ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Skeptical Podcasts » Skeptics Guide to the Universe
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 21st January 2019, 10:17 AM   #1
Fellow Traveler
Master Poster
 
Fellow Traveler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,553
Religious Fanatics

Science has been working with Religion as a constant drag on the necessary interchange of findings. As an example I was talking with a very intelligent small town man who goes to church faithfully. He wanted to clear up a question I might have regarding the book of Genesis. He said obviously something was awry with the story of Cain and Abel; that after murdering Abel Cain could not have found a wife in distant land as his people were the first. He gave me a sincere stare and said "Cain had to marry an Ape". I had to work hard on a straight face. That was funny but at least he saw something wrong with the biblical account.
__________________
Trouble walks in on small delicate feet and grows
Fellow Traveler is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st January 2019, 12:23 PM   #2
MRC_Hans
Penultimate Amazing
 
MRC_Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 22,153
Well, define 'ape'.

Hans
__________________
Experience is an excellent teacher, but she sends large bills.
MRC_Hans is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd January 2019, 08:09 AM   #3
MRC_Hans
Penultimate Amazing
 
MRC_Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 22,153
Well, seriously ....

In general, Christians have no problem reconciling with science. The majority do not expect OT legends to be the literal truth in any way.

Hard-core Bible followers of various kinds do have a problem, which most solve by rejecting any unpleasant scientific facts.

Hans
__________________
Experience is an excellent teacher, but she sends large bills.
MRC_Hans is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th January 2019, 04:05 PM   #4
dudalb
Penultimate Amazing
 
dudalb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 44,646
IMHO fanaticism is not a issue of belief, no matter how stupid the b eliefs might be, but one of behavior.
__________________
Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay - and claims a halo for his dishonesty.

Robert Heinlein.
dudalb is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th January 2019, 03:55 AM   #5
MRC_Hans
Penultimate Amazing
 
MRC_Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 22,153
I tend to agree. You can find fanatics on any subject, but there are some belief systems that seem more fertile grounds for fanatism than others.

Hans
__________________
Experience is an excellent teacher, but she sends large bills.
MRC_Hans is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd February 2019, 05:40 AM   #6
applecorped
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 19,621
Is this the global warming thread?
applecorped is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th February 2019, 05:33 PM   #7
Puppycow
Penultimate Amazing
 
Puppycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 23,668
Do they think we are all descended from Cain and this "ape" he married?

I'm just trying to understand what he believes.
__________________
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
William Shakespeare
Puppycow is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th February 2019, 06:37 AM   #8
dann
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,328
Originally Posted by MRC_Hans View Post
Well, define 'ape'.

Well, at least according to Wikipedia, it includes us:
Quote:
This article is about the branch of primates which includes humans.
Ape (Wikipedia)
__________________
/dann
"Stupidity renders itself invisible by assuming very large proportions. Completely unreasonable claims are irrefutable. Ni-en-leh pointed out that a philosopher might get into trouble by claiming that two times two makes five, but he does not risk much by claiming that two times two makes shoe polish." B. Brecht
"The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions." K. Marx
dann is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th February 2019, 06:39 AM   #9
dann
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,328
Originally Posted by Puppycow View Post
Do they think we are all descended from Cain and this "ape" he married?

I'm just trying to understand what he believes.

He is obviously in the process of distancing himself from a literal reading of the Bible.
__________________
/dann
"Stupidity renders itself invisible by assuming very large proportions. Completely unreasonable claims are irrefutable. Ni-en-leh pointed out that a philosopher might get into trouble by claiming that two times two makes five, but he does not risk much by claiming that two times two makes shoe polish." B. Brecht
"The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions." K. Marx
dann is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th March 2019, 04:50 PM   #10
Craig B
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,648
Originally Posted by MRC_Hans View Post
Well, seriously ....

In general, Christians have no problem reconciling with science. The majority do not expect OT legends to be the literal truth in any way.

Hard-core Bible followers of various kinds do have a problem, which most solve by rejecting any unpleasant scientific facts.

Hans
Do Christians reconcile with science only by rejecting the literal truth of OT legends. What about NT legends like the Virgin Birth, raising of people from death, and suchlike? Can they be reconciled with science?
Craig B is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd March 2019, 11:29 AM   #11
dann
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,328
Originally Posted by Craig B View Post
Do Christians reconcile with science only by rejecting the literal truth of OT legends. What about NT legends like the Virgin Birth, raising of people from death, and suchlike? Can they be reconciled with science?

No, they can't. The majority of the Danish Christians that I know, some of them members of Dansk Skeptica, wouldn't dream of trying to reconcile NT legends with science. They don't believe in the the immaculate conception, raising people from death or even changing water into wine. Remember that we have clergymen who don't even believe in God (Wikipedia):

Quote:
he received a lot of media attention in Denmark for publicly stating disbelief in an interventionist creator God.
(...)
In the spring of 2003, Thorkild Grosbøll published the book En Sten i Skoen (A Stone in the Shoe), resulting in very limited reactions, though he wrote in it that [hilite]he does not believe in God[/HIILITE]. On May 23, 2003, the Danish newspaper Weekendavisen published an interview with Grosbøll, in which he repeated statements from his book, in particular that he does not believe in a creating or upholding God.
(...)
On July 23, 2003, Thorkild Grosbøll was allowed to continue his service as a parish priest in Taarbæk, subject to special supervision by the bishop.
On June 3, 2004, Grosbøll was instructed to resign no later than June 4, or he would be suspended. On June 7, 2004, the chairman of the elected parish council in Taarbæk, Lars Heilesen, informed the parish about the situation in the church in Taarbæk. On June 10, 2004, Rebel again relieved Thorkild Grosbøll of his duties.
During all these events, the parish community in Taarbæk stood by Thorkild Grosbøll. There was an animated public debate, occasionally fuelled by statements from Grosbøll like: "God belongs in the past. He is actually so old fashioned that I am baffled by modern people believing in his existence. I am thoroughly fed up with empty words about miracles and eternal life." At the same time he maintained that the bishop and the press misunderstood him, taking quotes from his sermons out of context.
(...)
On May 20, 2006 Grosbøll confirmed his priestly vows before Lindhardt in the presence of witnesses and by his signature, and was allowed to serve again as parish priest, but was instructed not to talk to the press.
(And, yes, we even have a bishop called Rebel!!! )
Nowadays Grosbøll's retired, but according to this article by a more fundamentalist Danish Christian, Grosbøll is still teaching the atheist 'gospel'.
In my translation:
Quote:
TG calls himself a Christian atheist. (...) He's upset by the Danish Church because it is "committing idolatry with the creed".
(...)
Grosbøll claims that about half of all Danish vicars (...) don't believe in God.
(...)
TG also claims that a quarter of all vicars "TG hævder også, at en fjerdedel af præsterne er "completely obscured in the head and take everything literally." He obviously has not respect for those.
Grosbøll is not the biggest problem (Indre Mission, Feb. 22, 2019)

This is why I always stress that in Denmark even the Church of Denmark (Wikipedia) has become secularized. [/i]"As of 1 January 2019, 74.7% of the population of Denmark are members,"[/i] but only a minority believe in God and a very small minority takes anything in the Christian Bible literally. They are cultural Christians who may think that you should always ask yourself what Jesus would do - except for the making-up-fairy-tales-about-miracles part!


(And our Christian skeptics are usually the first to criticize people who believe in weeping Madonna statuettes or creationism! And they love for instance Zola's adage about Lourdes and the wooden legs!
https://www.facebook.com/skeptica.dk...8753734887837? )

I can recommend Phil Zuckerman's book Society without God. He spent some time in Denmark and Sweden researching the phenomenon.


ETA: Ever heard of this guy, the Pentecostal American Bob Bakker?
__________________
/dann
"Stupidity renders itself invisible by assuming very large proportions. Completely unreasonable claims are irrefutable. Ni-en-leh pointed out that a philosopher might get into trouble by claiming that two times two makes five, but he does not risk much by claiming that two times two makes shoe polish." B. Brecht
"The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions." K. Marx

Last edited by dann; 22nd March 2019 at 11:38 AM.
dann is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th April 2019, 03:44 PM   #12
Craig B
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,648
Originally Posted by dann View Post
(And, yes, we even have a bishop called Rebel!!! )
The Bishop's forenames are even more remarkable: Lise-Lotte. Yes, you even have a bishop called Lise-Lotte. There are none of that name in the Church of England (or of Rome!)
Craig B is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th April 2019, 01:34 PM   #13
dann
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,328
The name is quite common in Scandinavia, Germany and Switzerland: Lise Lotte, Lise-Lotte or Liselotte.
It is not surprising that there aren't any Catholic bishops called Lise-Lotte, but I didn't know that the CoE didn't have female bishops.
In addition to Lise-Lotte Rebel, Denmark has one Tine and two Mariannes; and Greenland has a Sofie: https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biskop
__________________
/dann
"Stupidity renders itself invisible by assuming very large proportions. Completely unreasonable claims are irrefutable. Ni-en-leh pointed out that a philosopher might get into trouble by claiming that two times two makes five, but he does not risk much by claiming that two times two makes shoe polish." B. Brecht
"The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions." K. Marx
dann is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 24th April 2019, 06:25 AM   #14
Craig B
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,648
Originally Posted by dann View Post
The name is quite common in Scandinavia, Germany and Switzerland: Lise Lotte, Lise-Lotte or Liselotte.
It is not surprising that there aren't any Catholic bishops called Lise-Lotte, but I didn't know that the CoE didn't have female bishops.
In addition to Lise-Lotte Rebel, Denmark has one Tine and two Mariannes; and Greenland has a Sofie: https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biskop
Im a bit out of date, because I'm not in England and not keeping up. The First female bishop in the C of E was consecrated in 2015. Her forename is Libby. By 2017 there were ten female bishops, out of a total of 115.
Craig B is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 28th April 2019, 05:56 AM   #15
dann
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,328
In Denmark (Greenland, Faroe Islands), it's five of a total of only 12. The first one was appointed in 1995.
__________________
/dann
"Stupidity renders itself invisible by assuming very large proportions. Completely unreasonable claims are irrefutable. Ni-en-leh pointed out that a philosopher might get into trouble by claiming that two times two makes five, but he does not risk much by claiming that two times two makes shoe polish." B. Brecht
"The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions." K. Marx
dann is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th May 2019, 06:12 AM   #16
Roboramma
Penultimate Amazing
 
Roboramma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 12,676
Originally Posted by dann View Post
In Denmark (Greenland, Faroe Islands), it's five of a total of only 12. The first one was appointed in 1995.
That's pretty cool.
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together."
Isaac Asimov
Roboramma is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Skeptical Podcasts » Skeptics Guide to the Universe

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:19 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.