 PM | #22 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 12,984
|
Well ... yeah, but ... there was a time when I thought I had a pretty good idea what skeptics were like. Sure, they might have different histories and personalities, but they would have a lot in common, wouldn't they?
They'd be smart. Educated. Critical thinkers. Careful analysts. Having a good grasp of science. They'd be deliberate in what they said and did. Reason, not emotion, would be their prime mover. They would recognize that there were things they DIDN'T know. As skeptics despise BS-ers, they would not engage in BS-ing themselves. And so on. I actually thought skeptics as a group would be a more likeable class of people. I actually thought this. And indeed many skeptics do fit these descriptions. But I was stunned to find how many self-described skeptics do not. At my first skeptics meeting, I ran into several people were as stupid as sacks of soda straws. I also met people who were rash, and who were so lacking in the reasoning department that I wondered how they got along in life; and I also wondered if they had the slightest inkling what a "skeptic" was. And I encountered BS-artists, LOTS of them. At subsequent meetings, big and small, it was much the same. I liked some people and found others to be--to put it mildly--odd, not fitting my notions of what a "skeptic" ought to be. As Skeptic Ginger said, it is absurd to see skeptics as a monolithic group. But there was a time when I thought they might be, and I had to be taught otherwise by experience. Today, it would not surprise me if there were people in these crowds that do not know basic good manners when it comes to dealing with others, especially others of the opposite sex. Skeptics, as a group, are not immune from any of the negative qualities of human character. |
__________________
Klaatu: I'm impatient with stupidity. My people have learned to live without it. Mr. Harley: I'm afraid my people haven't. I am very sorry. I wish it were otherwise. -- The Day The Earth Stood Still, screenplay by Edmund H. North "Don't you get me wrong. I only want to know." -- Judas in Jesus Christ Superstar, lyrics by Tim Rice |
|
24th October 2012, 01:44 PM | #23 |
Thinker
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 227
|
|
__________________
There's a million fine looking women in the world, dude. But, they don't all bring you lasagna at work. |
|
24th October 2012, 01:51 PM | #24 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 5,147
|
|
24th October 2012, 02:02 PM | #26 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,827
|
That is one disturbing article though. I had avoided much of the discussion to date, but really she does seem to have received vast abuse. I only recall her vaguely from being banned from her for messing about with mod stuff?
|
__________________
I'm an Anglican Christian, so I declare my prejudice here. Please take it in to account when reading my posts. "Most people would rather die than think: many do." - Betrand Russell My dull life blogged http://jerome23.wordpress.com |
|
24th October 2012, 02:06 PM | #27 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,468
|
She still seems to think that "Dear Muslima" was a response to "Guys, don't do that" instead of a reaction to the firestorm that resulted with hyperbolic shrieking about "rape culture".
|
24th October 2012, 02:23 PM | #28 |
Nasty Woman
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 96,386
|
Not to revisit the whole thing for a third time, (though I have no doubt we will in another 50+ page thread ), most of what Watson complains about is baloney. It's not that, if true, we shouldn't address a problem of misbehaving men among skeptics. It's that it is simply NOT TRUE.
Specifically, a couple of incidents at TAM hardly means the whole community is defective or disappointing. At a conference, in Las Vegas for crying out loud, a couple of guys every year get drunk and act stupid. So what? OMFSM, the community isn't perfect. It's hardly a bastion of rampant misogyny. There are more men than women at TAM. Watson and her minions claimed that was because the horrid behavior of men chased women away. Puhleese! Are we that fragile that one or two jerks at a conference is devastating? Extensive efforts to quantify these horrible incidents and the number of women supposedly chased away from TAM and other events found a tiny handful of each. I'm pretty sure it would have been way fewer incidents than a typical conference with hundreds of people in attendance. OTOH, the fact a lot of skeptics happen to be interested in science and there are more men than women in the hard sciences (a condition that is rapidly changing) easily explains why there might be more men than women at TAMs. And yes, historically, women have had to break into these fields, be that science, math or engineering. Fine, address that issue but address it honestly, not with some ridiculous exaggeration about the horrible misogyny in the skeptics' communities. First, from my very feminist viewpoint, Watson's feminist view is the one that is harmful to women. Second, she's distorted Dawkins' comments and essentially claimed victimhood that is made from straw. Third, she seriously exaggerated her own victimization in order to rationalize her absurd response to people who did not fall all over themselves agreeing with her about the guy who made a pass in the elevator. This includes exaggerating the problems at TAM and other events, exaggerating the lack of administration response to her complaints, and exaggerating the proportion of women who had personal experiences that supported Watson's exaggerations. In short, the vast majority of men at TAM and other atheist/skeptical function seem to be perfectly well behaved. Watson's belief she's a victim is exaggerated beyond absurdity. People post jerky things in response to blogs. Famous people have creepy fans. It's not some issue within the skeptic communities, it's an issue with any large collection of people. |
24th October 2012, 02:33 PM | #29 |
Nasty Woman
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 96,386
|
The banning has zero to do with the elevator kerfuffle. But maybe it was a sign of her progressively growing disagreement with the JREF community.
As for the vast abuse, yeah, her at the whole rest of the blogosphere stars. Those kinds of blog replies are as common as dirt. |
24th October 2012, 02:36 PM | #30 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,827
|
I can't follow much of this, because it took place over many blogs, over along time, but the issue appears to be little to do with skepticism and much to do with misogyny? I have been a member of lots of Skeptic forums, and have argued fiercely with people - why all week GeeMack and I have been going for each other hammer & tongs - but if we met I'd buy him lunch and I'm pretty sure we would have a laugh and get on actually. Yet if I was a woman, perhaps my experience would be markedly different? I have seen frightening misogyny on completely non-sceptic forums at times? So why is this depicted as a skeptic issue alone?
|
__________________
I'm an Anglican Christian, so I declare my prejudice here. Please take it in to account when reading my posts. "Most people would rather die than think: many do." - Betrand Russell My dull life blogged http://jerome23.wordpress.com |
|
24th October 2012, 02:38 PM | #31 |
Thinker
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 241
|
That is quite true, Skeptic Ginger. Here is an article from the same magazine about a skeptic who should really know better than to believe that he visited Heaven, or even that Heaven exists:
http://www.slate.com/articles/health...vangelist.html |
24th October 2012, 02:38 PM | #32 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,186
|
Most people feel flattered when someone shows interest in them. The man in the elevator did absolutely nothing wrong. I think Dawkins' post was fairly clever and certainly made his point.
Then again, I think that tweet that is posted in the article is quite funny as well. Her comment on the tweet was, "In the weeks leading up to TAM, a man tweeted that he was attending and that if he ran into me in an elevator, he’d assault me." I would beg to differ. There is a word for what he wrote. It's called a joke. Any real abuse Watson took can't be condoned, but she seems to have an incredibly thin skin and not much of a sense of humor. |
__________________
"The sleeping and the dead Are but as pictures. 'Tis the eye of childhood That fears a painted devil." --Shakespeare - Macbeth |
|
24th October 2012, 02:51 PM | #33 |
Muse
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 761
|
maybe she realises that the elevator thing is keeping her in the headlines, so to speak. like geller and his spoon, one trick can go a long way.
im finding it hard to be tough on rebecca as i love sgu and think she adds a great deal. the show has been mainly silent on the issues recently although the interview with jamy ian swiss seemed to be quietly pointing toward a+. i think they, including rebecca should openly talk of their views on the subject of mixing social justice with skepticism. id like to hear that on the show. lxxx |
24th October 2012, 03:07 PM | #34 |
Guest
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,979
|
I hope that doesn't happen to me, because I otherwise enjoy that show. I've been going through the archives, and I haven't yet hit the episodes where she's a regular. However, from listening to more recent shows that she co-hosts, I've found her personality...grating. She seems like somebody who delights in needling people.
|
24th October 2012, 03:35 PM | #35 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,201
|
Years later and she is still going on about this? She needs professional "help" so she can put this behind her and move on.
Sheesh... |
24th October 2012, 04:10 PM | #36 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the wet side of the mountains
Posts: 3,906
|
Rebecca Watson on Slate
The Slate commenters are having a blast already with her post today.
http://www.slate.com/articles/double...e_threats.html I'm not entirely sure I want to comment on it here or there, because my opinion is neither black nor white, therefore seems to be irritating to everyone. I just don't feel up to being shot by both sides today. |
24th October 2012, 04:11 PM | #37 |
Merchant of Doom
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Not in Hell, but I can see it from here on a clear day...
Posts: 15,112
|
|
24th October 2012, 04:18 PM | #38 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,140
|
|
__________________
“In religion and politics, people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second-hand, and without examination, from authorities who have not themselves examined the questions at issue but have taken them at second-hand from other non-examiners, whose opinions about them were not worth a brass farthing.” —Mark Twain |
|
24th October 2012, 04:23 PM | #39 |
The Jester
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,763
|
|
__________________
As the size of an explosion increases, the number of social situations it is incapable of resolving approaches zero. -Vaarsuvius It's a rum state of affairs when you feel like punching a jar of mayonnaise in the face. -Charlie Brooker |
|
24th October 2012, 04:28 PM | #40 |
Observer of Phenomena
Pronouns: he/him Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ngunnawal Country
Posts: 87,214
|
Never. Read. Comments.
|
__________________
So take that quantum equation and recalculate the wave by a factor of hoopty doo! The answer is not my problem, it's yours. Three Word Story Wisdom |
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|